What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Tush Push - Do the rules apply for this play or not? Doesn't seem like it (6 Viewers)

I don't watch too much football these days. If this works so well, and it appears it does, why isn't every team in the league replicating this? I am sure this has been asked 100 times, but again, I am not very active in these threads or football news in general (besides my small world of neighborhood fantasy league)
 
Honestly what I’m curious about at this point is, what is the mechanism the Eagles are using to allow their guards to go early? They’re repeatedly false starting by just a split second. To do that so often and so tight to the snap that the refs aren’t calling it tells me that it’s intentional. Which means there must be something the Eagles are doing to key those two guys specifically early.
Looks to me like it's the only play the offense works on during the week.

They're not throwing deep balls in practice... I can see that.
 
Honestly what I’m curious about at this point is, what is the mechanism the Eagles are using to allow their guards to go early? They’re repeatedly false starting by just a split second. To do that so often and so tight to the snap that the refs aren’t calling it tells me that it’s intentional. Which means there must be something the Eagles are doing to key those two guys specifically early.
I think they're just telling the center and tackles to wait a second after the snap count and the guards go right away. The defense can't move until the ball moves and most of them are staring directly at the ball so the center pausing has the effect of the guards going early.
 
Most of the time the Tush Push teams gets to push forever, even well after the momentum of the play has stopped.

Not today. The Eagles fumbled the ball on the Tush Push. Whistle, end of play. No fumble. :ROFLMAO:


Just when you think this play has hit rock bottom, it finds new ways to fail.
I came here to post almost this exact thing. There is just no way you can give Hurts his 2nd, 3rd, 4th, 5th effort on these scrums but that also not be a fumble.
 
If you're going to allow the tush push to go on forever, even after momentum has stopped, giving the Eagles a huge advantage, you have to call the fumble. I had stepped back on this play and accepted it, but Hurts fumbled and it should have been called a fumble. Otherwise, do away with the play completely. At least be fair about it.
 
This play died when the Eagles ran it 4 times in a row, prime time, over a real-life span of what felt like 75 minutes of waiting for an actual football play
I hope you are correct. However, the Tush Push is like the blond brother in Die Hard. Just because we think it's over, it doesn’t mean that's it. We need to make sure before we reconnect with our significant other. Only when we know for sure can we get into the limo, go home, and celebrate with a legit Tush Push. Yippee-ki-yay Mother-Pusher!!
 
This play died when the Eagles ran it 4 times in a row, prime time, over a real-life span of what felt like 75 minutes of waiting for an actual football play
I hope you are correct. However, the Tush Push is like the blond brother in Die Hard. Just because we think it's over, it doesn’t mean that's it. We need to make sure before we reconnect with our significant other. Only when we know for sure can we get into the limo, go home, and celebrate with a legit Tush Push. Yippee-ki-yay Mother-Pusher!!
How dare you bring my son’s doppelgänger into the discussion! ;)
 
Most of the time the Tush Push teams gets to push forever, even well after the momentum of the play has stopped.

Not today. The Eagles fumbled the ball on the Tush Push. Whistle, end of play. No fumble. :ROFLMAO:


Just when you think this play has hit rock bottom, it finds new ways to fail.
I came here to post almost this exact thing. There is just no way you can give Hurts his 2nd, 3rd, 4th, 5th effort on these scrums but that also not be a fumble.
I agree with this. I was resolved to the fact that I didn't like the play because my team wasn't the team that perfected it. So I accepted it as that. Now with the refs not calling any of the false start penalties and yesterday somehow the fumble was after the whistle I am completely out.
 
Even Eagles fans can’t defend it after the travesty that occurred yesterday. Who knows what would have happened if that was correctly called a fumble.
 
Even Eagles fans can’t defend it after the travesty that occurred yesterday. Who knows what would have happened if that was correctly called a fumble.
They can’t — but they will still try
There hasn't been anybody in here defending the call from yesterday or the play. Maybe they will give up?

(I know they won't they just haven't yet come back yet)
 
Why is it the fault of the play that the officials did not rule a fumble? They should have. This is an officiating problem.

If officiating this play is a problem (which it is) then the officials need to be better at doing their jobs. Period.

All off-season the NFL attempted to eliminate the play but was unsuccessful. Maybe the NFL should have been instructing their (part-time) officials how to officiate this unique version of a QB Sneak?

Eliminating the play is the cowards solution. If the refs do not know how to officiate it, then instruct them how.
 
Even Eagles fans can’t defend it after the travesty that occurred yesterday. Who knows what would have happened if that was correctly called a fumble.
They can’t — but they will still try
There hasn't been anybody in here defending the call from yesterday or the play. Maybe they will give up?

