What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

What does the confederate flag mean to you? (1 Viewer)

I'm done with this for a while. You kids play nice.
:lmao: at ACP defending the "Confederate Flag = Racism" side of the argument, when I know....I just know, just as sure as I am sitting here.....I know the guy in his avatar sleeps under a layer of blankets made of Confederate Flags.
It's more fun to not know this than to know it...but since you brought it up....the guy in my avatar burned to death outside the college basketball arena in Lexington, KY a couple years ago. :cry: I blame seperatist southerners, jews, blacks, and several other groups to be named later.
 
As an outsider but living in the southern US (you can't get more South then FL, right?), I feel somewhat bemused by those that fly the old confederate flag.

I am guessing that those that fly it think it is simply a symbol of being a Rebel. Logically though, by flying the flag are they not trying to make a statement that they agree with the values of the Confederate States which I assume includes slavery? I can see why the descendants of those slaves would find it offensive. How the descendants of the owners of those slaves fail to see that is a little mystifying to this Englishman.

I have no allegiance to any State other than the one I now call Home.

 
It is what it is said:
It is what it is said:
It is what it is said:
It is what it is said:
It is what it is said:
For those here defending or promoting the use of the Confederate flag, may I ask you a question or two?Would you call a black person a n#####?If you answer no to this question, would you please elaborate as to why you would not call a black person a n#####?
I don't fly the flag, but I will defend someone else's right to use the confederate flag without getting labeled a racist.No, I would not call a black person a n#####, because to call someone this name is to make an intentional negative inflamatory name.
Why is it inflammatory?
I see you decided to leave as opposed to answer...I will answer it for you then. It is inflammatory because it is offensive to black people...in the same way the Confederate flag is.
lol at you jumping the gun.
Not as much as I'm laughing at your ridiculous analogies and comparisons...
What's ridiculous?
I thought I was clear...your analogies and comparisons are ridiculous. Such as saying "a soldier in a bar slapping away a man offering to shake with his left hand" and "a black man calling another black man a n#####"Absolutely ludicrious comparisons and analogies...
I suppose you can think they are ridiculous if you like, but that doesn't change the fact that they are good analagies to someone flying the confederate flag.You can be insulted all you want, but that doesn't mean that someone insulted you intentionally. Whether it's someone flying the flag or someone taking insult to you offering your left hand in a handshake, the fact that you felt insulted doesn't mean that it was intentional.
 
As an outsider but living in the southern US (you can't get more South then FL, right?), I feel somewhat bemused by those that fly the old confederate flag.

I am guessing that those that fly it think it is simply a symbol of being a Rebel. Logically though, by flying the flag are they not trying to make a statement that they agree with the values of the Confederate States which I assume includes slavery? I can see why the descendants of those slaves would find it offensive. How the descendants of the owners of those slaves fail to see that is a little mystifying to this Englishman.

I have no allegiance to any State other than the one I now call Home.
Because so many of them refuse to admit that it had anything to do with slavery. I was touring the historic homes of Charleston, SC a few years back, and on a carriage ride the tour guide tried to explain that economics was the reason the war was fought, not slavery. I had to bite my Yankee tongue pretty hard not to comment on that one.
 
As an outsider but living in the southern US (you can't get more South then FL, right?), I feel somewhat bemused by those that fly the old confederate flag.

I am guessing that those that fly it think it is simply a symbol of being a Rebel. Logically though, by flying the flag are they not trying to make a statement that they agree with the values of the Confederate States which I assume includes slavery? I can see why the descendants of those slaves would find it offensive. How the descendants of the owners of those slaves fail to see that is a little mystifying to this Englishman.

I have no allegiance to any State other than the one I now call Home.
Because so many of them refuse to admit that it had anything to do with slavery. I was touring the historic homes of Charleston, SC a few years back, and on a carriage ride the tour guide tried to explain that economics was the reason the war was fought, not slavery. I had to bite my Yankee tongue pretty hard not to comment on that one.
Economics huh? I'm sure the fact that the South had slaves for a workforce had nothing to do with the economics of the situation :popcorn:
 
