woah, woah, woah. no reason to attack SWCshiek what is going on my man you seem like you have become frustrated as of late and we are your friends here i bet that is you talked to us we could help you through whatever you gots that is going on if you know what i mean basically i am saying talk to me gooseman take that to the happy bank bromigoI assume this is a trick question and the answer is "Tanner"?![]()
It was just a joke. Tanner is one of my favorite posters, by far. It wasn't meant to be serious.
Hell, that's why you have insurance.You know what I hate. People that walk right out of a store and into the parking lot without looking for cars coming. And if they do see one coming still bolt into the road.
Yes you technically have the right of way bit I'm not jamming on my brakes because you think you don't need to wait.
Can't believe people are piling on the pedestrian and it's jut more "get off my lawn" from the most crochety group of men 35-55 ever.gianmarco said:No, the light is green for the traffic. The pedestrians are crossing to the right of the traffic. Cars that are going straight can go but cars turning right have to wait because the pedestrians have a walk signal. Problem is, as it's only 2 lanes going in that direction, if the car in front is waiting to turn right, that entire lane is stuck despite the light being green until the pedestrians clear the road. If they walk fast enough, there'd be plenty of time for more cars to turn.Doctor Detroit said:So the light is red in this scenario I'm guessing, but the cars are waiting to turn right?
person shouldn't be reading in the middle of the street.Can't believe people are piling on the pedestrian and it's jut more "get off my lawn" from the most crochety group of men 35-55 ever.gianmarco said:No, the light is green for the traffic. The pedestrians are crossing to the right of the traffic. Cars that are going straight can go but cars turning right have to wait because the pedestrians have a walk signal. Problem is, as it's only 2 lanes going in that direction, if the car in front is waiting to turn right, that entire lane is stuck despite the light being green until the pedestrians clear the road. If they walk fast enough, there'd be plenty of time for more cars to turn.Doctor Detroit said:So the light is red in this scenario I'm guessing, but the cars are waiting to turn right?
If you had just said it was one person walking slower and left out the texting, poll would be 80% against the car.
Doesn't matter what the person was doing or how slow they were walking. Pedestrians have right of way. Before you respond, imagine the what ifs:
- Person has a real but not outwardly visible handicap
- Person is reading that mom/dog/friend died
- etc
Can't believe people are piling on the pedestrian and it's jut more "get off my lawn" from the most crochety group of men 35-55 ever.gianmarco said:No, the light is green for the traffic. The pedestrians are crossing to the right of the traffic. Cars that are going straight can go but cars turning right have to wait because the pedestrians have a walk signal. Problem is, as it's only 2 lanes going in that direction, if the car in front is waiting to turn right, that entire lane is stuck despite the light being green until the pedestrians clear the road. If they walk fast enough, there'd be plenty of time for more cars to turn.Doctor Detroit said:So the light is red in this scenario I'm guessing, but the cars are waiting to turn right?
If you had just said it was one person walking slower and left out the texting, poll would be 80% against the car.
Doesn't matter what the person was doing or how slow they were walking. Pedestrians have right of way. Before you respond, imagine the what ifs:
- Person has a real but not outwardly visible handicap
- Person is reading that mom/dog/friend died
- etc
Person reading that mom/dog/friend died in the crosswalk while reading their phone.Can't believe people are piling on the pedestrian and it's jut more "get off my lawn" from the most crochety group of men 35-55 ever.gianmarco said:No, the light is green for the traffic. The pedestrians are crossing to the right of the traffic. Cars that are going straight can go but cars turning right have to wait because the pedestrians have a walk signal. Problem is, as it's only 2 lanes going in that direction, if the car in front is waiting to turn right, that entire lane is stuck despite the light being green until the pedestrians clear the road. If they walk fast enough, there'd be plenty of time for more cars to turn.Doctor Detroit said:So the light is red in this scenario I'm guessing, but the cars are waiting to turn right?
If you had just said it was one person walking slower and left out the texting, poll would be 80% against the car.
