yeah he wont make it to 20 probably. doubt KC would do it, but you never know.They'd have to trade up to get him you'd think.
yeah he wont make it to 20 probably. doubt KC would do it, but you never know.They'd have to trade up to get him you'd think.
Not sure why anyone would think he would be.I see basically zero chance he's a Chief
Yeah hard to see him falling that farI see basically zero chance he's a Chief
I’m impressed.So, what, 86th percentile of all WR's, like all all? Doesn't sound super impressive based on that alone.Kent Lee Plate @MathBombJaxon Smith-Njigba is a WR prospect in the 2023 draft class. He scored an unofficial 8.56 RAS out of a possible 10.00 after his pro day. This ranked 415 out of 2866 WR from 1987 to 2023. ras.football/ras-informatio… #RAS
Boo this man. Booooooooo!I see basically zero chance he's a Chief
Never mind the numbers. It’s been his hallmark his entire college career. You can go see it on virtually every clip of him on YouTube.If he can shake coverage like #11, he'll be fine. Seems like that's where the athletic numbers are pointing
Maybe because their receiving corps has been decimated and Skyy Moore is a better ST player than he is a WR?Not sure why anyone would think he would be.I see basically zero chance he's a Chief
My point wasn’t whether KC would take JSN, but that the Chiefs won’t sniff JSN in the draft.Maybe because their receiving corps has been decimated and Skyy Moore is a better ST player than he is a WR?Not sure why anyone would think he would be.I see basically zero chance he's a Chief
Seems like of all the teams that need a WR, KC is absolutely one of those teams. And since they don’t need a ton else, it is conceivable that they could trade up to take one.
And if they do, JSN is one of maybe 3 guys I could see them doing it for.
All outside chance, but to suggest it’s unthinkable seems shortsighted to me.
Without a trade-up, you mean?My point wasn’t whether KC would take JSN, but that the Chiefs won’t sniff JSN in the draft.Maybe because their receiving corps has been decimated and Skyy Moore is a better ST player than he is a WR?Not sure why anyone would think he would be.I see basically zero chance he's a Chief
Seems like of all the teams that need a WR, KC is absolutely one of those teams. And since they don’t need a ton else, it is conceivable that they could trade up to take one.
And if they do, JSN is one of maybe 3 guys I could see them doing it for.
All outside chance, but to suggest it’s unthinkable seems shortsighted to me.
Ya, I don't see them trading up THAT high, that would cost them a TON.My point wasn’t whether KC would take JSN, but that the Chiefs won’t sniff JSN in the draft.Maybe because their receiving corps has been decimated and Skyy Moore is a better ST player than he is a WR?Not sure why anyone would think he would be.I see basically zero chance he's a Chief
Seems like of all the teams that need a WR, KC is absolutely one of those teams. And since they don’t need a ton else, it is conceivable that they could trade up to take one.
And if they do, JSN is one of maybe 3 guys I could see them doing it for.
All outside chance, but to suggest it’s unthinkable seems shortsighted to me.
Is her 4.55 number based on pro days that have been adjusted? Or just on 4.55 as is numbers?By the way, the combine and timing isn't the be-all end-all of everything. Some guys don't test well and are fine players. It's just that Cynthia Frelund did some great work on guys that run below a 4.55 (the link is lost to posterity) and she found that the prognosis for guys that run under a 4.55 in timing is not good. For every Kupp there's twenty to thirty guys who didn't. For every Smith-Njigba (and who anointed him already, anyway?) there's twenty or thirty guys that are mediocre.
Can he have a great pro career? Sure, he could. It's just that the odds are against it to a degree.
Is her 4.55 number based on pro days that have been adjusted? Or just on 4.55 as is numbers?
You said run under 4.55 in your post but I assume you meant run over 4.55. In that case, if we aren’t adjusting pro day times, JSN is good timewise.Is her 4.55 number based on pro days that have been adjusted? Or just on 4.55 as is numbers?
I don't recall. I think, if I had to guess, she'd be using combine numbers or pro day as reported. That's my guess. But I don't know that for sure, and the article and data are sort of lost to the internet.
As he’s projected to be a slot receiver in the NFL, I’m struggling to figure out why you keep bashing him based on metrics that you literally just said don’t apply.And again, I'm talking strictly for his use as an outside receiver, not as a slot guy. They use different measurements for those guys, as we've already gone over in this very thread, I believe.
As he’s projected to be a slot receiver in the NFL, I’m struggling to figure out why you keep bashing him based on metrics that you literally just said don’t apply.
Sounds like half a flag to me with that hedge at the end.As he’s projected to be a slot receiver in the NFL, I’m struggling to figure out why you keep bashing him based on metrics that you literally just said don’t apply.
Because I'm bashing picking slot receivers with the 1.2-1.4 in general. That would be why.
I'm planting my flag and saying that it's bad business to do business that way. Will it be with this guy? Maybe or maybe not, but I sure wouldn't take the chance on it.
I’ll probably take him over GibbsAs he’s projected to be a slot receiver in the NFL, I’m struggling to figure out why you keep bashing him based on metrics that you literally just said don’t apply.
Because I'm bashing picking slot receivers with the 1.2-1.4 in general. That would be why.
I'm planting my flag and saying that it's bad business to do business that way. Will it be with this guy? Maybe or maybe not, but I sure wouldn't take the chance on it.