It is what it is said:
It is what it is said:
It is what it is said:
It is what it is said:
It is what it is said:
It is what it is said:
For those here defending or promoting the use of the Confederate flag, may I ask you a question or two?Would you call a black person a n#####?If you answer no to this question, would you please elaborate as to why you would not call a black person a n#####?
I don't fly the flag, but I will defend someone else's right to use the confederate flag without getting labeled a racist.No, I would not call a black person a n#####, because to call someone this name is to make an intentional negative inflamatory name.
Why is it inflammatory?
I see you decided to leave as opposed to answer...I will answer it for you then. It is inflammatory because it is offensive to black people...in the same way the Confederate flag is.
lol at you jumping the gun.
Not as much as I'm laughing at your ridiculous analogies and comparisons...
What's ridiculous?
I thought I was clear...your analogies and comparisons are ridiculous. Such as saying "a soldier in a bar slapping away a man offering to shake with his left hand" and "a black man calling another black man a n#####"Absolutely ludicrious comparisons and analogies...
I suppose you can think they are ridiculous if you like, but that doesn't change the fact that they are good analagies to someone flying the confederate flag.You can be insulted all you want, but that doesn't mean that someone insulted you intentionally. Whether it's someone flying the flag or someone taking insult to you offering your left hand in a handshake, the fact that you felt insulted doesn't mean that it was intentional.
The persons left handshake offer is in no way representative of his ancestors enslaving the other persons ancestors who is refusing the handshake...The left handshake offering is also in no way representative of a racist organization (KKK), who took and used the Confederate flag to represent it's organization, without any restraint at the time from the ruling white south...who lynched, burned at the cross and murdered various black peoples.
:wall: It boils down to one question: If the person flying the flag does not intend to cause insult to anyone, is he a racist? By your argument, yes, he is. By that logic, if someone.. anyone.. happens to be offended by me wearing my white sneakers on MLK Jr day, then I'm a racist. That just doesn't fly with me.Grow some thick skin already.
 
As an outsider but living in the southern US (you can't get more South then FL, right?), I feel somewhat bemused by those that fly the old confederate flag.I am guessing that those that fly it think it is simply a symbol of being a Rebel. Logically though, by flying the flag are they not trying to make a statement that they agree with the values of the Confederate States which I assume includes slavery? I can see why the descendants of those slaves would find it offensive. How the descendants of the owners of those slaves fail to see that is a little mystifying to this Englishman.I have no allegiance to any State other than the one I now call Home.
Steve,Florida is not culturally part of the "South". Florida is closer culturally to New York, Boston, or Havana. That's just the way it is. Florida was barely populated until the invention of air conditioning, and prior to that, Florida did not share the southern traditions of plantations or slavery (AFAIK). Of course, the further north you fo in FL, the more "Southern" the state becomes.
 
It is what it is said:
:wall: It boils down to one question: If the person flying the flag does not intend to cause insult to anyone, is he a racist? By your argument, yes, he is. By that logic, if someone.. anyone.. happens to be offended by me wearing my white sneakers on MLK Jr day, then I'm a racist. That just doesn't fly with me.Grow some thick skin already.
If a neighbor of yours, say an adult male, molests your child...your child reports this to the police and they arrest your neighbor...and this molesting neighbor of yours goes to trial and is somehow found not guilty.Then after the trial, your neighbor's roomate (another male child molestor) decides to stick the biggest NAMBLA sticker on their front door. Because he feels it's his right to do so to represent who they are (child molestors).Remember, the intent of the huge NAMBLA sticker is not to offend you, but just to represent who and what they are. And everytime you walk out your front door, you see this massive NAMBLA sticker reminding you of the pain and suffering your child went through.You are gonna honestly sit here and say you would have no problem with it because their intent is not to offend or insult anyone?
:lmao:
 
As an outsider but living in the southern US (you can't get more South then FL, right?), I feel somewhat bemused by those that fly the old confederate flag.

I am guessing that those that fly it think it is simply a symbol of being a Rebel. Logically though, by flying the flag are they not trying to make a statement that they agree with the values of the Confederate States which I assume includes slavery? I can see why the descendants of those slaves would find it offensive. How the descendants of the owners of those slaves fail to see that is a little mystifying to this Englishman.

I have no allegiance to any State other than the one I now call Home.
Because so many of them refuse to admit that it had anything to do with slavery. I was touring the historic homes of Charleston, SC a few years back, and on a carriage ride the tour guide tried to explain that economics was the reason the war was fought, not slavery. I had to bite my Yankee tongue pretty hard not to comment on that one.
For the 437th time, most Southerners (possibly as many as 95%) *DIDN'T* own slaves, so it's quite likely that their descendants comprise, oh I don't know, say 95% of those flying the flag. Besides, given that the slave owners were likely the movers and shakers of the communities (i.e. rich, educated, etc), it's also likely that they weren't on the front lines. So, if the non-slave-owners were doing the fighting, they must have had some other reason for fighting. Any ideas on those reasons, class? Beuler?
 
It is what it is said:
For those here defending or promoting the use of the Confederate flag, may I ask you a question or two?Would you call a black person a n#####?If you answer no to this question, would you please elaborate as to why you would not call a black person a n#####?
:thumbdown: I'm southern and I don't fly, wave, or wear the Confederate flag, but I am not against the flag being flown at Southern Institutions, and the like. I have the sense to know that the flag is a symbol of Southern heritage and pride. It's a shame that some southern backwoods heehaws have used it in a racist manner, tarnishing the the positive southern spirit that the flag respresents. It's also a shame some people only want to focus on the negative symbolism that some undesireable people stamped on the flag. It's as if they/you are unwilling to understand or accept the true southern heritage for which the flag stands. Most of the Confederate soldiers didn't even own slaves. There were also a lot of black Confederate soldiers, and the Confederacy was more integrated than the Union. When Lincoln issued the Emancipation Proclamation in 1863, all the slaves in the Confederate States were freed. The Federal Union didn't free all it's slaves until the 14th Amendment in 1868. Discussing the Confederate flag is always futile.
 