(I know they won't they just haven't yet come back yet)
I'm not here to defend the call, but it has little to do with this play. That was an egregious call by refs that made numerous egregious calls. The Dart "forward pass" overuling a fumble, the OPI that didn't really exist, just call after call went the wrong direction yesterday. That's a problem with the refs, not a problem with the play. I mean, I am a die hard Eagles fan and a strong proponent of the Tush Push. What happened on the "non-fumble" play was not difficult in the slightest to officiate. Jalen clearly fumbled the ball and it should have been called that way. Everyone I was watching with agreed. Everyone in the game thread agreed. All my friends in group chats agreed. Those refs should be fired, frankly.

But to say that "the play is too hard to officiate" is bs. Literally everyone that I interacted with regarding that play saw it one way. The refs saw it another. Thats a them problem.
 
But to say that "the play is too hard to officiate" is bs. Literally everyone that I interacted with regarding that play saw it one way. The refs saw it another. Thats a them problem.
The difficult is deciding when forward progress has been stopped. Typically there is an initial surge, then a second-3rd-4th-5th surge after what appears to be a stop in momentum. This is never officiated consistently. it's very difficult. The tush push is inherently going to have this setup. Much of the discourse is around the advantage given to the offense for this type of play and the "fumble" is a good example. The pushing team generally gets the benefit of the doubt in all manors for this. They get the multiple surge points to get the yard to gain but not when a fumble happens. This isn't the first time something like that has occurred but it was probably the easiest to see that the ruling was incorrect.

While agree the officiating needs to be better it's also a play that is sucking the football out of football.
 
Why is it the fault of the play that the officials did not rule a fumble? They should have. This is an officiating problem.

If officiating this play is a problem (which it is) then the officials need to be better at doing their jobs. Period.

All off-season the NFL attempted to eliminate the play but was unsuccessful. Maybe the NFL should have been instructing their (part-time) officials how to officiate this unique version of a QB Sneak?

Eliminating the play is the cowards solution. If the refs do not know how to officiate it, then instruct them how.

I've been a fan of the play up until this season.

1) NFL officiating is in a very bad spot. Some games were atrociously called. Not edge cases, just bizarre blown calls. Game changing blown calls.

2) The officials can NEVER call this right.

If the officials are incapable of calling a play correctly you have to get rid of the play. Its become unwatchable for this reason. The fundamental problem is the refs, not the play, but the NFL doesn't care about officiating so what do you do?
 
soooooo....I feel compelled to defend the refs a little here....this play, or any QB sneak/RB dive into the middle of the pile is indeed one of the hardest plays to officiate.....even at the middle school or high school level....the side officials are considered the primary officials on this play and they are the only ones with a view down the line of scrimmage.....once the play starts, you have masses of human bodies piling up onto each other and often you lose site of the ball and have NO clue.....like seriously NO clue where the ball is at....add to the fact that a football field is 53 and half yards wide (160 feet) and you have officials trying call this play starting basically 80 feet away....the false start themselves are tough let alone "when forward progress" stops.....

personally I feel this play has been under so much scrutiny that the officials who have the Eagles games are being told to make this play a priority and in doing so, have probably felt the pressure to now kill the play as soon as possible to take away the advantage that many of you mentioned above about the Eagles getting to keep pushing and pushing and pushing.....before a whistle is blown....

well in complaining about that, you are asking the officials NOT to let them keep pushing and pushing and pushing.....basically saying you want them to kill the play before the Eagles keep pushing and pushing and getting the benefit of a "patient whistle" ......so now when the officials kill the play quickly, plays like yesterday happen and you want a fumble.....all of this basically confirms that the play is hard to officiate...because as this thread points out....the refs can't get it right for you guys no matter what they do.....
 
soooooo....I feel compelled to defend the refs a little here....this play, or any QB sneak/RB dive into the middle of the pile is indeed one of the hardest plays to officiate.....even at the middle school or high school level....the side officials are considered the primary officials on this play and they are the only ones with a view down the line of scrimmage.....once the play starts, you have masses of human bodies piling up onto each other and often you lose site of the ball and have NO clue.....like seriously NO clue where the ball is at....add to the fact that a football field is 53 and half yards wide (160 feet) and you have officials trying call this play starting basically 80 feet away....the false start themselves are tough let alone "when forward progress" stops.....

personally I feel this play has been under so much scrutiny that the officials who have the Eagles games are being told to make this play a priority and in doing so, have probably felt the pressure to now kill the play as soon as possible to take away the advantage that many of you mentioned above about the Eagles getting to keep pushing and pushing and pushing.....before a whistle is blown....

well in complaining about that, you are asking the officials NOT to let them keep pushing and pushing and pushing.....basically saying you want them to kill the play before the Eagles keep pushing and pushing and getting the benefit of a "patient whistle" ......so now when the officials kill the play quickly, plays like yesterday happen and you want a fumble.....all of this basically confirms that the play is hard to officiate...because as this thread points out....the refs can't get it right for you guys no matter what they do.....
Your last statement says it all as to whether they should get rid of it.
 
This will be the last year it's allowed. Refs don't know how to officiate it.
Probably the smartest statement made regarding this play. Especially for the resaon why.

