He means you currently make $50,000 at Firm A, Firm B is offering you $100K and Firm C is offering $80K. Would you take Firm C's offer?I don't follow this:
Would you be willing to take 20% less in salary when signing a new contract - provided the new amount is still higher than your current salary?
If Firm C is a considerably better place to work, with better long term potential, absolutely. You're talking about a difference of about $500 hitting your account per paycheck. I wouldn't take that extra money to be miserable if it came down to a bad office or rough commute.He means you currently make $50,000 at Firm A, Firm B is offering you $100K and Firm C is offering $80K. Would you take Firm C's offer?I don't follow this:
Would you be willing to take 20% less in salary when signing a new contract - provided the new amount is still higher than your current salary?
He means you currently make $50,000 at Firm A, Firm B is offering you $100K and Firm C is offering $80K. Would you take Firm C's offer?I don't follow this:
Would you be willing to take 20% less in salary when signing a new contract - provided the new amount is still higher than your current salary?
Makes sense. I did a job switch that resulted in a big paycut and I was very, very happy I made the move. Then again, it was a move out of management consulting and almost any job environment is better than that. I've made up the difference since then in pay.He means you currently make $50,000 at Firm A, Firm B is offering you $100K and Firm C is offering $80K. Would you take Firm C's offer?I don't follow this:
Would you be willing to take 20% less in salary when signing a new contract - provided the new amount is still higher than your current salary?
Granted, there are significant differences between us and NFL players. One of which is most of us will have longer careers.Is this what GB is trying to sell Randall Cobb?
One reason players rarely do this is they know their careers are always one play from ending.
Make the money while you can.
poll editted to add this.Coming out of law school I had two offers. One was for a law clerk position which at the time paid $29,500, the other was with a personal injury firm specializing in class action suits. The latter was offering $58,000. I chose the lower paying position believing that in the long term I would be more employable and would increase my opportunity to maximize my career earnings. The law clerk position also offered me some distance from an unpleasant relationship break up.
If the salaries were figured on an hourly basis they were quite comparable as first year associates in the P.I. firm typically put in over 70 hours per week.
I'm at this point in my life also, however I was very driven by money previously. I was aggressive and had myself in a 'change/move up every 2-3yrs' plan.Yes, although I've never been put in that situation.
One thing I've learned about myself over the years is that I really don't care very much about my salary compared to most people, including my colleagues. I'm fortunate enough to earn a comfortable income that allows my family and me to not have to worry about most run-of-the-mill financial issues, and my wife and I both prefer a relatively modest lifestyle anyway. If I had to give up 20% of my salary for a clearly more fulfilling job, I'd do it with only a little hesitation. That would especially be true once my kids are out of college.
Possibly. Only Cobb can decide if staying in GB and catching passes from Rodgers is worth sacrificing millions of dollars that he can never recoup.Granted, there are significant differences between us and NFL players. One of which is most of us will have longer careers.Is this what GB is trying to sell Randall Cobb?
One reason players rarely do this is they know their careers are always one play from ending.
Make the money while you can.
I don't know what GB is selling Cobb, but it would be easy to see benefits of staying at his "Firm A".
It's a risk for sure, but he absolutely could recoup that money (and more).Possibly. Only Cobb can decide if staying in GB and catching passes from Rodgers is worth sacrificing millions of dollars that he can never recoup.Granted, there are significant differences between us and NFL players. One of which is most of us will have longer careers.Is this what GB is trying to sell Randall Cobb?
One reason players rarely do this is they know their careers are always one play from ending.
Make the money while you can.
I don't know what GB is selling Cobb, but it would be easy to see benefits of staying at his "Firm A".
Eric Decker comes to mind. He's a good player, but Peyton Manning got him paid. So why didn't he stay in Denver? Because Denver couldn't possibly pay him what he ended being worth on the open market.
Especially in the NFL, where the only guaranteed money a guy has is his signing bonus and current year salary, most guys are going to take the money.
Whatever each guy decides is cool with me. And I will add that I don't agree with people who criticize NFL players for "taking the money."
Especially if "Firm B" is the Raiders.Granted, there are significant differences between us and NFL players. One of which is most of us will have longer careers.Is this what GB is trying to sell Randall Cobb?
One reason players rarely do this is they know their careers are always one play from ending.
Make the money while you can.
