Who will be the Browns 2025 Week 1 Starting QB?
Does anybody care?
Agreed on Flacco, who I love, but way less than 9. Vegas has O/U at 4.5 wins. While we don't know the order, we do know the Browns opponents. Maybe Dolphins, maybe Titans, maybe Bears, maybe Jets, maybe Raiders. Maybe a split with Bengals or Steelers? I don't see any sure thing wins there. Depending on the order, could certainly see them starting 0-fer an indefinite amount of weeks which would necessitate a change at QB with other young options available.It'll be Grampy Joe.
Better question, IMO™: "How many games does Joe Flacco start for the Browns in 2025, more or less than 9?"
Just to add some context to Flacco's late season run, He beat some below average teams/QBs. It was a great run, but I don't see him repeating it.I know people online are saying, "they traded back this year for ammunition for next year" as if that is indicative that they are tanking. With that said, I don't think they are tanking and Joe Flacco previously lead this team (pretty much the same team) to the playoffs in 2023.
So my guess is that they attempt an actual season with Joe Flacco and once they've got 5 wins in late November, then you'll see Shedeur "unleashed".
Does anybody care?
FWIW
5. Deshaun Watson (+5000)
4. Dillon Gabriel (+750)
3. Shedeur Sanders (+300)
2. Joe Flacco (+250)
1. Kenny Pickett (+100)
I'm sorry to hear that. May God bless you in your journey.Does anybody care?
I care a lot!
And that wouldn't even be the record for starters in a year. Geesh.Pickett week one
Flacco week four
Gabriel week eight
Pickett week eleven
Flacco week fourteen
Sanders week seventeen
Went w Shadeur
SureWent w Shadeur
Thanks. Can you elaborate on how and why you think he earns the starting job by Week 1?
Pickett week one
Flacco week four
Gabriel week eight
Pickett week eleven
Flacco week fourteen
Sanders week seventeen
Would either be signed by another team if put on the PS?Gabriel/Sanders will battle for 3rd string/practice squad.
Oh, did not think of that. Well, I guess Cleveland could keep 4 QB's on the active roster if they cannot find a suitable trade partner for either rookie. I wouldn't put it past them to put one on the practice squad either. Maybe they will get lucky (unlucky?) and one of the rookies also lands on IR for the season, which would eliminate the need for tough decisions to be made. Whew!!! Glad I figured that out. Thanks for the heads up @-OZ-Would either be signed by another team if put on the PS?Gabriel/Sanders will battle for 3rd string/practice squad.
Can they be?
A trade seems plausible.
This is probably delusional but I don’t think stefanski goes into the season thinking “we have no chance guys, let’s start only the young players to develop them”.To me, it makes no sense to go with Flacco. They aren't a playoff team with him, and there's no future with him.
I think you go full open competition this summer, and Flacco only starts if everyone else completely bombs.
Ideally Sanders wins the job, but I'll vote for Pickett getting the 1st shot. He's the best combo of young, but also not being a rookie.
That's a good questionWho will be the Browns 2025 Week 1 Starting QB?
I agree. it has to be Flacco.Has to be Flacco, but nothing about the Browns and QBs have made sense since Bernie Kosar. They didn't do anything to change that this off-season either.
That's the problem with the "they're not winning anything" crowd. The players and staff want to win every game possible so they'll put the players on the field that give them the best chance to do that until they have nothing to play for in week 10/11/12 or whatever.This is probably delusional but I don’t think stefanski goes into the season thinking “we have no chance guys, let’s start only the young players to develop them”.To me, it makes no sense to go with Flacco. They aren't a playoff team with him, and there's no future with him.
I think you go full open competition this summer, and Flacco only starts if everyone else completely bombs.
Ideally Sanders wins the job, but I'll vote for Pickett getting the 1st shot. He's the best combo of young, but also not being a rookie.
Is his job really that secure where he won’t feel any pressure to win?
I'd argue that's a waste of a season. I think figuring out if any of Pickett, Gabriel, or Sanders have it, is more important than trying to maybe win 7 games with Flacco. The other guys might be able to do that (or better?) but have lower floors, its more important to figure out it any of them can be that. I don't think not going with Flacco=tanking. I think Flacco should be the "try and salvage the season, if everyone else sucks" option.That's the problem with the "they're not winning anything" crowd. The players and staff want to win every game possible so they'll put the players on the field that give them the best chance to do that until they have nothing to play for in week 10/11/12 or whatever.This is probably delusional but I don’t think stefanski goes into the season thinking “we have no chance guys, let’s start only the young players to develop them”.To me, it makes no sense to go with Flacco. They aren't a playoff team with him, and there's no future with him.