Not sure if you all watched the entire game yesterday. The refs were especially bad the entire day, not just on this one call.
That pretty much doesn't do anything to shut up those that think the NFL is rigged.

Yesterday's PHI/NY game was one of the worst officiated games I watch in a long time. There were more than a handful of calls where it was patently obvious the refs made a bad call.
 
If the refs do not know how to officiate it, then instruct them how.
I’m pretty sure they’ve been instructed to call a penalty when the o line goes before the ball is snapped. They just won’t
On the play where hurts fumbled yesterday…they’re supposed to blow it dead when forward progress is stopped. It’s a judgment call. Usually they let them push him forever. Yesterday was the fastest whistle I’ve seen in a long time on any play
 
This will be the last year it's allowed. Refs don't know how to officiate it.
Probably the smartest statement made regarding this play. Especially for the resaon why.

Not sure if you all watched the entire game yesterday. The refs were especially bad the entire day, not just on this one call.
That pretty much doesn't do anything to shut up those that think the NFL is rigged.

Yesterday's PHI/NY game was one of the worst officiated games I watch in a long time. There were more than a handful of calls where it was patently obvious the refs made a bad call.
Nice deflection away from the tush push this thread is about.
 
This will be the last year it's allowed. Refs don't know how to officiate it.
Probably the smartest statement made regarding this play. Especially for the resaon why.

Not sure if you all watched the entire game yesterday. The refs were especially bad the entire day, not just on this one call.
That pretty much doesn't do anything to shut up those that think the NFL is rigged.

Yesterday's PHI/NY game was one of the worst officiated games I watch in a long time. There were more than a handful of calls where it was patently obvious the refs made a bad call.
I'm really kind of surprised another official didn't come in to help out on the OPI call....and have them pick up the flag....if nothing else there was hand fighting by both players and at one point the Eagle defender had a handful of jersey or undershirt and was holding/pulling him....game changer...as was the fumble....
 
This will be the last year it's allowed. Refs don't know how to officiate it.
Probably the smartest statement made regarding this play. Especially for the resaon why.

Not sure if you all watched the entire game yesterday. The refs were especially bad the entire day, not just on this one call.
That pretty much doesn't do anything to shut up those that think the NFL is rigged.

Yesterday's PHI/NY game was one of the worst officiated games I watch in a long time. There were more than a handful of calls where it was patently obvious the refs made a bad call.
Nice deflection away from the tush push this thread is about.

Well for me, the current discussion isn't really isolated to the tush push. The overall refereeing was bad for not only that one play, but multiple plays throughout the game. You're arguing that a certain play needs to be banned because the refs missed this one particular call while ignoring all the other plays where the refs missed calls. Then people will argue that refs miss false starts while having the luxury of watching a play in super slow motion. It seems people who don't like the tush push will find any reason to cling to to try and ban it. This argument is just another, in a long-list of arguments that just kind of fall flat for me. Officials can't do their job, it's too hard, let's ban a play.
 
This will be the last year it's allowed. Refs don't know how to officiate it.
Probably the smartest statement made regarding this play. Especially for the resaon why.

Not sure if you all watched the entire game yesterday. The refs were especially bad the entire day, not just on this one call.
That pretty much doesn't do anything to shut up those that think the NFL is rigged.

Yesterday's PHI/NY game was one of the worst officiated games I watch in a long time. There were more than a handful of calls where it was patently obvious the refs made a bad call.
I'm really kind of surprised another official didn't come in to help out on the OPI call....and have them pick up the flag....if nothing else there was hand fighting by both players and at one point the Eagle defender had a handful of jersey or undershirt and was holding/pulling him....game changer...as was the fumble....

I'm really not trying to bag on the refs. My point is more, the crew yesterday had a bad day, to highlight one of their bad calls without looking at the totality of the officiating seems ludicrous.
 
This will be the last year it's allowed. Refs don't know how to officiate it.
Probably the smartest statement made regarding this play. Especially for the resaon why.

Not sure if you all watched the entire game yesterday. The refs were especially bad the entire day, not just on this one call.
That pretty much doesn't do anything to shut up those that think the NFL is rigged.

Yesterday's PHI/NY game was one of the worst officiated games I watch in a long time. There were more than a handful of calls where it was patently obvious the refs made a bad call.
Nice deflection away from the tush push this thread is about.

Well for me, the current discussion isn't really isolated to the tush push. The overall refereeing was bad for not only that one play, but multiple plays throughout the game. You're arguing that a certain play needs to be banned because the refs missed this one particular call while ignoring all the other plays where the refs missed calls. Then people will argue that refs miss false starts while having the luxury of watching a play in super slow motion. It seems people who don't like the tush push will find any reason to cling to to try and ban it. This argument is just another, in a long-list of arguments that just kind of fall flat for me. Officials can't do their job, it's too hard, let's ban a play.
It seems to me only the Eagles benefit from the bad officiating of this play. Correct me if I’m wrong.
 