I don't know what GB is selling Cobb, but it would be easy to see benefits of staying at his "Firm A".
Possibly. Only Cobb can decide if staying in GB and catching passes from Rodgers is worth sacrificing millions of dollars that he can never recoup.Granted, there are significant differences between us and NFL players. One of which is most of us will have longer careers.Is this what GB is trying to sell Randall Cobb?
One reason players rarely do this is they know their careers are always one play from ending.
Make the money while you can.
I don't know what GB is selling Cobb, but it would be easy to see benefits of staying at his "Firm A".
Eric Decker comes to mind. He's a good player, but Peyton Manning got him paid. So why didn't he stay in Denver? Because Denver couldn't possibly pay him what he ended being worth on the open market.
Especially in the NFL, where the only guaranteed money a guy has is his signing bonus and current year salary, most guys are going to take the money.
Whatever each guy decides is cool with me. And I will add that I don't agree with people who criticize NFL players for "taking the money."
Sure, Cobb is the gensis of the discussion but I didn't want to go too far down that rabbit hole. Cobb simply launched the discussion in our own careers, understanding there's a huge difference.Our jobs vs the job of an NFL player do not line up real well. Since I believe we are talking about Cobb, he has a short career. At most, he has 10 years left in the NFL. And, as many others have pointed out, his time in the NFL can end at any day. He needs to get the best contract that he can at this point in his career. In a few years, he can go after the contract that most likely leads to a ring.
or, say you work for Google and Firm B is Wal-Mart.Especially if "Firm B" is the Raiders.Granted, there are significant differences between us and NFL players. One of which is most of us will have longer careers.Is this what GB is trying to sell Randall Cobb?
One reason players rarely do this is they know their careers are always one play from ending.
Make the money while you can.
I don't know what GB is selling Cobb, but it would be easy to see benefits of staying at his "Firm A".
or, say you work for Google and Firm B is Wal-Mart.Especially if "Firm B" is the Raiders.Granted, there are significant differences between us and NFL players. One of which is most of us will have longer careers.Is this what GB is trying to sell Randall Cobb?
One reason players rarely do this is they know their careers are always one play from ending.
Make the money while you can.
I don't know what GB is selling Cobb, but it would be easy to see benefits of staying at his "Firm A".
https://balladeer.files.wordpress.com/2011/01/aldavis3.jpgor, say you work for Google and Firm B is Wal-Mart.Especially if "Firm B" is the Raiders.Granted, there are significant differences between us and NFL players. One of which is most of us will have longer careers.Is this what GB is trying to sell Randall Cobb?
One reason players rarely do this is they know their careers are always one play from ending.
Make the money while you can.
I don't know what GB is selling Cobb, but it would be easy to see benefits of staying at his "Firm A".![]()
Raiders - the Walmart of the NFL.
If I'm Cobb, I take $8MM from GB over $10MM from Cleveland, no questions asked. He's 24 and will be nicely positioned for another contract after the production he'll continue to put up in GB.
In that case, I can't say, as I don't earn my income via salary from an employer.Possibly. Only Cobb can decide if staying in GB and catching passes from Rodgers is worth sacrificing millions of dollars that he can never recoup.Granted, there are significant differences between us and NFL players. One of which is most of us will have longer careers.Is this what GB is trying to sell Randall Cobb?
One reason players rarely do this is they know their careers are always one play from ending.
Make the money while you can.
I don't know what GB is selling Cobb, but it would be easy to see benefits of staying at his "Firm A".
Eric Decker comes to mind. He's a good player, but Peyton Manning got him paid. So why didn't he stay in Denver? Because Denver couldn't possibly pay him what he ended being worth on the open market.
Especially in the NFL, where the only guaranteed money a guy has is his signing bonus and current year salary, most guys are going to take the money.
Whatever each guy decides is cool with me. And I will add that I don't agree with people who criticize NFL players for "taking the money."Sure, Cobb is the gensis of the discussion but I didn't want to go too far down that rabbit hole. Cobb simply launched the discussion in our own careers, understanding there's a huge difference.Our jobs vs the job of an NFL player do not line up real well. Since I believe we are talking about Cobb, he has a short career. At most, he has 10 years left in the NFL. And, as many others have pointed out, his time in the NFL can end at any day. He needs to get the best contract that he can at this point in his career. In a few years, he can go after the contract that most likely leads to a ring.
