For the sake of discussion lets ASSUME he ends up being the Colts #1 WR next year---Do you like him over a DeAndre Hopkins even if they pick Teddy Bridgewater?
I wasnt sure if situation would over-rule some things or not for some people. If Rogers was the #1 in Indy would that be enough to look past Hopkins being a first round pick and a #2 WR?I personally think Da'Rick Rogers is as talented as Hopkins and as far as measurables go. Hopkins has elite ball skills and college production.
Rogers has a shorter leash being an undrafted FA.
I see that post as useful and I'm sure many others do too.Oh, that again. You do that a lot. Did it ever occur to you that some people would like to know where Rodgers was drafted? Mark, you really need to stop that cool story bro crap.Cool story.It was very hard turning down a 1st round rookie pick in HyperActive I for him at the beginning of the season, but I did. I drafted him at 2.05 in HA1 and that was my first pick of the draft. I have him in 8 of my 10 dynasty leagues.
This is how he was obtained in my leagues.
HyperActive 1 - I drafted him at 2.05
HyperActive 3 - 2.08 (I didn't draft him, another team did)
Fantasy Legends 1 - I drafted him at 2.06
Fantasy Legends 2 - I drafted him at 2.07
Fantasy Legends 3 - 2.11 (another team drafted him, I obtained via a trade)
Fantasy Legends 4 - I drafted him at 2.03
Hall of Fame Dynasty - I drafted him at 2.04
Ultimate Football Dynasty - I drafted him at 3.12
Build a Champion 2 - I picked him off the Waiver Wire in early Oct.
The difference is you have no idea why you are disagreeing.we can agree to disagree.He's played like 3 games dude...slot receivers can get deep occasionally as well . . . true #1 receivers get deep often and often command help over the top - don't think he's in that class . . .Twice now in 4 weeks, Rogers has toasted the LCB on a deep route, only to be grabbed onto and a penalty called. Both would have likely been deep TDs. 26 yards downfield the 1st time, 2nd time, same play, 5 yard holding penalty.duaneok66 said:I am referring to their play on the field . . . Gordon can separate vertically . . . Rogers is more of an intermediate guy . . .
He still needs route running experience and Reggie needs to come back as player/coach.
you're right.The difference is you have no idea why you are disagreeing.we can agree to disagree.He's played like 3 games dude...slot receivers can get deep occasionally as well . . . true #1 receivers get deep often and often command help over the top - don't think he's in that class . . .Twice now in 4 weeks, Rogers has toasted the LCB on a deep route, only to be grabbed onto and a penalty called. Both would have likely been deep TDs. 26 yards downfield the 1st time, 2nd time, same play, 5 yard holding penalty.duaneok66 said:I am referring to their play on the field . . . Gordon can separate vertically . . . Rogers is more of an intermediate guy . . .
He still needs route running experience and Reggie needs to come back as player/coach.
They said the same thing about Dez...and Patterson.Interesting from someone on twitter.
@ColtsAuth_Kyle: @Eross418 yes and no. Rogers isn't... well... smart. So reading coverages probably isn't ever going to be great.
or not....Interesting from someone on twitter.
@ColtsAuth_Kyle: @Eross418 yes and no. Rogers isn't... well... smart. So reading coverages probably isn't ever going to be great.
To play devils advocate that could be a big IF and his mental issues made him go undrafted.or not....Interesting from someone on twitter.
@ColtsAuth_Kyle: @Eross418 yes and no. Rogers isn't... well... smart. So reading coverages probably isn't ever going to be great.
From ESPN.COM
Thats a pretty impressive name to be compared to, no matter who you are.Hes the smartest football player Ive ever coached besides Cris Carter, Baggett said. Cris Carter was the smartest as far as studying and knowing game and understanding the game. If DaRick learns to study the game, hell be the smartest football player on the Colts.
the red flags for off the field stuff is what caused him to go undrafted. There are plenty of articles stating he is regarded as the #1 Wr in the 2013 class. He also was the only Wr to post top 5s in every drill at the combine that year.To play devils advocate that could be a big IF and his mental issues made him go undrafted.or not....Interesting from someone on twitter.
@ColtsAuth_Kyle: @Eross418 yes and no. Rogers isn't... well... smart. So reading coverages probably isn't ever going to be great.
From ESPN.COM
Thats a pretty impressive name to be compared to, no matter who you are.Hes the smartest football player Ive ever coached besides Cris Carter, Baggett said. Cris Carter was the smartest as far as studying and knowing game and understanding the game. If DaRick learns to study the game, hell be the smartest football player on the Colts.
