What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Which City Would You Like To See Get An NFL Team (1 Viewer)

Bad Mojo

Footballguy
Los Angeles, CA

San Antonio, TX

Memphis, TN

Austin, TX

Las Vegas, NV

Portland, OR

Oklahoma City, OK

Omaha, NE

Salt Lake City, UT

Louisville, KY

Honolulu, HI

Birmingham, AL

 
Outside of Los Angeles, Vegas is probably the only city that might be able to sustain an NFL franchise. Within 10 years you would start to hear rumors about all of the others leaving for Los Angeles.

 
Las Vegas makes the most sense. LA is too fair-weather and has never shown that it can keep a NFL franchise, so I don't trust that city.

All the other cities you suggested are too small and could become like Jacksonville in 10 years.

 
Columbus, OH

Not because there is a need for another Ohio pro football team but rather so that I might listen to sports radio when I am here and not have to listen to 18 hours a day of OSU football. It is really annoying.

Austin or San Antonio could probably have one but that would kill Jerruh and he would fight to his last breath to keep that from happening.

 
The San Antonio/Austin area has deserved one for a long time, they can thank Jerry Jones for #### blocking them all this time.

 
Columbus, OHNot because there is a need for another Ohio pro football team but rather so that I might listen to sports radio when I am here and not have to listen to 18 hours a day of OSU football. It is really annoying.Austin or San Antonio could probably have one but that would kill Jerruh and he would fight to his last breath to keep that from happening.
Another Vote for Columbus, not that it would ever happen....As to Ohio not needing another team, where do you think that ALL the teams came from, for the most part? There used to be 4 or 5 pro teams in Ohio... :goodposting:
 
Highest ranked DMA's without an NFL franchise: (Link)

Rank Designated Market Area (DMA) TV Households % of US

2 Los Angeles, CA 5,666,900 4.889

19 Orlando-Daytona Beach-Melbourne, FL 1,453,120 1.254

20 Sacramento-Stockton-Modesto, CA 1,409,400 1.216

22 Portland, OR 1,197,780 1.033

25 Raleigh-Durham (Fayetteville), NC 1,131,310 0.976

30 Hartford and New Haven, CT 1,018,770 0.879

32 Salt Lake City, UT 953,950 0.823

34 Columbus, OH 915,950 0.790

36 Greenville-Spartanburg, SC-Asheville, NC-Anderson,SC 878,550 0.758

37 San Antonio, TX 844,910 0.729

38 West Palm Beach-Ft. Pierce, FL 773,890 0.668

39 Harrisburg-Lancaster-Lebanon-York, PA 749,020 0.646

40 Birmingham (Anniston and Tuscaloosa), AL 747,190 0.645

41 Grand Rapids-Kalamazoo-Battle Creek, MI 740,230 0.639

42 Las Vegas, NV 718,030 0.620

43 Norfolk-Portsmouth-Newport News, VA 716,050 0.618

44 Austin, TX 707,430 0.610

45 Oklahoma City, OK 704,670 0.608

46 Albuquerque-Santa Fe, NM 703,720 0.607

47 Greensboro-High Point-Winston Salem, NC 699,040 0.603

48 Memphis, TN 693,860 0.599

50 Louisville, KY 674,940 0.582

(For point of reference, Jax is 49, Buffalo is 51, New Orleans is 52, Green Bay is 71)

Based on this, the only areas I would consider for expansion/relocation are Los Angeles and Portland. The other ones are either too small or too close geographically to existing teams (i.e. Orlando, Sacramento, etc).

