Hot Sauce Guy
Footballguy
1. Gurley
2. Gurley
3. Gurley
2. Gurley
3. Gurley
Right on. Pretty amazing what Mixon has done this year behind a poor o-line. He’d be RB8 right now if he hadn’t missed those 2 games. Not sure if Cincy will draft high enough for one of the QBs but that or another o-lineman would be nice. A first round OT, Glenn and a healthy Price would be a big improvement over their current o-line. No risk of stacked boxes either with a solid WR core of Green, Boyd and Ross. Definite chance of Mixon being better next year with some help to the QB or o-line situations.The question I find more interesting is which RB will make the leap into the Top 5? My money is on MIxon. He's had kind of a weird season with injuries (to himself as well as Dalton, Green, etc.) but has still managed to produce (RB13 in 0.5 PPR). Particularly if they shake up the coaching staff and/or get a new QB, he has the talent to become elite.
He's no Bell though!`What does Conner have to do in your mind to secure the starting job? He's only had 1300 or so all purpose yards and 13 TDs.
The correct answer is Nick Chubb. He's practically there already with a rookie QB and average to below average tackles.The question I find more interesting is which RB will make the leap into the Top 5? My money is on MIxon. He's had kind of a weird season with injuries (to himself as well as Dalton, Green, etc.) but has still managed to produce (RB13 in 0.5 PPR). Particularly if they shake up the coaching staff and/or get a new QB, he has the talent to become elite.
I suppose the time is coming when the NFL will have to deal with human cloning, but I think we may still be a couple decades out from that...1. Gurley
2. Gurley
3. Gurley
Agreed. Odd take by the poster you quoted. If I were PIT, I’d be ecstatic with their RB situation. Now they can fill other holes in the draft.`What does Conner have to do in your mind to secure the starting job? He's only had 1300 or so all purpose yards and 13 TDs.
Chubb’s talent and pedigree >>>>>>> Jeremy Hill’s. Its not even comparable really.Chubb I think he benefits from not being used to much earlier in the season. I am strong believer in fresh legged RB's looking way better then they really are and a lot of Chubb's season reminds me of Jeremy Hill's rookie year. Now let me say Chubb does look good, better receiver then I thought and his balance, power/speed combo looks really good but I just don't know if he can be this kind of effective from week 1-16.
.
Hill was a second round pick, that puts his pedigree pretty close to Chubb IMO and Hill also surprised people with how well he did as a receiver.Ted Lange as your Bartender said:Chubb’s talent and pedigree >>>>>>> Jeremy Hill’s. Its not even comparable really.
Plus he’s proving that he can catch the ball out of the backfield which was the biggest knock against him because Georgia used Sony Michel in that role instead.
Again you are turning this into a Hill vs Chubb debate, taking one comp and wanting this to turn into a debate and get the thread off track. Sorry not playing.https://www.playerprofiler.com/nfl/nick-chubb/
https://www.playerprofiler.com/nfl/jeremy-hill/
Nick Chubb is an elite talent and was basically a Gurley-level prospect before his injury, which he seems to be coming back from nicely. Jeremy Hill was never an elite prospect.
Its not Chubb’s fault that the Browns signed Hyde to a multi-year contract before drafting him, but he showed enough for them to trade Hyde away (despite being pretty decent early on) after 6 games.
Guice had complications and infection issues that required three additional surgeries. This will likely delay his rehab and return to the field.Don't agree with this. I have Guice rated very high despite not playing a down in the regular season - if people are dropping him on their boards he's a terrific buy opp IMO. He's a beast. If you were on board with him before the season then no reason to drop him in your rankings at this point.
PPR rankings with Barkley outside the top 4 lack credibility IMO.PPR/0.5 PPR rankings for me next year.
1. Kamara (assuming Ingram leaves in few agency and there’s no timeshare. Kamara was on a historic pace when Ingram was out this year.)
2. Gurley
3. Zeke
4. Chubb (Assuming coaching changes don’t endanger his newfound status as a three down back. They are paying Duke Johnson some good money and ownership does influence football decisions in Cleveland sometimes so that will be a situation to watch for me).
Really?Andy Dufresne said:Top 3 is really not much of a discussion.
Barkley
Gurley
Elliott
How you order them is up to you.
I'm not sure what you're saying. That it should be McCaffrey instead?Really?
Last 7 games ppg...
McCaffrey 30.6
Elliot 27.9
Barkley 21.4
Hurley 20.3
Maybe you meant top 3 in the second tier?