As an outsider but living in the southern US (you can't get more South then FL, right?), I feel somewhat bemused by those that fly the old confederate flag.

I am guessing that those that fly it think it is simply a symbol of being a Rebel. Logically though, by flying the flag are they not trying to make a statement that they agree with the values of the Confederate States which I assume includes slavery? I can see why the descendants of those slaves would find it offensive. How the descendants of the owners of those slaves fail to see that is a little mystifying to this Englishman.

I have no allegiance to any State other than the one I now call Home.
Because so many of them refuse to admit that it had anything to do with slavery. I was touring the historic homes of Charleston, SC a few years back, and on a carriage ride the tour guide tried to explain that economics was the reason the war was fought, not slavery. I had to bite my Yankee tongue pretty hard not to comment on that one.
For the 437th time, most Southerners (possibly as many as 95%) *DIDN'T* own slaves, so it's quite likely that their descendants comprise, oh I don't know, say 95% of those flying the flag. Besides, given that the slave owners were likely the movers and shakers of the communities (i.e. rich, educated, etc), it's also likely that they weren't on the front lines. So, if the non-slave-owners were doing the fighting, they must have had some other reason for fighting. Any ideas on those reasons, class? Beuler?
Yeah, states rights. They didn't want a federal government telling them how to run there state. Of course, the right in question was slavery, but that's beside the point, right?Oh, and I'd venture to guess 95% of the Yankees really didn't give a rat's butt about slavery either. I wonder why they fought. Economics?

 
When Lincoln issued the Emancipation Proclamation in 1863, all the slaves in the Confederate States were freed.
The EP didn't free anyone. Lincoln "freed the slaves" in Confederate territory, territory in which he had no authority. It would be like FDR freeing American POWs held in Germany or Japan, or GWB ordering that the recently-kidnapped contractors be freed, or the Governor of Montana freeing prisoners held in Texas prisons. The idea was to cause an uprising in the South.
 
It is what it is said:
It is what it is said:
It is what it is said:
For those here defending or promoting the use of the Confederate flag, may I ask you a question or two?Would you call a black person a n#####?If you answer no to this question, would you please elaborate as to why you would not call a black person a n#####?
I don't fly the flag, but I will defend someone else's right to use the confederate flag without getting labeled a racist.No, I would not call a black person a n#####, because to call someone this name is to make an intentional negative inflamatory name.
Why is it inflammatory?
I see you decided to leave as opposed to answer...I will answer it for you then. It is inflammatory because it is offensive to black people...in the same way the Confederate flag is.
Your ignorance in simplicity is offensive to me. Will you stop posting?
 
When Lincoln issued the Emancipation Proclamation in 1863, all the slaves in the Confederate States were freed.
The EP didn't free anyone. Lincoln "freed the slaves" in Confederate territory, territory in which he had no authority. It would be like FDR freeing American POWs held in Germany or Japan, or GWB ordering that the recently-kidnapped contractors be freed, or the Governor of Montana freeing prisoners held in Texas prisons. The idea was to cause an uprising in the South.
He was the President of the United States. He very much has authority over the 11 rebellious states.
 
It is what it is said:
It is what it is said:
For those here defending or promoting the use of the Confederate flag, may I ask you a question or two?

Would you call a black person a n#####?

If you answer no to this question, would you please elaborate as to why you would not call a black person a n#####?
:thumbdown: I'm southern and I don't fly, wave, or wear the Confederate flag, but I am not against the flag being flown at Southern Institutions, and the like. I have the sense to know that the flag is a symbol of Southern heritage and pride. It's a shame that some southern backwoods heehaws have used it in a racist manner, tarnishing the the positive southern spirit that the flag respresents. It's also a shame some people only want to focus on the negative symbolism that some undesireable people stamped on the flag. It's as if they/you are unwilling to understand or accept the true southern heritage for which the flag stands.

Most of the Confederate soldiers didn't even own slaves. There were also a lot of black Confederate soldiers, and the Confederacy was more integrated than the Union. When Lincoln issued the Emancipation Proclamation in 1863, all the slaves in the Confederate States were freed. The Federal Union didn't free all it's slaves until the 14th Amendment in 1868.

Discussing the Confederate flag is always futile.
Are you kidding me? You are actually gonna sit here and try to imply that these black confederate soldiers were soldiers of choice? Un-friggin-believable! What planet are you from?
I know my history, and where did I say anything about soldiers of choice? Although some of the black soldiers were free already, the ones who weren't, were offered freedom for themselves and their families if they served for the confederate army. they were also paid the same as the white soldiers. The Federal Union had black soldiers too. They put them in a seperate unit. I don't like your tone, and I don't like your analogies.

