What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

WR Dontayvion Wicks, GB (3 Viewers)

The hype train for this guy is officially off the rails for this week's matchup.

Virtually every single fantasy site is hyping him up.

Probably for good reason. LAR are terrible against outside receivers, Wicks target share was superb last week, Doubs a bit banged up.

I'm trying to fit him in my lineup, but why does this feel like a "What could possibly go wrong?" situation.
 
The more hype, the less enthusiastic I feel but that's just my nature. I drafted him. I'm starting him regardless.
 
The more hype, the less enthusiastic I feel but that's just my nature. I drafted him. I'm starting him regardless.
Feel the same - how often does the reality live up to the hype? In any case, I'm also starting him regardless due to Nabers likely being out.
 
I'm starting him with Nabers out but I could easily see Doubs type numbers... wouldn't surprise me at all to see a 4/39 - 0 TD's
 
The hype train for this guy is officially off the rails for this week's matchup.

Virtually every single fantasy site is hyping him up.

Probably for good reason. LAR are terrible against outside receivers, Wicks target share was superb last week, Doubs a bit banged up.

I'm trying to fit him in my lineup, but why does this feel like a "What could possibly go wrong?" situation.

They were hyping him up before Doubs missed practice. Really dumb because GB was spreading the ball around to 4 receivers (3 WR, 1 TE). Then there's Josh Jacobs too.
GB was playing catchup mode vs Minn so that inflated the overall metrics.

Anyway he is only under consideration if Doubs is out. If Doubs is in I don't see how he is more than a flex play.
 
If Doubs is in I don't see how he is more than a flex play.

Wicks had more targets last week than Romeo had through the first 3 games. He's a lot better at creating space and getting open.

He had a 60 yd bomb called back in the 1st quarter of the first game. He's just good.
 
The more hype, the less enthusiastic I feel but that's just my nature. I drafted him. I'm starting him regardless.
Feel the same - how often does the reality live up to the hype? In any case, I'm also starting him regardless due to Nabers likely being out.
I also cringe whenever I read..."tasty matchup"
I would say the same thing for speculating on any kind of matchup because things rarely go as planned, but that's for another topic thread.
 
The hype train for this guy is officially off the rails for this week's matchup.

Virtually every single fantasy site is hyping him up.

Probably for good reason. LAR are terrible against outside receivers, Wicks target share was superb last week, Doubs a bit banged up.

I'm trying to fit him in my lineup, but why does this feel like a "What could possibly go wrong?" situation.

They were hyping him up before Doubs missed practice. Really dumb because GB was spreading the ball around to 4 receivers (3 WR, 1 TE). Then there's Josh Jacobs too.
GB was playing catchup mode vs Minn so that inflated the overall metrics.

Anyway he is only under consideration if Doubs is out. If Doubs is in I don't see how he is more than a flex play.
If Doubs is out, I'm seriously considering over T. Hill.

Amazing how the various rankings across sites have changed over the course of the week. Even looking at FBGs. T. Hill has kept plummeting while Wicks has been on the rise to the point in some spots they are ranked right next to each other in PPR.
 
When they went 12 personnel was he in over Reed after Watson left?
*Crickets* Anybody know?
After Watson’s injury, Wicks took over as the starting wide receiver opposite Doubs. Wicks rarely left the field. Bo Melton became the primary backup wide receiver. This had a minor impact on Doubs’ playing time and had no impact on Jayden Reed’s playing time. Reed continues to play only in three-receiver sets and has yet to play in a two-wide receiver set this season.
Thank you for the information. This is very important to know. Wicks has an opportunity here to be a positive game changer for us. Christian Watson may be Wally Pipped.

Looking at snap counts is something IDP people use a lot (well, they should anyhow).

Across the first 4 weeks, he's the slot guy, 3rd man in. In 2-wide personnel, it's usually been the other three guys.

As it applies to Reed, I feel like him getting to 2 man sets isn't really much of a thing to be concerned about. When he's on the field, they use him, he's showing efficiency. I dunno if I need him on the field with the two TE sets, blocking for Jacobs.
 
