Speaking Friday, Vic Fangio told reporters that Courtland Sutton may be added to the Reserve/COVID list.
If Sutton is out for Week 17 the Broncos will be rolling out Kendall Hinton, Seth Williams, and Diontae Spencer at wide receiver. With Drew Lock at quarterback, the Broncos passing game is likely to be an outright disaster. Sutton will be in WR2/3 consideration as the last wide receiver standing if he avoids the COVID list, otherwise, he will look to return in Week 18 against the Chiefs.
RELATED:
Vic Fangio
SOURCE: Mike Klis on Twitter
Dec 31, 2021, 2:59 PM ET
NFL Network's Ian Rapoport reports Courtland Sutton (illness) is expected to play in Week 17 against the Chargers.
Sutton is listed as questionable because of an illness and Broncos coach Vic Fangio said earlier in the week that he could land on the reserve/COVID list. Given that Sutton is traveling with the team, per Rapoport, he is likely dealing with a non-COVID illness that he can play through. With Jerry Jeudy and Tim Patrick out while on the COVID list, Sutton should get the chance to put up good numbers at the end of a disappointing season. He enters Week 17 as a high-upside WR3/4.
SOURCE: Ian Rapoport on Twitter
Jan 1, 2022, 3:25 PM ET
That’s a bold strategy, Cotton…Once Juedy and Patrick were listed as out I was hoping Sutton would not end up on the COVID list. Gut feeling he will be one of those out of nowhere championship hero's. Lock seemed to really rely on him in 2019 if I remember correctly. Considering him over Mooney (wind/weather) and Berrios (Jets offense).
That article sucked. It plain and simply sucked. Literally, no content. What is up with today's journalists?
IMO, Jeudy gets the biggest bump. Sutton, I compare to Metcalf. Jeudy to Lockett. (But, that's just my $.02)yep biggest winner in all of this maybe
Stats wise, yes, but value wise he is already more expensive to acquire than Sutton in dynastyIMO, Jeudy gets the biggest bump. Sutton, I compare to Metcalf. Jeudy to Lockett. (But, that's just my $.02)
 