 
It is what it is said:
It is what it is said:
It is what it is said:
It is what it is said:
For those here defending or promoting the use of the Confederate flag, may I ask you a question or two?Would you call a black person a n#####?If you answer no to this question, would you please elaborate as to why you would not call a black person a n#####?
I don't fly the flag, but I will defend someone else's right to use the confederate flag without getting labeled a racist.No, I would not call a black person a n#####, because to call someone this name is to make an intentional negative inflamatory name.
Why is it inflammatory?
I see you decided to leave as opposed to answer...I will answer it for you then. It is inflammatory because it is offensive to black people...in the same way the Confederate flag is.
Your ignorance in simplicity is offensive to me. Will you stop posting?
I've already defeated this way of thinking once on this page...but I will do it once again for your benefit because you are so special.If you can prove "my offensive ignorance in simplicistic posts" are in any way representative of confederate flag flyers ancestors enslaving black persons ancestors...And if you can also prove "my offensive ignorance in simplicistic posts" are in any way representative of a racist organization (KKK), who took and used the Confederate flag to represent it's organization, without any restraint at the time from the ruling white south...who lynched, burned at the cross and murdered various black peoples...then I will stop posting.Otherwise save your typing fingers and brainpower for lesser arguments more suited to your thinking ability...as I find your lack of thought as equally as offensive as you find my "simplistic posts" :D
Yeah, you're a moron. :bye:
 
It is what it is said:
Virtually all blacks were forced to fight for the confederacy and many were threatened with death to their families if they did not fight...the obvious reason for the south have a more integrated army was due to this and the overwhelming black population that was already pointed out here and provided for you above (which you attempted to omit). You attempt to paint a picture of blacks wanting to fight for the south, when in fact, the opposite is true.

As far as you not liking my tone or analogies...too bad. The truth often hurts :pics:
Your truth hurts because it is inaccurate.In January 1865, Robert E. Lee gave his powerful support in a letter to Andrew Hunter of Virginia. Lee proposed that all slaves who were willing to enlist be freed and armed. Their families would also be freed.On February 18, 1865, the Confederate Congress finally authorized the enlistment of Southern slaves "to provide additional forces to repel invasion, maintain the rightful possession of the Confederate States, secure their independence and preserve their institutions." One instituion they would not be preserving was that of slavery. No matter which side won, slavery was now as good as dead. Surprisingly, the Southern army accepted black soldiers as equals. By order of March 23, 1865, the black Confederates were to "receive the same ration, clothing, and compensation as allowed other troops in the same branch of service."

After the war, the contributions of black soldiers to the Southern war effort were almost completely forgotten. In part, this was the result of the growing misconception that the Civil War had been fought solely to end slavery. The political and economic causes were virtually ignored, as was the question of the legality of secession. The memory of the martyred Abraham Lincoln left little place for the recognition of black men who had fought against his armies. However, one former slave who had been captured with his master spoke for them all. "I had as much right to fight for my native State as you had to fight for yours," he told a Union officer, "and a blame sight more right than your furriners, what's got no homes."

The Confederate veterans did not forget. In 1913, 50 years after the bloody Battle of Gettysburg, thousands of surviving members of the rival armies met once more at the little Pennsylvania town, this time in friendship. The commission in charge of housing had provided accommodations for the black Union veterans. However, they were completely surprised when black Confederates showed up as well. The unexpected black Southerners were given straw pallets in the main tent of the compound. White veterans from Tennessee soon learned of their old comrads' plight. The white Confederates led the black veterans to their own camp, assigned them one of their tents, and saw to their every need. In peace, as in war, all men were equal.

 
On The Rocks said:
arrow1 said:
Orange Crush said:
To me, the confederate flag represents an illogical reminescence to a bygone white aristocracy that was built upon the evil institution of slavery.And I'm a descendent of a confederate general who helped promote the "The South will rise again" message during the antebellum.
That's what I was going to say.............
by those standards the American flag is a racist symbol also.
:goodposting: Thats all Im going to say on this debate.
 
It is what it is said:
the dude that authored the NAMBLA hypothetical called the analogies of others "ridiculous". awesome. :lmao:
I'm glad you got my intentional humor in that one :D I thought it was a pretty funny response to the guy who was claiming that wearing his white shoes on Martin Luther King Day was racist and his many other laughable analogies...
Intentional my ###. You're just an idiot.
 
I am from Mi and now live in GA. The confederate flag is how southerners hold onto their racism by hiding behind heritage. THat it was added in 1956 to the GA flag as a dirrect show of disdain vs supreme court decisons and the civil rights movement. Most people who still display them I believe to be racists or closet racist.

 
CrossEyed said:
Just because some racists hijacked the confederate flag as their symbol of choice doesn't mean that everyone who flies that flag is a racist. Many in the south hold on to history and tradition and the confederate flag is a part of their history and tradition.
originaly a swastika meant something else too. Would you still fly it in the same manner?
 
Leroy Hoard said:
Does he also have a black lawn jockey?
one of my neighbors growing up could only find a wite lawn jockey and they painted it black until angrily confronted by one of out black neighbors. At the time i didn't understand, but i was like 6.
 