This will be the last year it's allowed. Refs don't know how to officiate it.
Probably the smartest statement made regarding this play. Especially for the resaon why.

Not sure if you all watched the entire game yesterday. The refs were especially bad the entire day, not just on this one call.
That pretty much doesn't do anything to shut up those that think the NFL is rigged.

Yesterday's PHI/NY game was one of the worst officiated games I watch in a long time. There were more than a handful of calls where it was patently obvious the refs made a bad call.
Nice deflection away from the tush push this thread is about.

Well for me, the current discussion isn't really isolated to the tush push. The overall refereeing was bad for not only that one play, but multiple plays throughout the game. You're arguing that a certain play needs to be banned because the refs missed this one particular call while ignoring all the other plays where the refs missed calls. Then people will argue that refs miss false starts while having the luxury of watching a play in super slow motion. It seems people who don't like the tush push will find any reason to cling to to try and ban it. This argument is just another, in a long-list of arguments that just kind of fall flat for me. Officials can't do their job, it's too hard, let's ban a play.
It seems to me only the Eagles benefit from the bad officiating of this play. Correct me if I’m wrong.
if more teams ran it in terms of volume and style like the eagles.....more teams would probably reap the benefit....
 
This will be the last year it's allowed. Refs don't know how to officiate it.
Probably the smartest statement made regarding this play. Especially for the resaon why.

Not sure if you all watched the entire game yesterday. The refs were especially bad the entire day, not just on this one call.
That pretty much doesn't do anything to shut up those that think the NFL is rigged.

Yesterday's PHI/NY game was one of the worst officiated games I watch in a long time. There were more than a handful of calls where it was patently obvious the refs made a bad call.
Nice deflection away from the tush push this thread is about.

Well for me, the current discussion isn't really isolated to the tush push. The overall refereeing was bad for not only that one play, but multiple plays throughout the game. You're arguing that a certain play needs to be banned because the refs missed this one particular call while ignoring all the other plays where the refs missed calls. Then people will argue that refs miss false starts while having the luxury of watching a play in super slow motion. It seems people who don't like the tush push will find any reason to cling to to try and ban it. This argument is just another, in a long-list of arguments that just kind of fall flat for me. Officials can't do their job, it's too hard, let's ban a play.
It seems to me only the Eagles benefit from the bad officiating of this play. Correct me if I’m wrong.
if more teams ran it in terms of volume and style like the eagles.....more teams would probably reap the benefit....
Would that help the officiating of the play?
 
This will be the last year it's allowed. Refs don't know how to officiate it.
Probably the smartest statement made regarding this play. Especially for the resaon why.

Not sure if you all watched the entire game yesterday. The refs were especially bad the entire day, not just on this one call.
That pretty much doesn't do anything to shut up those that think the NFL is rigged.

Yesterday's PHI/NY game was one of the worst officiated games I watch in a long time. There were more than a handful of calls where it was patently obvious the refs made a bad call.
Nice deflection away from the tush push this thread is about.

Well for me, the current discussion isn't really isolated to the tush push. The overall refereeing was bad for not only that one play, but multiple plays throughout the game. You're arguing that a certain play needs to be banned because the refs missed this one particular call while ignoring all the other plays where the refs missed calls. Then people will argue that refs miss false starts while having the luxury of watching a play in super slow motion. It seems people who don't like the tush push will find any reason to cling to to try and ban it. This argument is just another, in a long-list of arguments that just kind of fall flat for me. Officials can't do their job, it's too hard, let's ban a play.
It seems to me only the Eagles benefit from the bad officiating of this play. Correct me if I’m wrong.
if more teams ran it in terms of volume and style like the eagles.....more teams would probably reap the benefit....
Would that help the officiating of the play?
nope....still be tough to officiate....just more of them....
 
This will be the last year it's allowed. Refs don't know how to officiate it.
Probably the smartest statement made regarding this play. Especially for the resaon why.

Not sure if you all watched the entire game yesterday. The refs were especially bad the entire day, not just on this one call.
That pretty much doesn't do anything to shut up those that think the NFL is rigged.

Yesterday's PHI/NY game was one of the worst officiated games I watch in a long time. There were more than a handful of calls where it was patently obvious the refs made a bad call.
Nice deflection away from the tush push this thread is about.

Well for me, the current discussion isn't really isolated to the tush push. The overall refereeing was bad for not only that one play, but multiple plays throughout the game. You're arguing that a certain play needs to be banned because the refs missed this one particular call while ignoring all the other plays where the refs missed calls. Then people will argue that refs miss false starts while having the luxury of watching a play in super slow motion. It seems people who don't like the tush push will find any reason to cling to to try and ban it. This argument is just another, in a long-list of arguments that just kind of fall flat for me. Officials can't do their job, it's too hard, let's ban a play.
It seems to me only the Eagles benefit from the bad officiating of this play. Correct me if I’m wrong.

