JohnnyU said:I think he's just as talented, if not more, than Miles Sanders.
Not what you said, but okay.No, I said Gainwell is in chapter one and that he could be as talented as Sanders.. Nothing more, nothing less. Keyword “could”.
JohnnyU said:I think he's just as talented, if not more, than Miles Sanders.
Not what you said, but okay.No, I said Gainwell is in chapter one and that he could be as talented as Sanders.. Nothing more, nothing less. Keyword “could”.
You’re right, I said he was just as talented. I believe that. It’s not like Sanders has looked all that study since he’s been drafted.Not what you said, but okay.
piques my interestI'm not sure that there is anything this week that peaks my interest. Lots of flash in the pans...
Jeudy: I see T Patrick as your best ROI. Must add !This year there doesn't seem to be too many options like there normally is. Gainwell peaks my interest a bit if the price is right.
Any interest in options from injuries? Juedy/Gallup/Mostert
I bid 50% on the league I drafted upside down. He's rostered in my other league.Anyone going in deep in Elijah Mitchell? I’m so torn since all he did was chew up the the lions but sermon looks very flat on tape and Mitchell with a sub 4.4 forty has my eye in a big way
I bid 50% on the league I drafted upside down. He's rostered in my other league.
Yeah, I'm not waiting for someone that might have more upside to emerge.I'm going 51% in my league. Waivers run tonight.
Tyson Williams looked great on a couple runs and catches. He also whiffed on a couple blocks. Murray was in there often late in the game. I’m wondering if they trust Murray more. I wasn’t expecting him to play as much after just being signed.
I think everything you typed here leads me to believe that Bell will get a crack at the starting job within the next week or so...
how he does with it, who knows?
Latavius Murray.
Tyson Williams looked great on a couple runs and catches. He also whiffed on a couple blocks. Murray was in there often late in the game. I’m wondering if they trust Murray more. I wasn’t expecting him to play as much after just being signed.
Tyson Williams is clearly the more explosive back. I thought Murray looked fine. I think there may be a misconception that Murray is washed up. New Orleans still wanted him on the squad but Tony Jones looked great so they made the business decision to ask Murray to take a pay cut. Notice how Murray quickly leap frogged Bell and Freeman.
Also, no disrespect to Tyson but Trenton Cannon looked good to running behind that line. I think Murray can be a worse version of Gus but with similar touches and more receiving work. Tyson is still probably the 1a with Murray the 1b.
I think everything you typed here leads me to believe that Bell will get a crack at the starting job within the next week or so...
how he does with it, who knows?
If Bell is the guy despite not having broken 4.0ypc in half a decade), AND he was added before Murray.... why was he on the practice squad while Murray backed up Williams on the field last night?
I received a news alert that Hamler was running with the ones today.Jeudy: I see T Patrick as your best ROI. Must add !
Lev Bell is washed. He will be a non-factor.
I would love to believe this narrative but both Freeman and Bell were brought in on the same day (Sept 7) and the Ravens signed Bell. So Bell couldn't have been that far out of "football shape".This is actually very simple... Murray and Freeman were both in NFL training camps for the past couple of months and in football shape. Le'veon Bell has been working out on his own, and while in shape, is not currently in football shape. He's getting up to speed.
I also didn't write that Bell was "the guy." But, he will get a crack at that job more than likely.
Plus his running style does not fit with the Raven blocking scheme. He had a great opportunity in KC and did nothing with it.Lev Bell is washed. He will be a non-factor.
Lev Bell is washed. He will be a non-factor.
I have Bell and think zoonation may not be far off base.So, which player do you have currently... Williams or Murray? LOL
It's the narrative that Harbough is speaking... it's Google'able.I would love to believe this narrative but both Freeman and Bell were brought in on the same day (Sept 7) and the Ravens signed Bell. So Bell couldn't have been that far out of "football shape".
Ravens brought back Freeman and signed Murray (Sept 10) after watching Bell for three days, maybe they just weren't that impressed once Bell put the pads on.
