mambomambo
Footballguy
Have not had a chance to watch the game yet, but for those of you who have, was he double teamed? TJ had a good game...Was Palmer looking his way a lot??
Yea, I'm sure those six straight 1150+ yard seasons were just dumb luck.He sucks.HTH
3 games into this season he is pretty much not good.Yea, I'm sure those six straight 1150+ yard seasons were just dumb luck.He sucks.HTH
No one was good on that team until today. Housh finally broke out, Palmer still didn't have big numbers. The jury is still out on CJ.3 games into this season he is pretty much not good.Yea, I'm sure those six straight 1150+ yard seasons were just dumb luck.He sucks.HTH
i never saw him double teamed. i never saw him get more than a step on any CB at any point. i don't recall him ever being open, so he was blanketed on the few times that palmer threw it his way.obviously, i can't speak for the rest of the season, but for today, ocho was the 3rd best bengal WR on the field and it wasn't that close. housh was housh and chatman was electric at times.ocho was just a guy for today.Have not had a chance to watch the game yet, but for those of you who have, was he double teamed? TJ had a good game...Was Palmer looking his way a lot??
He'll kill your fantasy team. He puts up half of those 1150 yards in two games every season, every other week he puts up like 40 yards. HIGHLY overrated fantasy WR.Yea, I'm sure those six straight 1150+ yard seasons were just dumb luck.He sucks.HTH
:myth:He was extremely consistent during his first few seasons.He'll kill your fantasy team. He puts up half of those 1150 yards in two games every season, every other week he puts up like 40 yards. HIGHLY overrated fantasy WR.Yea, I'm sure those six straight 1150+ yard seasons were just dumb luck.He sucks.HTH
Too bad that was 2002. Most leagues I'm in, score 2008 games. So a 30 year old WRs "first few seasons" don't really help much.:myth:He was extremely consistent during his first few seasons.He'll kill your fantasy team. He puts up half of those 1150 yards in two games every season, every other week he puts up like 40 yards. HIGHLY overrated fantasy WR.Yea, I'm sure those six straight 1150+ yard seasons were just dumb luck.He sucks.HTH
I'm 3-0 in my 1999 league. Got Faulk and Warner in the first 2 rounds.Too bad that was 2002. Most leagues I'm in, score 2008 games. So a 30 year old WRs "first few seasons" don't really help much.:myth:He was extremely consistent during his first few seasons.He'll kill your fantasy team. He puts up half of those 1150 yards in two games every season, every other week he puts up like 40 yards. HIGHLY overrated fantasy WR.Yea, I'm sure those six straight 1150+ yard seasons were just dumb luck.He sucks.HTH
Var(Var(X))=BigwhereX=WR ProductionHTH.teamroc said:Too bad that was 2002. Most leagues I'm in, score 2008 games. So a 30 year old WRs "first few seasons" don't really help much.
I've owned him since his rookie year (in a non-PPR, that may make a difference). I've never been thrilled with his "consistency".EBF said::myth:He was extremely consistent during his first few seasons.tomarken said:He'll kill your fantasy team. He puts up half of those 1150 yards in two games every season, every other week he puts up like 40 yards. HIGHLY overrated fantasy WR.EBF said:Yea, I'm sure those six straight 1150+ yard seasons were just dumb luck.tomarken said:He sucks.HTH
The Cinny offense is beginning to get it together... Palmer is finding Housh & the slot guy. Ocho will get his soon, I'm playing him next week... so I bet he goes off.valhallan said:I thought he looked fine today. Just didn't get many targets.
So far, two posters have claimed that CJ was consistently double-teamed and one poster claims there were no double-teams.Can you guys get the story straight, or do I have to watch NFL replay to find out?CJ does have a bad shoulder which may hurt him some, but if you look at the games, the guy always is double teamed. Housh gets to run freely and Chad has coverage help all day long.The guy is clearly one of the best WR's in football and it is without debate among NFL members. if you are in a dynasty league get him while his value is low; in fact he is worthy in a redraft league as well if the price is right.