Nope, not correct, the Eagles have been penalized on this play in the past. (see, NFCD game vs. LAR, 4th quarter 13:26 left, 4th and goal at the 1, Lane Johnson called for false start)
 
This will be the last year it's allowed. Refs don't know how to officiate it.
Probably the smartest statement made regarding this play. Especially for the resaon why.

Not sure if you all watched the entire game yesterday. The refs were especially bad the entire day, not just on this one call.
That pretty much doesn't do anything to shut up those that think the NFL is rigged.

Yesterday's PHI/NY game was one of the worst officiated games I watch in a long time. There were more than a handful of calls where it was patently obvious the refs made a bad call.
Nice deflection away from the tush push this thread is about.

Well for me, the current discussion isn't really isolated to the tush push. The overall refereeing was bad for not only that one play, but multiple plays throughout the game. You're arguing that a certain play needs to be banned because the refs missed this one particular call while ignoring all the other plays where the refs missed calls. Then people will argue that refs miss false starts while having the luxury of watching a play in super slow motion. It seems people who don't like the tush push will find any reason to cling to to try and ban it. This argument is just another, in a long-list of arguments that just kind of fall flat for me. Officials can't do their job, it's too hard, let's ban a play.
It seems to me only the Eagles benefit from the bad officiating of this play. Correct me if I’m wrong.

Nope, not correct, the Eagles have been penalized on this play in the past. (see, NFCD game vs. LAR, 4th quarter 13:26 left, 4th and goal at the 1, Lane Johnson called for false start)
So you had to go back to last year, got it.
 
This will be the last year it's allowed. Refs don't know how to officiate it.
Probably the smartest statement made regarding this play. Especially for the resaon why.

Not sure if you all watched the entire game yesterday. The refs were especially bad the entire day, not just on this one call.
That pretty much doesn't do anything to shut up those that think the NFL is rigged.

Yesterday's PHI/NY game was one of the worst officiated games I watch in a long time. There were more than a handful of calls where it was patently obvious the refs made a bad call.
Nice deflection away from the tush push this thread is about.

Well for me, the current discussion isn't really isolated to the tush push. The overall refereeing was bad for not only that one play, but multiple plays throughout the game. You're arguing that a certain play needs to be banned because the refs missed this one particular call while ignoring all the other plays where the refs missed calls. Then people will argue that refs miss false starts while having the luxury of watching a play in super slow motion. It seems people who don't like the tush push will find any reason to cling to to try and ban it. This argument is just another, in a long-list of arguments that just kind of fall flat for me. Officials can't do their job, it's too hard, let's ban a play.
It seems to me only the Eagles benefit from the bad officiating of this play. Correct me if I’m wrong.

Nope, not correct, the Eagles have been penalized on this play in the past. (see, NFCD game vs. LAR, 4th quarter 13:26 left, 4th and goal at the 1, Lane Johnson called for false start)
So you had to go back to last year, got it.
Looks like to me they are moving before the ball is snapped every time they run it.
 
Philly has to get the guards going first to pinch the middle with kind of a triangle of mass. That's the whole concept behind the play. For them, it's has to be timed good enough where they get the head-start, but not get called for it. You see tackles get away with a slight head-start all the time.

You see a ton of plays now where OL (or any offensive player) start pushing the ballcarrier. You'll see a RB get stopped a few yards short of the GL and a bunch of 300+-pounders push him into the EZ. It's kinda become a joke.

It might get to the point where the refs start being stricter with the head-start, but somebody will eventually figure out how to stop it and essentially make the play no more effective than a regular sneak. That said, I think this is the last season it'll be allowed. There's just way too much negative publicity with it at this point. The Eagles didn't do themselves any favors when they ran it several times in a row to score a TD a couple weeks ago and drew even more attention to it. I'm surprised they did for that very reason.
 
Last edited:
If you're going to allow the tush push to go on forever, even after momentum has stopped, giving the Eagles a huge advantage, you have to call the fumble. I had stepped back on this play and accepted it, but Hurts fumbled and it should have been called a fumble. Otherwise, do away with the play completely. At least be fair about it.
I've posted elsewhere that while I didn't think the call egregious as his momentum had been stopped (a second time) the gap between when it had stopped and when the ball came out was too short. It should have been called a fumble. But it's the kind of miss we see in every game all the time. A judgment call that is a heck of a lot easier to question with the benefit of replay.
It's getting more attention then warranted because it was near the goal line and it was a tush push.

THat said, I also get the frustration with refs on this play...why do they miss/mess up so much with it?
 
This will be the last year it's allowed. Refs don't know how to officiate it.
Probably the smartest statement made regarding this play. Especially for the resaon why.

Not sure if you all watched the entire game yesterday. The refs were especially bad the entire day, not just on this one call.
That pretty much doesn't do anything to shut up those that think the NFL is rigged.

Yesterday's PHI/NY game was one of the worst officiated games I watch in a long time. There were more than a handful of calls where it was patently obvious the refs made a bad call.
Nice deflection away from the tush push this thread is about.

