urbanhack
Fight The Power!
Is it the transcript? Yes or No only please.The fact is that is what we have from the call and that shows Trump did nothing wrong. Deal with it.
Is it the transcript? Yes or No only please.The fact is that is what we have from the call and that shows Trump did nothing wrong. Deal with it.
Looks like the talking points made it to the correct audience this time.The fact is that is what we have from the call and that shows Trump did nothing wrong. Deal with it.
See, this is another example of how you fail to "state facts".Completely false. Mueller's report does say he could not prove collusion/conspiracy, this isn't a difficult concept to understand.You've been caught claiming multiple times that the Mueller report fully exonerated Trump and/or claimed "no collusion", only to later admit that you were actually referring to Barr's summary of the report.
A few days ago you were caught claiming that Hillary's emails were on the DNC server, only to later admit that you were actually referring to the DNC emails.
You've repeatedly defended or sympathized with various conspiracy theories invoking Seth Rich or Crowdstrike, including this post where you used a double negative to show your sympathy to Qanon.
The call does not show that actually.The fact is that is what we have from the call and that shows Trump did nothing wrong. Deal with it.
Yes, the only transcript of the call that has been made public.Is it the transcript? Yes or No only please.
Does Mueller say no conspiracy yes or no?See, this is another example of how you fail to "state facts".
First, you'll claim that Mueller said "no collusion".
Then, when challenged, you'll say "Mueller does not say he could not prove collusion". (Using double negatives and triple negatives to skew the meanings of your claims.)
Then, you'll claim that your original statement ("no collusion") was accurate all along.
It's not just bad shtick, but it's the very epitome of what disinformation is all about.
It wasn't a transcript.Yes, the only transcript of the call that has been made public.
Why do you keeping calling it a transcript? It was an edited and abbreviated memorandum of the call.Yes, the only transcript of the call that has been made public.
No, the Mueller report does not say "no conspiracy" anywhere.Does Mueller say no conspiracy yes or no?See, this is another example of how you fail to "state facts".
First, you'll claim that Mueller said "no collusion".
Then, when challenged, you'll say "Mueller does not say he could not prove collusion". (Using double negatives and triple negatives to skew the meanings of your claims.)
Then, you'll claim that your original statement ("no collusion") was accurate all along.
It's not just bad shtick, but it's the very epitome of what disinformation is all about.
He says "A statement that the investigation did not establish particular facts does not mean there was no evidence of those facts" There was clearly direct communication between the campaign and Russia, but Mueller deemed they were too stupid to realize what they were doing was illegal.Does Mueller say no conspiracy yes or no?
"The investigation did not establish that members of the Trump Campaign conspired or coordinated with the Russian government in its election interference activities."
Did not establish a conspiracy <> there was no conspiracy"The investigation did not establish that members of the Trump Campaign conspired or coordinated with the Russian government in its election interference activities."
Sorry, Mueller couldn't have been any more clear.
"A statement that the investigation did not establish particular facts does not mean there was no evidence of those facts""The investigation did not establish that members of the Trump Campaign conspired or coordinated with the Russian government in its election interference activities."
Sorry, Mueller couldn't have been any more clear.
Yep, like you have said before Dems and Republicans will continue to see things how they want to.Round and round and round we go, where we stop everybody knows. Round and round and round we go, where we stop everybody knows. Round and round and round we go........
True..."republicans" continue to see things how Trump says it...despite the mounds of evidence of his dishonesty. Democrats and those who aren't all in with Trump continue to look at actual quotes and facts and not conflate multiple issues or buy into nutty conspiracy theories that have already been proven false (like download speeds of the hack...or pushing an idea that there was one server that the Ukraine now has, or that Crowdstrike was the only one who looked at the data and the FBI only relied on a partial draft report).Don't Noonan said:Yep, like you have said before Dems and Republicans will continue to see things how they want to.
Yes, you are clearly looking at this non partisan at all.True..."republicans" continue to see things how Trump says it...despite the mounds of evidence of his dishonesty. Democrats and those who aren't all in with Trump continue to look at actual quotes and facts and not conflate multiple issues or buy into nutty conspiracy theories that have already been proven false (like download speeds of the hack...or pushing an idea that there was one server that the Ukraine now has, or that Crowdstrike was the only one who looked at the data and the FBI only relied on a partial draft report).
One side is engaging in honest discussion and provides links...the other side, not so much.
So far I'm seeing one side of the discussion establish facts, and the opposing side try to discredit the person bringing those facts to light, because they can't dispute said facts. Hint: it's not the Republicans bringing facts up.Yes, you are clearly looking at this non partisan at all.
Spare me the honest discussion crap when you continually exhibit how you don't understand the difference between opinions and facts.
Nothing new was learned today from Taylor. Trump still did nothing impeachable.So far I'm seeing one side of the discussion establish facts, and the opposing side try to discredit the person bringing those facts to light, because they can't dispute said facts. Hint: it's not the Republicans bringing facts up.