Doesn't matter what the person was doing or how slow they were walking. Pedestrians have right of way. Before you respond, imagine the what ifs:
- Person has a real but not outwardly visible handicap
- Person is reading that mom/dog/friend died
- etc
Cool. I have another one for my list. Good timing Cliff.Can't believe people are piling on the pedestrian and it's jut more "get off my lawn" from the most crochety group of men 35-55 ever.gianmarco said:No, the light is green for the traffic. The pedestrians are crossing to the right of the traffic. Cars that are going straight can go but cars turning right have to wait because the pedestrians have a walk signal. Problem is, as it's only 2 lanes going in that direction, if the car in front is waiting to turn right, that entire lane is stuck despite the light being green until the pedestrians clear the road. If they walk fast enough, there'd be plenty of time for more cars to turn.Doctor Detroit said:So the light is red in this scenario I'm guessing, but the cars are waiting to turn right?
If you had just said it was one person walking slower and left out the texting, poll would be 80% against the car.
Doesn't matter what the person was doing or how slow they were walking. Pedestrians have right of way. Before you respond, imagine the what ifs:
- Person has a real but not outwardly visible handicap
- Person is reading that mom/dog/friend died
- etc
Get the #### off my lawn. People like you with no consideration for others are destroying this society.Can't believe people are piling on the pedestrian and it's jut more "get off my lawn" from the most crochety group of men 35-55 ever.gianmarco said:No, the light is green for the traffic. The pedestrians are crossing to the right of the traffic. Cars that are going straight can go but cars turning right have to wait because the pedestrians have a walk signal. Problem is, as it's only 2 lanes going in that direction, if the car in front is waiting to turn right, that entire lane is stuck despite the light being green until the pedestrians clear the road. If they walk fast enough, there'd be plenty of time for more cars to turn.Doctor Detroit said:So the light is red in this scenario I'm guessing, but the cars are waiting to turn right?
If you had just said it was one person walking slower and left out the texting, poll would be 80% against the car.
Doesn't matter what the person was doing or how slow they were walking. Pedestrians have right of way. Before you respond, imagine the what ifs:
- Person has a real but not outwardly visible handicap
- Person is reading that mom/dog/friend died
- etc
Fairly important detail.Can't believe people are piling on the pedestrian and it's jut more "get off my lawn" from the most crochety group of men 35-55 ever.gianmarco said:No, the light is green for the traffic. The pedestrians are crossing to the right of the traffic. Cars that are going straight can go but cars turning right have to wait because the pedestrians have a walk signal. Problem is, as it's only 2 lanes going in that direction, if the car in front is waiting to turn right, that entire lane is stuck despite the light being green until the pedestrians clear the road. If they walk fast enough, there'd be plenty of time for more cars to turn.Doctor Detroit said:So the light is red in this scenario I'm guessing, but the cars are waiting to turn right?
If you had just said it was one person walking slower and left out the texting, poll would be 80% against the car.
Doesn't matter what the person was doing or how slow they were walking. Pedestrians have right of way. Before you respond, imagine the what ifs:
- Person has a real but not outwardly visible handicap
- Person is reading that mom/dog/friend died
- etc
Exactly.Fairly important detail.Can't believe people are piling on the pedestrian and it's jut more "get off my lawn" from the most crochety group of men 35-55 ever.gianmarco said:No, the light is green for the traffic. The pedestrians are crossing to the right of the traffic. Cars that are going straight can go but cars turning right have to wait because the pedestrians have a walk signal. Problem is, as it's only 2 lanes going in that direction, if the car in front is waiting to turn right, that entire lane is stuck despite the light being green until the pedestrians clear the road. If they walk fast enough, there'd be plenty of time for more cars to turn.Doctor Detroit said:So the light is red in this scenario I'm guessing, but the cars are waiting to turn right?
If you had just said it was one person walking slower and left out the texting, poll would be 80% against the car.
Doesn't matter what the person was doing or how slow they were walking. Pedestrians have right of way. Before you respond, imagine the what ifs:
- Person has a real but not outwardly visible handicap
- Person is reading that mom/dog/friend died
- etc
To be fair, there is no way to know for sure he was texting. Pedestrian could have been submitting a waiver claim for C. Michael.Anybody who is texting when they should be doing something else is a taint sore.
