17seconds
root of all aliai
I think it's the funniest chick movie ever made. It's a low bar, but stillBilly Bats said:Bridesmaids. (after hearing how funny it was, well I found it terribly unfunny)
I think it's the funniest chick movie ever made. It's a low bar, but stillBilly Bats said:Bridesmaids. (after hearing how funny it was, well I found it terribly unfunny)
The 4th Indiana Jones film definitely belongs in this conversation.Over The Top had to have been mentioned already, right?
The fourth Indiana Jones film is by far the most disappointing film I've ever seen. An absolutely huge waste of everyone's time.
Eyes Wide Shut is a steaming pile of drivel.
Even Spielberg seems to admit this was a disaster. He tip toes around all the issues with Lucas' script in a way which definitely seems to indicate he knew this wasn't going to work.The 4th Indiana Jones film definitely belongs in this conversation.Over The Top had to have been mentioned already, right?
The fourth Indiana Jones film is by far the most disappointing film I've ever seen. An absolutely huge waste of everyone's time.
Eyes Wide Shut is a steaming pile of drivel.
Yeah that was a big disappointment. Hartnett is terrible. On the plus side, I don't know if Hilary Swank has ever been hotter in a film. She outhotted Scarlett Johansson in my opinion and as my avatar will tell you that's not something I think happens all that often.The Black Dahlia from 06 with Josh Hartnett and Scarlett Johansson was probably the worst movie I've ever had hopes for and was disappointed the most. Directed by Brian DePalma.
yeah... um... you're now doing this wrong.This used to be my go-to for worst movie ever until I saw Donnie Darko and V for Vendetta.I take it nobody else saw Dungeons and Dragons (the movie)?
oh yeah- this one is an absolute clunker.The worst high budget movie ever made is Congo. Not close.
I don't like the movie or the director, but I appreciate both for what they do well (visuals, pretty much). I can forgive movies that look good or show some interesting craft.The Cook, His Wife, The Thief and Her Lover. If it's been mentioned before I don't apologize. It's worth repeating just how truly awful that thing was.
Now you're just trying too hard.This used to be my go-to for worst movie ever until I saw Donnie Darko and V for Vendetta.I take it nobody else saw Dungeons and Dragons (the movie)?
I'd like to highlight this post for a specific reason. It's one thing to have a baseless opinion but Flysack shares why, shows some appreciation for the film which I like(ToL) but wouldn't want to watch again and again, and overall I sort of agree with or understand where the POV is coming from.Tree of Life is an odd one.
I saw it in the theaters and afterward remember arguing vehemently with a friend about it. He loved it. But he's also a guy who loves odd avant garde attempts in writing and art, even if they miss the mark. And to me, this is the 20-30 minute opening section of Tree of Life: an attempt to do something that, in concept, is a nifty idea....that simply didn't translate onto the screen. It wanted to situate the Brad Pitt family drama within the macro context of the universe and time. Hence all the space shots, dinosaurs, etc. The idea is great. To show how something can be so full of meaning (the family drama) and yet utterly meaningless in the larger context of things. Only the film put you to sleep. It was boring. Beyond boring. It just kept trudging on and on and on. I nearly walked out of the theater.
Then the Brad Pitt family section starts, and I was astounded. It was fantastic. Incredibly well written, incredibly shot, incredibly acted. Tree of Life is like two different movies made by two different directors, one a crappy art school shmuck who does nothing but SUCK, and the other a crafty, pitch-perfect indie film director who makes masterpieces.
I can't dislike it. I'd even watch it again if it comes out on netflix. But I get why many hurl their hate at it.
It sorta reminds me of Franzen's The Corrections. People loved it. It won the national book award. Parts of it are indeed incredible writing. But other parts, specifically the Denise section, as just god awful. Such a bipolar work. Just like Tree of Life.
Agree and I like his analysis. But it is pretty clear from his analysis that it isn't even close to worst ever territory.I'd like to highlight this post for a specific reason. It's one thing to have a baseless opinion but Flysack shares why, shows some appreciation for the film which I like(ToL) but wouldn't want to watch again and again, and overall I sort of agree with or understand where the POV is coming from.Tree of Life is an odd one.
I saw it in the theaters and afterward remember arguing vehemently with a friend about it. He loved it. But he's also a guy who loves odd avant garde attempts in writing and art, even if they miss the mark. And to me, this is the 20-30 minute opening section of Tree of Life: an attempt to do something that, in concept, is a nifty idea....that simply didn't translate onto the screen. It wanted to situate the Brad Pitt family drama within the macro context of the universe and time. Hence all the space shots, dinosaurs, etc. The idea is great. To show how something can be so full of meaning (the family drama) and yet utterly meaningless in the larger context of things. Only the film put you to sleep. It was boring. Beyond boring. It just kept trudging on and on and on. I nearly walked out of the theater.
Then the Brad Pitt family section starts, and I was astounded. It was fantastic. Incredibly well written, incredibly shot, incredibly acted. Tree of Life is like two different movies made by two different directors, one a crappy art school shmuck who does nothing but SUCK, and the other a crafty, pitch-perfect indie film director who makes masterpieces.
I can't dislike it. I'd even watch it again if it comes out on netflix. But I get why many hurl their hate at it.
It sorta reminds me of Franzen's The Corrections. People loved it. It won the national book award. Parts of it are indeed incredible writing. But other parts, specifically the Denise section, as just god awful. Such a bipolar work. Just like Tree of Life.
