What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Woman accused of embezzlement vows to get even....... (1 Viewer)

So is the guy a racist scumbag or not?
What's funny is all the statements that are coming in now from people who say 'oh yeah hes been known to be a racist a33hole for years' from everyone, from Rollie Massimino to Baron Davis.

But this gets broken by TMZ, not a sports or news network or paper. Reminds me a bit of the Tiger Woods situation, same thing, 'oh yeah there were stories about his whoring around for years...' But then when the tabloids get a hold of it, oh now the professional journalists will talk about it.

 
So is the guy a racist scumbag or not?
What's funny is all the statements that are coming in now from people who say 'oh yeah hes been known to be a racist a33hole for years' from everyone, from Rollie Massimino to Baron Davis.

But this gets broken by TMZ, not a sports or news network or paper. Reminds me a bit of the Tiger Woods situation, same thing, 'oh yeah there were stories about his whoring around for years...' But then when the tabloids get a hold of it, oh now the professional journalists will talk about it.
That is strange. I remember when the tabloids were pretty much hack stories that weren't even close to accurate. One of them wrote a story once, I forget exactly how long ago it was, but it purported to have a picture of Princess Diana as a man. Even as a young kid, I found out pretty quickly that they were full of horse apples.

 
So is the guy a racist scumbag or not?
What's funny is all the statements that are coming in now from people who say 'oh yeah hes been known to be a racist a33hole for years' from everyone, from Rollie Massimino to Baron Davis.

But this gets broken by TMZ, not a sports or news network or paper. Reminds me a bit of the Tiger Woods situation, same thing, 'oh yeah there were stories about his whoring around for years...' But then when the tabloids get a hold of it, oh now the professional journalists will talk about it.
what is it about the modern culture of journalism that keeps these things under wraps?

 
So is the guy a racist scumbag or not?
What's funny is all the statements that are coming in now from people who say 'oh yeah hes been known to be a racist a33hole for years' from everyone, from Rollie Massimino to Baron Davis.

But this gets broken by TMZ, not a sports or news network or paper. Reminds me a bit of the Tiger Woods situation, same thing, 'oh yeah there were stories about his whoring around for years...' But then when the tabloids get a hold of it, oh now the professional journalists will talk about it.
That is strange. I remember when the tabloids were pretty much hack stories that weren't even close to accurate. One of them wrote a story once, I forget exactly how long ago it was, but it purported to have a picture of Princess Diana as a man. Even as a young kid, I found out pretty quickly that they were full of horse apples.
It's not that big of a mystery. The tabloids like sensational stuff. Ordinarily that limits them to Hillary screwing space aliens, but occasionally that gives them the freedom to break "real" stories that the mainstream media is too nervous to handle. The John Edwards affair during the 2008 presidential election is a prime example of that.

 
So is the guy a racist scumbag or not?
What's funny is all the statements that are coming in now from people who say 'oh yeah hes been known to be a racist a33hole for years' from everyone, from Rollie Massimino to Baron Davis.

But this gets broken by TMZ, not a sports or news network or paper. Reminds me a bit of the Tiger Woods situation, same thing, 'oh yeah there were stories about his whoring around for years...' But then when the tabloids get a hold of it, oh now the professional journalists will talk about it.
That is strange. I remember when the tabloids were pretty much hack stories that weren't even close to accurate. One of them wrote a story once, I forget exactly how long ago it was, but it purported to have a picture of Princess Diana as a man. Even as a young kid, I found out pretty quickly that they were full of horse apples.
It's not that big of a mystery. The tabloids like sensational stuff. Ordinarily that limits them to Hillary screwing space aliens, but occasionally that gives them the freedom to break "real" stories that the mainstream media is too nervous to handle. The John Edwards affair during the 2008 presidential election is a prime example of that.
The fact that the Enquirer broke that story blew my mind, because I figured they were on par with the Weekly World News, just in color. I still distrust the tabloids on principle, but it still makes one think.

 
So is the guy a racist scumbag or not?
What's funny is all the statements that are coming in now from people who say 'oh yeah hes been known to be a racist a33hole for years' from everyone, from Rollie Massimino to Baron Davis.

But this gets broken by TMZ, not a sports or news network or paper. Reminds me a bit of the Tiger Woods situation, same thing, 'oh yeah there were stories about his whoring around for years...' But then when the tabloids get a hold of it, oh now the professional journalists will talk about it.
what is it about the modern culture of journalism that keeps these things under wraps?
I'm going to go ahead and say: fear of loss of access.