Rhino said:
Orange Crush said:
Rhino said:
Orange Crush said:
Actually I've probably thought too much about my family's history and what kinds of actions I must do to make up for the sins of my family name.
Why? Why should you feel guilty about something your great great grandfather did to someone else's great great grandfather? I'll wager you've never personally kept a slave. What sins do you have to atone for? This is a mentality that I'll never understand.
I've gone back and forth on this quite a bit. I didn't say that I had come to a definitive conclusion. Just that I had thought a lot about it. And the "too much" part means exactly that. I've thought about it more than it was probably worth. But doesn't one normally want to have pride in their family? I met one relative who changed the spelling of his last name to disassociate himself from our family history.
Rhino said:
Orange Crush said:
The south was racist. Those that dream about the past "greatness" of Southern history and tradition are reminiscing about a culture of racism.
That's a pretty broad brush you paint with. I don't think it's as black and white (pardon the metaphore) as you make it out to be - the world I live in is a little more grey
But some things are just so horrible and unjust that it is best to avoid the appearance of being associated with it, don't you think?
Personally, I think that's being a little drastic. If my last name was Lee because a was a decendent of General Robert Lee I wouldn't feel compelled to change. It's history - it's something that happened before my parents were even concieved. How could I possibly be held responsible for it? I just don't see it being that big of a stigma.I think it depends on how you associate yourself with them. You can do it in the way Mjolnirs does and participate in Civil War re-enactments with pride in your heritage and I think it's perfectly fine and respectable.

Or you can put the flag in the rear window of your pick'em'up truck and it just makes you an ignorant redneck.
what ifyour last name was hitler?
 
It is what it is said:
It is what it is said:
It is what it is said:
Virtually all blacks were forced to fight for the confederacy and many were threatened with death to their families if they did not fight...the obvious reason for the south have a more integrated army was due to this and the overwhelming black population that was already pointed out here and provided for you above (which you attempted to omit). You attempt to paint a picture of blacks wanting to fight for the south, when in fact, the opposite is true.

As far as you not liking my tone or analogies...too bad. The truth often hurts :pics:
Your truth hurts because it is inaccurate.In January 1865, Robert E. Lee gave his powerful support in a letter to Andrew Hunter of Virginia. Lee proposed that all slaves who were willing to enlist be freed and armed. Their families would also be freed.On February 18, 1865, the Confederate Congress finally authorized the enlistment of Southern slaves "to provide additional forces to repel invasion, maintain the rightful possession of the Confederate States, secure their independence and preserve their institutions." One instituion they would not be preserving was that of slavery. No matter which side won, slavery was now as good as dead. Surprisingly, the Southern army accepted black soldiers as equals. By order of March 23, 1865, the black Confederates were to "receive the same ration, clothing, and compensation as allowed other troops in the same branch of service."

After the war, the contributions of black soldiers to the Southern war effort were almost completely forgotten. In part, this was the result of the growing misconception that the Civil War had been fought solely to end slavery. The political and economic causes were virtually ignored, as was the question of the legality of secession. The memory of the martyred Abraham Lincoln left little place for the recognition of black men who had fought against his armies. However, one former slave who had been captured with his master spoke for them all. "I had as much right to fight for my native State as you had to fight for yours," he told a Union officer, "and a blame sight more right than your furriners, what's got no homes."

The Confederate veterans did not forget. In 1913, 50 years after the bloody Battle of Gettysburg, thousands of surviving members of the rival armies met once more at the little Pennsylvania town, this time in friendship. The commission in charge of housing had provided accommodations for the black Union veterans. However, they were completely surprised when black Confederates showed up as well. The unexpected black Southerners were given straw pallets in the main tent of the compound. White veterans from Tennessee soon learned of their old comrads' plight. The white Confederates led the black veterans to their own camp, assigned them one of their tents, and saw to their every need. In peace, as in war, all men were equal.
* One group of slaves upon hearing that they might be forced to fight for the South, devised the following strategy. Knowing that they would be segregated; if they were placed in front, when the Union troops approached they would turn and fire on the south; if they were placed in back, they would trap the South in crossfire.

* William F. Tillman, a Black steward on the Brig. S. J. Waring carrying a cargo valued at $100,000, led a revolt and regained control of the vessel which the Confederates had seized. With the help of a German and Canadian, he brought the ship to New York.

http://www.duboislc.org/BlackPerspective/B...ctivePart7.html
The South was using slave labor to build roads, forts, raise food, taking care of homes, etc. The North at first returned runaway slaves, but upon realizing the southern advantage of slave labor, came up with a doctrine of "contraband of war" relative to confiscated, captured and runaway slaves. Seeing that the North would not return runaways, the enslaved in mass would flee to the northern camps whenever and wherever the Union Army approached. This created what amounted to a workers "general strike."Thus, the Blacks entered the war as official Union troops. Although there was discrimination in pay, and while many regiments refused to receive the reduced rates, they continued to fight. For they knew that their freedom was at stake!

The logistics of the Black labor moving from south to north coupled with the zeal of the Black soldier fighting for freedom spelled doom for the South. The South considered using slaves as soldiers (in fact, a few slaves did fight, though mostly by force), but the consequence of such an endeavor would result in their freedom. And by just walking into northern camps volunteering their services they crippled the South by depriving them of that same service. The realization of losing the Blacks to the North weighed heavily on the South.

