dboysrock94
Footballguy
Have teams just figured out how to take him away now. Only one decent game in the last 5
So are you saying his isn't "dominant"...hmmm?Good info on the ratio, but overall, people that really value Welker are PPR people, not TD leagues and every WR, even the dominant ones like Calvin, have stretches where they don't do what people think they will do. Welker has not caught a ton of balls the past few weeks; Calvin hasn't caught many TDs the past few weeks. It happens.His numbers going way down was very predictable. I called it in several threads. He is good, but not that good. That ridiculous shootout in Buffalo and the fluky 99-yard TD against Miami in Week 1 have inflated his overall numbers. Props to him for having those games, but I think we are seeing now, with teams going out of their way to shut him down, how good he really is. He is not some unstoppable force of nature (like Megatron) who can produce absurd numbers no matter what. True stud WRs score touchdowns, and Welker's touchdown to reception ratio is still very poor, even this year.
He's a WR, and virtually all WRs are inconsistent.It's extremely rare to have a guy like Calvin Johnson putting up 100+ and/or a TD (or multiple TDs) each week.It is much easier to scheme to take away a WR than a RB, as with double coverage you can prevent a WR from touching the ball. QBs and RBs are going to get their touches, it's just a matter of what they do with it. It's a lot easier to shut a guy down if you can prevent him from touching the ball.Have teams just figured out how to take him away now. Only one decent game in the last 5
That might be true, but probably not in the redzone. Gronkowski is literally uncoverable in the redzone.As others have said, Welker is getting the #1CB, some double coverage, and Brady seeing that is practically impossible to cover both Gronkowski and Hernandez.....one of them is going to have a mismatch that's easily exploitable. Why force it to Welker when Gronkowski is wide open like he was on that 52 yard TD last night. Not sure where the defense was on that play.Welker's numbers are skewed by two big games. No way he's in Calvin's league.....but going forward, still no reason to believe he can't have a consistent 6 rec, 75 yds every week, with a TD every other week. So he's still a very viable option in a PPR league.Defs will shift to Gronk, then shift back to Welker, back to Gronk, Welker....
That might be true, but probably not in the redzone. Gronkowski is literally uncoverable in the redzone.As others have said, Welker is getting the #1CB, some double coverage, and Brady seeing that is practically impossible to cover both Gronkowski and Hernandez.....one of them is going to have a mismatch that's easily exploitable. Why force it to Welker when Gronkowski is wide open like he was on that 52 yard TD last night. Not sure where the defense was on that play.Defs will shift to Gronk, then shift back to Welker, back to Gronk, Welker....
Welker's numbers are skewed by two big games. No way he's in Calvin's league.....but going forward, still no reason to believe he can't have a consistent 6 rec, 75 yds every week, with a TD every other week. So he's still a very viable option in a PPR league.
That old truism isn't so true this year. They're only giving up 3.9 recep, 38.1 yds & 0.4 TD per game to TEs.....good for 5th TOUGHEST D against TEs in PPR scoringEagles can't really cover the TE, and Samuel/Namdi will be all over Welker. I'd say more of Gronk, less of Welker again this week.
Call me a cherry picker but I refuse to count a couple of those weeks, right or wrong. Week 1 and Week 3(Before Ballard was a focal point) should be tossed right out the window. Scott Chandler is also a terrible barometer.Show me a team with a LEGIT threat at TE, and I'll show you a team who had success utilizing him against Philly.Tony G (7/83/2)Vernon Davis (4/48/1)Fred Davis (6/95)Witten ( 4/28 in a game they came out and said they would remove him)Even this past week Ballard found a plethora of opportunities, however he couldn't catch a cold. Gronk is the best TE in the league right now, and if they couldn't cover the Tony G, how are they going to cover a guy who is bigger and faster?That old truism isn't so true this year. They're only giving up 3.9 recep, 38.1 yds & 0.4 TD per game to TEs.....good for 5th TOUGHEST D against TEs in PPR scoringEagles can't really cover the TE, and Samuel/Namdi will be all over Welker. I'd say more of Gronk, less of Welker again this week.
This is clearly where Moss made a difference to this team when he was there.No double teams on Welker.That might be true, but probably not in the redzone. Gronkowski is literally uncoverable in the redzone.As others have said, Welker is getting the #1CB, some double coverage, and Brady seeing that is practically impossible to cover both Gronkowski and Hernandez.....one of them is going to have a mismatch that's easily exploitable. Why force it to Welker when Gronkowski is wide open like he was on that 52 yard TD last night. Not sure where the defense was on that play.Welker's numbers are skewed by two big games. No way he's in Calvin's league.....but going forward, still no reason to believe he can't have a consistent 6 rec, 75 yds every week, with a TD every other week. So he's still a very viable option in a PPR league.Defs will shift to Gronk, then shift back to Welker, back to Gronk, Welker....