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Highest ranked DMA's without an NFL franchise: (Link)

Rank Designated Market Area (DMA) TV Households % of US

2 Los Angeles, CA 5,666,900 4.889

19 Orlando-Daytona Beach-Melbourne, FL 1,453,120 1.254

20 Sacramento-Stockton-Modesto, CA 1,409,400 1.216

22 Portland, OR 1,197,780 1.033

25 Raleigh-Durham (Fayetteville), NC 1,131,310 0.976

30 Hartford and New Haven, CT 1,018,770 0.879

32 Salt Lake City, UT 953,950 0.823

34 Columbus, OH 915,950 0.790

36 Greenville-Spartanburg, SC-Asheville, NC-Anderson,SC 878,550 0.758

37 San Antonio, TX 844,910 0.729

38 West Palm Beach-Ft. Pierce, FL 773,890 0.668

39 Harrisburg-Lancaster-Lebanon-York, PA 749,020 0.646

40 Birmingham (Anniston and Tuscaloosa), AL 747,190 0.645

41 Grand Rapids-Kalamazoo-Battle Creek, MI 740,230 0.639

42 Las Vegas, NV 718,030 0.620

43 Norfolk-Portsmouth-Newport News, VA 716,050 0.618

44 Austin, TX 707,430 0.610

45 Oklahoma City, OK 704,670 0.608

46 Albuquerque-Santa Fe, NM 703,720 0.607

47 Greensboro-High Point-Winston Salem, NC 699,040 0.603

48 Memphis, TN 693,860 0.599

50 Louisville, KY 674,940 0.582

Based on this, the only areas I would consider for expansion/relocation are Los Angeles and Portland. The other ones are either too small or too close geographically to existing teams (i.e. Orlando, Sacramento, etc).
Let's try to leave logic and data out of this Perot. We want knee jerk emotional responses to these types of questions.
 
Highest ranked DMA's without an NFL franchise: (Link)

Rank Designated Market Area (DMA) TV Households % of US

2 Los Angeles, CA 5,666,900 4.889

19 Orlando-Daytona Beach-Melbourne, FL 1,453,120 1.254

20 Sacramento-Stockton-Modesto, CA 1,409,400 1.216

22 Portland, OR 1,197,780 1.033

25 Raleigh-Durham (Fayetteville), NC 1,131,310 0.976

30 Hartford and New Haven, CT 1,018,770 0.879

32 Salt Lake City, UT 953,950 0.823

34 Columbus, OH 915,950 0.790

36 Greenville-Spartanburg, SC-Asheville, NC-Anderson,SC 878,550 0.758

37 San Antonio, TX 844,910 0.729

38 West Palm Beach-Ft. Pierce, FL 773,890 0.668

39 Harrisburg-Lancaster-Lebanon-York, PA 749,020 0.646

40 Birmingham (Anniston and Tuscaloosa), AL 747,190 0.645

41 Grand Rapids-Kalamazoo-Battle Creek, MI 740,230 0.639

42 Las Vegas, NV 718,030 0.620

43 Norfolk-Portsmouth-Newport News, VA 716,050 0.618

44 Austin, TX 707,430 0.610

45 Oklahoma City, OK 704,670 0.608

46 Albuquerque-Santa Fe, NM 703,720 0.607

47 Greensboro-High Point-Winston Salem, NC 699,040 0.603

48 Memphis, TN 693,860 0.599

50 Louisville, KY 674,940 0.582

(For point of reference, Jax is 49, Buffalo is 51, New Orleans is 52, Green Bay is 71)

Based on this, the only areas I would consider for expansion/relocation are Los Angeles and Portland. The other ones are either too small or too close geographically to existing teams (i.e. Orlando, Sacramento, etc).
Add the Richmond area to Norfolk (a little over an hour apart) and you get over 1.2 million, just above Portland.
 
What is the maximum number of teams one State should be allowed? If LA got one that would be 4 in Cali. Should spread the NFL love to those less fortunate, imo

 
I'd like to see a team in LA. the problem is that the team wouldn't be in LA. they would put the team in Ontario, or Irvine, or some other place that's really 50+ miles away from LA.