 
So is the guy a racist scumbag or not?
What's funny is all the statements that are coming in now from people who say 'oh yeah hes been known to be a racist a33hole for years' from everyone, from Rollie Massimino to Baron Davis.

But this gets broken by TMZ, not a sports or news network or paper. Reminds me a bit of the Tiger Woods situation, same thing, 'oh yeah there were stories about his whoring around for years...' But then when the tabloids get a hold of it, oh now the professional journalists will talk about it.
what is it about the modern culture of journalism that keeps these things under wraps?
Not sure it's "modern" in politics and sports. In the old days, the beat writers knew a lot of stuff they didn't print. Think about JFK.

Did the Nixon scandal change all of that? :shrug:

 
problem with the world in a nutshell

V: And is that right?

DS: It isn't a question—we don't evaluate what's right and wrong, we live in a society. We live in a culture. We have to live within that culture.

V: But shouldn't we take a stand for what's wrong? And be the change and the difference?

DS: I don't want to change the culture, because I can't. It's too big
 
So is the guy a racist scumbag or not?
What's funny is all the statements that are coming in now from people who say 'oh yeah hes been known to be a racist a33hole for years' from everyone, from Rollie Massimino to Baron Davis.

But this gets broken by TMZ, not a sports or news network or paper. Reminds me a bit of the Tiger Woods situation, same thing, 'oh yeah there were stories about his whoring around for years...' But then when the tabloids get a hold of it, oh now the professional journalists will talk about it.
what is it about the modern culture of journalism that keeps these things under wraps?
Modern? You've got to be kidding.

 
Sterling is probably no more racist than your a average NBA player. Sir Charles says that the NBA is a "black" league, but nobody jumps on that bit of obvious racist statements. Pretty tough to take racism seriously when those types of double standards exist.

 
Sterling is probably no more racist than your a average NBA player. Sir Charles says that the NBA is a "black" league, but nobody jumps on that bit of obvious racist statements. Pretty tough to take racism seriously when those types of double standards exist.
So.......you think the average NBA player and Charles Barkley would get mad at their wives/gf's for posting pictures with white people on Instagram, and tell their SO's to never bring white people to basketball games? And you think if people found out that they did that, everyone woudl be ok with it?
 
Sterling is probably no more racist than your a average NBA player. Sir Charles says that the NBA is a "black" league, but nobody jumps on that bit of obvious racist statements. Pretty tough to take racism seriously when those types of double standards exist.
So.......you think the average NBA player and Charles Barkley would get mad at their wives/gf's for posting pictures with white people on Instagram, and tell their SO's to never bring white people to basketball games? And you think if people found out that they did that, everyone woudl be ok with it?
Not sure if they would get mad or not but you obviously entirely missed the point I was making. Do you think if Ryan Braun called MLB a "white" league, that the world would not go ballistic and call him out on it?

 
Sterling is probably no more racist than your a average NBA player. Sir Charles says that the NBA is a "black" league, but nobody jumps on that bit of obvious racist statements. Pretty tough to take racism seriously when those types of double standards exist.
So.......you think the average NBA player and Charles Barkley would get mad at their wives/gf's for posting pictures with white people on Instagram, and tell their SO's to never bring white people to basketball games? And you think if people found out that they did that, everyone woudl be ok with it?
Not sure if they would get mad or not but you obviously entirely missed the point I was making. Do you think if Ryan Braun called MLB a "white" league, that the world would not go ballistic and call him out on it?
I'm on my phone so it's a little tough to do the whole linking thing...but can someone link a picture of an apple and a picture of an orange to help you see how your analogy doesn't really match?

 
Sterling is probably no more racist than your a average NBA player. Sir Charles says that the NBA is a "black" league, but nobody jumps on that bit of obvious racist statements. Pretty tough to take racism seriously when those types of double standards exist.
So.......you think the average NBA player and Charles Barkley would get mad at their wives/gf's for posting pictures with white people on Instagram, and tell their SO's to never bring white people to basketball games? And you think if people found out that they did that, everyone woudl be ok with it?
Not sure if they would get mad or not but you obviously entirely missed the point I was making. Do you think if Ryan Braun called MLB a "white" league, that the world would not go ballistic and call him out on it?
Perhaps, but that has nothing to do with Donald Sterling. I completely got the point you were making, and was pointing out how irrelevant it was.
 