Smarter than Andrew Luck?or not....Interesting from someone on twitter.
@ColtsAuth_Kyle: @Eross418 yes and no. Rogers isn't... well... smart. So reading coverages probably isn't ever going to be great.
From ESPN.COM
Thats a pretty impressive name to be compared to, no matter who you are.Hes the smartest football player Ive ever coached besides Cris Carter, Baggett said. Cris Carter was the smartest as far as studying and knowing game and understanding the game. If DaRick learns to study the game, hell be the smartest football player on the Colts.
I think he's a WR coach...or was at the time.Smarter than Andrew Luck?or not....Interesting from someone on twitter.
@ColtsAuth_Kyle: @Eross418 yes and no. Rogers isn't... well... smart. So reading coverages probably isn't ever going to be great.
From ESPN.COM
Thats a pretty impressive name to be compared to, no matter who you are.Hes the smartest football player Ive ever coached besides Cris Carter, Baggett said. Cris Carter was the smartest as far as studying and knowing game and understanding the game. If DaRick learns to study the game, hell be the smartest football player on the Colts.
Did you also take Stacy at 1.12 in this certain draft?Cool story Bro. My story is cool too. Grabbed him in the 1st Rd at #11 because he's the best WR in the class and by luck he now has the best QB throwing to him in the 2013 WR draft class. Referring to page 1, I was hoping Indy would draft him. This such a huge jackpot if he keeps his head on straight. I had to write his name in on the draft board. Love doing that. You get the 'huh'? 'who' and then the 'son of a #####, ####' down the road.Watch out for the "Cool Story Bro" post coming because you mentioned something about your specific team. Good for you man. I know the Rogers story hasn't been written yet, but if he can stay out of trouble, his on the field story might just be an exciting one. You certainly got him cheap.In early May of this year, Rogers was drafted at 4.06 of the rookie draft of our 12 team Dynasty league after he signed with the Bills. I was going to make him my final pick at 4.12 had he not been picked. As luck would have it, he was cut by his fantasy owner on September 3rd when our league had its cut down to 25. Beginning 9/19/13, I added and dropped him twice while he was just getting under way in Indy off and on the practice squad, being inactive and finally active. I added him as a free agent for nothing on 11/24/13 when he finally was activated. I am happy to have him.
I like seeing where others got him as well.It was very hard turning down a 1st round rookie pick in HyperActive I for him at the beginning of the season, but I did. I drafted him at 2.05 in HA1 and that was my first pick of the draft. I have him in 8 of my 10 dynasty leagues.
This is how he was obtained in my leagues.
HyperActive 1 - I drafted him at 2.05
HyperActive 3 - 2.08 (I didn't draft him, another team did)
Fantasy Legends 1 - I drafted him at 2.06
Fantasy Legends 2 - I drafted him at 2.07
Fantasy Legends 3 - 2.11 (another team drafted him, I obtained via a trade)
Fantasy Legends 4 - I drafted him at 2.03
Hall of Fame Dynasty - I drafted him at 2.04
Ultimate Football Dynasty - I drafted him at 3.12
Build a Champion 2 - I picked him off the Waiver Wire in early Oct.
Impressively lame comment. He's in there but Luck is locked on in Hilton.So evidently Rogers is too dumb to play in the hurry-up then, and that's been their main offense lately so that's why he's a non-factor.
wrongImpressively lame comment. He's in there but Luck is locked on in Hilton.So evidently Rogers is too dumb to play in the hurry-up then, and that's been their main offense lately so that's why he's a non-factor.
Which part? Rogers is in there AND Luck is locked in on Hilton.wrongImpressively lame comment. He's in there but Luck is locked on in Hilton.So evidently Rogers is too dumb to play in the hurry-up then, and that's been their main offense lately so that's why he's a non-factor.
They have been playing Hilton, Whalen and Brazil with Fleener for all but about 5-6 plays in first half.Which part? Rogers is in there AND Luck is locked in on Hilton.wrongImpressively lame comment. He's in there but Luck is locked on in Hilton.So evidently Rogers is too dumb to play in the hurry-up then, and that's been their main offense lately so that's why he's a non-factor.