Sounds like half a flag to me with that hedge at the end.
Way to be bold.
I’ll probably take him over Gibbs
I’d rather have JSN over HigginsI’ll probably take him over Gibbs
Who has massive question marks of his own. I'd trade out of those spots and get really good players, if you ask me.
Trade your 1.2 and then a little bit for Higgins or see if the owner bites at the 1.2. That's what I would do.
I know it's not always that easy (my league is like pulling teeth and you're always losing deals), but it's at least worth a shot.
Same.I’d rather have JSN over HigginsI’ll probably take him over Gibbs
Who has massive question marks of his own. I'd trade out of those spots and get really good players, if you ask me.
Trade your 1.2 and then a little bit for Higgins or see if the owner bites at the 1.2. That's what I would do.
I know it's not always that easy (my league is like pulling teeth and you're always losing deals), but it's at least worth a shot.
I’d rather have JSN over Higgins
There’s no such thing as a sure thing.You're searching for outliers here when what you should be drafting is sure things.
SameI’ll probably take him over Gibbs
I have Higgins in both of my leagues - I would not take JSN over Higgins.I’d rather have JSN over Higgins
A time he beat, FWIW.
He also did a lot of things a lot better than most WR at the combine, like putting on a clinic in the shuttle drill.A time he beat, FWIW.
Prototype WRs for Frelund fall in the 4.51 or below category, where the combine is the standard measurement. By early and later accounts, he did not run that even at his pro day.
He had a hamstring injury and reportedly it prevented him from training for the 40 in time for the combine. Saying he chose not to seems slightly inaccurate.And before we get into the "pro day is just fine" thing, he could have solved any doubts by running at the combine, but he chose not to.
I was with you on CEH - it’s what led me to deal him for the pick that turned out to be 1.01Whatever. I'm not doing what I did in the CEH thread, which is to get a lot of people personally upset about a slow, undersized prospect that wowed people on film and that they desperately wanted to draft with their high pick. I've already said it. No need to beat it to death.
And the big thing is: you drafted Amon Ra at a discount. No one was pounding the table for Amon Ra at 1.3.Now, he mind wind up like Amon-Ra St. Brown and just be peachy (Brown ran a 4.6 on his pro day, IIRC), but the likelihood is slim that he performs on the outside and gets a huge second contract
And the big thing is: you drafted Amon Ra at a discount.
Actually, you don’t. No one does. Yet.Actually, I know it's not,
Actually, you don’t
The actual player.Know it's the profile or the actual player?
She digs up some great stats sometimes but this isn't one of them. 40 time isn't a great predictor of NFL success for receivers.It's just that Cynthia Frelund did some great work on guys that run below a 4.55 (the link is lost to posterity) and she found that the prognosis for guys that run under a 4.55 in timing is not good. For every Kupp there's twenty to thirty guys who didn't.
40 time isn't a great predictor of NFL success for receivers.
As an ARSB shareholder, I recognize it as well.You get no such discount this year.
WR1 SOLIDIFIED
Jaxon Smith-Njigba missed much of the 2022 season after a dominant effort in 2021, but he's had a big two months to kick off the draft process.
Starting in Indy where he posted a 6.57 three-cone (96th percentile) and 3.93 shuttle (97th percentile), elite agility testing numbers. He then ran his forty at Ohio State's Pro Day this week, timing in the range of 4.48-4.52. No one in the scouting circles expected him to be a burner on the track, but Smith-Njigba surpassed a key threshold for receivers in the forty time with the range of times he posted.
On top of that, he's interviewed extremely well throughout this process much like his former Buckeyes teammates Garrett Wilson and Chris Olave did last year.
With his route polish, ability to make catches in traffic, high IQ and pro ready skill set, he's expected to be the first wide receiver off the board in April. That could be as early as the first 15 picks, despite the position group lacking prototypical hype this year.
I've gotten higher on JSN throughout the process (has probably helped that I've also been underwhelmed by Addison) and am seeing that higher upside. After really deep diving on him, I'm a little surprised by some of the comps, because with his times being so much better than expected, I think he's out of the slot bubble so to speak. I've been sorta toying with a CeeDee Lamb comparison. JSN isn't as good after the catch, and is a little shorter, but they both have that same easy separation, without elite speed.Funny - went over to rotoworld & JSN being the WR1 is their headline story.
WR1 SOLIDIFIED
Jaxon Smith-Njigba missed much of the 2022 season after a dominant effort in 2021, but he's had a big two months to kick off the draft process.
Starting in Indy where he posted a 6.57 three-cone (96th percentile) and 3.93 shuttle (97th percentile), elite agility testing numbers. He then ran his forty at Ohio State's Pro Day this week, timing in the range of 4.48-4.52. No one in the scouting circles expected him to be a burner on the track, but Smith-Njigba surpassed a key threshold for receivers in the forty time with the range of times he posted.
On top of that, he's interviewed extremely well throughout this process much like his former Buckeyes teammates Garrett Wilson and Chris Olave did last year.
With his route polish, ability to make catches in traffic, high IQ and pro ready skill set, he's expected to be the first wide receiver off the board in April. That could be as early as the first 15 picks, despite the position group lacking prototypical hype this year.
They sound convinced.
Could make an analogy like JSN is to Stroud what QJ is to ARich.Having said that, I still think Quentin Johnston is a better prospect. Just offers more upside in my eyes,