What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

US Men's National Team (22 Viewers)

So, while waiting for USA-Wales, what's everyone rooting for in the first Group B game? 0-0 to minimize points in the group? England win to provide an easier avenue to 2nd in the group? Iran 2-0 because England is the worst?

Intellectually I think an Iran loss is probably best for the US, but emotionally I'm not going to shed any tears if England faceplants.
 
What are your keys to advancing?
How do the CBs hold up when our FBs go forward? Adams and Musah being healthy in front of them helps a lot IMO, but I think central defense is a creaky spot for the team. Given the cover we have in attack, I would trade any of those players (CP, Reyna, Aaronson, Weah) to have Robinson back.

Does the team play as a unit? This is where we've been hit or miss under Berhalter. We've had a couple games where it's all fallen into place and we look like a top-10 team in the world. And then, especially when teams sit back like Wales and Iran will probably do, we've had a bunch of games where they look disjointed. This is the one criticism of Berhalter that seems more than fair to me and I think how we do on this front in these next 3-5 games will ultimately determine his legacy. If they gel and play cohesively they could make a deep run, but, sadly, I think that may be more of the story for this group in 2026.

Is our #9 consistently a threat? Can he score a few?

Do we stay healthy? Do we get un/lucky? In a 3-game tournament anything can happen. Good teams are more likely to get lucky with own goals and PKs and cards, but there's a big chunk of it that's just random too.
 
with our core's general lack of time together, I honestly think its gonna come down to finishing at both ends.

- Our CB's (no matter who they are) are going to allow chances....just due to the lack of time together, I think. Will the other teams finish those chances,
- I dont think we're going to create that many chances. We're playing one team that is more talented (although maybe shaky at CB) and then 2 teams that will play very defensive. Will we finish the chances we get?
 
We're playing one team that is more talented (although maybe shaky at CB) and then 2 teams that will play very defensive. Will we finish the chances we get?

I posted the below many months ago but I think it still holds true.

The US thinks they can beat either Wales or Iran
Wales thinks they can beat either the US or Iran
Iran thinks they can beat either the US or Wales

Outside of the England outlier, our group is probably the most balanced in the whole cup because the 3 other teams are relatively evenly matched.

I am unsure we will see any of the 3 teams play very defensive against each other unless in the last game, a draw is all one of Iran or US needs to advance.
 
So, while waiting for USA-Wales, what's everyone rooting for in the first Group B game? 0-0 to minimize points in the group? England win to provide an easier avenue to 2nd in the group? Iran 2-0 because England is the worst?

Intellectually I think an Iran loss is probably best for the US, but emotionally I'm not going to shed any tears if England faceplants.

I'm ok with 1-0 for England. IMO, it's the best result that allows us to win the group. And some red cards or injuries (not wishing injuries on anyone!)
 
So, while waiting for USA-Wales, what's everyone rooting for in the first Group B game? 0-0 to minimize points in the group? England win to provide an easier avenue to 2nd in the group? Iran 2-0 because England is the worst?

Intellectually I think an Iran loss is probably best for the US, but emotionally I'm not going to shed any tears if England faceplants.

I'm ok with 1-0 for England. IMO, it's the best result that allows us to win the group. And some red cards or injuries (not wishing injuries on anyone!)

if England is to win, you want them to win as big as possible against both Wales and Iran. Tie breakers are very likely to come into play and since the first tie breaker is GD, big losses for either Iran or Wales helps the US.

Any other result beyond a England win against Iran will throw the group into a bit of a tail spin and it is also very very likely to get England's tail feathers up when playing against the US rather than hopefully overlooking us if they play well against Iran.

My going in thought was if any team gets points off of England, their chances of advancing sky rocket.
 
So, while waiting for USA-Wales, what's everyone rooting for in the first Group B game? 0-0 to minimize points in the group? England win to provide an easier avenue to 2nd in the group? Iran 2-0 because England is the worst?

Intellectually I think an Iran loss is probably best for the US, but emotionally I'm not going to shed any tears if England faceplants.

I'm ok with 1-0 for England. IMO, it's the best result that allows us to win the group. And some red cards or injuries (not wishing injuries on anyone!)

if England is to win, you want them to win as big as possible against both Wales and Iran. Tie breakers are very likely to come into play and since the first tie breaker is GD, big losses to either Iram or Wales helps the US.

Any other result beyond a England win against Iran will throw the group into a bit of a tail spin and it is also very very likely to get England's tail feathers up when playing against the US rather than hopefully overlooking us if they play well against Iran.

My going in thought was if any team gets points off of England, their chances of advancing sky rocket.