Not even close to the truth. Try again.Nothing new was learned today from Taylor. Trump still did nothing impeachable.
The Russian Judge gives this a 10Nothing new was learned today from Taylor. Trump still did nothing impeachable.
True, just some more then others.Don't Noonan said:Yep, like you have said before Dems and Republicans will continue to see things how they want to.
I believe DonaldSomeone’s a liar
McConnell says he never spoke to Trump about the Ukrainian call. Trump says Mitchell told him it’s a “perfect call” and so innocent.
Mitchell is a weasel but not really a liar about stuff so easily disproven.
Who we believe here MAGA folks?
Why? He has said stuff like this before and been shown to have lied about it...he lies about nearly everything he does. Why believe him?I believe Donald
So you believe McConnell? InterestingWhy? He has said stuff like this before and been shown to have lied about it...he lies about nearly everything he does. Why believe him?
McConnell is a weasily politician but is he a known liar on things that are easily proven? In this situation given track records on this I believe McConnell and Trump was just talking out his backside here.So you believe McConnell? Interesting
Someone’s a liar
McConnell says he never spoke to Trump about the Ukrainian call. Trump says Mitchell told him it’s a “perfect call” and so innocent.
Mitchell is a weasel but not really a liar about stuff so easily disproven.
Who we believe here MAGA folks?
You can always tell the Trumpian language - there is no way that McConnell being the true politician he is - love him or hate him - would say "Innocent" or "Perfect." Even in his worst Turtle self he'd use language that totally couches the situation or neutralizes it. Here the Turtle just nimbly stepped out from under the bus that Trump is driving all over town.McConnell's comments appear to contradict Trump, who earlier this month said that the GOP leader had told him the phone call with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky was "innocent" and "perfect."
When asked if the president was lying, McConnell demurred and directed reporters to speak with the president.
"You'd have to ask him. I don't recall any conversations with the president about that phone call," McConnell said.
Yup. Trump was definitely lying there seems to be the best conclusion to come to. McConnell doesn't lie about stuff that is this obvious and easy to disprove.You can always tell the Trumpian language - there is no way that McConnell being the true politician he is - love him or hate him - would say "Innocent" or "Perfect." Even in his worst Turtle self he'd use language that totally couches the situation or neutralizes it. Here the Turtle just nimbly stepped out from under the bus that Trump is driving all over town.
I think the only other person I can recall using the word "Innocent" to describe himself was Michael Jackson.
Well that’s weird.
Following up on this: Trump's approval rating at Rasmussen has dropped another point, which ties his lowest approval rating since January.....of 2018.Trump's approval rating drops to lowest number since February
His approval rating has fallen 6 points in just 5 days.
Spoiler: it's just a reprint of this.Make sure you get your Impeachment Defense Membership Card
As one of President Trump’s most loyal supporters, it is critical that you help the President FIGHT BACK against the LIES from the Democrats and the Fake News media.
President Trump is grateful for your loyal support and is excited to announce that we’re launching our Official Impeachment Defense Membership Cards.
We were planning on releasing just one Impeachment Defense Membership Card, but then President Trump had a great idea - he wants YOU to pick the card you like best. The people always know best.
We are only reaching out to President Trump’s most loyal supporters. Your vote will decide the design of our all new membership cards.
Please select which Impeachment Defense Membership Card you like best below by 11:59 PM TONIGHT
Well, ok what are the different cards? I guess this means you can show your support for the president by showing this card at any time, right?We were planning on releasing just one Impeachment Defense Membership Card, but then President Trump had a great idea - he wants YOU to pick the card you like best. The people always know best.
Of course not. He only asks questions and never answers themNo response?
Out of curiosity whose version do you believe?Of course not. He only asks questions and never answers them
3 easy payments of $29.99?Make sure you get your Impeachment Defense Membership Card
As one of President Trump’s most loyal supporters, it is critical that you help the President FIGHT BACK against the LIES from the Democrats and the Fake News media.
President Trump is grateful for your loyal support and is excited to announce that we’re launching our Official Impeachment Defense Membership Cards.
We were planning on releasing just one Impeachment Defense Membership Card, but then President Trump had a great idea - he wants YOU to pick the card you like best. The people always know best.
We are only reaching out to President Trump’s most loyal supporters. Your vote will decide the design of our all new membership cards.
Please select which Impeachment Defense Membership Card you like best below by 11:59 PM TONIGHT
Trump. He hasn’t let us down yet.Out of curiosity whose version do you believe?
What's this? Another steaks scam? And people are going to send him money, too, I bet.3 easy payments of $29.99?
Why would Mitch lie about this “conversation”?Trump. He hasn’t let us down yet.
Don’t know And don’t care. Mitch is a Senator from Kentucky. It’s not my place to judge his motives.Why would Mitch lie about this “conversation”?