Get the #### off my lawn. People like you with no consideration for others are destroying this society.Can't believe people are piling on the pedestrian and it's jut more "get off my lawn" from the most crochety group of men 35-55 ever.No, the light is green for the traffic. The pedestrians are crossing to the right of the traffic. Cars that are going straight can go but cars turning right have to wait because the pedestrians have a walk signal. Problem is, as it's only 2 lanes going in that direction, if the car in front is waiting to turn right, that entire lane is stuck despite the light being green until the pedestrians clear the road. If they walk fast enough, there'd be plenty of time for more cars to turn.So the light is red in this scenario I'm guessing, but the cars are waiting to turn right?
If you had just said it was one person walking slower and left out the texting, poll would be 80% against the car.
Doesn't matter what the person was doing or how slow they were walking. Pedestrians have right of way. Before you respond, imagine the what ifs:
- Person has a real but not outwardly visible handicap
- Person is reading that mom/dog/friend died
- etc
Reads like you've never driven in a heavy pedestrian city. Walk with purpose or get the hell out of the way.Can't believe people are piling on the pedestrian and it's jut more "get off my lawn" from the most crochety group of men 35-55 ever.No, the light is green for the traffic. The pedestrians are crossing to the right of the traffic. Cars that are going straight can go but cars turning right have to wait because the pedestrians have a walk signal. Problem is, as it's only 2 lanes going in that direction, if the car in front is waiting to turn right, that entire lane is stuck despite the light being green until the pedestrians clear the road. If they walk fast enough, there'd be plenty of time for more cars to turn.So the light is red in this scenario I'm guessing, but the cars are waiting to turn right?
If you had just said it was one person walking slower and left out the texting, poll would be 80% against the car.
Doesn't matter what the person was doing or how slow they were walking. Pedestrians have right of way. Before you respond, imagine the what ifs:
- Person has a real but not outwardly visible handicap
- Person is reading that mom/dog/friend died
- etc
Why? Person would be moving at same speed regardless and causing some obstruction, and the obstruction is the reason for the anger right?Exactly.Fairly important detail.Can't believe people are piling on the pedestrian and it's jut more "get off my lawn" from the most crochety group of men 35-55 ever.No, the light is green for the traffic. The pedestrians are crossing to the right of the traffic. Cars that are going straight can go but cars turning right have to wait because the pedestrians have a walk signal. Problem is, as it's only 2 lanes going in that direction, if the car in front is waiting to turn right, that entire lane is stuck despite the light being green until the pedestrians clear the road. If they walk fast enough, there'd be plenty of time for more cars to turn.So the light is red in this scenario I'm guessing, but the cars are waiting to turn right?
If you had just said it was one person walking slower and left out the texting, poll would be 80% against the car.
Doesn't matter what the person was doing or how slow they were walking. Pedestrians have right of way. Before you respond, imagine the what ifs:
- Person has a real but not outwardly visible handicap
- Person is reading that mom/dog/friend died
- etc
Drove from one end of Manhattan to another in driving rain at 3:30 pm. I'm just not the type of ####### to honk at someone crossing a sidewalk when they have the right of way.dparker713 said:Reads like you've never driven in a heavy pedestrian city. Walk with purpose or get the hell out of the way.Can't believe people are piling on the pedestrian and it's jut more "get off my lawn" from the most crochety group of men 35-55 ever.No, the light is green for the traffic. The pedestrians are crossing to the right of the traffic. Cars that are going straight can go but cars turning right have to wait because the pedestrians have a walk signal. Problem is, as it's only 2 lanes going in that direction, if the car in front is waiting to turn right, that entire lane is stuck despite the light being green until the pedestrians clear the road. If they walk fast enough, there'd be plenty of time for more cars to turn.So the light is red in this scenario I'm guessing, but the cars are waiting to turn right?
If you had just said it was one person walking slower and left out the texting, poll would be 80% against the car.
