Another Vote for Columbus, not that it would ever happen....As to Ohio not needing another team, where do you think that ALL the teams came from, for the most part? There used to be 4 or 5 pro teams in Ohio...Columbus, OHNot because there is a need for another Ohio pro football team but rather so that I might listen to sports radio when I am here and not have to listen to 18 hours a day of OSU football. It is really annoying.Austin or San Antonio could probably have one but that would kill Jerruh and he would fight to his last breath to keep that from happening.

Not sure this would be able to work given the Sunday game schedule.Salt Lake City, UT
Let's try to leave logic and data out of this Perot. We want knee jerk emotional responses to these types of questions.Highest ranked DMA's without an NFL franchise: (Link)
Rank Designated Market Area (DMA) TV Households % of US
2 Los Angeles, CA 5,666,900 4.889
19 Orlando-Daytona Beach-Melbourne, FL 1,453,120 1.254
20 Sacramento-Stockton-Modesto, CA 1,409,400 1.216
22 Portland, OR 1,197,780 1.033
25 Raleigh-Durham (Fayetteville), NC 1,131,310 0.976
30 Hartford and New Haven, CT 1,018,770 0.879
32 Salt Lake City, UT 953,950 0.823
34 Columbus, OH 915,950 0.790
36 Greenville-Spartanburg, SC-Asheville, NC-Anderson,SC 878,550 0.758
37 San Antonio, TX 844,910 0.729
38 West Palm Beach-Ft. Pierce, FL 773,890 0.668
39 Harrisburg-Lancaster-Lebanon-York, PA 749,020 0.646
40 Birmingham (Anniston and Tuscaloosa), AL 747,190 0.645
41 Grand Rapids-Kalamazoo-Battle Creek, MI 740,230 0.639
42 Las Vegas, NV 718,030 0.620
43 Norfolk-Portsmouth-Newport News, VA 716,050 0.618
44 Austin, TX 707,430 0.610
45 Oklahoma City, OK 704,670 0.608
46 Albuquerque-Santa Fe, NM 703,720 0.607
47 Greensboro-High Point-Winston Salem, NC 699,040 0.603
48 Memphis, TN 693,860 0.599
50 Louisville, KY 674,940 0.582
Based on this, the only areas I would consider for expansion/relocation are Los Angeles and Portland. The other ones are either too small or too close geographically to existing teams (i.e. Orlando, Sacramento, etc).
Add the Richmond area to Norfolk (a little over an hour apart) and you get over 1.2 million, just above Portland.Highest ranked DMA's without an NFL franchise: (Link)
Rank Designated Market Area (DMA) TV Households % of US
2 Los Angeles, CA 5,666,900 4.889
19 Orlando-Daytona Beach-Melbourne, FL 1,453,120 1.254
20 Sacramento-Stockton-Modesto, CA 1,409,400 1.216
22 Portland, OR 1,197,780 1.033
25 Raleigh-Durham (Fayetteville), NC 1,131,310 0.976
30 Hartford and New Haven, CT 1,018,770 0.879
32 Salt Lake City, UT 953,950 0.823
34 Columbus, OH 915,950 0.790
36 Greenville-Spartanburg, SC-Asheville, NC-Anderson,SC 878,550 0.758
37 San Antonio, TX 844,910 0.729
38 West Palm Beach-Ft. Pierce, FL 773,890 0.668
39 Harrisburg-Lancaster-Lebanon-York, PA 749,020 0.646
40 Birmingham (Anniston and Tuscaloosa), AL 747,190 0.645
41 Grand Rapids-Kalamazoo-Battle Creek, MI 740,230 0.639
42 Las Vegas, NV 718,030 0.620
43 Norfolk-Portsmouth-Newport News, VA 716,050 0.618
44 Austin, TX 707,430 0.610
45 Oklahoma City, OK 704,670 0.608
46 Albuquerque-Santa Fe, NM 703,720 0.607
47 Greensboro-High Point-Winston Salem, NC 699,040 0.603
48 Memphis, TN 693,860 0.599
50 Louisville, KY 674,940 0.582
(For point of reference, Jax is 49, Buffalo is 51, New Orleans is 52, Green Bay is 71)
Based on this, the only areas I would consider for expansion/relocation are Los Angeles and Portland. The other ones are either too small or too close geographically to existing teams (i.e. Orlando, Sacramento, etc).
