Possible felony. Since he doesn't have a CPL, needed to be in a gun case in the trunk. Brother having his in the vehicle was a non-issue because he has his CPL.
Super easy to get a CPL in Michigan. 10 million residents, 756,000 have their CPL. They also have reciprocity with just about everybody so he would have been good even with an out-of-state license.
Not sure how Michigan law will handle this nuance, but in Ohio the presence of the LCCH holder in the vehicle preempts the charge unless the firearm is in the physical possession of the non-licensee. Being under the seat would still fall under the licensee's right and responsibility.
It's like saying "a minor cannot possess alcohol" so a 6 pack in the back seat would be a big issue if a teen were driving alone but if Mom's driving it's a nothing burger. Until I hear more the "charge" doesn't concern me.
The pattern of behavior does though. He's clearly a moron and he clearly doesn't have the capacity to stay out of his own way. These guys always fade away pretty quickly.
The younger brother’s CPL is for him and for his registered firearm.
Jamo’s firearm is registered properly, but he does not have a CPL. The Michigan statue is clear how a non-CPL gun owner may transport in a vehicle. 1) Unloaded, And 2) In a carry case, And 3) Not accessible from the passenger compartment, e.g., in the trunk.
At the scene they tried the “oh that one’s mine [younger bro], too.”
OK, let’s see if your CPL is for that gun. Huh…not the case. In fact the gun is registered to your big brother. Wanna try again?