It's all relative. Kenyans / Afghans / 90% of the rest of the world would view the 42k-50k similar to how we view 8-10MI'm not sure it's ever fair to compare taking 8MM or 10MM vs. 42K or 50K
When you are at NFL level money you have a lifetime's supply of money if you do things correctly (granted like 70% of those guys ruin the opportunity and donk it up).
with 42 vs. 50 you're talking about some real living money for the person in question.
I have no personal experience with the matter and dental jobs don't really work like that, so I'm not sure what i'd do.
great point. The spread between the 1% and the bottom 10% is so gigantic it's hard to fathom.It's all relative. Kenyans / Afghans / 90% of the rest of the world would view the 42k-50k similar to how we view 8-10MI'm not sure it's ever fair to compare taking 8MM or 10MM vs. 42K or 50K
When you are at NFL level money you have a lifetime's supply of money if you do things correctly (granted like 70% of those guys ruin the opportunity and donk it up).
with 42 vs. 50 you're talking about some real living money for the person in question.
I have no personal experience with the matter and dental jobs don't really work like that, so I'm not sure what i'd do.
No one here knows anything about the Packers discussions with Cobb, any other offers or options Cobb may have, or the motivations that may affect Cobb's career decisions, nor does anyone here have even the slightest basis upon which to meaningfully opine as to what Cobb will or should do. That said, it is a good topic for standard off-season fantasy football message board banter.Is this what GB is trying to sell Randall Cobb?
One reason players rarely do this is they know their careers are always one play from ending.
Make the money while you can.
His first question doesn't say that. There is no discussion of trade offs - its like ...or what? Not have a job? Have to move? Tougher assignments??He means you currently make $50,000 at Firm A, Firm B is offering you $100K and Firm C is offering $80K. Would you take Firm C's offer?I don't follow this:
Would you be willing to take 20% less in salary when signing a new contract - provided the new amount is still higher than your current salary?
Of course my first question doesn't say that. It's the 2nd question.His first question doesn't say that. There is no discussion of trade offs - its like ...or what? Not have a job? Have to move? Tougher assignments??He means you currently make $50,000 at Firm A, Firm B is offering you $100K and Firm C is offering $80K. Would you take Firm C's offer?I don't follow this:
Would you be willing to take 20% less in salary when signing a new contract - provided the new amount is still higher than your current salary?
fair point on the 3rd, assumed there could be a reason everyone might be willing at some point.Horribly constructed poll. The second and third questions are confusing enough as it is, but the third question is missing an answer. The question starts with " IF YOU'D BE WILLING.....", but provides no possible response to those who are NOT willing to take a lesser salary.
But there are reporters who talk to people in the know and report stuff to us.No one here knows anything about the Packers discussions with Cobb, any other offers or options Cobb may have, or the motivations that may affect Cobb's career decisions, nor does anyone here have even the slightest basis upon which to meaningfully opine as to what Cobb will or should do. That said, it is a good topic for standard off-season fantasy football message board banter.Is this what GB is trying to sell Randall Cobb?
One reason players rarely do this is they know their careers are always one play from ending.
Make the money while you can.
Sure you would.If I'm Cobb, I take $8MM from GB over $10MM from Cleveland, no questions asked. He's 24 and will be nicely positioned for another contract after the production he'll continue to put up in GB.
If you haven't noticed, an important part of being a receiver is having someone to throw the ball to you. Anyone choosing the uncertainty of Cleveland over a future HoF smack in the middle of his prime is nuts.Sure you would.If I'm Cobb, I take $8MM from GB over $10MM from Cleveland, no questions asked. He's 24 and will be nicely positioned for another contract after the production he'll continue to put up in GB.
Smart people would, but not all NFL players are smart.Sure you would.If I'm Cobb, I take $8MM from GB over $10MM from Cleveland, no questions asked. He's 24 and will be nicely positioned for another contract after the production he'll continue to put up in GB.
Ian RapoportVerified account@RapSheetLooks like Cobb got the money AND the QB. Good for him.
What's the cost of living in Wisconsin vs California?45]Looks like Cobb got the money AND the QB. Good for him.
Ian RapoportVerified account@RapSheethttps://twitter.com/RapSheet
Randall Cobb had 6-7 offers today, Im told. He turned down considerably more money elsewhere to sign with the #Packers.
7:27 PM - 7 Mar 2015