Well for me, the current discussion isn't really isolated to the tush push. The overall refereeing was bad for not only that one play, but multiple plays throughout the game. You're arguing that a certain play needs to be banned because the refs missed this one particular call while ignoring all the other plays where the refs missed calls. Then people will argue that refs miss false starts while having the luxury of watching a play in super slow motion. It seems people who don't like the tush push will find any reason to cling to to try and ban it. This argument is just another, in a long-list of arguments that just kind of fall flat for me. Officials can't do their job, it's too hard, let's ban a play.
It seems to me only the Eagles benefit from the bad officiating of this play. Correct me if I’m wrong.
Assuming you're talking in the general sense and not just that play in that game...you're not quite accurate. Defenders are often in the neutral zone at the snap.
 
This will be the last year it's allowed. Refs don't know how to officiate it.
Probably the smartest statement made regarding this play. Especially for the resaon why.

Not sure if you all watched the entire game yesterday. The refs were especially bad the entire day, not just on this one call.
That pretty much doesn't do anything to shut up those that think the NFL is rigged.

Yesterday's PHI/NY game was one of the worst officiated games I watch in a long time. There were more than a handful of calls where it was patently obvious the refs made a bad call.
Nice deflection away from the tush push this thread is about.

Well for me, the current discussion isn't really isolated to the tush push. The overall refereeing was bad for not only that one play, but multiple plays throughout the game. You're arguing that a certain play needs to be banned because the refs missed this one particular call while ignoring all the other plays where the refs missed calls. Then people will argue that refs miss false starts while having the luxury of watching a play in super slow motion. It seems people who don't like the tush push will find any reason to cling to to try and ban it. This argument is just another, in a long-list of arguments that just kind of fall flat for me. Officials can't do their job, it's too hard, let's ban a play.
It seems to me only the Eagles benefit from the bad officiating of this play. Correct me if I’m wrong.

Nope, not correct, the Eagles have been penalized on this play in the past. (see, NFCD game vs. LAR, 4th quarter 13:26 left, 4th and goal at the 1, Lane Johnson called for false start)
So you had to go back to last year, got it.

:shrug:

A divisional playoff game where the winning team gets to host the NFCCG. At the time the Eagles were up 1 point, in the 4th quarter. Seems like a much more important example to use than any regular season game. But your post didn't place a time limit on play, you can move the goalposts all you want. We both know your position isn't really that strong here.
 
This will be the last year it's allowed. Refs don't know how to officiate it.
Probably the smartest statement made regarding this play. Especially for the resaon why.

Not sure if you all watched the entire game yesterday. The refs were especially bad the entire day, not just on this one call.
That pretty much doesn't do anything to shut up those that think the NFL is rigged.

Yesterday's PHI/NY game was one of the worst officiated games I watch in a long time. There were more than a handful of calls where it was patently obvious the refs made a bad call.
Nice deflection away from the tush push this thread is about.

Well for me, the current discussion isn't really isolated to the tush push. The overall refereeing was bad for not only that one play, but multiple plays throughout the game. You're arguing that a certain play needs to be banned because the refs missed this one particular call while ignoring all the other plays where the refs missed calls. Then people will argue that refs miss false starts while having the luxury of watching a play in super slow motion. It seems people who don't like the tush push will find any reason to cling to to try and ban it. This argument is just another, in a long-list of arguments that just kind of fall flat for me. Officials can't do their job, it's too hard, let's ban a play.
It seems to me only the Eagles benefit from the bad officiating of this play. Correct me if I’m wrong.

Nope, not correct, the Eagles have been penalized on this play in the past. (see, NFCD game vs. LAR, 4th quarter 13:26 left, 4th and goal at the 1, Lane Johnson called for false start)
So you had to go back to last year, got it.

:shrug:

A divisional playoff game where the winning team gets to host the NFCCG. At the time the Eagles were up 1 point, in the 4th quarter. Seems like a much more important example to use than any regular season game. But your post didn't place a time limit on play, you can move the goalposts all you want. We both know your position isn't really that strong here.
How many times have they been called for it vs how many times have they gotten away with it?
 
soooooo....I feel compelled to defend the refs a little here....this play, or any QB sneak/RB dive into the middle of the pile is indeed one of the hardest plays to officiate.....even at the middle school or high school level....the side officials are considered the primary officials on this play and they are the only ones with a view down the line of scrimmage.....once the play starts, you have masses of human bodies piling up onto each other and often you lose site of the ball and have NO clue.....like seriously NO clue where the ball is at....add to the fact that a football field is 53 and half yards wide (160 feet) and you have officials trying call this play starting basically 80 feet away....the false start themselves are tough let alone "when forward progress" stops.....

personally I feel this play has been under so much scrutiny that the officials who have the Eagles games are being told to make this play a priority and in doing so, have probably felt the pressure to now kill the play as soon as possible to take away the advantage that many of you mentioned above about the Eagles getting to keep pushing and pushing and pushing.....before a whistle is blown....