Sterling is probably no more racist than your a average NBA player. Sir Charles says that the NBA is a "black" league, but nobody jumps on that bit of obvious racist statements. Pretty tough to take racism seriously when those types of double standards exist.
So.......you think the average NBA player and Charles Barkley would get mad at their wives/gf's for posting pictures with white people on Instagram, and tell their SO's to never bring white people to basketball games? And you think if people found out that they did that, everyone woudl be ok with it?
Not sure if they would get mad or not but you obviously entirely missed the point I was making. Do you think if Ryan Braun called MLB a "white" league, that the world would not go ballistic and call him out on it?
How about we don't try to manufacture hypothetical situations and instead stick to what was actually said by the guy who said it. Do you think Sterling is racist, yes or no? Do you think the NBA should take some form of action against him, yes or no?

 
bigbottom said:
Underachievers said:
hxperson said:
Underachievers said:
Sterling is probably no more racist than your a average NBA player. Sir Charles says that the NBA is a "black" league, but nobody jumps on that bit of obvious racist statements. Pretty tough to take racism seriously when those types of double standards exist.
So.......you think the average NBA player and Charles Barkley would get mad at their wives/gf's for posting pictures with white people on Instagram, and tell their SO's to never bring white people to basketball games? And you think if people found out that they did that, everyone woudl be ok with it?
Not sure if they would get mad or not but you obviously entirely missed the point I was making. Do you think if Ryan Braun called MLB a "white" league, that the world would not go ballistic and call him out on it?
How about we don't try to manufacture hypothetical situations and instead stick to what was actually said by the guy who said it. .......
The NBA is a black league?
 
Underachievers said:
hxperson said:
Underachievers said:
Sterling is probably no more racist than your a average NBA player. Sir Charles says that the NBA is a "black" league, but nobody jumps on that bit of obvious racist statements. Pretty tough to take racism seriously when those types of double standards exist.
So.......you think the average NBA player and Charles Barkley would get mad at their wives/gf's for posting pictures with white people on Instagram, and tell their SO's to never bring white people to basketball games? And you think if people found out that they did that, everyone woudl be ok with it?
Not sure if they would get mad or not but you obviously entirely missed the point I was making. Do you think if Ryan Braun called MLB a "white" league, that the world would not go ballistic and call him out on it?
Where was the outrage when Braun beat a hispanic man with a bat???

http://giant.gfycat.com/MeekMixedKissingbug.gif

 
Christo said:
Rove! said:
SaintsInDome2006 said:
Kal El said:
So is the guy a racist scumbag or not?
What's funny is all the statements that are coming in now from people who say 'oh yeah hes been known to be a racist a33hole for years' from everyone, from Rollie Massimino to Baron Davis.

But this gets broken by TMZ, not a sports or news network or paper. Reminds me a bit of the Tiger Woods situation, same thing, 'oh yeah there were stories about his whoring around for years...' But then when the tabloids get a hold of it, oh now the professional journalists will talk about it.
what is it about the modern culture of journalism that keeps these things under wraps?
Modern? You've got to be kidding.
touche

 
Dr Oadi said:
Roeser said the woman reported to be Sterling's girlfriend whose voice is on the tape is the defendant in a lawsuit in which the Sterling family alleges she embezzled more than $1.8 million and she has vowed to "get even."
http://sports.yahoo.com/news/clippers-considered-boycotting-game-4-against-warriors-in-wake-of-owner-s-alleged-comments-235601798.html

O really
Rivers said a possible boycott was among many other things considered during a very vocal 45-minute meeting at the team hotel prior to Saturday's practice. Rivers was the only member of the Clippers who took questions about Sterling's alleged comments.

"We needed to talk about it because everyone else is," Rivers said of the team's meeting. "We needed to talk about it and all things came up. We heard all the stuff and boycotts and all that stuff. All those things are things you can do. We choose to play and we're going to play tomorrow.
This reminds me a little bit of the movie Major League.

 
The Clippers are going to tank their series over this, aren;t they?

Also - did Chris Paul really know nothing about what this guy was about when he signed up for the long haul with them? Yes the Hornets traded him but he had the choice of where to go and then he later also re-signed with them rather than go somewhere else.