I think you go full open competition this summer, and Flacco only starts if everyone else completely bombs.
Ideally Sanders wins the job, but I'll vote for Pickett getting the 1st shot. He's the best combo of young, but also not being a rookie.
Is his job really that secure where he won’t feel any pressure to win?
ETA: not a shot at anyone/travdogg, just a general statement.
Almost perfect, it's just missing something out of left field week 18 like Trey LancePickett week one
Flacco week four
Gabriel week eight
Pickett week eleven
Flacco week fourteen
Sanders week seventeen
To quote that famous wordsmith Jerry Glanville, the NFL stands for Not For Long when you're only winning 3 or 4 games.I'd argue that's a waste of a season. I think figuring out if any of Pickett, Gabriel, or Sanders have it, is more important than trying to maybe win 7 games with Flacco. The other guys might be able to do that (or better?) but have lower floors, its more important to figure out it any of them can be that. I don't think not going with Flacco=tanking. I think Flacco should be the "try and salvage the season, if everyone else sucks" option.That's the problem with the "they're not winning anything" crowd. The players and staff want to win every game possible so they'll put the players on the field that give them the best chance to do that until they have nothing to play for in week 10/11/12 or whatever.This is probably delusional but I don’t think stefanski goes into the season thinking “we have no chance guys, let’s start only the young players to develop them”.To me, it makes no sense to go with Flacco. They aren't a playoff team with him, and there's no future with him.
I think you go full open competition this summer, and Flacco only starts if everyone else completely bombs.
Ideally Sanders wins the job, but I'll vote for Pickett getting the 1st shot. He's the best combo of young, but also not being a rookie.
Is his job really that secure where he won’t feel any pressure to win?
ETA: not a shot at anyone/travdogg, just a general statement.
I think Stefanski has a relatively safe job. I'd be pretty shocked if he were fired, even if the Browns were picking #2 again.
I'd also argue, why are we (just people in general) acting like Flacco is good? Flacco would be a backup everywhere else. He was ok in 2023, he was ok (I guess) last year, but he hasn't been "good" in ages.
I see no reason why Pickett wouldn't make the team. I'd reiterate it'd make more sense for Flacco not to make the team, but there is nothing stopping them from keeping 4 QBs, just because its not what most teams do.I doubt Pickett even makes the team. They won't be able to sneak either rookie onto the practice squad, and they aren't keeping 4 active. A preseason "injury" could change this I suppose if they can put somebody on IR for as bit
Gabriel might, which makes the pick all the more frustrating.They won't be able to sneak either rookie onto the practice squad,
Just saw this after I posted above. I'd agree except I don't think they carry all 4 on the opening day roster and if they try to put one on practice squad they likely get claimed. So I'm thinking they cut one if IR is not an option.Better question might how many of the four QBs on the roster get a start this year.
Might be all of them!
Mason Rudolph is undeniably a better quarterback than Kenny Pickett, and it's not even close. The idea that Pickett takes too much flak for his Pittsburgh tenure ignores the reality that he simply didn't perform at an NFL level. He wasn't just held back by Matt Canada's play callin he showed consistent flaws in his game regardless of the scheme. Even after Canada was fired, Pickett had one solid game, but his overall body of work was uninspiring. Meanwhile, Rudolph stepped in and immediately ran the offense with decisiveness and efficiency, something Pickett struggled to do for two seasons.I see no reason why Pickett wouldn't make the team. I'd reiterate it'd make more sense for Flacco not to make the team, but there is nothing stopping them from keeping 4 QBs, just because its not what most teams do.I doubt Pickett even makes the team. They won't be able to sneak either rookie onto the practice squad, and they aren't keeping 4 active. A preseason "injury" could change this I suppose if they can put somebody on IR for as bit
I think Pickett takes too much flak for his Pittsburgh run. Matt Canada was as bad a play caller as I've seen. I have 100% confidence I'd be a better OC than he was. Pickett had arguably his best game as a Steeler the week after Canada was fired, then unfortunately the next week, he got hurt for the rest of the season. People acted like Rudolph was an upgrade, but he wasn't really, the offense was better because of Canada being gone.
I think Pickett is still salvageable and fully expect him to get 1st crack, the recent report that Mary Kay Cabot had only re-enforces that. One major thing Pickett does much better than Flacco is not turn the ball over. This is a team that wants to run the ball and play defense (based on all their other personnel moves) and their decision not to stick with Winston to me, speaks to how much they care about turnovers. Of some note, Shedeur Sanders and Dillon Gabriel were the 2 best QBs in college football last year at taking care of the football.