I think it all comes down whether you think we can get a point off England. I should have expanded on my post and said - if the goal is to just advance then yes, a huge England win is what you want. I'm greedy and want to win the group. So, draw against England and win your other two with better results. I acknowledge that first goal should be to advance. I will say, there's also a question of whether England playing really well coming in to the match with us is good or bad. Are they overconfident or does it give them a boost and take some pressure off? A dodgy 1-0 win against Iran with the US beating Wales puts some pressure on England.
 
what does this mean?

===============

BVB Newsblog
@bvbnewsblog

Borussia Dortmund receives around 2.6 million euros from FIFA for the secondment of the national players.
Secondment means that a person is working another organization to do something while still retaining their contract at the first organization. It happens in government when say an FBI agent is loaned to the NSA or a CDC scientist is working with WHO on something. They are still employed by the CDC, but their work is with the WHO (as opposed to a direct WHO staff member).

In this case, FIFA is likely paying the wages for the players during the World Cup, which seems a little strange to me, but whatever.
 
USMNT vs Haters
@USMNTvsHaters

Tim Ream on his chemistry with Antonee Robinson (aka Jedi): “On the field, there is that connection. That bond… we kind of know where each other is gonna be and what each other is gonna do on and off the ball… it’s almost a sixth sense. And we use that to our advantage.”

Savy. He's pushing hard to start and he should. I named my bracket entry in @CletiusMaximus bracket challenge - GGG Better Ream Me
 
So, while waiting for USA-Wales, what's everyone rooting for in the first Group B game? 0-0 to minimize points in the group? England win to provide an easier avenue to 2nd in the group? Iran 2-0 because England is the worst?

Intellectually I think an Iran loss is probably best for the US, but emotionally I'm not going to shed any tears if England faceplants.

I'm ok with 1-0 for England. IMO, it's the best result that allows us to win the group. And some red cards or injuries (not wishing injuries on anyone!)

if England is to win, you want them to win as big as possible against both Wales and Iran. Tie breakers are very likely to come into play and since the first tie breaker is GD, big losses to either Iram or Wales helps the US.

Any other result beyond a England win against Iran will throw the group into a bit of a tail spin and it is also very very likely to get England's tail feathers up when playing against the US rather than hopefully overlooking us if they play well against Iran.

My going in thought was if any team gets points off of England, their chances of advancing sky rocket.

I think it all comes down whether you think we can get a point off England. I should have expanded on my post and said - if the goal is to just advance then yes, a huge England win is what you want. I'm greedy and want to win the group. So, draw against England and win your other two with better results. I acknowledge that first goal should be to advance. I will say, there's also a question of whether England playing really well coming in to the match with us is good or bad. Are they overconfident or does it give them a boost and take some pressure off? A dodgy 1-0 win against Iran with the US beating Wales puts some pressure on England.

I am with you. I am rooting for 1st place in the group.

We are far from favorites for anything, but for the first time we can pretty safely say that the majority of our players playing in these matches will be playing against the same caliber of player they play week in and week out, if not weaker. These guys are used to playing against Manchester City and AC Milan and Real Madrid, there isn't going to be any talent shock when they try and dribble or pass the ball in these games.

It's not Berhalter's personality, so we probably won't see it, but I'd just love to see us go for it. Forget playing for draws, playing it safe, and trying to limp in with 4 points. Let's go out there and try and win these friggin games and not just get to the knockout stage, but get there with confidence rather than just feeling like we eeked our way in by not quite screwing up too much.

And let's stop treating England like they're some world cup juggernaut. Hopefully the players will remember that England, despite all their talent, has 3 wins in their last 9 world cup group stage matches. They're far from invincible.

Oh, and let's not forget, in the WC they're 0-1-1 against the US of freaking A!!
 
So, while waiting for USA-Wales, what's everyone rooting for in the first Group B game? 0-0 to minimize points in the group? England win to provide an easier avenue to 2nd in the group? Iran 2-0 because England is the worst?

Intellectually I think an Iran loss is probably best for the US, but emotionally I'm not going to shed any tears if England faceplants.

I'm ok with 1-0 for England. IMO, it's the best result that allows us to win the group. And some red cards or injuries (not wishing injuries on anyone!)

if England is to win, you want them to win as big as possible against both Wales and Iran. Tie breakers are very likely to come into play and since the first tie breaker is GD, big losses to either Iram or Wales helps the US.

Any other result beyond a England win against Iran will throw the group into a bit of a tail spin and it is also very very likely to get England's tail feathers up when playing against the US rather than hopefully overlooking us if they play well against Iran.

My going in thought was if any team gets points off of England, their chances of advancing sky rocket.