If Doubs is in I don't see how he is more than a flex play.

Wicks had more targets last week than Romeo had through the first 3 games. He's a lot better at creating space and getting open.
Some additional context:

Love threw 34 passes in game 1, it was Malik Willis for two weeks, then Love threw 54 freaking passes in week 4.

You start counting up targets on a 54 pass day, and trying to pro-rate them, you gonna be picking up Luke Musgrave if you don't look out :<_<:
 
If Doubs is in I don't see how he is more than a flex play.

Wicks had more targets last week than Romeo had through the first 3 games. He's a lot better at creating space and getting open.
Some additional context:

Love threw 34 passes in game 1, it was Malik Willis for two weeks, then Love threw 54 freaking passes in week 4.

You start counting up targets on a 54 pass day, and trying to pro-rate them, you gonna be picking up Luke Musgrave if you don't look out :<_<:
And the Rams are so bad that the game could be over by the 3rd.
Cardinals dropped 41 on them and Kyler only threw 21 passes.

I'm starting Wicks, but 2 Jacobs TD's, a Kraft TD and then take the air out of the ball/get Malik some more reps is certainly in play.
 
If Doubs is in I don't see how he is more than a flex play.

Wicks had more targets last week than Romeo had through the first 3 games. He's a lot better at creating space and getting open.
Some additional context:

Love threw 34 passes in game 1, it was Malik Willis for two weeks, then Love threw 54 freaking passes in week 4.

You start counting up targets on a 54 pass day, and trying to pro-rate them, you gonna be picking up Luke Musgrave if you don't look out :<_<:
And the Rams are so bad that the game could be over by the 3rd.
Cardinals dropped 41 on them and Kyler only threw 21 passes.

I'm starting Wicks, but 2 Jacobs TD's, a Kraft TD and then take the air out of the ball/get Malik some more reps is certainly in play.
Due to injuries/byes I've gotta start Wicks and Whittington so I'm hoping for a shootout lol. Both teams can be passed on IMO.
 
If Doubs is in I don't see how he is more than a flex play.

Wicks had more targets last week than Romeo had through the first 3 games. He's a lot better at creating space and getting open.
Some additional context:

Love threw 34 passes in game 1, it was Malik Willis for two weeks, then Love threw 54 freaking passes in week 4.

You start counting up targets on a 54 pass day, and trying to pro-rate them, you gonna be picking up Luke Musgrave if you don't look out :<_<:
And the Rams are so bad that the game could be over by the 3rd.
Cardinals dropped 41 on them and Kyler only threw 21 passes.

I'm starting Wicks, but 2 Jacobs TD's, a Kraft TD and then take the air out of the ball/get Malik some more reps is certainly in play.
I think at home, Stafford keeps firing away and keeps it close enough.
 
As it applies to Reed, I feel like him getting to 2 man sets isn't really much of a thing to be concerned about. When he's on the field, they use him, he's showing efficiency. I dunno if I need him on the field with the two TE sets, blocking for Jacobs.
Route running percentage is a better guide then snap counts for WR's but there is usually a correlation.

I understand being out there on running plays means nothing but of course teams can't be that predictable. Reed does get used decently when he's available and he's wildly efficient but I still think it's impacting his ultimate upside.

Reeds route running percentage is up to 82% this year from 69% last year but ironically it's actually positively skewed by the Malik Willis starts. He's been a 70% and 78% in the two full Love games and both of those games they had to go more pass heavy. My guess is over the course of a full season it's going to shrink back down to near the 70% mark like last year.

But this thread is about Wicks and he's shown a much higher target to route running percentage then Reed, albeit not remotely the same efficiency nor am I in anyway trying to knock Reed, just pointing out that to me not playing in 2 WR sets has an impact on him.

Some data:

Wicks has had just shy of one full game with Love as his QB and got 13 targets. I get the game script could not have been better but Reed's career high is 10 targets and Doubs career high is 13. Again for emphasis this was essentially Wicks first full game as a starter and even saying that it's "almost" a full game, give him those extra few snaps and he likely goes over the 13.