On January 31, 1865, the Thirteenth Amendment abolishing slavery was ratified. The Blacks were jubilant and this was reflected in their fighting spirit. The defeat of the South was inevitable. On April 9, 1865 at Appomattox, Virginia, Lee surrendered, officially ending the Civil War.

http://www.duboislc.org/BlackPerspective/B...ctivePart6.html

:popcorn:

This all comes directly from the black persons viewpoint...but I guess that isn't good enough for a good ole southern boy like yourself. :lmao:

Just as I stated, the black southern slaves were forced to fight as soldiers for the Confederacy...and they turned their backs on their ruthless southern slave masters at the first chance they got. Common sense should have told you this if nothing else.

Your welcome for the free history lesson slimey...
Should we deem all those who fly the American Stars and Stripes as racist too? After all, not only did the country officially endorse the institution of slavery for its first 100 years.....but it also turned a blind eye to Jim Crowe laws and segregation (all over the country) well into the 1960s.
 
It is what it is said:
This all comes directly from the black persons viewpoint...but I guess that isn't good enough for a good ole southern boy like yourself. :lmao: Just as I stated, the black southern slaves were forced to fight as soldiers for the Confederacy...and they turned their backs on their ruthless southern slave masters at the first chance they got. Common sense should have told you this if nothing else. Your welcome for the free history lesson slimey...
Your history lesson is inaccurate. Read some real history books, instead of trying to find views that fit your agenda. I've already submitted facts, and there are thousands more to back it up, but you are simply a waste of my time.Also I'm a woman, not a good ole southern boy. My interaction with you is over. :yucky:
 
I browsed over this thread and I think I understand what's going on, but I need something clarified. IIWIS is saying he thinks the confederate flag is offensive because it represents slavery, prosecution etc, and it represents that because the KKK put it as a patch on their sleeves. Is this correct?

Wouldn't the intellectual thing be to not lump ALL peopls in with the KKK and consider the source of who is flying the flag and why? This is very similar to saying all Muslims are radical because there is one group of misguided morons who do their work under the guise of Islam.

I can't believe people still think this way and I find that thought process very disturbing and dangerous as well as ignorant.

Just my :2cents:

 
It is what it is said:
For those here defending or promoting the use of the Confederate flag, may I ask you a question or two?Would you call a black person a n#####?If you answer no to this question, would you please elaborate as to why you would not call a black person a n#####?
:thumbdown: I'm southern and I don't fly, wave, or wear the Confederate flag, but I am not against the flag being flown at Southern Institutions, and the like. I have the sense to know that the flag is a symbol of Southern heritage and pride. It's a shame that some southern backwoods heehaws have used it in a racist manner, tarnishing the the positive southern spirit that the flag respresents. It's also a shame some people only want to focus on the negative symbolism that some undesireable people stamped on the flag. It's as if they/you are unwilling to understand or accept the true southern heritage for which the flag stands. Most of the Confederate soldiers didn't even own slaves. There were also a lot of black Confederate soldiers, and the Confederacy was more integrated than the Union. When Lincoln issued the Emancipation Proclamation in 1863, all the slaves in the Confederate States were freed. The Federal Union didn't free all it's slaves until the 14th Amendment in 1868. Discussing the Confederate flag is always futile.
You have got to be kidding me if you honestly believe that.
 
It is what it is said:
It is what it is said:
For those here defending or promoting the use of the Confederate flag, may I ask you a question or two?

Would you call a black person a n#####?

If you answer no to this question, would you please elaborate as to why you would not call a black person a n#####?
:thumbdown: I'm southern and I don't fly, wave, or wear the Confederate flag, but I am not against the flag being flown at Southern Institutions, and the like. I have the sense to know that the flag is a symbol of Southern heritage and pride. It's a shame that some southern backwoods heehaws have used it in a racist manner, tarnishing the the positive southern spirit that the flag respresents. It's also a shame some people only want to focus on the negative symbolism that some undesireable people stamped on the flag. It's as if they/you are unwilling to understand or accept the true southern heritage for which the flag stands.

Most of the Confederate soldiers didn't even own slaves. There were also a lot of black Confederate soldiers, and the Confederacy was more integrated than the Union. When Lincoln issued the Emancipation Proclamation in 1863, all the slaves in the Confederate States were freed. The Federal Union didn't free all it's slaves until the 14th Amendment in 1868.

Discussing the Confederate flag is always futile.
Are you kidding me? You are actually gonna sit here and try to imply that these black confederate soldiers were soldiers of choice? Un-friggin-believable! What planet are you from?