well in complaining about that, you are asking the officials NOT to let them keep pushing and pushing and pushing.....basically saying you want them to kill the play before the Eagles keep pushing and pushing and getting the benefit of a "patient whistle" ......so now when the officials kill the play quickly, plays like yesterday happen and you want a fumble.....all of this basically confirms that the play is hard to officiate...because as this thread points out....the refs can't get it right for you guys no matter what they do.....
Ignore the Tush push part of it for a minute. The NFL forward progress definition might be worse than the catch rule at this point. What is even the rule? If you get stopped for a second, then surge forward for the first down on ANY play, they call that second effort and give you a first down. If you get stopped for a second, but then go backwards, you get it up where you initially got stopped. If you get stopped for a second, but then fumble, ball to the offense. Is that roughly how its always called now? So essentially the refs are playing advantage like soccer, nothing after that initial stop can hurt you, you can gain more, but nothing bad can happen.
 
This will be the last year it's allowed. Refs don't know how to officiate it.
Probably the smartest statement made regarding this play. Especially for the resaon why.

Not sure if you all watched the entire game yesterday. The refs were especially bad the entire day, not just on this one call.
That pretty much doesn't do anything to shut up those that think the NFL is rigged.

Yesterday's PHI/NY game was one of the worst officiated games I watch in a long time. There were more than a handful of calls where it was patently obvious the refs made a bad call.
Nice deflection away from the tush push this thread is about.

Well for me, the current discussion isn't really isolated to the tush push. The overall refereeing was bad for not only that one play, but multiple plays throughout the game. You're arguing that a certain play needs to be banned because the refs missed this one particular call while ignoring all the other plays where the refs missed calls. Then people will argue that refs miss false starts while having the luxury of watching a play in super slow motion. It seems people who don't like the tush push will find any reason to cling to to try and ban it. This argument is just another, in a long-list of arguments that just kind of fall flat for me. Officials can't do their job, it's too hard, let's ban a play.
It seems to me only the Eagles benefit from the bad officiating of this play. Correct me if I’m wrong.

Nope, not correct, the Eagles have been penalized on this play in the past. (see, NFCD game vs. LAR, 4th quarter 13:26 left, 4th and goal at the 1, Lane Johnson called for false start)
So you had to go back to last year, got it.

:shrug:

A divisional playoff game where the winning team gets to host the NFCCG. At the time the Eagles were up 1 point, in the 4th quarter. Seems like a much more important example to use than any regular season game. But your post didn't place a time limit on play, you can move the goalposts all you want. We both know your position isn't really that strong here.
So they have been called once out of 178 times they ran it when it should be called probably closer to 50-60% of the times they run it?
 
This will be the last year it's allowed. Refs don't know how to officiate it.
Probably the smartest statement made regarding this play. Especially for the resaon why.

Not sure if you all watched the entire game yesterday. The refs were especially bad the entire day, not just on this one call.
That pretty much doesn't do anything to shut up those that think the NFL is rigged.

Yesterday's PHI/NY game was one of the worst officiated games I watch in a long time. There were more than a handful of calls where it was patently obvious the refs made a bad call.
Nice deflection away from the tush push this thread is about.

Well for me, the current discussion isn't really isolated to the tush push. The overall refereeing was bad for not only that one play, but multiple plays throughout the game. You're arguing that a certain play needs to be banned because the refs missed this one particular call while ignoring all the other plays where the refs missed calls. Then people will argue that refs miss false starts while having the luxury of watching a play in super slow motion. It seems people who don't like the tush push will find any reason to cling to to try and ban it. This argument is just another, in a long-list of arguments that just kind of fall flat for me. Officials can't do their job, it's too hard, let's ban a play.
It seems to me only the Eagles benefit from the bad officiating of this play. Correct me if I’m wrong.

Nope, not correct, the Eagles have been penalized on this play in the past. (see, NFCD game vs. LAR, 4th quarter 13:26 left, 4th and goal at the 1, Lane Johnson called for false start)
So you had to go back to last year, got it.

:shrug:

A divisional playoff game where the winning team gets to host the NFCCG. At the time the Eagles were up 1 point, in the 4th quarter. Seems like a much more important example to use than any regular season game. But your post didn't place a time limit on play, you can move the goalposts all you want. We both know your position isn't really that strong here.
So they have been called once out of 178 times they ran it when it should be called probably closer to 50-60% of the times they run it?