Running 20 routes a game is a pretty low bar but that's where I'll start.Week 4 was the first game Wicks did that all year. He did it 5 times last year and the number of routes he ran, targets and PPR points not counting fumbles or anything:

2023:

34/6/8.5
23/1/0
24/6/4
31/7/16.7
27/7/22.1

2024:

43/13/24.8

So we did have one total dud and some meh games but those were also his first 3 games getting that many routes early during his rookie season. Safe assumption he and Love had improved a great deal and his last 3 games getting this kind of work he's posted WR1 numbers and that was with Doubs in the lineup.

As mentioned he's not efficient. He makes a lot of mistakes but it sure seems to me he's going to get plenty of chances.
 
If Doubs is in I don't see how he is more than a flex play.

Wicks had more targets last week than Romeo had through the first 3 games. He's a lot better at creating space and getting open.
Some additional context:

Love threw 34 passes in game 1, it was Malik Willis for two weeks, then Love threw 54 freaking passes in week 4.

You start counting up targets on a 54 pass day, and trying to pro-rate them, you gonna be picking up Luke Musgrave if you don't look out :<_<:
And the Rams are so bad that the game could be over by the 3rd.
Cardinals dropped 41 on them and Kyler only threw 21 passes.

I'm starting Wicks, but 2 Jacobs TD's, a Kraft TD and then take the air out of the ball/get Malik some more reps is certainly in play.
I think at home, Stafford keeps firing away and keeps it close enough.
I hope they do. Making no predictions.

But if the Packers get up early, all bets are off. Packers are 2-2 this season. The 2 games they won were when they got up early and ran the hell out of the ball.
The games where they threw a lot were they games they lost. Wouldn't be shocking for LeFleur to get up early and pound away. He's 2-0 with Malik in games where he knew they were better and didn't need to throw the ball.

Anyway, I'm starting Wicks because he's a good player on a good offense against a bad defense. Just mentioning how the game script could go wrong. Could easily be one of those "hope he catches one of the first 3 TD's or it's a dud" kind of games

I hope the Rams show some life. But there's obviously a chance they won't.
 
But if the Packers get up early, all bets are off. Packers are 2-2 this season. The 2 games they won were when they got up early and ran the hell out of the ball.
The games where they threw a lot were they games they lost. Wouldn't be shocking for LeFleur to get up early and pound away. He's 2-0 with Malik in games where he knew they were better and didn't need to throw the ball
With the Love injury, and then facing a really good divisional opponent (who played well AND had some lucky bounces) this past week, I feel like the Packers have barely gotten out of the garage. I am not even going to try and project them based on these first 4 games--in terms of gameplan and tendency.

Their next 4 games are @Rams, then Cards and Texans at home, and @Jags. In my league, 3 out of those 4 are bottom 6 in fantasy points allowed to WR, and the Cards are 15th.
So, from a fantasy points allowed perspective, the Packers toughest opponent is ARI at home. Now, small sample size and all that, but the next month looks juicy for Packers passing game.

Everyone who matters on that offense is ascending, and I want a piece of this team come fantasy playoffs.
 
If Doubs is in I don't see how he is more than a flex play.

Wicks had more targets last week than Romeo had through the first 3 games. He's a lot better at creating space and getting open.
Some additional context:

Love threw 34 passes in game 1, it was Malik Willis for two weeks, then Love threw 54 freaking passes in week 4.

You start counting up targets on a 54 pass day, and trying to pro-rate them, you gonna be picking up Luke Musgrave if you don't look out :<_<:
And the Rams are so bad that the game could be over by the 3rd.
Cardinals dropped 41 on them and Kyler only threw 21 passes.

I'm starting Wicks, but 2 Jacobs TD's, a Kraft TD and then take the air out of the ball/get Malik some more reps is certainly in play.
I think at home, Stafford keeps firing away and keeps it close enough.
I hope they do. Making no predictions.