I think it all comes down whether you think we can get a point off England. I should have expanded on my post and said - if the goal is to just advance then yes, a huge England win is what you want. I'm greedy and want to win the group. So, draw against England and win your other two with better results. I acknowledge that first goal should be to advance. I will say, there's also a question of whether England playing really well coming in to the match with us is good or bad. Are they overconfident or does it give them a boost and take some pressure off? A dodgy 1-0 win against Iran with the US beating Wales puts some pressure on England.

I am with you. I am rooting for 1st place in the group.

We are far from favorites for anything, but for the first time we can pretty safely say that the majority of our players playing in these matches will be playing against the same caliber of player they play week in and week out, if not weaker. These guys are used to playing against Manchester City and AC Milan and Real Madrid, there isn't going to be any talent shock when they try and dribble or pass the ball in these games.

It's not Berhalter's personality, so we probably won't see it, but I'd just love to see us go for it. Forget playing for draws, playing it safe, and trying to limp in with 4 points. Let's go out there and try and win these friggin games and not just get to the knockout stage, but get there with confidence rather than just feeling like we eeked are way in by not quite screwing up too much.

And let's stop treating England like they're some world cup juggernaut. Hopefully the players will remember that England, despite all their talent, has 3 wins in their last 9 world cup group stage matches. They're far from invincible.

I agree with a lot of this but I will say England is better than us - probably significantly - but we are closing the gap. A draw against them would be a great result.
 
So, while waiting for USA-Wales, what's everyone rooting for in the first Group B game? 0-0 to minimize points in the group? England win to provide an easier avenue to 2nd in the group? Iran 2-0 because England is the worst?

Intellectually I think an Iran loss is probably best for the US, but emotionally I'm not going to shed any tears if England faceplants.

I'm ok with 1-0 for England. IMO, it's the best result that allows us to win the group. And some red cards or injuries (not wishing injuries on anyone!)

if England is to win, you want them to win as big as possible against both Wales and Iran. Tie breakers are very likely to come into play and since the first tie breaker is GD, big losses to either Iram or Wales helps the US.

Any other result beyond a England win against Iran will throw the group into a bit of a tail spin and it is also very very likely to get England's tail feathers up when playing against the US rather than hopefully overlooking us if they play well against Iran.

My going in thought was if any team gets points off of England, their chances of advancing sky rocket.

I think it all comes down whether you think we can get a point off England. I should have expanded on my post and said - if the goal is to just advance then yes, a huge England win is what you want. I'm greedy and want to win the group. So, draw against England and win your other two with better results. I acknowledge that first goal should be to advance. I will say, there's also a question of whether England playing really well coming in to the match with us is good or bad. Are they overconfident or does it give them a boost and take some pressure off? A dodgy 1-0 win against Iran with the US beating Wales puts some pressure on England.

I am with you. I am rooting for 1st place in the group.

We are far from favorites for anything, but for the first time we can pretty safely say that the majority of our players playing in these matches will be playing against the same caliber of player they play week in and week out, if not weaker. These guys are used to playing against Manchester City and AC Milan and Real Madrid, there isn't going to be any talent shock when they try and dribble or pass the ball in these games.

It's not Berhalter's personality, so we probably won't see it, but I'd just love to see us go for it. Forget playing for draws, playing it safe, and trying to limp in with 4 points. Let's go out there and try and win these friggin games and not just get to the knockout stage, but get there with confidence rather than just feeling like we eeked are way in by not quite screwing up too much.

And let's stop treating England like they're some world cup juggernaut. Hopefully the players will remember that England, despite all their talent, has 3 wins in their last 9 world cup group stage matches. They're far from invincible.

I agree with a lot of this but I will say England is better than us - probably significantly - but we are closing the gap. A draw against them would be a great result.
If the USA does pull off a win vs ENG, how much **** will Musah talk at the end?
 
what does this mean?

===============

BVB Newsblog
@bvbnewsblog

Borussia Dortmund receives around 2.6 million euros from FIFA for the secondment of the national players.
Secondment means that a person is working another organization to do something while still retaining their contract at the first organization. It happens in government when say an FBI agent is loaned to the NSA or a CDC scientist is working with WHO on something. They are still employed by the CDC, but their work is with the WHO (as opposed to a direct WHO staff member).

In this case, FIFA is likely paying the wages for the players during the World Cup, which seems a little strange to me, but whatever.
Fifa had to spread some of the graft around to get leagues to move their schedules to accommodate a November World Cup.
 
So, while waiting for USA-Wales, what's everyone rooting for in the first Group B game? 0-0 to minimize points in the group? England win to provide an easier avenue to 2nd in the group? Iran 2-0 because England is the worst?