No, they've been called for false starts multiple times. Using the refs ability/inability to officiate false starts seems like a strange angle to take to ban a play. How many penalties would be acceptable for you. You can literally call holding on the offensive line every play, what is acceptable and what isn't?
 
soooooo....I feel compelled to defend the refs a little here....this play, or any QB sneak/RB dive into the middle of the pile is indeed one of the hardest plays to officiate.....even at the middle school or high school level....the side officials are considered the primary officials on this play and they are the only ones with a view down the line of scrimmage.....once the play starts, you have masses of human bodies piling up onto each other and often you lose site of the ball and have NO clue.....like seriously NO clue where the ball is at....add to the fact that a football field is 53 and half yards wide (160 feet) and you have officials trying call this play starting basically 80 feet away....the false start themselves are tough let alone "when forward progress" stops.....

personally I feel this play has been under so much scrutiny that the officials who have the Eagles games are being told to make this play a priority and in doing so, have probably felt the pressure to now kill the play as soon as possible to take away the advantage that many of you mentioned above about the Eagles getting to keep pushing and pushing and pushing.....before a whistle is blown....

well in complaining about that, you are asking the officials NOT to let them keep pushing and pushing and pushing.....basically saying you want them to kill the play before the Eagles keep pushing and pushing and getting the benefit of a "patient whistle" ......so now when the officials kill the play quickly, plays like yesterday happen and you want a fumble.....all of this basically confirms that the play is hard to officiate...because as this thread points out....the refs can't get it right for you guys no matter what they do.....
Ignore the Tush push part of it for a minute. The NFL forward progress definition might be worse than the catch rule at this point. What is even the rule? If you get stopped for a second, then surge forward for the first down on ANY play, they call that second effort and give you a first down. If you get stopped for a second, but then go backwards, you get it up where you initially got stopped. If you get stopped for a second, but then fumble, ball to the offense. Is that roughly how its always called now? So essentially the refs are playing advantage like soccer, nothing after that initial stop can hurt you, you can gain more, but nothing bad can happen.
technically as soon as an official determines forward progress has stopped, the whistle is supposed to be blown....whats hard is often we as viewers never really know when the whistle is blown....as an official myself there is a point where even though the ball carrier may be "trying" to fight for extra yardage (second effort)....he just isn't getting any further so we are supposed to blow the whistle (to help avoid injury etc.) ....there is a little bit of a gray area and when to blow the whistle is a judgment call...it really comes down to an official having to decide if the defender has done enough to stop the play or does the ball carrier still have a chance to keep going forward....it's kind of hard to explain but it's a lot like pr0n....you know it when you see it....what causes problems is if an official doesn't put air in the whistle at the time they have determined forward progress to have stopped....and I think that is a problem at the NFL level because the officials are encouraged to let the play "play out" because they can always fall back on replay.....but if forward progress is determined to have stopped before a fumble....there is no replay...

on the play in question here.....it must have been a very quick whistle because Hurts was still in the process of extending his arms forward when the ball became loose....and we are used to seeing this "play out" a little more....if I'm Daboll....between that and the OPI I'm probably getting two 15 yards flags and getting myself kicked out on principle.....those were two game changing plays that NYG got hosed on IMO....
 
on the play in question here.....it must have been a very quick whistle because Hurts was still in the process of extending his arms forward when the ball became loose....and we are used to seeing this "play out" a little more.
The whistle was clearly blown after the fumble.
 
This will be the last year it's allowed. Refs don't know how to officiate it.
Probably the smartest statement made regarding this play. Especially for the resaon why.

Not sure if you all watched the entire game yesterday. The refs were especially bad the entire day, not just on this one call.
That pretty much doesn't do anything to shut up those that think the NFL is rigged.

Yesterday's PHI/NY game was one of the worst officiated games I watch in a long time. There were more than a handful of calls where it was patently obvious the refs made a bad call.
Nice deflection away from the tush push this thread is about.

Well for me, the current discussion isn't really isolated to the tush push. The overall refereeing was bad for not only that one play, but multiple plays throughout the game. You're arguing that a certain play needs to be banned because the refs missed this one particular call while ignoring all the other plays where the refs missed calls. Then people will argue that refs miss false starts while having the luxury of watching a play in super slow motion. It seems people who don't like the tush push will find any reason to cling to to try and ban it. This argument is just another, in a long-list of arguments that just kind of fall flat for me. Officials can't do their job, it's too hard, let's ban a play.
It seems to me only the Eagles benefit from the bad officiating of this play. Correct me if I’m wrong.

Nope, not correct, the Eagles have been penalized on this play in the past. (see, NFCD game vs. LAR, 4th quarter 13:26 left, 4th and goal at the 1, Lane Johnson called for false start)
So you had to go back to last year, got it.

:shrug:

A divisional playoff game where the winning team gets to host the NFCCG. At the time the Eagles were up 1 point, in the 4th quarter. Seems like a much more important example to use than any regular season game. But your post didn't place a time limit on play, you can move the goalposts all you want. We both know your position isn't really that strong here.
So they have been called once out of 178 times they ran it when it should be called probably closer to 50-60% of the times they run it?

No, they've been called for false starts multiple times. Using the refs ability/inability to officiate false starts seems like a strange angle to take to ban a play. How many penalties would be acceptable for you. You can literally call holding on the offensive line every play, what is acceptable and what isn't?
For a false start? It should be called 100% of the time.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top