I read the quote.It's the narrative that Harbough is speaking... it's Google'able.
I read the quote.
"Not in football shape" can mean a lot of things for example; "he runs soft as a feather pillow" or "he's a fat tub of goo" or "I've made a huge mistake."
ETA: I have the guy, I hope he gets a shot and excels I am simply tempering my enthusiasm with a dose of reality.
neither. won't get Murray either because he will cost too much.So, which player do you have currently... Williams or Murray? LOL
I watched all of his KC work on video recently. He didn't look washed... he looked like his normal self. He's not shot out of a cannon, which I guess people love to see.neither. won't get Murray either because he will cost too much.
I made my comment based on following the mess in KC last year. Bell looked washed to me then. He's slow.
I'm not saying Bell is a league winner... but, if you watch his tape from last season, he wasn't as bad as the "narrative." He was still very shifty, and caught the ball well. He does things that the guys on the Ravens right now can't. In a deep league he's worth a hold to see how this all plays out. If it breaks his way, I think he can be a decent RB2 type for an RB desperate team.
No. He was JAG last year... at best.
I dunno, it might be best to sit for one more week, then pounce on the wire. not a lot of standouts clamoring for your attention, as others have said, there's a lot of flash in the pan type stuff out there right now.
two weeks is the beginning of a trend, let's see who carries it over through next week.
J. Reagor had himself a game, can he sustain it? what about D. Parker?
B. Edwards might be the poster boy for one week wonder. is Darnold this year's version of Tannehill 2020?
And since that tweet was sent a year ago he's? You said he looked washed up on the Chiefs. That's actually Chiefs film. Ya know, the last time he played... you're a brick.And since that tweet was sent a year ago he's?
He played out of the slot with Fitz gone. This may be what he needed.I have always loved Kirk as well, but I thought there was a lot of noise in the way (so many WRs)..... if he stays on Murray's radar he will be solid.
The fact that he was a reliable target and made some big plays during crunch time will earn him more targets. Baltimore is a tough matchup for WR's. He had no separation early. He didn't have much separation late but it didn't matter because he still caught everything.I added Edwards before the came last night with all the talk of him being a camp darling and the next TO. I almost dropped him during the game lol but plan on holding for now.
If someone told you he had 4 catches for 80 yards after all the preseason hype and you didn't know when in the game it happened people would be throwing crazy coin on him right now.
Link to me saying "he looked washed up on the Cheifs"?You said he looked washed up on the Chiefs. That's actually Chiefs film. Ya know, the last time he played... you're a brick.
bit early in the day to be drinking there, buddy.![]()
What makes you think it will be Bell and not Freeman?Chaka said:I have Bell and think zoonation may not be far off base.
The Ravens have to hold Bell, and he may even get a few opportunities to prove he can still carry the ball but nothing that has happened since Bell was signed to the PS inspires hope that he could be a factor this season.
Bell and not Freeman what? called up to the game day roster? Not much, the Ravens worked.out both Bell & Freeman on the same day and opted to sign Bell to the PS and let Freeman walk.What makes you think it will be Bell and not Freeman?
After watching that cards game, I’m excited about both of those guys (Kirk and Moore), but I actually think Moore will return better season long value.ratbast said:Kirk has to deal with Green and Moore for 2nd looks. Reports were not favorable prior to game. Moore was listed as WR2?
Im in need of WR help with Galloday and Ayuk not ready to contribute. I picked up Agolar as he Jones/McDanials seem to be on same page.
ratbast said:Kirk has to deal with Green and Moore for 2nd looks. Reports were not favorable prior to game. Moore was listed as WR2?
Im in need of WR help with Galloday and Ayuk not ready to contribute. I picked up Agolar as he Jones/McDanials seem to be on same page.
Bell could not get it done in KC, he’s not going to get it done in Baltimore.zoonation said:Lev Bell is washed. He will be a non-factor.