 
Highest ranked DMA's without an NFL franchise: (Link)

Rank Designated Market Area (DMA) TV Households % of US

2 Los Angeles, CA 5,666,900 4.889

19 Orlando-Daytona Beach-Melbourne, FL 1,453,120 1.254

20 Sacramento-Stockton-Modesto, CA 1,409,400 1.216

22 Portland, OR 1,197,780 1.033

25 Raleigh-Durham (Fayetteville), NC 1,131,310 0.976

30 Hartford and New Haven, CT 1,018,770 0.879

32 Salt Lake City, UT 953,950 0.823

34 Columbus, OH 915,950 0.790

36 Greenville-Spartanburg, SC-Asheville, NC-Anderson,SC 878,550 0.758

37 San Antonio, TX 844,910 0.729

38 West Palm Beach-Ft. Pierce, FL 773,890 0.668

39 Harrisburg-Lancaster-Lebanon-York, PA 749,020 0.646

40 Birmingham (Anniston and Tuscaloosa), AL 747,190 0.645

41 Grand Rapids-Kalamazoo-Battle Creek, MI 740,230 0.639

42 Las Vegas, NV 718,030 0.620

43 Norfolk-Portsmouth-Newport News, VA 716,050 0.618

44 Austin, TX 707,430 0.610

45 Oklahoma City, OK 704,670 0.608

46 Albuquerque-Santa Fe, NM 703,720 0.607

47 Greensboro-High Point-Winston Salem, NC 699,040 0.603

48 Memphis, TN 693,860 0.599

50 Louisville, KY 674,940 0.582

(For point of reference, Jax is 49, Buffalo is 51, New Orleans is 52, Green Bay is 71)

Based on this, the only areas I would consider for expansion/relocation are Los Angeles and Portland. The other ones are either too small or too close geographically to existing teams (i.e. Orlando, Sacramento, etc).
Toronto far bigger than any other city on this list outside of LA, with a CMA of 5,113,149.
 
Highest ranked DMA's without an NFL franchise: (Link)

Rank Designated Market Area (DMA) TV Households % of US

2 Los Angeles, CA 5,666,900 4.889

19 Orlando-Daytona Beach-Melbourne, FL 1,453,120 1.254

20 Sacramento-Stockton-Modesto, CA 1,409,400 1.216

22 Portland, OR 1,197,780 1.033

25 Raleigh-Durham (Fayetteville), NC 1,131,310 0.976

30 Hartford and New Haven, CT 1,018,770 0.879

32 Salt Lake City, UT 953,950 0.823

34 Columbus, OH 915,950 0.790

36 Greenville-Spartanburg, SC-Asheville, NC-Anderson,SC 878,550 0.758

37 San Antonio, TX 844,910 0.729

38 West Palm Beach-Ft. Pierce, FL 773,890 0.668

39 Harrisburg-Lancaster-Lebanon-York, PA 749,020 0.646

40 Birmingham (Anniston and Tuscaloosa), AL 747,190 0.645

41 Grand Rapids-Kalamazoo-Battle Creek, MI 740,230 0.639

42 Las Vegas, NV 718,030 0.620

43 Norfolk-Portsmouth-Newport News, VA 716,050 0.618

44 Austin, TX 707,430 0.610

45 Oklahoma City, OK 704,670 0.608

46 Albuquerque-Santa Fe, NM 703,720 0.607

47 Greensboro-High Point-Winston Salem, NC 699,040 0.603

48 Memphis, TN 693,860 0.599

50 Louisville, KY 674,940 0.582

(For point of reference, Jax is 49, Buffalo is 51, New Orleans is 52, Green Bay is 71)

Based on this, the only areas I would consider for expansion/relocation are Los Angeles and Portland. The other ones are either too small or too close geographically to existing teams (i.e. Orlando, Sacramento, etc).
Toronto far bigger than any other city on this list outside of LA, with a CMA of 5,113,149.
If players would be taxed at Canadian rates there is no way they get a team.
 
