mr roboto
Footballguy
So anybody who’s going down can just flip it like that? He clearly wasn’t targeting anybody. He was clearly doing that to try to not take the sack.obvious pass sorry guys
So anybody who’s going down can just flip it like that? He clearly wasn’t targeting anybody. He was clearly doing that to try to not take the sack.obvious pass sorry guys
People around me are so confused. They only showed like one replay.OK, that is one of the dumbest things I’ve ever seen
ExactlyAt worse how is that not grounding
At worse how is that not grounding
Vikes fan and i agree. He flicked it.obvious pass sorry guys
Until you get a ref that thinks it's a fumble. This is not a court where precedent matters. It's basically whatever that individual ref feels like.QBs should now do that anytime they are about to get sacked. Perverse incentive.
if Anthony Richardson was throwing it sure, but not Staffordobvious pass sorry guys
for a football guy this is a bad take, stafford obviously flicked it forward on purpose so it’s no different than a shuffle pass which by rule is not a fumble when not caughtInsult to injury - it’s not even a sack.
I coulda lived with them saying he was in the grasp. But incomplete is just trash officiating.
Half the offense was right there.At worse how is that not grounding
He did kind of flip it with his hand towards one of the Rams receivers that was in the backfield. Kind of like a backhanded toss, but it was clear. He wasn’t trying to target anybody I don’t even think he could’ve seen that somebody was over there at very worst. It should’ve been intentional grounding.People around me are so confused. They only showed like one replay.OK, that is one of the dumbest things I’ve ever seen
Was that legit?? Whole stadium seemed collectively confused.
I like to think my bad takes are equal whether they’re at FBG or if I’m yelling at my television, thank you.for a football guy this is a bad take, stafford obviously flicked it forward on purpose so it’s no different than a shuffle pass which by rule is not a fumble when not caughtInsult to injury - it’s not even a sack.
I coulda lived with them saying he was in the grasp. But incomplete is just trash officiating.
It was a pass. No grounding either because Puka was in areaPeople around me are so confused. They only showed like one replay.OK, that is one of the dumbest things I’ve ever seen
Was that legit?? Whole stadium seemed collectively confused.
And that's the problem.Until you get a ref that thinks it's a fumble. This is not a court where precedent matters. It's basically whatever that individual ref feels like.QBs should now do that anytime they are about to get sacked. Perverse incentive.
Oh he definitely randomly threw the ballVikes fan and i agree. He flicked it.obvious pass sorry guys
The ball landed right in front of Nacua so no grounding.I'll give that it was a pass. But it was 100% grounding. No attempt to complete the pass.
1….What number are you?Omg that happened right in front of me. Totally looked like a fumble.
the answer is there was a receiver in the area, sometimes guys like Stafford and Mahomes and others will complete throws like that. Now in this case there was no chance but can't have the rule be overly subjective.At worse how is that not grounding
allegedlyVikes fanobvious pass sorry guys
I’m with this takeI'll give that it was a pass. But it was 100% grounding. No attempt to complete the pass.
i just spit out my drink reading thatI like to think my bad takes are equal whether they’re at FBG or if I’m yelling at my television, thank you.for a football guy this is a bad take, stafford obviously flicked it forward on purpose so it’s no different than a shuffle pass which by rule is not a fumble when not caughtInsult to injury - it’s not even a sack.
I coulda lived with them saying he was in the grasp. But incomplete is just trash officiating.
Only in the same way as when a QB throws at an RB’s feet on a broken play. Stafford clearly was throwing that toward Pukas feet.I'll give that it was a pass. But it was 100% grounding. No attempt to complete the pass.
Sure, but it’s really hard to argue that he knew somebody was in the vicinity with his head having a 250 pounder on top of it.Vikes fan and i agree. He flicked it.obvious pass sorry guys
Obviously not if you're asking us what happened1….What number are you?Omg that happened right in front of me. Totally looked like a fumble.
…. In hearts.
(I’m right on the 20 yard line up a bit. Had a clear view of it).
Spati just spit out my drink reading thatI like to think my bad takes are equal whether they’re at FBG or if I’m yelling at my television, thank you.for a football guy this is a bad take, stafford obviously flicked it forward on purpose so it’s no different than a shuffle pass which by rule is not a fumble when not caughtInsult to injury - it’s not even a sack.
I coulda lived with them saying he was in the grasp. But incomplete is just trash officiating.![]()
Yeah the league has lost it’s way…..it really has.So if you are looking at your nuts and casually flip the ball towards nothing, that's a pass. Cool.