You comment is lame regardless. He started the game and Luck threw zero passes to him week 17 as well. He played that week as much as any other WR. Ditto every week since. He may not be in there now but no matter, they obviously suck without him in there.They have been playing Hilton, Whalen and Brazil with Fleener for all but about 5-6 plays in first half.Which part? Rogers is in there AND Luck is locked in on Hilton.wrongImpressively lame comment. He's in there but Luck is locked on in Hilton.So evidently Rogers is too dumb to play in the hurry-up then, and that's been their main offense lately so that's why he's a non-factor.
From everything I've read then and since, Rogers was a total slacker in Buffalo. Wasn't learning the playbook, late to meetings, not staying late working on routes, etc. He likely would have failed in Buffalo. He needed to be cut to wake him up and get him to take it seriously. Not much the Bills could do about that.Can't believe buffalo cut this guy. :(
Where did you read that?......I never heard anything of that nature.From everything I've read then and since, Rogers was a total slacker in Buffalo. Wasn't learning the playbook, late to meetings, not staying late working on routes, etc. He likely would have failed in Buffalo. He needed to be cut to wake him up and get him to take it seriously. Not much the Bills could do about that.Can't believe buffalo cut this guy. :(
Da'Rick Rogers played on 28-of-67 (41.7 percent) snaps in Saturday's win over the Chiefs.
T.Y. Hilton led the way with 61 snaps, followed by Griff Whalen (54) and LaVon Brazill (49). Still, Rogers' usage in a playoff game is encouraging considering he was signed off the street by the Colts in September. With a full offseason to work in the program, he could easily pass up Brazill for No. 2 duties opposite Hilton.
Source: profootballfocus.com
Doug Marrone was hardly biting his tongue whenever he would talk about Rogers in the pre season. He quite clearly was hoping for better effort from him and he felt that Da'Rick just wasn't bringing it every time. If he's turned over a new leaf with regard to his approach then good for him. I genuinely hope that he ultimately makes it in the league.King of the Jungle said:Where did you read that?......I never heard anything of that nature.From everything I've read then and since, Rogers was a total slacker in Buffalo. Wasn't learning the playbook, late to meetings, not staying late working on routes, etc. He likely would have failed in Buffalo. He needed to be cut to wake him up and get him to take it seriously. Not much the Bills could do about that.Can't believe buffalo cut this guy. :(
Wayne drops to #3 or #4???Rotoworld:
Da'Rick Rogers played on 28-of-67 (41.7 percent) snaps in Saturday's win over the Chiefs.
T.Y. Hilton led the way with 61 snaps, followed by Griff Whalen (54) and LaVon Brazill (49). Still, Rogers' usage in a playoff game is encouraging considering he was signed off the street by the Colts in September. With a full offseason to work in the program, he could easily pass up Brazill for No. 2 duties opposite Hilton.
Source: profootballfocus.com
I could see Wayne in the slot with Rogers on the outside. Good for Wayne, not so much for Rogers. Hilton on the other side. Brazill and Whalen watching form the sidelines. Hilton has big play abilities but not size. Rogers has both. Hilton doesn't come down with that deep pass that Rogers caught. Brazill and Whalen are obviously inferior talents. Hopefully Wayne comes back for another season. Rogers could use that from a coaching perspective.Wayne is going to hit the wall at some point. Even if he comes back, it wouldn't surprise me a bit if there was a huge dropoff in production.
He is still a talent but his issue is his head. If he can keep his nose clean in the offseason and work hard he may take a step forward. I'm not that trusting of him, however.I liked brazil last year as a sleeper in dynasty. What is the opinion on him now?
I love Wayne, but let's be honest here - to paraphrase a famous Shaq quote, "36 ain't 26." Wayne will turn 36 next season.Wayne drops to #3 or #4???Rotoworld:
Da'Rick Rogers played on 28-of-67 (41.7 percent) snaps in Saturday's win over the Chiefs.
T.Y. Hilton led the way with 61 snaps, followed by Griff Whalen (54) and LaVon Brazill (49). Still, Rogers' usage in a playoff game is encouraging considering he was signed off the street by the Colts in September. With a full offseason to work in the program, he could easily pass up Brazill for No. 2 duties opposite Hilton.
Source: profootballfocus.com
That's why I can see him in the slot catching the chain moving passes.I certainly don't think Wayne would be a #1, but he'd be deadly in the slot and I could see him grabbing 70 passes. All of this, of course, if he's healthy.
He is always in top physical condition, so I have no worries there. He was having a very good season at 35, so again pending health, I think he can still be an integral part of the offense.