Toronto far bigger than any other city on this list outside of LA, with a CMA of 5,113,149.Highest ranked DMA's without an NFL franchise: (Link)
Rank Designated Market Area (DMA) TV Households % of US
2 Los Angeles, CA 5,666,900 4.889
19 Orlando-Daytona Beach-Melbourne, FL 1,453,120 1.254
20 Sacramento-Stockton-Modesto, CA 1,409,400 1.216
22 Portland, OR 1,197,780 1.033
25 Raleigh-Durham (Fayetteville), NC 1,131,310 0.976
30 Hartford and New Haven, CT 1,018,770 0.879
32 Salt Lake City, UT 953,950 0.823
34 Columbus, OH 915,950 0.790
36 Greenville-Spartanburg, SC-Asheville, NC-Anderson,SC 878,550 0.758
37 San Antonio, TX 844,910 0.729
38 West Palm Beach-Ft. Pierce, FL 773,890 0.668
39 Harrisburg-Lancaster-Lebanon-York, PA 749,020 0.646
40 Birmingham (Anniston and Tuscaloosa), AL 747,190 0.645
41 Grand Rapids-Kalamazoo-Battle Creek, MI 740,230 0.639
42 Las Vegas, NV 718,030 0.620
43 Norfolk-Portsmouth-Newport News, VA 716,050 0.618
44 Austin, TX 707,430 0.610
45 Oklahoma City, OK 704,670 0.608
46 Albuquerque-Santa Fe, NM 703,720 0.607
47 Greensboro-High Point-Winston Salem, NC 699,040 0.603
48 Memphis, TN 693,860 0.599
50 Louisville, KY 674,940 0.582
(For point of reference, Jax is 49, Buffalo is 51, New Orleans is 52, Green Bay is 71)
Based on this, the only areas I would consider for expansion/relocation are Los Angeles and Portland. The other ones are either too small or too close geographically to existing teams (i.e. Orlando, Sacramento, etc).
If players would be taxed at Canadian rates there is no way they get a team.Toronto far bigger than any other city on this list outside of LA, with a CMA of 5,113,149.Highest ranked DMA's without an NFL franchise: (Link)
Rank Designated Market Area (DMA) TV Households % of US
2 Los Angeles, CA 5,666,900 4.889
19 Orlando-Daytona Beach-Melbourne, FL 1,453,120 1.254
20 Sacramento-Stockton-Modesto, CA 1,409,400 1.216
22 Portland, OR 1,197,780 1.033
25 Raleigh-Durham (Fayetteville), NC 1,131,310 0.976
30 Hartford and New Haven, CT 1,018,770 0.879
32 Salt Lake City, UT 953,950 0.823
34 Columbus, OH 915,950 0.790
36 Greenville-Spartanburg, SC-Asheville, NC-Anderson,SC 878,550 0.758
37 San Antonio, TX 844,910 0.729
38 West Palm Beach-Ft. Pierce, FL 773,890 0.668
39 Harrisburg-Lancaster-Lebanon-York, PA 749,020 0.646
40 Birmingham (Anniston and Tuscaloosa), AL 747,190 0.645
41 Grand Rapids-Kalamazoo-Battle Creek, MI 740,230 0.639
42 Las Vegas, NV 718,030 0.620
43 Norfolk-Portsmouth-Newport News, VA 716,050 0.618
44 Austin, TX 707,430 0.610
45 Oklahoma City, OK 704,670 0.608
46 Albuquerque-Santa Fe, NM 703,720 0.607
47 Greensboro-High Point-Winston Salem, NC 699,040 0.603
48 Memphis, TN 693,860 0.599
50 Louisville, KY 674,940 0.582
(For point of reference, Jax is 49, Buffalo is 51, New Orleans is 52, Green Bay is 71)
Based on this, the only areas I would consider for expansion/relocation are Los Angeles and Portland. The other ones are either too small or too close geographically to existing teams (i.e. Orlando, Sacramento, etc).