Intellectually I think an Iran loss is probably best for the US, but emotionally I'm not going to shed any tears if England faceplants.

I'm ok with 1-0 for England. IMO, it's the best result that allows us to win the group. And some red cards or injuries (not wishing injuries on anyone!)

if England is to win, you want them to win as big as possible against both Wales and Iran. Tie breakers are very likely to come into play and since the first tie breaker is GD, big losses to either Iram or Wales helps the US.

Any other result beyond a England win against Iran will throw the group into a bit of a tail spin and it is also very very likely to get England's tail feathers up when playing against the US rather than hopefully overlooking us if they play well against Iran.

My going in thought was if any team gets points off of England, their chances of advancing sky rocket.

I think it all comes down whether you think we can get a point off England. I should have expanded on my post and said - if the goal is to just advance then yes, a huge England win is what you want. I'm greedy and want to win the group. So, draw against England and win your other two with better results. I acknowledge that first goal should be to advance. I will say, there's also a question of whether England playing really well coming in to the match with us is good or bad. Are they overconfident or does it give them a boost and take some pressure off? A dodgy 1-0 win against Iran with the US beating Wales puts some pressure on England.

I am with you. I am rooting for 1st place in the group.

We are far from favorites for anything, but for the first time we can pretty safely say that the majority of our players playing in these matches will be playing against the same caliber of player they play week in and week out, if not weaker. These guys are used to playing against Manchester City and AC Milan and Real Madrid, there isn't going to be any talent shock when they try and dribble or pass the ball in these games.

It's not Berhalter's personality, so we probably won't see it, but I'd just love to see us go for it. Forget playing for draws, playing it safe, and trying to limp in with 4 points. Let's go out there and try and win these friggin games and not just get to the knockout stage, but get there with confidence rather than just feeling like we eeked are way in by not quite screwing up too much.

And let's stop treating England like they're some world cup juggernaut. Hopefully the players will remember that England, despite all their talent, has 3 wins in their last 9 world cup group stage matches. They're far from invincible.

I agree with a lot of this but I will say England is better than us - probably significantly - but we are closing the gap. A draw against them would be a great result.
If the USA does pull off a win vs ENG, how much **** will Musah talk at the end?

Musah? I don't think the guy has a negative bone in his body.

I am sure Jedi, Adams, Ream, Pulisic, Turner, and Aaronson will have a jab or two at their team mates when they return home.
 
Some Paul Carr stats
=============

As the opener goes, so goes the USMNT at the World Cup. 9 previous appearances with a group stage, the U.S. has advanced all 5 times after getting a win or draw in the opener, and been eliminated in the group stage all 4 times after losing its opener.

The USMNT’s last five World Cup opening matches have all had a goal in the first 10 minutes.

Having two European teams in the group could mean trouble for the USMNT, which is winless in nine straight World Cup matches against European sides, last beating Portugal in the 2002 opener.
 
The Guardian writers were asked who could be the surprise of the tournament. I was happy to see one writer mention the US until I read his reasoning. Let's hope the English team is as well informed as this guy about who the key players are.

====================

USA – which might be bad news for England, with whom they share a group. Look out for DeAndre Yedlin, the sole survivor from their last appearance in 2014 who has Premier League experience, and rising star, Haji Wright. JJ
 
I acknowledge that first goal should be to advance. I will say, there's also a question of whether England playing really well coming in to the match with us is good or bad. Are they overconfident or does it give them a boost and take some pressure off? A dodgy 1-0 win against Iran with the US beating Wales puts some pressure on England.
Yes, somehow if England comes out flat against Iran it counterintuitively makes me much more worried for the US match. If England beats Iran 3-0 or somesuch, maybe they're already sort of mentally looking ahead to the knockout rounds and the US can punch them in the mouth.

The US got a decent draw overall, but I really don't like the order of the games. We'll have a young team with probably its most important match as far as advancing right off the bat. I think having England first would have been preferable since a loss there is much more recoverable. I guess in the end that's all minutiae, though - this team has the talent to advance, and [almost] all of the key players are actually coming in healthy. They just have to perform.
 
One other thing...part way into the season, id think the English and Welsh players will have some familiarity with the US players in the EPL and may have solutions for them. I think it will be guys outside of England that will need to step up and provide special moments for the US...Reyna and Musah especially. But Jesus and Haji too.
 
Like...while Sarge will undoubtedly be his very useful working self, I don't see him doing much offensively vs that back line, as much because of talent as familiarity. Jesus and Haji bring more of an x factor, at least vs the UK teams
 
Qatar's results in the build-up to the World Cup have been called into question on the eve of their tournament opener against Ecuador, after FIFA received an integrity alert.