As a former owner, I know how you feel but I wouldnt say he sucks. I just wont ever own him again.tomarken said:He'll kill your fantasy team. He puts up half of those 1150 yards in two games every season, every other week he puts up like 40 yards. HIGHLY overrated fantasy WR.EBF said:Yea, I'm sure those six straight 1150+ yard seasons were just dumb luck.tomarken said:He sucks.HTH
this is correctI watched today's game and the glaring difference to me seemed to be the routes - CJ usually extends the field whereas Housh runs the shorter, simpler routes. Pretty much every look to CJ requires a deep, tough throw as required by the play's design. Palmer has no time and therefore cannot make these throws.
So far, two posters have claimed that CJ was consistently double-teamed and one poster claims there were no double-teams.Can you guys get the story straight, or do I have to watch NFL replay to find out?CJ does have a bad shoulder which may hurt him some, but if you look at the games, the guy always is double teamed. Housh gets to run freely and Chad has coverage help all day long.The guy is clearly one of the best WR's in football and it is without debate among NFL members. if you are in a dynasty league get him while his value is low; in fact he is worthy in a redraft league as well if the price is right.
Seriously, for once can we substitute reliable info for acrimony?So far, two posters have claimed that CJ was consistently double-teamed and one poster claims there were no double-teams.Can you guys get the story straight, or do I have to watch NFL replay to find out?CJ does have a bad shoulder which may hurt him some, but if you look at the games, the guy always is double teamed. Housh gets to run freely and Chad has coverage help all day long.The guy is clearly one of the best WR's in football and it is without debate among NFL members. if you are in a dynasty league get him while his value is low; in fact he is worthy in a redraft league as well if the price is right.
OK I will disagree with this, he is not even the best WR on his team. I do not associate CJ with clutch catches for clutch wins but massive stats in blow out games. If I were an NFL owner I would not even want him on my team.CJ does have a bad shoulder which may hurt him some, but if you look at the games, the guy always is double teamed. Housh gets to run freely and Chad has coverage help all day long.
The guy is clearly one of the best WR's in football and it is without debate among NFL members. if you are in a dynasty league get him while his value is low; in fact he is worthy in a redraft league as well if the price is right.
Let's look at the "inconsistent" Chad Johnson:2005I've owned him since his rookie year (in a non-PPR, that may make a difference). I've never been thrilled with his "consistency".
All true, and CJ could be a great buy low in dynasty leagues, but the fact is he hasn't been consistant. In years. Three years ago yes, but not since then has he been reliable as a weekly starter. Now if he's playing for a new team next year everything could change, but at this moment, would you feel comfortable with him as your #1 WR? He's been billed as a #1 for the last three years and while his overall numbers are very good, he disappears in many games.Let's look at the "inconsistent" Chad Johnson:2005I've owned him since his rookie year (in a non-PPR, that may make a difference). I've never been thrilled with his "consistency".
- Played in 16 games
- Had 50 or more receiving yards in 15 games
- Had 100+ yards and/or a TD catch in 8 games
- Had 5 or more catches in 12 games
2004
- Played in 16 games
- Had 50 or more receiving yards in 12 games
- Had 100+ yards and/or a TD catch in 7 games
- Had 5 or more catches in 12 games
2003
- Played in 16 games
- Had 50 or more receiving yards in 14 games
- Had 100+ yards and/or a TD catch in 9 games
- Had 5 or more catches in 10 games
So over a three year span:
- 85% chance of 50 yards or more
- 50% chance of 100+ yards and/or a TD
- 71% chance of 5 or more catches
His production has become more sporadic in recent years (probably due to Housh and Henry) and he's having a horrible 2008 season, but he's perfectly capable of being very consistent. He's going to be a huge value play this offseason if he continues to struggle and animosity towards him continues to grow. His shoulder will heal, he'll be traded to a new team, and he'll have a renaissance in 2009.