 I would decline Mooney if offered for Sutton. Or counter adding something like maybe my 2023 3rd for his 2nd. But I am not a believer in Fields so there is that!!Curious if you guys would trade away Mooney for Sutton in a PPR best ball dynasty format? I was offered Sutton for Mooney a week ago and rejected it...should I be reconsidering now or keep Mooney?
If you have Sutton who recently got a nice extension of about $15M a year, let the good times roll. Why trade into the unknown? Odds are high Denver's Offense just got light years better.Curious if you guys would trade away Mooney for Sutton in a PPR best ball dynasty format? I was offered Sutton for Mooney a week ago and rejected it...should I be reconsidering now or keep Mooney?
You should have accepted that. Look at what Sutton did with Case Keenum before his injury.Curious if you guys would trade away Mooney for Sutton in a PPR best ball dynasty format? I was offered Sutton for Mooney a week ago and rejected it...should I be reconsidering now or keep Mooney?
There could be some parallels, but I'd be careful to extrapolate Wilson's tendencies with the Seattle guys to what he'll do in Denver.In the 10 games that Jeudy and Sutton played together, Sutton averaged 3.8 targets per game and 16 yards per game. Jeudy averaged 46 yards per game. All of this with bad QB play. I think 10 games is good enough of a sample size to see who you want between Jeudy and Sutton in 2022 with a good QB. If you want to look at this as Jeudy is the new Lockett and Sutton is the new Metcalf, let's not forget Wilson was in love with Lockett. I'll take the better route runner in this situation.
Do you really believe this? If so you may want to take a statistics class. You may end up being correct but your reasoning is specious.I think 10 games is good enough of a sample size to see who you want between Jeudy and Sutton in 2022 with a good QB.
What would be a good sample size in this scenario?Do you really believe this? If so you may want to take a statistics class. You may end up being correct but your reasoning is specious.
There's too much "noise" in a ten game sample size to draw any real conclusions. Maybe Sutton was banged up some of those weeks, maybe some of the games pop gun armed Bridgewater never even looked deep, maybe the better corner was on Sutton....What would be a good sample size in this scenario?
I can respect that, but that's what we have for the year 2021 when both were on the field together. I would think 10 games is a lot, but don't know how Wilson will work with either. I can see a Wilson / Lockett comparison for Jeudy and some big plays downfield with Sutton.There's too much "noise" in a ten game sample size to draw any real conclusions. Maybe Sutton was banged up some of those weeks, maybe some of the games pop gun armed Bridgewater never even looked deep, maybe the better corner was on Sutton....
On top of that I'm not sure what happened with bums like Bridgewater, Keenum, Flacco, Rypien or Lock under center have any predictive value on what will happen with Wilson.
I'm not saying you're wrong to believe Jeudy is the top target in Denver, there's plenty of good reasons to feel that way. I just wouldn't put any stock in some random 10 game sample size though that lacks context.
For the record I think Metcalf >>> Sutton and Lockett is >>> Jeudy so I hate the comps. But Wilson will certainly unlock whatever untapped potential they have.
That is key no matter whether one is assessing Sutton, Jeudy, Patrick, Hamler or Albert O in the passing game.Also, two kind of important things. Hamler and a stud RB are now at Wilson's disposal. I think the numbers might be alright, it's your guess as to where they'll go. Jeudy and/or Hamler are good buys imo.
What on earth is Pianowski telling us in that article? At least Behrens planted a flag. Pianowski said nothing, really, other than being Russell Wilson's favorite target would let somebody have a better season than they had with Lock and Bridgewater last year. No kidding, man.Courtland Sutton is the early favorite to be Russell Wilson’s top target
Certainly not the top half of the 1st but I could see a preference for Sutton to a late first, especially for a win now team.83805 said:Thoughts on value? Is he worth a rookie 1st with WR's seeming to be better out of the gate these days.
ESPN's Jeff Legwold writes that when Russell Wilson "really needs a completion or is moved off his spot" he's going to look for Courtland Sutton.
One of the biggest questions in fantasy football this year has been who will be the No. 1 target in Denver's offense: Courtland Sutton or Jerry Jeudy? Jeudy and Sutton tend to go off the board right in the same range. So even though this isn't necessarily a major scoop about usage or something like that, it is interesting to hear that Sutton appears to be Wilson's go-to receiver target in practice. It's probably worth tilting the scale towards Sutton for now.
SOURCE: ESPN
Aug 16, 2022, 1:56 PM ET
Adam Levitan @adamlevitan
This says Courtland Sutton has been Russ Wilson's "favorite target during training camp."
The New Testament slider in our #BibleNarrative models are breaking.
But I’m intrigued to see from the Sharks who we think comes out on top.
This reminds me of Lockett and Metcalf. Two years ago I took Metcalf later. Last year the script flipped and I took Lockett later. If you can get this right it can be a big help.But I’m intrigued to see from the Sharks who we think comes out on top.
For the cost, it seems that Sutton is rising to the point where he may no longer be the value (see him often going mid-late 3rd round) while Jeudy is creeping into that value target range in the mid/late 5th.
For the cost, I have found myself aiming for Jeudy a bit more, while just 3-4 weeks ago I was targeting Sutton a lot in the mid-late 4th.
I think Sutton will end up with slightly better stats, but that it will be close enough that from a fantasy perspective, I'd rather pick up Jeudy in the 5th and get someone like Waddle/DJ Moore who have similar ADPs as Sutton in the 3rd/early 4th
This statement is completely false. Doug Baldwin was the NFL's "prototypical slot receiver" in 2018 according to PFF. And NFL's best slot receiver in 2016, according to SI.Wilson, regardless of system, has always favored outside boundary receivers.
					
				
					
				This is true. It would be nice to hear reports about them connecting like that. The reports are more about Sutton at this point and I’m a buyer!And Jerry Jeudy is more like Doug Baldwin given his route-running skills.
This statement is completely false. Doug Baldwin was the NFL's "prototypical slot receiver" in 2018 according to PFF. And NFL's best slot receiver in 2016, according to SI.Wilson, regardless of system, has always favored outside boundary receivers.
Baldwin has been one of Russell Wilson’s favorite targets in the last few years, and the two have combined to be one of the best QB/WR duos in the NFL.
![]()
Doug Baldwin is NFL's prototypical slot receiver
The NFL's summer vacation has given Pro Football Focus a chance to sift through some of their data and help come up with NFL prototypes. The Seattle Seahawks' Doug Baldwin has been crowned as the 'shifty slot prototype' for his excellence as a slot receiver. Baldwin has…seahawkswire.usatoday.com
![]()
Doug Baldwin, Seattle Seahawks
Baldwin's strength as a receiver lies on the inside where he is a master improviser.www.si.com
This is true. Jeudy has significant potential but still has much to prove to fulfill it. So Sutton is the the less risky choice in a FF draft.Also, Sutton we know is a good WR when healthy.
We don't know that about Jeudy.
At this point you're just digging a deeper hole. Your statement was "regardless of system" and "always favored" the outside WR. Blatantly false on both counts.Wilson does not do well throwing the ball over the middle. Been that way for years.
But thanks for reminding us Doug Baldwin was fantasy relevant in 2017.