What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

US Men's National Team (13 Viewers)

Interesting discussion about U20 WC roster but are there any guys that are age eligible (Gio is not no matter how many times Edu says so) that are with the seniors? Pepi is the only one I can think of.

You have to be 2003.  I don't think anyone on this roster is on the verge even. We'll have a Gold Cup next summer so my guess is the fringe older players go there and all the U20 play in the WC. 


Correct.  Only Pepi would make the age cut.  Yunus, Scally and Gio all missed by a month or two.

 
5 minutes ago, prefontaine said:
Interesting discussion about U20 WC roster but are there any guys that are age eligible (Gio is not no matter how many times Edu says so) that are with the seniors? Pepi is the only one I can think of.

You have to be 2003.  I don't think anyone on this roster is on the verge even. We'll have a Gold Cup next summer so my guess is the fringe older players go there and all the U20 play in the WC. 
Expand  


Correct.  Only Pepi would make the age cut.  Yunus, Scally and Gio all missed by a month or two.
scally?

 
There are a lot of interesting prospects on this side but I don't think any of them are knocking on the door of the senior side. Honestly, the guy closest to playing for our senior side in this tournament played for Guate (Quimi) just because of his position. 

 
Tsakiris played the full 90 and even knocked in a goal. He of course is eligible for next year's WC, but he will also be eligible for the U20 World Cup in 2025. Obed Vargas who didn't end up coming also will be.

My guess is neither plays the next cycle as they will likely be the Paredes/Gaga tier that their club won't release them. Then again, that quasi already happened to Vargas this year. 

 
Vasquez scored for Cincy tonight.

In an extreme rarity, Yanks are high up in the MLS scoring charts.  I guess making the WC is wonderful motivation.

Jesus is on top with 10.  Vasquez and Ebobisse are at 9 and Nips is at 8.

 
Matthew Doyle@MattDoyle76

Man it's nice to see Eryk Williamson back and balling like this.
Had been wondering what his status was.  Feels like there's still some room for the one of the #8 spots (Weston, Musah, LDLT and ...) and he looked great in his run with the full team before he got hurt.

 
Had been wondering what his status was.  Feels like there's still some room for the one of the #8 spots (Weston, Musah, LDLT and ...) and he looked great in his run with the full team before he got hurt.


I think the 4th number 8 will be Gio.  He was playing almost exclusively at the 8 for Dortmund during the short periods he was not hurt and most of his minimal US time since the injury has been at the 8.

 
Paxten was voted best player of the tournament.
Based on this tournament and his MLS play, who which of the Aaronson boys will have a better pro career? Which will be more influential for the USMNT?

Obviously Brendan has a head start but Paxton's talent cannot be denied here. 

They play the same position (right?), so they'll be in competition for the USMNT.

 
Based on this tournament and his MLS play, who which of the Aaronson boys will have a better pro career? Which will be more influential for the USMNT?

Obviously Brendan has a head start but Paxton's talent cannot be denied here. 

They play the same position (right?), so they'll be in competition for the USMNT.


Watching the 11 Yanks/Tac Manager live recap....the general consensus is that Paxton is ahead of where Our Lil' Brendan was at the same age (from a technical standpoint) . But Paxton might lack the top-end speed/burst that he'll need to get to the top level.  But he's still so young, so it may still come.

 
Based on this tournament and his MLS play, who which of the Aaronson boys will have a better pro career? Which will be more influential for the USMNT?

Obviously Brendan has a head start but Paxton's talent cannot be denied here. 

They play the same position (right?), so they'll be in competition for the USMNT.
Not exactly.  Paxten is more a pure #10.  Brenden is more an 8/10 hybrid “transitional mid”.  Brenden is probably better defensively in pressing.  Paxten is more talented offensively.

I could see them playing together someday

 
Had been wondering what his status was.  Feels like there's still some room for the one of the #8 spots (Weston, Musah, LDLT and ...) and he looked great in his run with the full team before he got hurt.


