Logical and I tend to agree. But others say since he almost played last week that maybe he is near a full go this week.I hope everybody is going to be realistic here and understand he's extremely likely to be on a snap count.
Probably 15-20 plays, see how he fares, get him out of there hammy intact.
He's not winning your desperate ### your game this week![]()
I remember Donte Stallworth having a hamstring issue that limited him for most of a season when I had him.Unbelievable, the worst hamstring injury in history. You would have thought he tore his ACL. If he ever does that his career is over with his ridiculous recovery timeCoach LaFleur just said Watson still has not been medically cleared to play.
Both teams down 2 top OL--- I thin points will be difficult to come by-- especially for GBAs a Jayden Reed-stan, I'm thinking Watson playing this week helps Reed's value more than Watson's. Either way I'm betting the over and hoping both teams score a ton.
Haven't they been down most of those guys for a couple weeks now? I guess you're right and it could be a defensive showcase taking that into consideration. But considering how much Jones, Reed, ARSB I own I'm hoping not. I may just be unrealistically wishing this into existence lol....Both teams down 2 top OL--- I thin points will be difficult to come by-- especially for GBAs a Jayden Reed-stan, I'm thinking Watson playing this week helps Reed's value more than Watson's. Either way I'm betting the over and hoping both teams score a ton.
NFL Network’s Tom Pelissero reports the team “will be cautious” with Christian Watson’s workload in Week 4 against the Lions.
This should serve as an immediate red flag to fantasy managers who were hoping to roll out Watson in his first game back. The Packers boast the eighth-highest scoring offense in the league through three weeks, and have gotten by just fine without Watson. While his return will bolster the passing game, the 2-1 Packers probably don’t feel much urgency to rush Watson back to action after he spent nearly three full weeks recovering from a hamstring injury. Unless you’re desperate for a spark, Watson may be best left on fantasy benches in Week 4.
They already gave him extra time by holding him out Sunday vs Saints. This way he plays Thursday and gets to see how his body responds when they have a long break until facing the Raiders on MNF in 1.5 weeks.I know it's a big game, but considering they have a bye next week, it would seem crazy to not give him that extra extended healing time, unless they view him as 100%
Bears D is legit horrible.Ive got to choose between Watson vs a decent detroit D or Mims vs a sucky chicago D. I expect both to play limited snaps. I see Watson as having a higher floor and Mims having a higher ceiling (at least for this week) Im leaning Mims for this week.
thanks to a TD. was otherwise disastrous.Doubs had a "pitch count" in week 1 and still did well.
you drafted him you start him zero pts be damned. you'll be kicking yourself if you sit him and he goes off for 7-138-2
* 2 TDsthanks to a TD. was otherwise disastrous.Doubs had a "pitch count" in week 1 and still did well.
He's sitting behind Lamb, Cooper, Puka, or maybe Lockett.they would not have put him out there if he can't go full speed thats like taking a speedster horse coming off an injury and trying to make a mudder out of him just because. sorry lol.
it's balls to the wall here not 'oooooh the water's too cold I'm gonna put one toe in at a time' nonsense.
![]()
Accept - Balls to the Wall
Accept's official music video for 'Balls To The Wall'. Click to listen to Accept on Spotify: http://smarturl.it/AcceptSpotify?IQid=AcceptBTTWAs featured on B...www.youtube.com
you drafted him you start him zero pts be damned. you'll be kicking yourself if you sit him and he goes off for 7-138-2
I pulled Doubs from my lineup week 1 because of the limited snap count and I lost because of it after he scored 2 TD's on my benchI hope everybody is going to be realistic here and understand he's extremely likely to be on a snap count.
Probably 15-20 plays, see how he fares, get him out of there hammy intact.
He's not winning your desperate ### your game this week![]()
I saw him briefly but they had a 3rd and 3 and he wasn't on the field.Is he on the field? How’s he look?
Not watching (yet).
Please advise![]()
Couple targets now, all goodI saw him briefly but they had a 3rd and 3 and he wasn't on the field.Is he on the field? How’s he look?
Not watching (yet).
Please advise![]()
0 points is not all good lolCouple targets now, all goodI saw him briefly but they had a 3rd and 3 and he wasn't on the field.Is he on the field? How’s he look?
Not watching (yet).
Please advise![]()
![]()
Just saw himIs he alive?
0 points is not all good lolCouple targets now, all goodI saw him briefly but they had a 3rd and 3 and he wasn't on the field.Is he on the field? How’s he look?
Not watching (yet).
Please advise![]()
![]()
Lol hindsight is 20/20.Easy call to start him... Packers are notorious for being extra cautious. Just takes one play for him to eat...he can still break one off this game
im happy he got some points0 points is not all good lolCouple targets now, all goodI saw him briefly but they had a 3rd and 3 and he wasn't on the field.Is he on the field? How’s he look?
Not watching (yet).
Please advise![]()
![]()
Why you trying to jinx my reverse hex?
TD Watson!!
You and me both man, he was looking like a hen and not a roosterim happy he got some points0 points is not all good lolCouple targets now, all goodI saw him briefly but they had a 3rd and 3 and he wasn't on the field.Is he on the field? How’s he look?
Not watching (yet).
Please advise![]()
![]()
Why you trying to jinx my reverse hex?
TD Watson!!
Not on the field this drive, mystifyingYou and me both man, he was looking like a hen and not a roosterim happy he got some points0 points is not all good lolCouple targets now, all goodI saw him briefly but they had a 3rd and 3 and he wasn't on the field.Is he on the field? How’s he look?
Not watching (yet).
Please advise![]()
![]()
Why you trying to jinx my reverse hex?
TD Watson!!![]()