What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Yearly fantasy points stay the same only the names change. (1 Viewer)

nightmare

Footballguy
Fantasy points by year/position. FBG standard scoring, points rounded down.

QB1, RB1 WR1, and TE1 will vary but RB12, RB24, WR12, WR24, And the freakishly consistent

TE4 and TE12 stay well, consistent. Point jumps like 2007 Brady/Moss are easy to spot.

People moan about RBBC but WR and TE points don't seem to show the difference.

QB1 QB4 QB12 RB1 RB4 RB12 RB24 WR1 WR4 WR12 WR24 TE1 TE4 TE12
2000 402 349 249 375 256 229 159 234 224 169 123 174 92 61
2001 370 326 257 341 262 185 135 243 203 166 137 131 93 75
2002 362 326 265 373 289 219 152 239 189 161 133 123 92 63
2003 329 306 269 373 311 208 142 267 189 164 116 152 74 65
2004 433 329 268 307 278 198 157 238 203 165 147 174 113 69
2005 318 281 260 364 305 188 143 237 201 161 125 170 119 82
2006 362 307 242 427 272 186 161 209 181 159 131 146 113 81
2007 454 328 262 308 236 176 136 287 211 164 130 157 141 79
2008 372 335 257 284 244 203 148 215 183 159 128 166 118 82
2009 395 340 283 347 252 190 150 212 190 162 129 175 145 99
2010 357 348 286 330 242 205 138 209 198 161 126 154 130 96
2011 458 427 285 301 258 181 149 265 208 159 127 241 130 97
2012 418 380 311 309 251 183 119 226 205 173 133 152 130 96
2013 487 349 309 312 241 186 130 227 209 171 133 218 134 93
2014 426 374 318 304 244 177 121 254 227 176 135 184 136 94

 
One thing that stands out is the big shift to TE's from 2003 to 2005 - the TE12 in 2005 scored more than the TE4 in 2003 and almost as much as the TE4 in previous years.

 
You will notice a point difference in the QB totals. The first time I took the stats from FBG's stats

page. The second one is from my FBG's insider page yearly stats totals. Totals are rounded down.

PPR totals

QB1 QB4 QB12 RB1 RB4 RB12 RB24 WR1 WR4 WR12 WR24 TE1 TE4 TE12
2000 401 349 248 455 324 262 198 327 311 259 190 267 160 91
2001 369 325 256 423 306 226 166 351 309 250 208 203 152 113
2002 362 325 265 442 347 269 201 382 289 249 195 191 147 102
2003 329 300 268 447 337 245 167 378 285 242 172 222 124 102
2004 433 329 267 351 329 235 180 331 291 252 208 270 176 104
2005 317 281 260 378 359 218 168 339 289 233 199 259 190 131
2006 362 306 242 483 334 229 188 303 271 243 199 217 185 131
2007 454 327 261 372 274 209 166 385 304 244 195 252 222 126
2008 372 334 256 307 282 236 179 320 268 235 197 261 178 122
2009 395 339 282 396 325 221 180 312 285 247 188 271 221 152
2010 356 347 285 395 286 244 171 314 278 239 190 248 188 154
2011 458 427 285 376 307 224 168 361 284 233 195 330 209 163
2012 418 380 311 349 283 218 156 348 301 258 196 237 200 147
2013 486 348 309 382 296 227 174 319 306 269 201 303 214 148
2014 426 374 318 382 296 227 174 383 316 259 209 266 220 160

 
Why would wr/te show the difference? Rbbc clearly implies rbs splitting points whereas they didnt do so as frequently in the past. In other words, other rbs are getting the additional points the top rbs are clearly losing.

 
Shady your right, I mashed that sentence. The charts aren't going to show the second RB on

the RBBC team gaining points. 2004 seem to be the drop in RB1.

 
Pretty clear to see that we are in a passing league now with point totals of TE's and WR's trending up through the years. That's the biggest takeaway.

 
FBG standerd scoring RB's 96 is as far back as the stats go.

2000 to 2003 could be just an fluke, quark, outlier, or whatever.

RB1 RB4 RB12 RB24
1999 316 253 181 130
1998 350 264 195 126
1997 319 231 186 132
1996 280 250 175 125

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top