This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!
Same reason Damon Huard doesn't count.
It doesn't let his numbers look as nice.
They are old.
Why?
GarrardBorn: 2/14/1978
He was the starter last opening day.
Because they were born a long time ago? Garrard's 29 and Huard is 34, which hardly qualifies them as YOUNG gun QBs.
Schaub is 26 and in his fourth season
26 is a lot farther from 30 than 29 is.Schaub is 26 and in his fourth season
McCown is right in the middle.26 is a lot farther from 30 than 29 is.Schaub is 26 and in his fourth season
Trying to figure out the rules. Guy who's making his first start for the team in the first game of the year, right? McCown wasn't the Raiders starter last year, trying to figure out why he was excluded.
His momma.I do agree that Schaub should be excluded from the numbers, and it's pretty obvious that KRS is massaging the criteria a little bit to get a more interesting result, but I think the point is a decent one- the young QBs are looking pretty good today. Just further reinforces the notion that if a QB is ever going to be any good, he'll show it by his 3rd season in the league.
He started an opener for the cards. Doesn't matter that he changed teams.
Didn't really think about him honestly. Thought he was the opening day starter for the Cards some years back.
Looks like he was 2004.
Missed that one, then. But Romo should count later on today, right?
Yup, he's up next (forgot about him).
Who is Gerrard?
Some backup scrub that lucked into a starting job so I never bothered learning how to spell his name right.
Well, at least Alex Smith added one to the win column...
I didn't think he'd be top 10 this year but I'm really surprised how bad he looks. He has all the weapons but just can't put it together. Cutler is clearly a much better Qb at this point and going forward IMO.
