SecondCity34
Footballguy
Obviously, assuming they have the same name as their fathers.
So, why would men use it if they don't have any kids? Two seperate friends of mine in high school each used II. They have each had sons and neither has named any of their sons the same name as their father.Just curious.typically, it denotes at least the presence of a III.
Because they realize it's stupid for someone to be calling them Junior at age 50?So, why would men use it if they don't have any kids? Two seperate friends of mine in high school each used II. They have each had sons and neither has named any of their sons the same name as their father.Just curious.typically, it denotes at least the presence of a III.
Junior is used when the son bears the same name as the father."II" is used when a son shares a name with another male relative such a grandfather.
I think you are in the clear from the name police. According to this source:I was named after my father and have the same first, middle, and last name. I vaguely remember when I was very young they asked me what I would like for my name; junior or II. Turns out they were applying for my Social Security number and needed it for that. I picked II because junior sounds dorky. Even after growing up and realizing that according to conventional naming I picked the wrong one I'm still glad I picked II.
When is it appropriate to use 'Junior' versus 'II'?
Junior is used to distinguish a son with the same name as his father. The following conditions apply:
1. The Junior must be a son of the father, not a grandson.
2. The names must be exactly the same, including the middle name.
3. The father must still be living.
'II' is used whenever any close relative, including for example a grandfather or a great-uncle, shares the same name as the child.
Huh, so I could have been using "II" all these years? Cool."II" is used when a son shares a name with another male relative such a grandfather.
Wow.I'm named after my Grandfather John, and I have 3 older cousins also named after him.I think you are in the clear from the name police. According to this source:I was named after my father and have the same first, middle, and last name. I vaguely remember when I was very young they asked me what I would like for my name; junior or II. Turns out they were applying for my Social Security number and needed it for that. I picked II because junior sounds dorky. Even after growing up and realizing that according to conventional naming I picked the wrong one I'm still glad I picked II.When is it appropriate to use 'Junior' versus 'II'?
Junior is used to distinguish a son with the same name as his father. The following conditions apply:
1. The Junior must be a son of the father, not a grandson.
2. The names must be exactly the same, including the middle name.
3. The father must still be living.
'II' is used whenever any close relative, including for example a grandfather or a great-uncle, shares the same name as the child.
As a 'III', I had the opportunity to name my son 'IV'. We decided to change up the middle name, though I think I would have been ok with IV. I think once you hit 'V' though, it starts sounding really pretentious.At what point is it unacceptable to keep a roman numeral chain going? IV? V?
I'm friends with a guy nicknamed Trip...he's a III.I worked with a guy who was a IV. His son was V. They called him "Quint" for a nickname.
"II" is used when a son shares a name with another male relative such a grandfather.
It seems like anything past IV makes you look like you consider yourself royalty.I worked with a guy who was a IV. His son was V. They called him "Quint" for a nickname.
Hell, 90% of the people here think they're royalty!It seems like anything past IV makes you look like you consider yourself royalty.I worked with a guy who was a IV. His son was V. They called him "Quint" for a nickname.
Hmmm.....good point.Hell, 90% of the people here think they're royalty!It seems like anything past IV makes you look like you consider yourself royalty.I worked with a guy who was a IV. His son was V. They called him "Quint" for a nickname.
That's what we nicknamed my son. I'm a "II" because my father didn't want people calling me "Junior".I'm friends with a guy nicknamed Trip...he's a III.I worked with a guy who was a IV. His son was V. They called him "Quint" for a nickname.
I had a III friend who went by Tres.I'm friends with a guy nicknamed Trip...he's a III.I worked with a guy who was a IV. His son was V. They called him "Quint" for a nickname.
Don't worry Sheik, you'll eventually get that diploma and graduate.My new business cards say "TheIronSheik, Sr."
I don't have any kids, but the "Sr." makes me sound more important. And it's not technically lying.
Pipe down, serfs. ----------------Hmmm.....good point.Hell, 90% of the people here think they're royalty!It seems like anything past IV makes you look like you consider yourself royalty.I worked with a guy who was a IV. His son was V.
They called him "Quint" for a nickname.
Same here at work, I call his son Cinco.I worked with a guy who was a IV. His son was V. They called him "Quint" for a nickname.
I have a friend who's a IV. He goes by the nickname "Quatro."I worked with a guy who was a IV. His son was V. They called him "Quint" for a nickname.
I have a friend he is a "VI". He just had a son, and sure enough he is a "VII". The mother is part Cajun so she likes to call him Sept or Septien.It seems like anything past IV makes you look like you consider yourself royalty.I worked with a guy who was a IV. His son was V. They called him "Quint" for a nickname.
The original, real one, so the Kenyan one.Was that the Kenyan birth certificate or the Hawaiian one?