Here are some facts...

http://www.americanrevwar.homestead.com/fi...ar/slavery.html

By the mid-18th century, American slavery had acquired a number of distinctive features. More than 90 percent of American slaves lived in the South where conditions contrasted sharply with those to both the south and north. In Caribbean colonies, such as Jamaica and Saint-Domingue (present-day Haiti), blacks outnumbered whites by more than ten to one and slaves often lived on huge estates with hundreds of other slaves. In the Northern colonies, blacks were few and slaves were typically held in small groups of less than five. The South, by contrast, was neither overwhelmingly white nor overwhelmingly black: slaves formed a large minority of the population, and most slaves lived on small and medium-sized holdings containing between 5 and 50 slaves. Slaves in the North were typically held in small numbers, and most served as domestic servants. Only in New York did they form more than 10 percent of the population, and in the North as a whole less than 5 percent of the inhabitants were slaves. Slaves constituted about 40 percent of the population of the Southern colonies, with the highest concentration in South Carolina, where more than half the people were slaves.

The last third of the 18th century saw the first widespread questioning of slavery by white Americans. This questioning increased after the American Revolution (1775-1783), which sharply increased egalitarian thinking. The contradiction between the rhetoric of documents such as the Declaration of Independence and the reality of slavery was apparent. Many leaders of the new government, including George Washington and Thomas Jefferson, while slave holders, were profoundly troubled by slavery. Although leery of rash actions, they undertook a series of cautious acts that they thought would lead to gradual abolition of slavery.

These acts included measures in all states north of Delaware to abolish slavery. A few states did away with slavery immediately. More typical were gradual emancipation acts, such as that passed by Pennsylvania in 1780, whereby all children born to slaves in the future would be freed when they became 28 years old. Two significant measures dated from 1787. First, the Northwest Ordinance barred slavery from the Northwest Territory, an area that included much of what is now the upper Midwest. Second, a compromise reached at the Constitutional Convention allowed the Congress of the United States to outlaw the importation of slaves in 1808.

Meanwhile, a number of states passed acts making it easier for individuals to free their slaves.

Hundreds of slave owners, especially in the upper South, set some or all of their slaves free. In addition, tens of thousands of slaves acted on their own, taking advantage of wartime disruption to escape from their masters. As a result, the number of free blacks, which had been tiny before the Revolution, surged during the last quarter of the 18th century.

Nevertheless, the Revolutionary-era challenge to slavery was successful only in the North, where the investment in slaves was small. The antislavery movement never made much progress in Georgia and South Carolina, where planters imported tens of thousands of Africans to beat the cut-off of the slave trade in 1808. In the upper South, sentiment in favor of equality faded, along with revolutionary enthusiasm, in the 1790s and 1800s. The end of slave imports did not undermine slavery as it did elsewhere because the slave population in the United States was self-reproducing. The ultimate result of the first antislavery movement was to leave slavery a newly sectional institution, on the road to abolition throughout the North but largely intact in the South.
:goodposting:
 
It is what it is said:
For those here defending or promoting the use of the Confederate flag, may I ask you a question or two?Would you call a black person a n#####?If you answer no to this question, would you please elaborate as to why you would not call a black person a n#####?
:thumbdown: I'm southern and I don't fly, wave, or wear the Confederate flag, but I am not against the flag being flown at Southern Institutions, and the like. I have the sense to know that the flag is a symbol of Southern heritage and pride. It's a shame that some southern backwoods heehaws have used it in a racist manner, tarnishing the the positive southern spirit that the flag respresents. It's also a shame some people only want to focus on the negative symbolism that some undesireable people stamped on the flag. It's as if they/you are unwilling to understand or accept the true southern heritage for which the flag stands. Most of the Confederate soldiers didn't even own slaves. There were also a lot of black Confederate soldiers, and the Confederacy was more integrated than the Union. When Lincoln issued the Emancipation Proclamation in 1863, all the slaves in the Confederate States were freed. The Federal Union didn't free all it's slaves until the 14th Amendment in 1868. Discussing the Confederate flag is always futile.
You have got to be kidding me if you honestly believe that.
What is there not to believe? Everything the person wrote is factual.
 
It is what it is said:
If you know something that you are doing is extremely offensive to a particular race of people...and you continue to do it...what does that make you?
Of course, that reasoning never stopped you from posting here. :excited:
 
It is what it is said:
I personally find it very racially offensive that you would tell me to read some history books, as opposed to accepting the facts presented to you from black people, whose ancestors fought in the war and passed their knowledge down to them. Why are these black people's viewpoint unacceptable to you?
What a joke. There is nothing racially offensive on what she wrote. Everything she wrote is correct. You have totally dismissed the facts she has said, and she never said those black people's viewpoints were unacceptable. You like to distort things. My wife is mixed, and grew up in the South. I've been in the South for some time now. Her relatives own farmlands that their ancestors passed on to them, which was given to them by their owners. Some of her ancestors fought under that flag, and she and her relatives have no problem with it. I asked her what the flag means to her and she said, "Southern culture, State's Rights, and Freedom".
 
It is what it is said:
Should we deem all those who fly the American Stars and Stripes as racist too? After all, not only did the country officially endorse the institution of slavery for its first 100 years.....but it also turned a blind eye to Jim Crowe laws and segregation (all over the country) well into the 1960s.
The Stars and Stripes is the also same flag that is view upon by blacks as ultimately fighting to break these horrendous actions and laws...while the confederate flag represents to blacks those that attempted to continue them.
Continue them? Union Generals kept slaves for 5 years after the South freed them. The Union had Border States such as Maryland, Delaware, etc. still practicing slavery until the 14th Admendment put a stop to it.
 