Thanks
Godfather part 1 and 2dudeBarfly
I agree that it's kind of silly to put Barfly in here but the idea that it is anywhere in the same stratosphere as GF 1 & 2 is laughable.Godfather part 1 and 2dudeBarfly
Let's argue about it for few pages.I agree that it's kind of silly to put Barfly in here but the idea that it is anywhere in the same stratosphere as GF 1 & 2 is laughable.Godfather part 1 and 2dudeBarfly
Watch "House of Games" and tell you me you don't want to smack a child with a kitten flung by it's tail after about a half an hour of that constant repeat every last line nonsense that Mamet does.Bostonfred trying a little hard in here.
I agree that Donnie Darko is highly overrated but even with understanding the deep nuances, which I don't know and won't look into, it is still far above a worst ever level.
V for Vendetta is meh but, come on, worst ever is an incredibly low bar and V doesn't even come close.
Mamet gets a free pass from most people for Glengarry Glen Ross but to say that anything he touches approaches worst ever category is plain silly. My experience with him is Spanish Prisoner, Redbelt & Phil Spector and while they may not be spectacular, again, they don't even come close to worst ever territory.
Sorry you didn't enjoy them, I wasn't exactly a huge fan either (except for Glengarry Glen Ross which is phenomenal), but you need to re-calibrate your film appreciation meter.
No argument here.Barfly is a lot closer to GF than it is to Dungeons and Dragons, IMHO.
Watch Glengarry Glen Ross and think the opposite. So...?Watch "House of Games" and tell you me you don't want to smack a child with a kitten flung by it's tail after about a half an hour of that constant repeat every last line nonsense that Mamet does.Bostonfred trying a little hard in here.
I agree that Donnie Darko is highly overrated but even with understanding the deep nuances, which I don't know and won't look into, it is still far above a worst ever level.
V for Vendetta is meh but, come on, worst ever is an incredibly low bar and V doesn't even come close.
Mamet gets a free pass from most people for Glengarry Glen Ross but to say that anything he touches approaches worst ever category is plain silly. My experience with him is Spanish Prisoner, Redbelt & Phil Spector and while they may not be spectacular, again, they don't even come close to worst ever territory.
Sorry you didn't enjoy them, I wasn't exactly a huge fan either (except for Glengarry Glen Ross which is phenomenal), but you need to re-calibrate your film appreciation meter.
House of Games was the first Mamet I saw- didn't bother me at the time, even though I thought it was odd. I mentioned the writing to my brother and his wife (both actors, and both people who's opinion about such things I typically respect) and they both gushed about Mamet, so I gave him the benefit of the doubt. But with the first movie viewing out of the way, the repeat thing you mention makes his work pretty much unwatchable to me. So ####### annoying. But far- really far- from the worst movies I've ever seen.Watch "House of Games" and tell you me you don't want to smack a child with a kitten flung by it's tail after about a half an hour of that constant repeat every last line nonsense that Mamet does.Bostonfred trying a little hard in here.
I agree that Donnie Darko is highly overrated but even with understanding the deep nuances, which I don't know and won't look into, it is still far above a worst ever level.
V for Vendetta is meh but, come on, worst ever is an incredibly low bar and V doesn't even come close.
Mamet gets a free pass from most people for Glengarry Glen Ross but to say that anything he touches approaches worst ever category is plain silly. My experience with him is Spanish Prisoner, Redbelt & Phil Spector and while they may not be spectacular, again, they don't even come close to worst ever territory.
Sorry you didn't enjoy them, I wasn't exactly a huge fan either (except for Glengarry Glen Ross which is phenomenal), but you need to re-calibrate your film appreciation meter.
no. wrong- there's a couple of pages of argument to be had. ####### quitter.No argument here.Barfly is a lot closer to GF than it is to Dungeons and Dragons, IMHO.
It's like, "What were you expecting?"I think it's the funniest chick movie ever made. It's a low bar, but stillBilly Bats said:Bridesmaids. (after hearing how funny it was, well I found it terribly unfunny)
It's better than the 2005 version.Original Fantastic Four movie from 1994 (never released)
plays like a fan made film only worse
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ON57I0i3ryw
horrible.KarmaPolice said:Yeah, Batman and Robin is atrocious.
We had to rewind many times to just marvel at the lines coming out the mouth's of great comedians like Rock, Spade and James.
Insein said:I think the thread is on a tangent now. People are naming movies they don't like that are liked by the majority. This thread should be reserved for steaming piles of all kinds. Bonfire of the Vanities style bombs.
Need a new thread of unpopular movie opinions.
Except young hot Lea Thompson.I can't believe Howard the Duck isn't getting any play in this thread. I can't break down exactly how and why It's so godawful, since it was all I could do to make it through, but I didn't know then that it was a film adaptation of some comic. That knowledge would have lowered my expectations by a lot. Still, I think that stinker failed in every conceivable way.
at least the worst "golf movie" ever made.Caddyshack 2 is easily the winner. Can't believe that steaming pile only got one mention in here.
Michael is one of those movies I actually watch whenever I see it playing on TV. Although I must admit most of that desire is based on my attraction to Andie MacDowell. William Hurt was aweful in the movie though.Insein said:I think the thread is on a tangent now. People are naming movies they don't like that are liked by the majority. This thread should be reserved for steaming piles of all kinds. Bonfire of the Vanities style bombs.
Need a new thread of unpopular movie opinions.
Here are my worst selections.
Michael - John Travolta, Andie MacDowell, William Hurt. This is horrible. It actually finished at #1 at the box office in it's first week of release. I wonder if half of them even saw the ending.
Yor, the Hunter from the Future - I saw this at the theater, man was this horrible.