I think the 4th number 8 will be Gio.  He was playing almost exclusively at the 8 for Dortmund during the short periods he was not hurt and most of his minimal US time since the injury has been at the 8.
I admit I don't know him well, but I thought he was a 6? And we could use that.

Glad to see him back.

 
I'm not an MLS watcher (I'll occasionally tune in for a big game, but I'm never watching Real Salt Lake or San Jose or anyone outside the big markets) but I'll be really interested to see how Luna develops over the next year or so. He's obviously unique and he's got the "tries stuff" gene for sure. Seems to process quickly and made some really incisive passes.

But it seems like he wasn't as good against the better teams after a really strong group stage. So I'll be curious to see if he can get consistent PT.

 
But it seems like he wasn't as good against the better teams after a really strong group stage. So I'll be curious to see if he can get consistent PT.
Agree with you. I'm hopeful part of that may just be he hasn't been playing at a high enough level. Moving to MLS hopefully accelerates his development because he will be playing against the "better teams" week in and week out. 

 
Cool

======

Fabrizio Romano

@FabrizioRomano

Leeds are set to sign Tyler Adams from RB Leipzig, done deal and here we go! Deal completed for £20m fee [add ons included]. It’s 100% agreed, Jesse Marsch wanted him. #LUFC Adams will travel to England soon to undergo medical tests and sign long term deal with Leeds.

 
Cool

======

Fabrizio Romano

@FabrizioRomano

Leeds are set to sign Tyler Adams from RB Leipzig, done deal and here we go! Deal completed for £20m fee [add ons included]. It’s 100% agreed, Jesse Marsch wanted him. #LUFC Adams will travel to England soon to undergo medical tests and sign long term deal with Leeds.


Twitter says NYRB will be getting around $8m for this sale since they still hold a % of Adams.

 
hmm..translated tweet

===================

Regarding Matthijs de Ligt:

Renewal stopped. He wants a new challenge. Juve asks for 80/100 mln € . Juve-Che negotiation. The Italians have asked for Pulisic, CHE says NO. Constant contacts between the Blues and the player environment. Bayern, City and United: pay attention.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
You think Canada is the better team?
Overall, yes. More talented, no. But sometimes talent isn't everything. 

They played to their strengths, minimized their weaknesses.  They got points Central America (draw in Mexico, wins in ELS and HON) where the US has historically struggled.  Canada can score goals and they can engage in CONCACAF ####housery to close out games. 

They were absolutely the better team in qualifying. 

 
They were absolutely the better team in qualifying. 
I mean overall.

IOW, if the US played Canada 100 times -- say once a week in a neutral venue, with whoever was healthy that week -- do you think Canada would win more than the US?

I think the US would come out comfortably ahead. 

 
Overall, yes. More talented, no. But sometimes talent isn't everything. 

They played to their strengths, minimized their weaknesses.  They got points Central America (draw in Mexico, wins in ELS and HON) where the US has historically struggled.  Canada can score goals and they can engage in CONCACAF ####housery to close out games. 

They were absolutely the better team in qualifying. 
Exactly this.

To a man, they knew what their roles were and executed them well every game, which 9f course goes towards how they played as a team- clear tactics, executed well every game.

 
OptaJack

@OptaJack

2010-11 - The last time two American outfield players each appeared in at least 10 games for the same team in a Premier League season was 2010-11 (C. Dempsey, E. Johnson -@FulhamFC)

========

Leeds Leeds Leeds

 
Overall, yes. More talented, no. But sometimes talent isn't everything. 

They played to their strengths, minimized their weaknesses.  They got points Central America (draw in Mexico, wins in ELS and HON) where the US has historically struggled.  Canada can score goals and they can engage in CONCACAF ####housery to close out games. 

They were absolutely the better team in qualifying. 
They finished 3 pts ahead of us - you’re overselling Canada here, IMO.  If they had the injuries we had to the same key people they maybe done even qualify.  They finished 1st deservedly but they were not that much better than MEX or US.