It is what it is said:
If you know something that you are doing is extremely offensive to a particular race of people...and you continue to do it...what does that make you?
Jesse Jackson? Gangsta rappaz?
 
As an outsider but living in the southern US (you can't get more South then FL, right?), I feel somewhat bemused by those that fly the old confederate flag.

I am guessing that those that fly it think it is simply a symbol of being a Rebel. Logically though, by flying the flag are they not trying to make a statement that they agree with the values of the Confederate States which I assume includes slavery? I can see why the descendants of those slaves would find it offensive. How the descendants of the owners of those slaves fail to see that is a little mystifying to this Englishman.

I have no allegiance to any State other than the one I now call Home.
Because so many of them refuse to admit that it had anything to do with slavery. I was touring the historic homes of Charleston, SC a few years back, and on a carriage ride the tour guide tried to explain that economics was the reason the war was fought, not slavery. I had to bite my Yankee tongue pretty hard not to comment on that one.
For the 437th time, most Southerners (possibly as many as 95%) *DIDN'T* own slaves, so it's quite likely that their descendants comprise, oh I don't know, say 95% of those flying the flag. Besides, given that the slave owners were likely the movers and shakers of the communities (i.e. rich, educated, etc), it's also likely that they weren't on the front lines. So, if the non-slave-owners were doing the fighting, they must have had some other reason for fighting. Any ideas on those reasons, class? Beuler?
Yeah, states rights. They didn't want a federal government telling them how to run there state. Of course, the right in question was slavery, but that's beside the point, right?Oh, and I'd venture to guess 95% of the Yankees really didn't give a rat's butt about slavery either. I wonder why they fought. Economics?
Economics played a big part in the Civil War, as did slavery. Also the Southern states didn't want the federal gov't involved, but you have to remember that the Revolutionary War was not that long ago then. Democracy was still in it's infancy. The EP was not passed until the Union began to fear that England may back the Confederacy. Lincoln made it a war against slavery and kept pretty much any other country out of the war.ETA: you can't dispute the fact that there were other things in play other than slavery

 
Last edited by a moderator:
It is what it is said:
It is what it is said:
If you know something that you are doing is extremely offensive to a particular race of people...and you continue to do it...what does that make you?
Jesse Jackson? Gangsta rappaz?
I can see how what Jesse Jackson has done is remindfull to whites, in the same way the confederate flag is remindfull to blacks, of white people enslaving blacks, beating blacks, lynching blacks, burning blacks at the cross and murdering blacks. The similiarities between the two are simply uncanny. :rolleyes:
They're called African Americans, you ####### racist! :hot:
 
It is what it is said:
It is what it is said:
If you know something that you are doing is extremely offensive to a particular race of people...and you continue to do it...what does that make you?
Jesse Jackson? Gangsta rappaz?
I can see how what Jesse Jackson has done is remindfull to whites, in the same way the confederate flag is remindfull to blacks, of white people enslaving blacks, beating blacks, lynching blacks, burning blacks at the cross and murdering blacks. The similiarities between the two are simply uncanny. :rolleyes:
To Label is to Disabel
 
It is what it is said:
It is what it is said:
I personally find it very racially offensive that you would tell me to read some history books, as opposed to accepting the facts presented to you from black people, whose ancestors fought in the war and passed their knowledge down to them. Why are these black people's viewpoint unacceptable to you?
What a joke. There is nothing racially offensive on what she wrote. Everything she wrote is correct. You have totally dismissed the facts she has said, and she never said those black people's viewpoints were unacceptable. You like to distort things.
Your history lesson is inaccurate. Read some real history books, instead of trying to find views that fit your agenda
This above is exactly what she wrote in response to the links and facts I provided from the black persons viewpoint.
Some of what you wrote that you quoted has been found to be inaccurate and embellished. There are many documented accounts by blacks that tell a different tale. I'm not saying that all that was written is not correct, but a lot is inaccurate, or leaves out a big part that is different than what you quoted. As for her saying it is inaccurate, I have no idea where you get that black people's viewpoints are unacceptable to her. She never said that, or implied such. You sound like Jesse Jackson trying to play the race card.
 
It is what it is said:
It is what it is said:
It is what it is said:
If you know something that you are doing is extremely offensive to a particular race of people...and you continue to do it...what does that make you?
Jesse Jackson? Gangsta rappaz?
I can see how what Jesse Jackson has done is remindfull to whites, in the same way the confederate flag is remindfull to blacks, of white people enslaving blacks, beating blacks, lynching blacks, burning blacks at the cross and murdering blacks. The similiarities between the two are simply uncanny. :rolleyes:
They're called African Americans, you ####### racist! :hot:
Most of us refer to ourselves as blacks you dumb####...
Obviously you have no idea what you're talking about.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top