13-18 seem like good ages for home-schooling.no but my kids were for a time
parents' aren't too bright, eh?No, thank god.
Somewhere between average and above average I'd say. Certainly smarter than a few posters I could name. And way smarter than every person I ever met claiming they could teach their kids every subject through every grade and do it better than the public schools.parents' aren't too bright, eh?No, thank god.
Parents' what?parents' aren't too bright, eh?No, thank god.
No. Do you want them to be socially inept?13-18 seem like good ages for home-schooling.no but my kids were for a time
My daughter? Yes.No. Do you want them to be socially inept?13-18 seem like good ages for home-schooling.no but my kids were for a time
This is a quality posting.Somewhere between average and above average I'd say. Certainly smarter than a few posters I could name. And way smarter than every person I ever met claiming they could teach their kids every subject through every grade and do it better than the public schools.parents' aren't too bright, eh?No, thank god.
This is the worst argument. Kids don't need to be around other kids 8 hours a day 9 months out of the year to be 'socialized'.No. Do you want them to be socially inept?13-18 seem like good ages for home-schooling.no but my kids were for a time
I recommend Catholic All Girls school. I had a lot of luck with those girls.My daughter? Yes.No. Do you want them to be socially inept?13-18 seem like good ages for home-schooling.no but my kids were for a time
Maybe I'll compromise and send her to an all girls school.
Yeah, one on one teaching really is a terrible thing.Somewhere between average and above average I'd say. Certainly smarter than a few posters I could name. And way smarter than every person I ever met claiming they could teach their kids every subject through every grade and do it better than the public schools.parents' aren't too bright, eh?No, thank god.
You're an FBG, right?My daughter? Yes.No. Do you want them to be socially inept?13-18 seem like good ages for home-schooling.no but my kids were for a time
Maybe I'll compromise and send her to an all girls school.
Please. but I am sure you have trig and algebra and that new fangled thing 'evolution' down.This is the worst argument. Kids don't need to be around other kids 8 hours a day 9 months out of the year to be 'socialized'.No. Do you want them to be socially inept?13-18 seem like good ages for home-schooling.no but my kids were for a time
Ah, great logic here. 1. I wasn't homeschooled, and we don't homeschool out kids.Please. but I am sure you have trig and algebra and that new fangled thing 'evolution' down.This is the worst argument. Kids don't need to be around other kids 8 hours a day 9 months out of the year to be 'socialized'.No. Do you want them to be socially inept?13-18 seem like good ages for home-schooling.no but my kids were for a time
That depends on which state you live in.Ah, great logic here.1. I wasn't homeschooled, and we don't homeschool out kids.Please. but I am sure you have trig and algebra and that new fangled thing 'evolution' down.This is the worst argument. Kids don't need to be around other kids 8 hours a day 9 months out of the year to be 'socialized'.No. Do you want them to be socially inept?13-18 seem like good ages for home-schooling.no but my kids were for a time
2. You brought up 'socialized' then respond with a completely new argument - academics.
3. Most homeschooled families supplement with small group co-ops for subjects beyond the expertise of the parents. Most parents took algebra and can easily teach it with some study of their own.
4. Many homeschool families aren't doing it for religious reasons (which I assume is where the 'evolution' comment comes from)
5. Homeschooled kids still need to pass all standards to get a diploma.
i have the impression home schooling is more popular now than it used to beCurios that nobody has answered yes?
More than 2 million U.S. students in grades K-12 were home-schooled in 2010, accounting for nearly four percent of all school-aged children, according to the National Home Education Research Institute. Studies suggest that those who go on to college will outperform their peers.
Students coming from a home school graduated college at a higher rate than their peers -- 66.7 percent compared to 57.5 percent -- and earned higher grade point averages along the way, according to a study that compared students at one doctoral university from 2004-2009.
They're also better socialized than most high school students, says Joe Kelly, an author and parenting expert who home-schooled his twin daughters.
