HOWEVER - Boise State is in the playoffs and are only in the playoffs because of Ashton Jeanty. Full stop. There isn't a poster on this website who can argue otherwise.
Jeanty obviously played a massive role, but It is certainly plausible/possible that Boise would still be 12-1 without Jeanty. They run through the mountain west fairly regulary and won 10 games in it just a couple years ago with a team that was much worse than their current team (especially at QB).
Follow-up: did they beat Washington State and Oregon State a couple years ago? Did they lose to the #1 team in the country on a late field goal a couple of years ago?
I'd like to know what percentage Jeanty was of his team's offense - I think he was near 80% of their rushing yards.
They've had double digit wins 6 of the last 8 years (not counting the covid year where they only played 7 games), and they were the heavy betting favorites to win the MWC this year even against the field.
Point being, they were an implied 10 win team before the season already back when we didn't know Jeanty was this special. Maybe Jeanty got them to 12. Maybe they would have won 11 or 12 anyway. It was certainly within their reasonable projected outcomes. Their odds to make the playoffs were actually pretty reasonable before the season, again before we knew Jeanty was this good.
That's a very different scenario than a Colorado team that hasn't done crap in forever and had an implied preseason win total of around 4-5 games, and might have ended up in the playoffs themselves were it not for some tiebreaker math.
Relative to preseason expectations before we knew these guys were going to have special seasons, Colorado getting as close as they did to making the playoffs is arguably as (or more) impressive as Boise making the playoffs, which people thought was extremely plausible even before they knew Jeanty was going to blow up.