If players would be taxed at Canadian rates there is no way they get a team.Toronto far bigger than any other city on this list outside of LA, with a CMA of 5,113,149.Highest ranked DMA's without an NFL franchise: (Link)
Rank Designated Market Area (DMA) TV Households % of US
2 Los Angeles, CA 5,666,900 4.889
19 Orlando-Daytona Beach-Melbourne, FL 1,453,120 1.254
20 Sacramento-Stockton-Modesto, CA 1,409,400 1.216
22 Portland, OR 1,197,780 1.033
25 Raleigh-Durham (Fayetteville), NC 1,131,310 0.976
30 Hartford and New Haven, CT 1,018,770 0.879
32 Salt Lake City, UT 953,950 0.823
34 Columbus, OH 915,950 0.790
36 Greenville-Spartanburg, SC-Asheville, NC-Anderson,SC 878,550 0.758
37 San Antonio, TX 844,910 0.729
38 West Palm Beach-Ft. Pierce, FL 773,890 0.668
39 Harrisburg-Lancaster-Lebanon-York, PA 749,020 0.646
40 Birmingham (Anniston and Tuscaloosa), AL 747,190 0.645
41 Grand Rapids-Kalamazoo-Battle Creek, MI 740,230 0.639
42 Las Vegas, NV 718,030 0.620
43 Norfolk-Portsmouth-Newport News, VA 716,050 0.618
44 Austin, TX 707,430 0.610
45 Oklahoma City, OK 704,670 0.608
46 Albuquerque-Santa Fe, NM 703,720 0.607
47 Greensboro-High Point-Winston Salem, NC 699,040 0.603
48 Memphis, TN 693,860 0.599
50 Louisville, KY 674,940 0.582
(For point of reference, Jax is 49, Buffalo is 51, New Orleans is 52, Green Bay is 71)
Based on this, the only areas I would consider for expansion/relocation are Los Angeles and Portland. The other ones are either too small or too close geographically to existing teams (i.e. Orlando, Sacramento, etc).
What does that have to do with anything? I'm not saying the team would do well (Win/loss-wise), but it would be a highly lucrative market. Just look at the Raptors - the team is downright terrible yet they are very successful financially.If wins and losses aren't important then maybe they could support a team.If players would be taxed at Canadian rates there is no way they get a team.Toronto far bigger than any other city on this list outside of LA, with a CMA of 5,113,149.Highest ranked DMA's without an NFL franchise: (Link)
Rank Designated Market Area (DMA) TV Households % of US
2 Los Angeles, CA 5,666,900 4.889
19 Orlando-Daytona Beach-Melbourne, FL 1,453,120 1.254
20 Sacramento-Stockton-Modesto, CA 1,409,400 1.216
22 Portland, OR 1,197,780 1.033
25 Raleigh-Durham (Fayetteville), NC 1,131,310 0.976
30 Hartford and New Haven, CT 1,018,770 0.879
32 Salt Lake City, UT 953,950 0.823
34 Columbus, OH 915,950 0.790
36 Greenville-Spartanburg, SC-Asheville, NC-Anderson,SC 878,550 0.758
37 San Antonio, TX 844,910 0.729
38 West Palm Beach-Ft. Pierce, FL 773,890 0.668
39 Harrisburg-Lancaster-Lebanon-York, PA 749,020 0.646
40 Birmingham (Anniston and Tuscaloosa), AL 747,190 0.645
41 Grand Rapids-Kalamazoo-Battle Creek, MI 740,230 0.639
42 Las Vegas, NV 718,030 0.620
43 Norfolk-Portsmouth-Newport News, VA 716,050 0.618
44 Austin, TX 707,430 0.610
45 Oklahoma City, OK 704,670 0.608
46 Albuquerque-Santa Fe, NM 703,720 0.607
47 Greensboro-High Point-Winston Salem, NC 699,040 0.603
48 Memphis, TN 693,860 0.599
50 Louisville, KY 674,940 0.582
(For point of reference, Jax is 49, Buffalo is 51, New Orleans is 52, Green Bay is 71)
Based on this, the only areas I would consider for expansion/relocation are Los Angeles and Portland. The other ones are either too small or too close geographically to existing teams (i.e. Orlando, Sacramento, etc).What does that have to do with anything? I'm not saying the team would do well (Win/loss-wise), but it would be a highly lucrative market. Just look at the Raptors - the team is downright terrible yet they are very successful financially.