Sportsmail has learned that one of FIFA's integrity partners has contacted the world governing body in the last few days highlighting 'an unusually high number of penalties' awarded to Qatar in their pre-World Cup friendlies, many of which were staged behind closed doors and not televised or streamed.

The integrity alert is understood to have warned FIFA of suggestions that a high number of spot-kicks were awarded to ensure that Qatar achieved positive results in the tournament build-up, although it adds that this claim cannot be verified.
Have a feeling Qatar is going to be quite bitter by the time this is over.
 
One other thing...part way into the season, id think the English and Welsh players will have some familiarity with the US players in the EPL and may have solutions for them. I think it will be guys outside of England that will need to step up and provide special moments for the US...Reyna and Musah especially. But Jesus and Haji too.

Don’t forget Yedlin.
 
Oh oh, I don't like the sound of this :) if Dest had to ask Weston what to say, it feels like GGG might be trying something new and that has not worked well in the past

========

Ives Galarcep

@SoccerByIves


Sergiño Dest was overly cautious in today's #USMNT press conference when asked how USA will approach Wales on Monday. After consulting w/Weston McKennie he eventually said (cautiously) that Wales' style leaves space in behind on the wings to exploit. So why so cautious?
 
Oh oh, I don't like the sound of this :) if Dest had to ask Weston what to say, it feels like GGG might be trying something new and that has not worked well in the past

========

Ives Galarcep
@SoccerByIves


Sergiño Dest was overly cautious in today's #USMNT press conference when asked how USA will approach Wales on Monday. After consulting w/Weston McKennie he eventually said (cautiously) that Wales' style leaves space in behind on the wings to exploit. So why so cautious?

Why the hell would he say that either way?
 
One other thing...part way into the season, id think the English and Welsh players will have some familiarity with the US players in the EPL and may have solutions for them. I think it will be guys outside of England that will need to step up and provide special moments for the US...Reyna and Musah especially. But Jesus and Haji too.
We played Wales in 2020 and both Reyna and Musah started. It was 2 years ago, but I don't think they are going to be surprised by what either can do. Both were great in that game from my memory.
 
Oh oh, I don't like the sound of this :) if Dest had to ask Weston what to say, it feels like GGG might be trying something new and that has not worked well in the past

========

Ives Galarcep
@SoccerByIves


Sergiño Dest was overly cautious in today's #USMNT press conference when asked how USA will approach Wales on Monday. After consulting w/Weston McKennie he eventually said (cautiously) that Wales' style leaves space in behind on the wings to exploit. So why so cautious?

Why the hell would he say that either way?

these guys clearly have not taken the Bill Belichick lesson on how to handle the media :)
 
I think the idea that some players skills would be a surprise kind of nonsensical - with the amount of video and scouting today they know more about what each player can do than ever before. Especially when talking about sides like England, Wales and the US - maybe some Iranians players but even that seems unlikely.
 
I think the idea that some players skills would be a surprise kind of nonsensical - with the amount of video and scouting today they know more about what each player can do than ever before. Especially when talking about sides like England, Wales and the US - maybe some Iranians players but even that seems unlikely.

I agree, there will be no suprises for any team. The closest any one will get to a suprise is basic human underestimation which is one of the key components in every upset.
 
Weston seemed very upbeat in the presser and said he played well in the friendly/training session with the Qatari club and was ready to go.
I think we're going MMA in midfield. Sounds like Yedlin at RB.

Question is LCB, RW, and Striker. I think Ream maybe at LCB but it could leave us exposed on counter. RW I expect Gio and I'd play #TeamHaji because I think we need a presence in box but I expect Jesus to start. I'm just not sure this game will suit Jesus.
 
Weston seemed very upbeat in the presser and said he played well in the friendly/training session with the Qatari club and was ready to go.
I think we're going MMA in midfield. Sounds like Yedlin at RB.

Question is LCB, RW, and Striker. I think Ream maybe at LCB but it could leave us exposed on counter. RW I expect Gio and I'd play #TeamHaji because I think we need a presence in box but I expect Jesus to start. I'm just not sure this game will suit Jesus.

GGG has mentioned a few times he wants a physical striker against Wales which certainly seems to point to Sarge or Haji. GGG even mentioned Sarge's time in the Championship was a good base for playing against Wales due to the physical nature of the league.

Yedlin has not played a game in a long long time. Maybe they will split 45-45 between Yedlin and Dest since neither can probably go a full game?
 

Users who are viewing this thread

  • Back
    Top