Highest ranked DMA's without an NFL franchise: (Link)

Rank Designated Market Area (DMA) TV Households % of US

2 Los Angeles, CA 5,666,900 4.889

19 Orlando-Daytona Beach-Melbourne, FL 1,453,120 1.254

20 Sacramento-Stockton-Modesto, CA 1,409,400 1.216

22 Portland, OR 1,197,780 1.033

25 Raleigh-Durham (Fayetteville), NC 1,131,310 0.976

30 Hartford and New Haven, CT 1,018,770 0.879

32 Salt Lake City, UT 953,950 0.823

34 Columbus, OH 915,950 0.790

36 Greenville-Spartanburg, SC-Asheville, NC-Anderson,SC 878,550 0.758

37 San Antonio, TX 844,910 0.729

38 West Palm Beach-Ft. Pierce, FL 773,890 0.668

39 Harrisburg-Lancaster-Lebanon-York, PA 749,020 0.646

40 Birmingham (Anniston and Tuscaloosa), AL 747,190 0.645

41 Grand Rapids-Kalamazoo-Battle Creek, MI 740,230 0.639

42 Las Vegas, NV 718,030 0.620

43 Norfolk-Portsmouth-Newport News, VA 716,050 0.618

44 Austin, TX 707,430 0.610

45 Oklahoma City, OK 704,670 0.608

46 Albuquerque-Santa Fe, NM 703,720 0.607

47 Greensboro-High Point-Winston Salem, NC 699,040 0.603

48 Memphis, TN 693,860 0.599

50 Louisville, KY 674,940 0.582

(For point of reference, Jax is 49, Buffalo is 51, New Orleans is 52, Green Bay is 71)

Based on this, the only areas I would consider for expansion/relocation are Los Angeles and Portland. The other ones are either too small or too close geographically to existing teams (i.e. Orlando, Sacramento, etc).
Toronto far bigger than any other city on this list outside of LA, with a CMA of 5,113,149.
If players would be taxed at Canadian rates there is no way they get a team.
:unsure: What does that have to do with anything? I'm not saying the team would do well (Win/loss-wise), but it would be a highly lucrative market. Just look at the Raptors - the team is downright terrible yet they are very successful financially.

 
Highest ranked DMA's without an NFL franchise: (Link)

Rank Designated Market Area (DMA) TV Households % of US

2 Los Angeles, CA 5,666,900 4.889

19 Orlando-Daytona Beach-Melbourne, FL 1,453,120 1.254

20 Sacramento-Stockton-Modesto, CA 1,409,400 1.216

22 Portland, OR 1,197,780 1.033

25 Raleigh-Durham (Fayetteville), NC 1,131,310 0.976

30 Hartford and New Haven, CT 1,018,770 0.879

32 Salt Lake City, UT 953,950 0.823

34 Columbus, OH 915,950 0.790

36 Greenville-Spartanburg, SC-Asheville, NC-Anderson,SC 878,550 0.758

37 San Antonio, TX 844,910 0.729

38 West Palm Beach-Ft. Pierce, FL 773,890 0.668

39 Harrisburg-Lancaster-Lebanon-York, PA 749,020 0.646

40 Birmingham (Anniston and Tuscaloosa), AL 747,190 0.645

41 Grand Rapids-Kalamazoo-Battle Creek, MI 740,230 0.639

42 Las Vegas, NV 718,030 0.620

43 Norfolk-Portsmouth-Newport News, VA 716,050 0.618

44 Austin, TX 707,430 0.610

45 Oklahoma City, OK 704,670 0.608

46 Albuquerque-Santa Fe, NM 703,720 0.607

47 Greensboro-High Point-Winston Salem, NC 699,040 0.603

48 Memphis, TN 693,860 0.599

50 Louisville, KY 674,940 0.582

(For point of reference, Jax is 49, Buffalo is 51, New Orleans is 52, Green Bay is 71)

Based on this, the only areas I would consider for expansion/relocation are Los Angeles and Portland. The other ones are either too small or too close geographically to existing teams (i.e. Orlando, Sacramento, etc).
Toronto far bigger than any other city on this list outside of LA, with a CMA of 5,113,149.
If players would be taxed at Canadian rates there is no way they get a team.
:confused: What does that have to do with anything? I'm not saying the team would do well (Win/loss-wise), but it would be a highly lucrative market. Just look at the Raptors - the team is downright terrible yet they are very successful financially.
If wins and losses aren't important then maybe they could support a team.
 
