mjm3773
Footballguy
It really just boils down two these two statements, which are NOT mutually exclusive:
1) It is more likely than not that Chris Johnson will not finish 2010 as the #1 rb. (The OP's claim)
2) Chris Johnson has a better chance to finish #1 than any other single rb. (The rebuttal, which is why he is the consensus #1 pick)
Since everybody loves the poker analogies, it's like when someone flops a set, ends up pushing and someone calls, having proper pot odds, with both a flush draw and an open-ended straight draw. The pusher got his money in with the best hand, the caller got the right odds to call. Both of them were right in their moves, it just that one will end up losing a lot of money.
Just like both of the above statements can both be true, but at the end one the year, only one will have taken place.
1) It is more likely than not that Chris Johnson will not finish 2010 as the #1 rb. (The OP's claim)
2) Chris Johnson has a better chance to finish #1 than any other single rb. (The rebuttal, which is why he is the consensus #1 pick)
Since everybody loves the poker analogies, it's like when someone flops a set, ends up pushing and someone calls, having proper pot odds, with both a flush draw and an open-ended straight draw. The pusher got his money in with the best hand, the caller got the right odds to call. Both of them were right in their moves, it just that one will end up losing a lot of money.
Just like both of the above statements can both be true, but at the end one the year, only one will have taken place.