"I know that sounds counterintuitive because they're not around dozens or hundreds of other kids every day, but I would argue that's why they're better socialized," Kelly says. "Many home-schoolers play on athletic teams, but they're also interactive with students of different ages."
Home-schooled students often spend less time in class, Kelly says, giving them more opportunity to get out into the world and engage with adults and teens alike.
"The socialization thing is really a nonissue for most home schoolers," he says. "They're getting a lot of it."
Socialization
John Taylor later found, using the Piers-Harris Children's Self-Concept Scale, "while half of the conventionally schooled children scored at or below the 50th percentile (in self-concept), only 10.3% of the home-schooling children did so."[38] He further stated that "the self-concept of home-schooling children is significantly higher statistically than that of children attending conventional school. This has implications in the areas of academic achievement and socialization which have been found to parallel self-concept. Regarding socialization, Taylor's results would mean that very few home-schooling children are socially deprived. He states that critics who speak out against homeschooling on the basis of social deprivation are actually addressing an area which favors homeschoolers.[38]
In 2003, the National Home Education Research Institute conducted a survey of 7,300 U.S. adults who had been homeschooled (5,000 for more than seven years). Their findings included:
Homeschool graduates are active and involved in their communities. 71% participate in an ongoing community service activity, like coaching a sports team, volunteering at a school, or working with a church or neighborhood association, compared with 37% of U.S. adults of similar ages from a traditional education background.
Homeschool graduates are more involved in civic affairs and vote in much higher percentages than their peers. 76% of those surveyed between the ages of 18 and 24 voted within the last five years, compared with only 29% of the corresponding U.S. populace. The numbers are even greater in older age groups, with voting levels not falling below 95%, compared with a high of 53% for the corresponding U.S. populace.
58.9% report that they are "very happy" with life, compared with 27.6% for the general U.S. population. 73.2% find life "exciting", compared with 47.3%.[39]
Criticism
People claim the studies that show that homeschooled students do better on standardized tests,[33][40] compare voluntary homeschool testing with mandatory public-school testing.
By contrast, SAT and ACT tests are self-selected by homeschooled and formally schooled students alike. Homeschoolers averaged higher scores on these college entrance tests in South Carolina.[41] Other scores (1999 data) showed mixed results, for example showing higher levels for homeschoolers in English (homeschooled 23.4 vs national average 20.5) and reading (homeschooled 24.4 vs national average 21.4) on the ACT, but mixed scores in math (homeschooled 20.4 vs national average 20.7 on the ACT as opposed homeschooled 535 vs national average 511 on the 1999 SAT math).[42]
Some advocates of homeschooling and educational choice counter with an input-output theory, pointing out that home educators expend only an average of $500$600 a year on each student, in comparison to $9,000-$10,000 for each public school student in the United States, which suggests home-educated students would be especially dominant on tests if afforded access to an equal commitment of tax-funded educational resources.[43]
Drawing from 15 independent testing services, the Progress Report 2009: Homeschool Academic Achievement and Demographics included 11,739 homeschooled students from all 50 states who took three well-known testsCalifornia Achievement Test, Iowa Tests of Basic Skills, and Stanford Achievement Test for the 200708 academic year. The Progress Report is the most comprehensive homeschool academic study ever completed.
The Results
Overall the study showed significant advances in homeschool academic achievement as well as revealing that issues such as student gender, parents education level, and family income had little bearing on the results of homeschooled students.
National Average Percentile Scores
Subtest Homeschool Public School
Reading 89 50
Language84 50
Math 84 50
Science 86 50
Social Studies 84 50
Core a 88 50
Composite b 86 50
a. Core is a combination of Reading, Language, and Math.
b. Composite is a combination of all subtests that the student took on the test.
There was little difference between the results of homeschooled boys and girls on core scores.
Boys87th percentile
Girls88th percentile
Household income had little impact on the results of homeschooled students.