Doesn't matter what the person was doing or how slow they were walking. Pedestrians have right of way. Before you respond, imagine the what ifs:
- Person has a real but not outwardly visible handicap
- Person is reading that mom/dog/friend died
- etc
NoWhy? Person would be moving at same speed regardless and causing some obstruction, and the obstruction is the reason for the anger right?Exactly.Fairly important detail.Can't believe people are piling on the pedestrian and it's jut more "get off my lawn" from the most crochety group of men 35-55 ever.No, the light is green for the traffic. The pedestrians are crossing to the right of the traffic. Cars that are going straight can go but cars turning right have to wait because the pedestrians have a walk signal. Problem is, as it's only 2 lanes going in that direction, if the car in front is waiting to turn right, that entire lane is stuck despite the light being green until the pedestrians clear the road. If they walk fast enough, there'd be plenty of time for more cars to turn.So the light is red in this scenario I'm guessing, but the cars are waiting to turn right?
If you had just said it was one person walking slower and left out the texting, poll would be 80% against the car.
Doesn't matter what the person was doing or how slow they were walking. Pedestrians have right of way. Before you respond, imagine the what ifs:
- Person has a real but not outwardly visible handicap
- Person is reading that mom/dog/friend died
- etc
This - totally rude to text/read in the crosswalk but the bigger ####### in that moment is the driver. I have no doubt that the driver lost his temper because of what the pedestrian did and I also have no doubt the pedestrian is a bigger ####### the rest of the time but you can't do something that puts someones life in danger just because someone is being rude.Driver.
You're driving a large machine. Back the #### off.
Why? Person would be moving at same speed regardless and causing some obstruction, and the obstruction is the reason for the anger right?Exactly.Fairly important detail.Can't believe people are piling on the pedestrian and it's jut more "get off my lawn" from the most crochety group of men 35-55 ever.If you had just said it was one person walking slower and left out the texting, poll would be 80% against the car.No, the light is green for the traffic. The pedestrians are crossing to the right of the traffic. Cars that are going straight can go but cars turning right have to wait because the pedestrians have a walk signal. Problem is, as it's only 2 lanes going in that direction, if the car in front is waiting to turn right, that entire lane is stuck despite the light being green until the pedestrians clear the road. If they walk fast enough, there'd be plenty of time for more cars to turn.So the light is red in this scenario I'm guessing, but the cars are waiting to turn right?
Doesn't matter what the person was doing or how slow they were walking. Pedestrians have right of way. Before you respond, imagine the what ifs:
- Person has a real but not outwardly visible handicap
- Person is reading that mom/dog/friend died
- etc
This seems more pervelant with young people. They have the "it's my right" mindset and stroll along lazily...because they can. Not taking into consideration the needs of others around them.Yeah the more I think about this, the pedestrian is the bigger #######. Unfortunately most people in society are completely oblivious and inconsiderate ##### bagsNope, I was neither. But I was behind the driver that honked. The pedestrian was obnoxiously clueless of all the traffic she was holding up. While I personally wouldn't honk, I do think she deserved it.So I'm guessing you're the driver.
I hate everyone equally.
How does honking a horn, a safety measure, put someone's life in danger?This - totally rude to text/read in the crosswalk but the bigger ####### in that moment is the driver. I have no doubt that the driver lost his temper because of what the pedestrian did and I also have no doubt the pedestrian is a bigger ####### the rest of the time but you can't do something that puts someones life in danger just because someone is being rude.Driver.
You're driving a large machine. Back the #### off.
driving your car close by them as you make the turn does.How does honking a horn, a safety measure, put someone's life in danger?This - totally rude to text/read in the crosswalk but the bigger ####### in that moment is the driver. I have no doubt that the driver lost his temper because of what the pedestrian did and I also have no doubt the pedestrian is a bigger ####### the rest of the time but you can't do something that puts someones life in danger just because someone is being rude.Driver.
You're driving a large machine. Back the #### off.
No issue with honking - but any time you intentional drive close to a pedestrian you are an #######.How does honking a horn, a safety measure, put someone's life in danger?This - totally rude to text/read in the crosswalk but the bigger ####### in that moment is the driver. I have no doubt that the driver lost his temper because of what the pedestrian did and I also have no doubt the pedestrian is a bigger ####### the rest of the time but you can't do something that puts someones life in danger just because someone is being rude.Driver.
You're driving a large machine. Back the #### off.