This was an interview Baron Davis did the week before the Sterling reports hit:

http://grantland.com/the-triangle/baron-davis-on-donald-sterling-he-called-me-a-*******/

The players talk amongst themselves quite a bit, there had to be scuttlebutt or knowledge that Sterling was who we now know him to be.

- I also heard on sports radio this morning that the NBA cannot force Sterling to sell. I don't know why they could not force someone else to take over management though like the 49ers did with DeBartolo or the Reds with Marge Schott.

 
The Clippers are going to tank their series over this, aren;t they?

Also - did Chris Paul really know nothing about what this guy was about when he signed up for the long haul with them? Yes the Hornets traded him but he had the choice of where to go and then he later also re-signed with them rather than go somewhere else.

This was an interview Baron Davis did the week before the Sterling reports hit:

http://grantland.com/the-triangle/baron-davis-on-donald-sterling-he-called-me-a-*******/

The players talk amongst themselves quite a bit, there had to be scuttlebutt or knowledge that Sterling was who we now know him to be.

- I also heard on sports radio this morning that the NBA cannot force Sterling to sell. I don't know why they could not force someone else to take over management though like the 49ers did with DeBartolo or the Reds with Marge Schott.
Different leagues have different ownership rules, different rules for voting, commissioner powers, etc. :shrug:

 
The Clippers are going to tank their series over this, aren;t they?

Also - did Chris Paul really know nothing about what this guy was about when he signed up for the long haul with them? Yes the Hornets traded him but he had the choice of where to go and then he later also re-signed with them rather than go somewhere else.

This was an interview Baron Davis did the week before the Sterling reports hit:

http://grantland.com/the-triangle/baron-davis-on-donald-sterling-he-called-me-a-*******/

The players talk amongst themselves quite a bit, there had to be scuttlebutt or knowledge that Sterling was who we now know him to be.

- I also heard on sports radio this morning that the NBA cannot force Sterling to sell. I don't know why they could not force someone else to take over management though like the 49ers did with DeBartolo or the Reds with Marge Schott.
Different leagues have different ownership rules, different rules for voting, commissioner powers, etc. :shrug:
Also, I seem to remember an umpire collapsing on the field during a Reds game, and Schott's handling of it led to her getting ousted, though I can't be sure.

 
So reports are out there that Magic and his Dodger Partners want to buy the Clippers. I certainly wouldn't put it past that group to have reached out to this gold digger and plan a way to set up Sterling to expose himself as the racist pig he seems to be in order to force the sale.

 
So reports are out there that Magic and his Dodger Partners want to buy the Clippers. I certainly wouldn't put it past that group to have reached out to this gold digger and plan a way to set up Sterling to expose himself as the racist pig he seems to be in order to force the sale.
You gotta be kidding me, is this for real?

 
Magic IIRC is already a part-owner of the Lakers along with the Bus family as of 5-10 years ago. I don't see him selling out of the Lakers to buy the Clippers, especially as a Lakers legend.

As for the valuation of the Clippers, their primary value is that they're part of a highly successful league with huge TV revenues. While they're in a first class facility in one of the world's major media markets, the truth is that they'll always be second class citizens here behind the Lakers, who are certainly a national brand and likely as close to a worldwide brand as basketball has. The Clips' actual market is probably more on the order of a regional team like Cleveland or Atlanta than "Los Angeles".

 
So reports are out there that Magic and his Dodger Partners want to buy the Clippers. I certainly wouldn't put it past that group to have reached out to this gold digger and plan a way to set up Sterling to expose himself as the racist pig he seems to be in order to force the sale.
I remember thinking sort of along these same lines when Traci Lords revealed that she had been underage during her early career, forcing everybody to dump their tapes of her and leaving her own produced versions the only ones on the market. "Tricky tricky Traci", I remember thinking. "So devious, so nasty, so wonderful."

 
Magic IIRC is already a part-owner of the Lakers along with the Bus family as of 5-10 years ago. I don't see him selling out of the Lakers to buy the Clippers, especially as a Lakers legend.

As for the valuation of the Clippers, their primary value is that they're part of a highly successful league with huge TV revenues. While they're in a first class facility in one of the world's major media markets, the truth is that they'll always be second class citizens here behind the Lakers, who are certainly a national brand and likely as close to a worldwide brand as basketball has. The Clips' actual market is probably more on the order of a regional team like Cleveland or Atlanta than "Los Angeles".
Funny, they started out as the Buffalo "Braves" which would probably be a controversial name today if it has remained in Buffalo.