$34,999 or less85th percentile
$35,000$49,99986th percentile
$50,000$69,99986th percentile
$70,000 or more89th percentile
The education level of the parents made a noticeable difference, but the homeschooled children of non-college educated parents still scored in the 83rd percentile, which is well above the national average.
Neither parent has a college degree83rd percentile
One parent has a college degree86th percentile
Both parents have a college degree90th percentile
Whether either parent was a certified teacher did not matter.
Certified (i.e., either parent ever certified)87th percentile
Not certified (i.e., neither parent ever certified)88th percentile
Parental spending on home education made little difference.
Spent $600 or more on the student89th percentile
Spent under $600 on the student86th percentile
The extent of government regulation on homeschoolers did not affect the results.
Low state regulation87th percentile
Medium state regulation88th percentile
High state regulation87th percentile
HSLDA defines the extent of government regulation this way:
States with low regulation: No state requirement for parents to initiate any contact or State requires parental notification only.
States with moderate regulation: State requires parents to send notification, test scores, and/or professional evaluation of student progress.
State with high regulation: State requires parents to send notification or achievement test scores and/or professional evaluation, plus other requirements (e.g. curriculum approval by the state, teacher qualification of parents, or home visits by state officials).
The question HSLDA regularly puts before state legislatures is, If government regulation does not improve the results of homeschoolers why is it necessary?
In short, the results found in the new study are consistent with 25 years of research, which show that as a group homeschoolers consistently perform above average academically. The Progress Report also shows that, even as the numbers and diversity of homeschoolers have grown tremendously over the past 10 years, homeschoolers have actually increased the already sizeable gap in academic achievement between themselves and their public school counterparts-moving from about 30 percentile points higher in the Rudner study (1998) to 37 percentile points higher in the Progress Report (2009).
As mentioned earlier, the achievement gaps that are well-documented in public school between boys and girls, parents with lower incomes, and parents with lower levels of education are not found among homeschoolers. While it is not possible to draw a definitive conclusion, it does appear from all the existing research that homeschooling equalizes every student upwards. Homeschoolers are actually achieving every day what the public schools claim are their goalsto narrow achievement gaps and to educate each child to a high level.
Of course, an education movement which consistently shows that children can be educated to a standard significantly above the average public school student at a fraction of the costthe average spent by participants in the Progress Report was about $500 per child per year as opposed to the public school average of nearly $10,000 per child per yearwill inevitably draw attention from the K-12 public education industry.
See the studies. Test scores, college attendance and graduation, community involvement all better among the homeschooled cohort. My daughter went to kindergarten this week. They are learning how to sound out letters. She reads small books, probably at a 1st or 2nd grade level. Because we actively taught her. Before 'school'. She's gonna be bored out of her mind academically. When someone needs to learn something important, or is struggling in a subject, individual tutoring is applied. Why? Because its more effective. So if a kid can progress at their rate, learn in a small group or individual format, advance as fast as they are able, they will learn faster than the preset grade advancement of public or private school.Whatever. I'm not from the US and in our constitution the state is required to give you nine years of education. For free, And by the way it's a pretty decent quality.
The rest of the education (through university) is free too, So here, the only reason you would be home schooled is if your parent were religious nuts.
So, please, educate me on why it makes sense to keep your children inside your house for whatever education you as parents deem fit to give them.
Long story, short. Nobody knows their kids better than a parent. The curriculum can be standard across the board. But, why should my kid sit and wait for your kid to learn what 2+2 is? Or if my kid is struggling why should the school day determine that there is not enough time for each kid to fully understand when he/she is having troubleWhatever. I'm not from the US and in our constitution the state is required to give you nine years of education. For free, And by the way it's a pretty decent quality.
The rest of the education (through university) is free too, So here, the only reason you would be home schooled is if your parent were religious nuts.
So, please, educate me on why it makes sense to keep your children inside your house for whatever education you as parents deem fit to give them.
