KellysHeroes
Footballguy
pretty sure Doobs role will decrease, Watson is basically gone; Reed seems to be the only WR that will have a role next to Golden
From your above posts, and from my previous post….I'm rooting for UNlucky.It doesn't look like I'm going to get him in any of my drafts 3 completed and another almost done and two just started. Unlucky or lucky?
Javon Walker 2002.Hell I don’t think the packers have drafted a WR in the 1st round in over 20yrs
It’s a case where it’s crowded because other than Reed, the other guys aren’t good (or with Watson not reliable). It seems GB would be wise to try and focus the passing game in on Reed, Golden and the TEs. My worry for fantasy team is even if Golden is good, he’s better for the offense than he is for statistical production.Heard an interesting take the other day on a podcast - might’ve been the football guys pod? I dunno.
But one of the concerns was the “crowded” WR room in GB. The one dude put it pretty nicely when he said “ if Golden hits, the rest of the WR’s on that team won’t matter”
So true, and a great way to think about it when drafting Golden. No, he’s not your prototypical “alpha WR” … but if he’s commanding the targets in an upcoming offense? Well worth it.
Hell I don’t think the packers have drafted a WR in the 1st round in over 20yrs
Sure .. but like I said, or the podcast man said - if Golden hits? I highly doubt there much value in any of the ancillary WR’s.It’s a case where it’s crowded because other than Reed, the other guys aren’t good (or with Watson not reliable). It seems GB would be wise to try and focus the passing game in on Reed, Golden and the TEs. My worry for fantasy team is even if Golden is good, he’s better for the offense than he is for statistical production.Heard an interesting take the other day on a podcast - might’ve been the football guys pod? I dunno.
But one of the concerns was the “crowded” WR room in GB. The one dude put it pretty nicely when he said “ if Golden hits, the rest of the WR’s on that team won’t matter”
So true, and a great way to think about it when drafting Golden. No, he’s not your prototypical “alpha WR” … but if he’s commanding the targets in an upcoming offense? Well worth it.
Hell I don’t think the packers have drafted a WR in the 1st round in over 20yrs
Ray G
When I’m evaluating WR I pay particular attention to a players catch to acceleration transition.
Matthew Golden’s ability to create after the catch on hitch routes (one of the most frequently run routes in the NFL) is outstanding.
No wasted movement. Very Good Player #NFLDraft
@wisconsinsane
Todd McShay: Matthew Golden stepped up in big games. Every time they needed him he stepped up. The fact he can adjust and track the football.
"Golden is the only guy in his class that moves like this . He's going to be a number two as a rookie and emerge as a number one."
Jason B. Hirschhorn
Nobody knows what rookies will be so soon after the draft, so take the following with a grain of salt.
@AlbertBreer wrote that the Packers feel Matthew Golden's "overall athleticism has already shown up" and they could make a veteran WR available "based on Golden's development."
Welcome aboard, Golden.
Just took him at 2.2 in FFPC 1QB TEP league.
From many of the comments in here, it sounds like I should’ve waited to grab him with my 4th round pick![]()
Packers have a strong plan for him and I expect WR3 level numbers from him as a rookie
60+/900/6-8 TDs as a rookie
I felt Jacobs was value at his ADP last year, this year I feel he is sky high and the Packers have a 2nd round RB from the '24 Draft, Marshawn Lloyd who is going to see touchesPackers have a strong plan for him and I expect WR3 level numbers from him as a rookie
60+/900/6-8 TDs as a rookie
I think those are fair expectations so long as he establishes himself as the leader of the pack in that room; but I'd agree that's also a fair expectation to have considering his draft capital and the role he played in college. He seems like their direct replacement to Watson, as no other WR on that team was really a field stretcher proficient at those deep routes and with the speed to really attack NFL secondaries.
My concerns are more the passing offense in general. They were 30th in passing attempts last year; the rest of their numbers being middle of the pack instead of bottom speak to a very high efficiency. But I worry it may also be a signal for some regression unless they up those attempts a bit. That could be a safe bet too though considering their investment in two more WRs and even their work horse back calling for the team to get a real WR1. He might not want 300+ rushing attempts again haha.
Seeing that your league is non-TEP, and you already have Kincaid and Kraft, I go with the first round WR at 1.12.Welcome aboard, Golden.
Just took him at 2.2 in FFPC 1QB TEP league.
From many of the comments in here, it sounds like I should’ve waited to grab him with my 4th round pick![]()
Good value there. I'm debating using the 1.12 if he's available, but will definitely be on board if a 1st round WR falls to my 2.3.
As it pertains to 1.12, really trying to figure out if the TEs offer any more than a marginal upgrade to Kraft or Kincaid in a non-TEP. I think it's probably just more of the same but leaning slightly towards Loveland over Golden for now.
Ryan Wood
Romeo Doubs’ initial impressions of Matthew Golden:
“Kid’s a stud, man.”
Ryan Wood
Matthew Golden already making an impression. Caught an 11-yard out from Malik Willis on second-team offense during 2-minute drill. Bumped up to starters on next 2-minute series and caught 9-yard out from Jordan Love, one play before touchdown to Jayden Reed.
What really strands out early is same thing everyone who’s ever coached Golden has said: tremendous hands. Looks like a natural receiving the football.