Raps were 10th and 14th in attendance in the last 2 years despite missing the playoffs both years. Last year, outdrew the Heat, Suns, Magic, and Hawks.If wins and losses aren't important then maybe they could support a team.What does that have to do with anything? I'm not saying the team would do well (Win/loss-wise), but it would be a highly lucrative market. Just look at the Raptors - the team is downright terrible yet they are very successful financially.
i only see 1 . . .NY has 2 football teams
And you get two dumpy cities rather than one.Add the Richmond area to Norfolk (a little over an hour apart) and you get over 1.2 million, just above Portland.Highest ranked DMA's without an NFL franchise: (Link)
Rank Designated Market Area (DMA) TV Households % of US
2 Los Angeles, CA 5,666,900 4.889
19 Orlando-Daytona Beach-Melbourne, FL 1,453,120 1.254
20 Sacramento-Stockton-Modesto, CA 1,409,400 1.216
22 Portland, OR 1,197,780 1.033
25 Raleigh-Durham (Fayetteville), NC 1,131,310 0.976
30 Hartford and New Haven, CT 1,018,770 0.879
32 Salt Lake City, UT 953,950 0.823
34 Columbus, OH 915,950 0.790
36 Greenville-Spartanburg, SC-Asheville, NC-Anderson,SC 878,550 0.758
37 San Antonio, TX 844,910 0.729
38 West Palm Beach-Ft. Pierce, FL 773,890 0.668
39 Harrisburg-Lancaster-Lebanon-York, PA 749,020 0.646
40 Birmingham (Anniston and Tuscaloosa), AL 747,190 0.645
41 Grand Rapids-Kalamazoo-Battle Creek, MI 740,230 0.639
42 Las Vegas, NV 718,030 0.620
43 Norfolk-Portsmouth-Newport News, VA 716,050 0.618
44 Austin, TX 707,430 0.610
45 Oklahoma City, OK 704,670 0.608
46 Albuquerque-Santa Fe, NM 703,720 0.607
47 Greensboro-High Point-Winston Salem, NC 699,040 0.603
48 Memphis, TN 693,860 0.599
50 Louisville, KY 674,940 0.582
(For point of reference, Jax is 49, Buffalo is 51, New Orleans is 52, Green Bay is 71)
Based on this, the only areas I would consider for expansion/relocation are Los Angeles and Portland. The other ones are either too small or too close geographically to existing teams (i.e. Orlando, Sacramento, etc).
You might want to ask the Canadian NHL teams about how this affects them.If wins and losses aren't important then maybe they could support a team.What does that have to do with anything? I'm not saying the team would do well (Win/loss-wise), but it would be a highly lucrative market. Just look at the Raptors - the team is downright terrible yet they are very successful financially.
I think Chicago could easily support a 2nd NFL team. I'd actually kind of like having an AFC team in the area too.I would love to see a second team in Chicago. NY has 2 football teams, california has 3, texas has 2. The east coast in general is oversaturated already. I think Chicago could support two teams and they used to have the cardinals here a long time ago. I think it would improve the Bears as well as it would force the McCaskeys to be more competative. Wishful thinking.
What's an "NHL"?You might want to ask the Canadian NHL teams about how this affects them.If wins and losses aren't important then maybe they could support a team.What does that have to do with anything? I'm not saying the team would do well (Win/loss-wise), but it would be a highly lucrative market. Just look at the Raptors - the team is downright terrible yet they are very successful financially.
You're selling the idea to me.Omaha NE, for sure. Just look at their brand new UFL franchise, two consecutive packed house sellouts. Hell, thousands of people showed up to watch a UFL team practice. With a metro area of 750,000 and a relatively untapped market in Iowa nearby, an NFL franchise in Omaha would be financially viable. Plus you've got Warren Buffet in town as a likely investor.
More bonuses:
Hosts CWS every year, so they are prepared to host large sporting events.
Ranked 8th among top 50 largest cities in Fortune 500 companies and billionaires per capita (advertising and investment money)
Large international airport (cheap transportation costs)
Several highly regarded hospitals (hopefully never need them)
L.A. wants a team. They just don't want the City/County to pay for the stadium. If they could resolve the stadium issue, L.A.'s getting a team and the fans in L.A. will be ecstatic.Also, they're looking to put a stadium right by the Staples Center. The downtown area in L.A. is really growing and becoming a desirable place.NONE of the above
Really .....and STOP with the LALAland nonsense - they DON'T want a team, it wouldn't be in a desirable area, would create tremendous traffic problems no matter where it was located and the people (especially FF players) who would not attend don't want to lose the third TV game each week they are home.
It really should not be wishful thinking. My guess is that the 100k people on the Bears season ticket queue would welcome another franchise. May not make sense on paper, but I have little doubt that a sports toen like Chicago will have a hard time filling another 60k seats 8 times a year.I would love to see a second team in Chicago. NY has 2 football teams, california has 3, texas has 2. The east coast in general is oversaturated already. I think Chicago could support two teams and they used to have the cardinals here a long time ago. I think it would improve the Bears as well as it would force the McCaskeys to be more competative. Wishful thinking.