We have three primary reasons that we decided to try it:Whatever. I'm not from the US and in our constitution the state is required to give you nine years of education. For free, And by the way it's a pretty decent quality.
The rest of the education (through university) is free too, So here, the only reason you would be home schooled is if your parent were religious nuts.
So, please, educate me on why it makes sense to keep your children inside your house for whatever education you as parents deem fit to give them.
so your public education system sucks? Do you have standards and consequences when not met?See the studies. Test scores, college attendance and graduation, community involvement all better among the homeschooled cohort. My daughter went to kindergarten this week. They are learning how to sound out letters. She reads small books, probably at a 1st or 2nd grade level. Because we actively taught her. Before 'school'. She's gonna be bored out of her mind academically.When someone needs to learn something important, or is struggling in a subject, individual tutoring is applied. Why? Because its more effective. So if a kid can progress at their rate, learn in a small group or individual format, advance as fast as they are able, they will learn faster than the preset grade advancement of public or private school.Whatever. I'm not from the US and in our constitution the state is required to give you nine years of education. For free, And by the way it's a pretty decent quality.
The rest of the education (through university) is free too, So here, the only reason you would be home schooled is if your parent were religious nuts.
So, please, educate me on why it makes sense to keep your children inside your house for whatever education you as parents deem fit to give them.
It doesn't suck, but many people think it could be better. It's very dependent on where you live. We live in an affluent area and our schools are very good. Yes, there are standards and consequences. But again, large format learning, for most subjects is far less effective and efficient.so your public education system sucks? Do you have standards and consequences when not met?See the studies. Test scores, college attendance and graduation, community involvement all better among the homeschooled cohort. My daughter went to kindergarten this week. They are learning how to sound out letters. She reads small books, probably at a 1st or 2nd grade level. Because we actively taught her. Before 'school'. She's gonna be bored out of her mind academically.When someone needs to learn something important, or is struggling in a subject, individual tutoring is applied. Why? Because its more effective. So if a kid can progress at their rate, learn in a small group or individual format, advance as fast as they are able, they will learn faster than the preset grade advancement of public or private school.Whatever. I'm not from the US and in our constitution the state is required to give you nine years of education. For free, And by the way it's a pretty decent quality.
The rest of the education (through university) is free too, So here, the only reason you would be home schooled is if your parent were religious nuts.
So, please, educate me on why it makes sense to keep your children inside your house for whatever education you as parents deem fit to give them.
Oof. That's the worst time.13-18 seem like good ages for home-schooling.no but my kids were for a time
I kind of agree with this.Oof. That's the worst time.13-18 seem like good ages for home-schooling.no but my kids were for a time
First of all it's not free, you're paying for it through your taxes. Just as I'm paying in NJ for the 3rd highest per student spending in the nation... $15,968 per kid per year. I have 3 kids, I spent about $1200 on curriculum this year. I don't know if my kids are going to be Rhodes scholars but they're all learning either on pace or at an advanced pace compared to their public school curriculum. We have weekly testing and grading and my kids are doing great so far. I don't anticipate them having any trouble going back to school in 9th grade. My daughter went to school last year after a year of home schooling and she ended up learning absolutely nothing in match we hadn't already covered the year before. I think it will be more work to keep up with the diversity and expertise of the education my kids can get in an above average high school, but until then I don't think there is anything form K-8 that my wife or I am not capable of teaching them as well or better than school. I don't have any experience yet at the high school level but the available material is excellent and I know a lot of really great kids doing fantastic in college who were home schooled their entire lives.Whatever. I'm not from the US and in our constitution the state is required to give you nine years of education. For free, And by the way it's a pretty decent quality.
The rest of the education (through university) is free too, So here, the only reason you would be home schooled is if your parent were religious nuts.
So, please, educate me on why it makes sense to keep your children inside your house for whatever education you as parents deem fit to give them.
They can around here to.Home schooled kids around here participate on the public school sports teams and in other public school activities.