I would love to see a second team in Chicago. NY has 2 football teams, california has 3, texas has 2. The east coast in general is oversaturated already. I think Chicago could support two teams and they used to have the cardinals here a long time ago. I think it would improve the Bears as well as it would force the McCaskeys to be more competative. Wishful thinking.

 
:lmao: What does that have to do with anything? I'm not saying the team would do well (Win/loss-wise), but it would be a highly lucrative market. Just look at the Raptors - the team is downright terrible yet they are very successful financially.
If wins and losses aren't important then maybe they could support a team.
Raps were 10th and 14th in attendance in the last 2 years despite missing the playoffs both years. Last year, outdrew the Heat, Suns, Magic, and Hawks.
 
NONE of the above

Really .....and STOP with the LALAland nonsense - they DON'T want a team, it wouldn't be in a desirable area, would create tremendous traffic problems no matter where it was located and the people (especially FF players) who would not attend don't want to lose the third TV game each week they are home.

 
San Antonio has been one of the fastest growing cities in the U.S. since 2000, and with the love people in Texas have for football I think the state could easily support a 3rd NFL team.

I wouldn't mind seeing L.V. or some other state get an NFL team that doesn't have one now though.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Highest ranked DMA's without an NFL franchise: (Link)

Rank Designated Market Area (DMA) TV Households % of US

2 Los Angeles, CA 5,666,900 4.889

19 Orlando-Daytona Beach-Melbourne, FL 1,453,120 1.254

20 Sacramento-Stockton-Modesto, CA 1,409,400 1.216

22 Portland, OR 1,197,780 1.033

25 Raleigh-Durham (Fayetteville), NC 1,131,310 0.976

30 Hartford and New Haven, CT 1,018,770 0.879

32 Salt Lake City, UT 953,950 0.823

34 Columbus, OH 915,950 0.790

36 Greenville-Spartanburg, SC-Asheville, NC-Anderson,SC 878,550 0.758

37 San Antonio, TX 844,910 0.729

38 West Palm Beach-Ft. Pierce, FL 773,890 0.668

39 Harrisburg-Lancaster-Lebanon-York, PA 749,020 0.646

40 Birmingham (Anniston and Tuscaloosa), AL 747,190 0.645

41 Grand Rapids-Kalamazoo-Battle Creek, MI 740,230 0.639

42 Las Vegas, NV 718,030 0.620

43 Norfolk-Portsmouth-Newport News, VA 716,050 0.618

44 Austin, TX 707,430 0.610

45 Oklahoma City, OK 704,670 0.608

46 Albuquerque-Santa Fe, NM 703,720 0.607

47 Greensboro-High Point-Winston Salem, NC 699,040 0.603

48 Memphis, TN 693,860 0.599

50 Louisville, KY 674,940 0.582

(For point of reference, Jax is 49, Buffalo is 51, New Orleans is 52, Green Bay is 71)

Based on this, the only areas I would consider for expansion/relocation are Los Angeles and Portland. The other ones are either too small or too close geographically to existing teams (i.e. Orlando, Sacramento, etc).
Add the Richmond area to Norfolk (a little over an hour apart) and you get over 1.2 million, just above Portland.
And you get two dumpy cities rather than one.
 
Omaha NE, for sure. Just look at their brand new UFL franchise, two consecutive packed house sellouts. Hell, thousands of people showed up to watch a UFL team practice. With a metro area of 750,000 and a relatively untapped market in Iowa nearby, an NFL franchise in Omaha would be financially viable. Plus you've got Warren Buffet in town as a likely investor.

More bonuses:

Hosts CWS every year, so they are prepared to host large sporting events.

Ranked 8th among top 50 largest cities in Fortune 500 companies and billionaires per capita (advertising and investment money)

Large international airport (cheap transportation costs)

Several highly regarded hospitals (hopefully never need them)

 
Last edited by a moderator:
43 Norfolk-Portsmouth-Newport News, VA 716,050 0.618

Plus Hampton, Suffolk, Virginia Beach, Chesapeake, all of which are continuous with Nofolk/Newport News. Add in Elizabeth City and Williamsburg within very easy driving range, and you have what is EASILY the biggest market in the country without a pro sports team of some kind.