 
They finished 3 pts ahead of us - you’re overselling Canada here, IMO.  If they had the injuries we had to the same key people they maybe done even qualify.  They finished 1st deservedly but they were not that much better than MEX or US.
its a weird conversation. and I don't see him overselling Canada.

they finished first and took points from anybody around them. they might be a "weaker" assembly of players than Mex and US, but throughout qualifying they played as the better team, which the results and eye-test showed. those results would've been historic for the US (points and wins away from home).

 
I think the US is better in a vacuum, but Canada was better throughout qualifying. No doubt we’d be big favorites against them in the hypothetical 100 matches at a neutral site scenario 

 
Qualifying is weird and very spread out, and Canada had the benefit of playing in the earlier rounds to build cohesiveness. 

 
its a weird conversation. and I don't see him overselling Canada.

they finished first and took points from anybody around them. they might be a "weaker" assembly of players than Mex and US, but throughout qualifying they played as the better team, which the results and eye-test showed. those results would've been historic for the US (points and wins away from home).
Maybe I’m reading something that’s not there but “absolutely” to me means they were much better - I don’t think they were.   :shrug:  

 
Maybe I’m reading something that’s not there but “absolutely” to me means they were much better - I don’t think they were.   :shrug:  
ah. I get caught up in words like that too, so I see your point.

but due to standings and doing everything they needed to do, I think the case could be made for "absolutely". they dictated every game they played, and did everything they needed to do to get the results. 

 
I'm talking about the specific results away from home.


Lets compare:

Canada was 2-3-2 (W-D-L) this cycle away from home.   9 points from 7 games or 1.28 points per game

US was 2-1-2 (W-D-L) in 2006 away from home.  7 points from 5 games or 1.4 points per game.

It is not apples to apples since the qualifying cycles were of different amount of games but there may be enough evidence here to say it would not have been historic if the US did what Canada did this year away from home.

Canada was a solid 6-1-0 at home.  19 out of 21 possible points.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Lets compare:

Canada was 2-3-2 (W-D-L) this cycle away from home.   9 points from 7 games or 1.28 points per game

US was 2-1-2 (W-D-L) in 2006 away from home.  7 points from 5 games or 1.4 points per game.

It is not apples to apples since the qualifying cycles were of different amount of games but there may be enough evidence here to say it would not have been historic if the US did what Canada did this year away from home.
I STAND CORRECTED

I mis-remembered them beating CR away, but they lost 0-1.

Win/Draw vs both Mex and US is pretty incredible though. I'm replacing the US with a US top opponent- like a CR- and imagining that result out of qualifying. not historic.

 
I STAND CORRECTED

I mis-remembered them beating CR away, but they lost 0-1.

Win/Draw vs both Mex and US is pretty incredible though. I'm replacing the US with a US top opponent- like a CR- and imagining that result out of qualifying. not historic.


Mexico had the best away record (4-1-2), which they needed since they had 3 draws at home.

 
Canada had qualification locked up with two games left to play as I recall.  That's pretty rare in CONCACAF, although the ocho format favors this. 

Also, Davies was injured for like 30% of their matches as I recall.  He's likely the best player in the region. 

They did get lucky with other injuries and other teams not converting xG into goals. But that's why you play the funny ol' game.  

Finally, as my old man says, "it's better to be lucky than good."

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I don't know how I missed this but we have another brother set brewing.  I just never made the connection.

Tyler Wolff, from Atlanta United and the U20's we just watched is Josh Wolff's son.  Josh, who is the current head coach of Austin, also has his 17 year old son Owen, Tyler's bother, on the senior roster and getting minutes.

Sure, having dad as a coach certainly helps but every one scream nepotism when Bob did the exact same thing years ago for Michael and that worked out pretty well.

 
[Fabrizio Romano] Gabriel Slonina, performing at top level in MLS. There was a verbal agreement in place with Chelsea for €10m - Chicago Fire waiting to see if after departure of Petr Cech the deal will collapse again. #CFC Slonina was already really close to Chelsea in January.

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top