But if the Packers get up early, all bets are off. Packers are 2-2 this season. The 2 games they won were when they got up early and ran the hell out of the ball.
The games where they threw a lot were they games they lost. Wouldn't be shocking for LeFleur to get up early and pound away. He's 2-0 with Malik in games where he knew they were better and didn't need to throw the ball.

Anyway, I'm starting Wicks because he's a good player on a good offense against a bad defense. Just mentioning how the game script could go wrong. Could easily be one of those "hope he catches one of the first 3 TD's or it's a dud" kind of games

I hope the Rams show some life. But there's obviously a chance they won't.
Isn't that what we're looking for lol?

My other option is arguably the most talented WR in the league but on a team with no real QB, on the road, potentially shadowed by a good CB, in an offense that looks completely dysfunctional, and with the lowest O/U on the board.
 
But if the Packers get up early, all bets are off. Packers are 2-2 this season. The 2 games they won were when they got up early and ran the hell out of the ball.
The games where they threw a lot were they games they lost. Wouldn't be shocking for LeFleur to get up early and pound away. He's 2-0 with Malik in games where he knew they were better and didn't need to throw the ball
With the Love injury, and then facing a really good divisional opponent (who played well AND had some lucky bounces) this past week, I feel like the Packers have barely gotten out of the garage. I am not even going to try and project them based on these first 4 games--in terms of gameplan and tendency.

Their next 4 games are @Rams, then Cards and Texans at home, and @Jags. In my league, 3 out of those 4 are bottom 6 in fantasy points allowed to WR, and the Cards are 15th.
So, from a fantasy points allowed perspective, the Packers toughest opponent is ARI at home. Now, small sample size and all that, but the next month looks juicy for Packers passing game.

Everyone who matters on that offense is ascending, and I want a piece of this team come fantasy playoffs.
@SEA, NO, @MIN weeks 15-17.

Maybe GB players get you to the playoffs, but you sell high just prior.
 
@SEA, NO, @MIN weeks 15-17.

Maybe GB players get you to the playoffs, but you sell high just prior.
Looking ahead to playoff schedule is fun, but Imma tell you right now, you not scaring me with MIN in the dome. He just threw 54 passes against them!
 
If Doubs is in I don't see how he is more than a flex play.

Wicks had more targets last week than Romeo had through the first 3 games. He's a lot better at creating space and getting open.
Some additional context:

Love threw 34 passes in game 1, it was Malik Willis for two weeks, then Love threw 54 freaking passes in week 4.

You start counting up targets on a 54 pass day, and trying to pro-rate them, you gonna be picking up Luke Musgrave if you don't look out :<_<:
And the Rams are so bad that the game could be over by the 3rd.
Cardinals dropped 41 on them and Kyler only threw 21 passes.

I'm starting Wicks, but 2 Jacobs TD's, a Kraft TD and then take the air out of the ball/get Malik some more reps is certainly in play.
Eh, division games are a different animal alot of times
 
I feel like the Packers have barely gotten out of the garage. I am not even going to try and project them based on these first 4 games--in terms of gameplan and tendency.

This. The Packers have their eyes on the SB. They know they're going to have to be a high scoring team. They're going to run, but they know if they're going to win it's going to be on Jordan's arm. With him having missed a couple games, I think he gets plenty of reps and takes some shots downfield, even if the Rams fall way behind early.


Remember how shaky Love was at the beginning of the season vs the playoffs? They want to make sure he's in his final form. I don't think Malik sees the field.
 
I feel like the Packers have barely gotten out of the garage. I am not even going to try and project them based on these first 4 games--in terms of gameplan and tendency.

This. The Packers have their eyes on the SB. They know they're going to have to be a high scoring team. They're going to run, but they know if they're going to win it's going to be on Jordan's arm. With him having missed a couple games, I think he gets plenty of reps and takes some shots downfield, even if the Rams fall way behind early.


Remember how shaky Love was at the beginning of the season vs the playoffs? They want to make sure he's in his final form. I don't think Malik sees the field.
Good point.

Why not push to see what the ceiling is vs. salting away wins.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top