I think the entire Bengals offense is a mystery at this point. Would I feel comfortable with Chad as my WR1? Absolutely not. I have him in one PPR redraft league and I benched him this past week for Eddie Royal and Chris Johnson. At this point he's very low on the todem pole behind guys like Lee Evans and Derrick Mason. Hell, I might even play Vincent Jackson over him. He's garbage this year and I don't know if we can expect that to change. Sometimes the most reliable players in the league have a bad season. The important thing is to recognize that (despite what clueless internet pundits say), he's one of the most talented receivers in the league and talent doesn't disappear over night. I went out and bought Santana Moss in a bunch of my leagues this year because it became clear to me that the public had forgotten about his talent after a couple down years. They did the same thing with Randy Moss, Terry Glenn, and Joey Galloway. Right now they're doing it with Chad Johnson. He has a down year, it becomes fashionable to rip him, and suddenly everyone thinks he's garbage.In 2009 Chad Johnson will be 31 years old and healthy with a chip on his shoulder. He's actually a strong "buy" candidate in dynasty leagues now that the bottom has fallen out of his value. Barring complete psychological breakdown, he'll be back.All true, and CJ could be a great buy low in dynasty leagues, but the fact is he hasn't been consistant. In years. Three years ago yes, but not since then has he been reliable as a weekly starter. Now if he's playing for a new team next year everything could change, but at this moment, would you feel comfortable with him as your #1 WR? He's been billed as a #1 for the last three years and while his overall numbers are very good, he disappears in many games.
Good stuff here pulling these stats together, but is 50 yards really the low-end benchmark you want to be using for what was a mid/low end #1 fantasy WR to determine "consistency"? If my #1 gets 50 yds on the day I'm pretty pi**ed if it doesn't come with a TD. I'm just ballparking, but I would think % of 75+yds would be better. I'd like to see those numbers. (And I don't know, maybe CJ was extremely consistent at 75+ yds too).Let's look at the "inconsistent" Chad Johnson:2005I've owned him since his rookie year (in a non-PPR, that may make a difference). I've never been thrilled with his "consistency".
- Played in 16 games
- Had 50 or more receiving yards in 15 games
- Had 100+ yards and/or a TD catch in 8 games
- Had 5 or more catches in 12 games
2004
- Played in 16 games
- Had 50 or more receiving yards in 12 games
- Had 100+ yards and/or a TD catch in 7 games
- Had 5 or more catches in 12 games
2003
- Played in 16 games
- Had 50 or more receiving yards in 14 games
- Had 100+ yards and/or a TD catch in 9 games
- Had 5 or more catches in 10 games
So over a three year span:
- 85% chance of 50 yards or more
- 50% chance of 100+ yards and/or a TD
- 71% chance of 5 or more catches
His production has become more sporadic in recent years (probably due to Housh and Henry) and he's having a horrible 2008 season, but he's perfectly capable of being very consistent. He's going to be a huge value play this offseason if he continues to struggle and animosity towards him continues to grow. His shoulder will heal, he'll be traded to a new team, and he'll have a renaissance in 2009.
You should watch the game. When the Giants blitzed Chad is not double teamed (although sometimes he still was). I am not sure if people understand what a double team is? When you are at the goal line you will see two guys very close, but in most situations a double team is when coverage is shifted in the guys direction to stop him from going to a certain area. It is designed to take away certain plays (usually most plays). Even so there are different types of double team coverages.So far, two posters have claimed that CJ was consistently double-teamed and one poster claims there were no double-teams.Can you guys get the story straight, or do I have to watch NFL replay to find out?CJ does have a bad shoulder which may hurt him some, but if you look at the games, the guy always is double teamed. Housh gets to run freely and Chad has coverage help all day long.The guy is clearly one of the best WR's in football and it is without debate among NFL members. if you are in a dynasty league get him while his value is low; in fact he is worthy in a redraft league as well if the price is right.
You can deny it all you want, but the it is true. Not only can you tell this by the coverage defenses use on players (think about Housh running free with nobody on him while Chad is taking two guys deep all day long to open it up), but... This sounds bogus, but I will say it anyway...I am friends with a writer and he asked Bill Belichik who the best receiver in the league is and he (and another DC) said that "CJ is the best receiver in the league, if you leave him in single coverage he will absolutely destroy you." They didn't name anyone else... I will ask the writer if I can use his name just so you don't think I am making it up. If BB says it I believe he is at least a top 5.OK I will disagree with this, he is not even the best WR on his team. I do not associate CJ with clutch catches for clutch wins but massive stats in blow out games. If I were an NFL owner I would not even want him on my team.CJ does have a bad shoulder which may hurt him some, but if you look at the games, the guy always is double teamed. Housh gets to run freely and Chad has coverage help all day long.
The guy is clearly one of the best WR's in football and it is without debate among NFL members. if you are in a dynasty league get him while his value is low; in fact he is worthy in a redraft league as well if the price is right.
