Jacob's Ladder
Footballguy
Bottom line, you said the NFL is doing all they can do. That's simply not true. Sometimes you have to take the decision out of individuals' hands for their own safety. Combat sports figured this out a long time ago. The NFL is still working on it. But like you said, it's a balance...a balance between making money and protecting the players.You must find a balance just like with anything. If the NFL really cared solely about the players well being this game would stop being played. So in that context you are correct that the NFL is not doing the best that they can. Brain injuries are not simple. Players understand the risks. Players fudge their baselines to make it easier for themselves to get back on the field. This is not only on the NFL. To answer your questions:Those are just a few questions, but point being, the NFL is most certainly not being conservative in any of this. They are not doing the best they can. They are not acting in the athletes' best interest. In many cases, these decisions need to be taken out of the athletes control as is done in combat sports. Maybe they should? Problem is, this would hurt the product. The NFL is in CYA mode, and I would argue they are doing the minimum necessary to impact public perception and potential litigation, vs the maximum they could be doing.
1. Do we know those caps work? They may, they may not, I am sure there is some player pushback on these so the NFL has given the options to the player. They aren't preventing them from being used so the player's themselves can decide what they want. Seems like a good way to go.
2. I have no idea but based on your comment I would assume not. I have no idea if this would really change anything other than having additional information for study purposes.
3. Because nobody knows how these things effect the individual and the players want to get back to playing. There is not one size fits all solution here. These are unique injuries and the NFL has made it so you have to go symptom free to start the road back to getting on the field. That "symptom free" timeline is different for each player. Doctor's don't even have a time line because they don't know. So that seems like a good way to proceed. Players can always step back and take longer if they don't feel right. The only 100% safe solution is to not play the game.
Bottom line between our viewpoints is I believe the responsibility falls mostly on the players as they know their body best. The understand the risks and are making a decision based on what they want. The NFL's job is to present information and guidelines based on expert recommendations. I think they are doing this. It's not a broken bone. It's a vague injury that treats everyone differently. There is no set timetable so trying to force a set timetable isn't really feasible. I believe you think there should just be a blanket time line for everyone that you must sit out X days. It would work but I don't think it's necessary because everyone is different. Gone are the days of the NFL hiding things (for the most part). Players know the risks and make enough money they can walk away in many cases. I think the burden falls on both the players and NFL....not just the NFL.