Sterling would have done well to try to create a real rivalry with the Lakers but they have been so bad for so long that it's on the order of UT vs Rice or something of that nature, it's certainly no Cubs-Chisox.

Clippers fans have been saddled with mismanagement for years and years, he could have been removed for that years ago, there is no worse franchise. I agree there is no reason for a Magic to want to get involved in that much less take on his beloved Lakers.

The Clips play in an arena where they have to cover up their co-tenants' banners for crying out loud. And how many Clippers banners of any kind are there? It's truly pathetic.

44 seasons, two division crowns (none before last year), .382 win %, 10 playoff appearances never going further than the quarters (conference semis), hold the league record for most losses in a season.

http://www.basketball-reference.com/teams/LAC/

I'd say just send the team to a city that wants NBA basketball - Seattle, KC, St. Louis, Vancouver, Cincy, anywhere - and get new ownership in the process. They almost need a whole new city, ownership, colors, logo, name, everything to wipe away what has got to be the worst history in any pro sport anywhere. This is just the final bone thrown on the garbage heap.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
So reports are out there that Magic and his Dodger Partners want to buy the Clippers. I certainly wouldn't put it past that group to have reached out to this gold digger and plan a way to set up Sterling to expose himself as the racist pig he seems to be in order to force the sale.
You gotta be kidding me, is this for real?
It wouldn't be the first time something like that ever happened. When rich greedy people want something, not much in the way of tactics is off the table.

btw this little tramp had to know from the word go that he was racist. Talk about a gold digger. She put up with all of it in order to live the high life.

They are both losers at life. Rich loser but losers all the same.

 
So reports are out there that Magic and his Dodger Partners want to buy the Clippers. I certainly wouldn't put it past that group to have reached out to this gold digger and plan a way to set up Sterling to expose himself as the racist pig he seems to be in order to force the sale.
You gotta be kidding me, is this for real?
It wouldn't be the first time something like that ever happened. When rich greedy people want something, not much in the way of tactics is off the table.

btw this little tramp had to know from the word go that he was racist. Talk about a gold digger. She put up with all of it in order to live the high life.

They are both losers at life. Rich loser but losers all the same.
Magic IIRC is already a part-owner of the Lakers along with the Bus family as of 5-10 years ago. I don't see him selling out of the Lakers to buy the Clippers, especially as a Lakers legend.
Magic sold his ownership piece of Lakers back in 2010.
Yeah I agree these are some sordid individuals, but the Magic angle is getting kind of conspiratorial. Is this being treated seriously?

I think a better theory is that maybe (if true) Sterling was fully aware of Magic's desire to get the team and that that was part of the source of his hatred for Magic in his diatribe.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
So reports are out there that Magic and his Dodger Partners want to buy the Clippers. I certainly wouldn't put it past that group to have reached out to this gold digger and plan a way to set up Sterling to expose himself as the racist pig he seems to be in order to force the sale.
You gotta be kidding me, is this for real?
It wouldn't be the first time something like that ever happened. When rich greedy people want something, not much in the way of tactics is off the table.

btw this little tramp had to know from the word go that he was racist. Talk about a gold digger. She put up with all of it in order to live the high life.

They are both losers at life. Rich loser but losers all the same.
Magic IIRC is already a part-owner of the Lakers along with the Bus family as of 5-10 years ago. I don't see him selling out of the Lakers to buy the Clippers, especially as a Lakers legend.
Magic sold his ownership piece of Lakers back in 2010.
Yeah I agree these are some sordid individuals, but the Magic angle is getting kind of conspiratorial. Is this being treated seriously?

I think a better theory is that maybe (if true) Sterling was fully aware of Magic's desire to get the team and that that was part of the source of his hatred for Magic in his diatribe.
Magic certainly wasted no time going from being linked in the initial story to saying the NBA has no place for someone like Sterling to expressing his desire to own the team. I would think the gold digger would have had more leverage to get money out of Sterling just by having the tapes instead of leaking them to TMZ. So who benefits the most by the tapes being leaked to the press? The group that wants to own the team.

 
Underachievers said:
Sterling is probably no more racist than your a average NBA player. Sir Charles says that the NBA is a "black" league, but nobody jumps on that bit of obvious racist statements. Pretty tough to take racism seriously when those types of double standards exist.
Sir Charles is right. The NBA is a black league.

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top