While Bill Belichick is the very personification of honesty and integrity, I'm going to need a little more...This sounds bogus, but I will say it anyway...I am friends with a writer and he asked Bill Belichik who the best receiver in the league is and he (and another DC) said that "CJ is the best receiver in the league, if you leave him in single coverage he will absolutely destroy you." They didn't name anyone else... I will ask the writer if I can use his name just so you don't think I am making it up. If BB says it I believe he is at least a top 5.
You set the bar far too low.85% chance of 50 yards? 50 yards is a sub-par game given where you have to draft him.He has a 50% chance of 100 + OR a TD?You gotta be kidding me.So over a three year span:- 85% chance of 50 yards or more- 50% chance of 100+ yards and/or a TD- 71% chance of 5 or more catches
Uhmmm.... because I was there?I find it difficult to tell who is able to get separation and who isn't on TV. This is because the camera follows the ball. During the routes, the screen is on the OL/QB. Once in the air, the TV follows the ball to the intended receiver. If the guy I'm following isn't the intended receiver or in the area, then I have no idea what kind of separation the guy is getting.How are you all able to take such strong stances when the coverage and/or receiver in question isn't in view of the camera?
Why is this a question? Are you asking me if you were there or not? How the hell would I know? I don't even know you.Uhmmm.... because I was there?I find it difficult to tell who is able to get separation and who isn't on TV. This is because the camera follows the ball. During the routes, the screen is on the OL/QB. Once in the air, the TV follows the ball to the intended receiver. If the guy I'm following isn't the intended receiver or in the area, then I have no idea what kind of separation the guy is getting.How are you all able to take such strong stances when the coverage and/or receiver in question isn't in view of the camera?
Since becoming a starter, in 0 PPR leagues Jonhson has scored 10 or more points 45 times in 99 games played.Random sampling of other WRs:Larry Fitzgerald 32 times in 63 games played.T.O. 55 times in 84 games since 2002.Burress 42 times in 93 games since 2002.You set the bar far too low.85% chance of 50 yards? 50 yards is a sub-par game given where you have to draft him.He has a 50% chance of 100 + OR a TD?You gotta be kidding me.So over a three year span:- 85% chance of 50 yards or more- 50% chance of 100+ yards and/or a TD- 71% chance of 5 or more catches
Touche`But I still think 50+ yards is meaningless.Since becoming a starter, in 0 PPR leagues Jonhson has scored 10 or more points 45 times in 99 games played.Random sampling of other WRs:Larry Fitzgerald 32 times in 63 games played.T.O. 55 times in 84 games since 2002.Burress 42 times in 93 games since 2002.You set the bar far too low.85% chance of 50 yards? 50 yards is a sub-par game given where you have to draft him.He has a 50% chance of 100 + OR a TD?You gotta be kidding me.So over a three year span:- 85% chance of 50 yards or more- 50% chance of 100+ yards and/or a TD- 71% chance of 5 or more catches
Exactly... which is why you shouldn't assume that I am talking about watching the game on TV. It is called "sarcasm". Hell... even the times that Chad was thrown to... you could see that he had someone right with him. His route running has gone SOUTH in a hurry. He used to be a great route runner... but he just doesn't put in the effort in it anymore. Either that, or the defenders simply know what he has, and are too prepared for everything that he does. In that case... his only chace is his deep routes, and Palmer doesn't have enough time to wait for a deep route to develope so far.Why is this a question? Are you asking me if you were there or not? How the hell would I know? I don't even know you.Uhmmm.... because I was there?I find it difficult to tell who is able to get separation and who isn't on TV. This is because the camera follows the ball. During the routes, the screen is on the OL/QB. Once in the air, the TV follows the ball to the intended receiver. If the guy I'm following isn't the intended receiver or in the area, then I have no idea what kind of separation the guy is getting.How are you all able to take such strong stances when the coverage and/or receiver in question isn't in view of the camera?
I'm starting him. I don't believe players are "due". He just has a great matchup.I'm going to start him this week. He's due. Sometimes fantasy football is all about the gut.
"He's due" is the only FF logic that gives "Take away the one long play..." a run for his money in ineptitude. I bet "all about the gut" is up there somewhere too.I'm going to start him this week. He's due. Sometimes fantasy football is all about the gut.