Football probably wouldn't happen with the Skins', Panthers, and Ravens all within a three hour drive (and Snyder would easily block this as this is technically Skins' territory)....but this area could easily support a football team (or other pro franchise) if the various cities (which really are continuous with one another...much like LA or NYC burroughs) would work together to make it happen.

 
:goodposting: What does that have to do with anything? I'm not saying the team would do well (Win/loss-wise), but it would be a highly lucrative market. Just look at the Raptors - the team is downright terrible yet they are very successful financially.
If wins and losses aren't important then maybe they could support a team.
You might want to ask the Canadian NHL teams about how this affects them.
 
I would love to see a second team in Chicago. NY has 2 football teams, california has 3, texas has 2. The east coast in general is oversaturated already. I think Chicago could support two teams and they used to have the cardinals here a long time ago. I think it would improve the Bears as well as it would force the McCaskeys to be more competative. Wishful thinking.
I think Chicago could easily support a 2nd NFL team. I'd actually kind of like having an AFC team in the area too.
 
:goodposting: What does that have to do with anything? I'm not saying the team would do well (Win/loss-wise), but it would be a highly lucrative market. Just look at the Raptors - the team is downright terrible yet they are very successful financially.
If wins and losses aren't important then maybe they could support a team.
You might want to ask the Canadian NHL teams about how this affects them.
What's an "NHL"?
 
Omaha NE, for sure. Just look at their brand new UFL franchise, two consecutive packed house sellouts. Hell, thousands of people showed up to watch a UFL team practice. With a metro area of 750,000 and a relatively untapped market in Iowa nearby, an NFL franchise in Omaha would be financially viable. Plus you've got Warren Buffet in town as a likely investor.

More bonuses:

Hosts CWS every year, so they are prepared to host large sporting events.

Ranked 8th among top 50 largest cities in Fortune 500 companies and billionaires per capita (advertising and investment money)

Large international airport (cheap transportation costs)

Several highly regarded hospitals (hopefully never need them)
You're selling the idea to me.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
NONE of the above

Really .....and STOP with the LALAland nonsense - they DON'T want a team, it wouldn't be in a desirable area, would create tremendous traffic problems no matter where it was located and the people (especially FF players) who would not attend don't want to lose the third TV game each week they are home.
L.A. wants a team. They just don't want the City/County to pay for the stadium. If they could resolve the stadium issue, L.A.'s getting a team and the fans in L.A. will be ecstatic.Also, they're looking to put a stadium right by the Staples Center. The downtown area in L.A. is really growing and becoming a desirable place.

 
I would love to see a second team in Chicago. NY has 2 football teams, california has 3, texas has 2. The east coast in general is oversaturated already. I think Chicago could support two teams and they used to have the cardinals here a long time ago. I think it would improve the Bears as well as it would force the McCaskeys to be more competative. Wishful thinking.
It really should not be wishful thinking. My guess is that the 100k people on the Bears season ticket queue would welcome another franchise. May not make sense on paper, but I have little doubt that a sports toen like Chicago will have a hard time filling another 60k seats 8 times a year.
 
Las Vegas Gamblers. Only if they get a dome though. Too hot in the desert. If any city could support one, it would definately be Vegas. Surprising to see that Vegas still doesn't have a pro team in town from any of the top 4 sports. The casinos would load up on luxury boxes, they have tons of space to build a stadium, and the casinos could comp their high rollers. Sounds like a win win.

 
Virginia Beach 433,575

Norfolk 233,333

Chesapeake 222,455

Newport News 193,172

Hampton 144,236

Portsmouth 99,321.

Suffolk 83,659

That totals 1,409,751 people, not including the suburbs. Again, it’s important to note that without a river crossing, or a sign saying “welcome to city X”, you’d never know when you left any of these cities and entered its neighbor. Of course, most major cities are surrounded by suburbs which would effectively double their populations, but going by this total alone, Hampton Roads would be a top ten city by population....the nations biggest city nobody talks about.

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top