I'm 50/50 him or prosise (who is available in a lot of places) the guy catching the passes is the one I want on this team. It's a mess. I'd rather pick my poisom with the Vikings or somethingLooks like the best pick-up in Seattle. Lacy looks flat.
agree here. I get grabbing Proise or Rawls instead of Lacy, but anybody who grabbed Carson is in 30-man roster leagues or somethingSure. Why wouldn't you draft the fourth running back on the depth chart of a team with a known (I assume knowledgeable people knew) crappy offensive line; being a seventh round pick before week one. Seems legit.
I drafted him in a 12 teamer in the 15th.agree here. I get grabbing Proise or Rawls instead of Lacy, but anybody who grabbed Carson is in 30-man roster leagues or something
hmm, well nice grab. i was suckered into Marlon Mack i think around there, did drop him before the season for Tarik Cohen thoughI drafted him in a 12 teamer in the 15th.
Which goes to my point.Not really true... Murray will get early down/goal line work, McKinnon 3rd down/passing down. There's no way McKinnon starts IMHO.
Yea drafted Cohen and Carson 14th and 15th. Sucks about Carson though.hmm, well nice grab. i was suckered into Marlon Mack i think around there, did drop him before the season for Tarik Cohen though
now if only Jon Fox can fall down a well until the fantasy season is over, we will be good
If you don't need him next week Hooper is widely available and with Jones and Sanu getting banged up might be a decent TE grab.Good luck figuring out that Seattle RB situation.
I hope to go Kroft this week.
Reading down this thread but Watson isn't?I've found that most of big pickups I already drafted or snagged 2 weeks early on speculation. But they haven't been season changers yet.
Hooper's target totals: 2 > 2 > 2 > 7If you don't need him next week Hooper is widely available and with Jones and Sanu getting banged up might be a decent TE grab.
Really? Short bench, and I would not even think twice about dropping a kicker. He is not that good - ranked 4th in our league - and the difference between 2nd and 13th ranked kicker is 8 points.Ugh, first bye week and the only guy I need to manage is Lutz. Short benches on my team mean I will need to drop someone of value, and hard to drop Lutz outright as he's been gold this year and will likely continue to be.
Just not true; he was drafted in both my leagues of 16 & 17 man rosters. He was sniped before I could grab him in one. Based on preseason performance, question marks with all the other RBs, and the luster of a young player with promise - plus Carroll's willingness to play his best guy put him on a lot of radars.agree here. I get grabbing Proise or Rawls instead of Lacy, but anybody who grabbed Carson is in 30-man roster leagues or something
I think he's gonna be a good play until Johnson returnsAndre Ellington if available, particularly if PPR.
I would think so, otherwise you're gonna miss his running.Rawls is on my waiver wire - just lost Cook. Is rawls worth a flier?
Honestly, this sounds exactly like Carsons situation..bad O line...mega touch split, and people went ape-poop for him...Which goes to my point.
Middling talent plus weak offensive line plus a split in touches doesn't lead to a wow.
If you're in deep leagues or need a body, go nuts. Otherwise...meh.
Carson clearly had won the bulk of the work (or was about to) when people were going bananas. That's not the case in Minnesota.Honestly, this sounds exactly like Carsons situation..bad O line...mega touch split, and people went ape-poop for him...
In the NFL , opportunity is the MOST important thing
I’m looking at 4-0...my RBs are Gordon and then a pile of mostly garbage right now... (Crowell, Ingram, Perine, Charles...and Carson who just went down)If you are having to actually start Lacy as a RB then I would venture to guess you team and season is pretty much shot.
I have this same dilemma after losing Carson. I am leaning towards Rawls (non-PPR). He has at least had success in that system whereas Lacy has not.Ugh Rawls or Lacy? Both available in my league...lol
With guys going down left and right, I would disagree with this statement.If you are having to actually start Lacy as a RB then I would venture to guess you team and season is pretty much shot.
Zay Jones should see an uptick in targets as well, although I'm not sure that he's ready for prime time yet.Charles Clay TE Buf
Great game yesterday, Jordon Mathews now out a month.
Now the No. 1 Option for Tyrod Taylor
what realistically do you think Lacy can give you?With guys going down left and right, I would disagree with this statement.
A headache. Maybe some reflux.what realistically do you think Lacy can give you?
Let him go. It's so unlikely to be a difference maker. FWIW I picked him up before Week 1 and love his consistency, but not worth hanging onto IMO.Ugh, first bye week and the only guy I need to manage is Lutz. Short benches on my team mean I will need to drop someone of value, and hard to drop Lutz outright as he's been gold this year and will likely continue to be.
Agree. I'm not against holding a K through his bye, but only if there's no one good in the WW. Otherwise, I'll take my chances and hope to get him back on the flipside.Let him go. It's so unlikely to be a difference maker. FWIW I picked him up before Week 1 and love his consistency, but not worth hanging onto IMO.
Probably not much, but a starting RB (assuming he assumes that role again) still has some value when there are fewer and fewer bellcows left.what realistically do you think Lacy can give you?
This is a fair point. He has value. A RB getting the start should be rostered. Frank Gore looks terrible but he's rostered in competitive leagues. Lacy has a better YPC than him- looked good vs IND who has been actually quite good against this run this year so far.Probably not much, but a starting RB (assuming he assumes that role again) still has some value when there are fewer and fewer bellcows left.
He's a RB on ESPN.PSA: JD McKissic is a WR on CBS site. Not sure on other sites.. Kindof a Ty Mont situation.
Fill-in RBs on GB have not been top 5 players, historically.A note on Aaron Jones. I am surprised he is not getting more mention in here. I think GB was looking for a way to limit Ty Mont touches even before he got hurt. Now Aaron Jones proved he is likely a better play than Jamaal Williams even if they are both healthy, and note that Williams got hurt.
So if Williams and TyMont miss wk 5 (I realize they have been optimistic on TyMont since the game but we will see), Aaron Jones becomes a top 5 RB play for week 5 against Dallas. Then he has probably moved ahead of Williams as an extremely valuable lottery ticket. And lastly I say he gets flex level touches even when Ty Mont plays simply because Jones looked good when he was in.
Point taken. I confess to hyberbole there.Fill-in RBs on GB have not been top 5 players, historically.
Heck the starting RB on GB has not been a top 5 player very often under McCarthy. Not when you can give it to Rodgers and let him throw all day.
I was curious enough about this to fire up the data dominator. Since 2015, here are how many top 5 RB weeks each NFL team has produced:Point taken. I confess to hyberbole there.
If he doesn't have to share though for one week, and seeing what RBs have done to Dallas, how about top 15 anyway.
As many points as Crowell or Ingram? If he is getting the carries vs. Rawls. I mean, at this point with the injuries...that is what some people are looking at.what realistically do you think Lacy can give you?
Eli Rogers was a healthy scratch yesterday. I think JuJu has surpassed him on the depth chartAdam LevitanVerified account @adamlevitan 5m5 minutes ago
More
20-year-old Juju Smith-Schuster has been in on 75% of the total snaps and 89% of Big Ben's dropbacks over the last two weeks.
How has Martavis Bryan looked? Any chance JuJu surpasses Bryant in the pecking order this season?Eli Rogers was a healthy scratch yesterday. I think JuJu has surpassed him on the depth chart