Because he's been #2 since Cooper showed up. Even more impressive is their offensive line has been patchwork at best.Elliott has been great lately but seems overrated in this thread. He is currently 5th or 6th in my leagues. Why would anyone expect to prefer him over Barkley, for example?
So the earlier games don't count?Because he's been #2 since Cooper showed up. Even more impressive is their offensive line has been patchwork at best.Elliott has been great lately but seems overrated in this thread. He is currently 5th or 6th in my leagues. Why would anyone expect to prefer him over Barkley, for example?
Of course they do and and he was at the top of the league, or top 3, in rushing yards and RB touches before Amari arrived. The only thing lacking was TDs, which is the most volatile stat to predict.So the earlier games don't count?
He's watched as much football as Stephen A Smith this year`What does Conner have to do in your mind to secure the starting job? He's only had 1300 or so all purpose yards and 13 TDs.
Freddie Kitchens is a great OC. The Browns have so much talent that's been held down by Hue Jackson. Chubb has been great since both Hyde and Jackson were sent packing.The correct answer is Nick Chubb. He's practically there already with a rookie QB and average to below average tackles.
That’s fair. I should have put Barkley at 4.PPR rankings with Barkley outside the top 4 lack credibility IMO.
I bolded the most relevant portion of your post.That’s fair. I should have put Barkley at 4.
I do think Kamara without a timeshare is underrated. Through the 4 games with Ingram on suspension he was walking away with RB1 in fantasy.
Nice cherrypicking there. You can make the same argument for McCaffrey, who is the #1 RB since Week 9 (which you don't have in your top 4). Or Todd Gurley, who was the #1 RB from weeks 5-8. But the #1RB in my PPR league for the entire season to date is Saquon Barkley, which you didn't originally have in your top 4.That’s fair. I should have put Barkley at 4.
I do think Kamara without a timeshare is underrated. Through the 4 games with Ingram on suspension he was walking away with RB1 in fantasy.
I hope so but the kid is injury proneRB to explode into the top 10 next year.....Kerryon.
Sure, let's consider total season.I'm not sure what you're saying. That it should be McCaffrey instead?
Or that we shouldn't consider total season performance but rather the last [insert arbitrary number of weeks here to get the result we're looking for] weeks of the season?
Interesting that you put Gordon in PPR over Gurley. I’d like to hear your thoughts - expect Gurley’s receptions to go down? If my quick math is right, Gurley avg 1 more reception per game played this year.Regular:
1. Gurley
2. Zeke
3. Barkley
PPR:
1. McCaffrey
2. Barkley
3. Gordon
I like the discussion of who will surprise rather than rehash rankings.RB to explode into the top 10 next year.....Kerryon.
I expect as Rivers continues to age, he'll start throwing the deep ball less, and he's a guy that already has no problem at all checking down. On the other end, I think the next logical place to go for the Rams is to grab a true #1 from somewhere...draft, FA, etc. There's no stud WR from the Rams, just basically a squad of #2's. I THINK that's what the Rams will do, but they could certainly be content with accepting their identity as a running team and leaning on Gurley.Interesting that you put Gordon in PPR over Gurley. I’d like to hear your thoughts - expect Gurley’s receptions to go down? If my quick math is right, Gurley avg 1 more reception per game played this year.
What if you pick 7th?1st round next year is gonna be easy. Just grab the next best RB on the board. I would be happy with Gurley, Zeke, Barkley, Kamara, CMC or Gordon as my #1. Prob in that order.
Throw Mixon in that group and take whoever is left. Hell, there’s Chubb too.What if you pick 7th?
He had 2 touches in the 1st half with #7 throwing 50 yard picks in this last game. He wasn't gassed last week and could easily have carried more that 7 times. He may not get quite that much as he did in the first month, but he could handle a McCaffrey type load and score 400+ easily.Kamara was often gassed and pulled for plays due to minor injuries during that 1st month as well.
No way in hell he was making it a full season at that pace. Absolute stud, but no way
In PPR, Chubb is #10 in ppg in weeks 7-16, at least for now (Lindsay could pass him tonight).Nick Chubb: Did not have more than THREE CARRIES, until Week 7. Did not have a reception until week 8.
Total Rushing: 972yds, 5.3ypc, 8TDs, long of 92.
Total Receiving: 153yds, 18 receptions, 2TDs.
TOTAL to WEEK 16: 1125yds, 10TDs.
..... and I repeat, he didnt get more than THREE carries, until Week 7.
Ya'll are missing the boat here. Big time.
Just seeing that list, plus Chubb, makes me feel pretty good if I get a top 7 pick in redraft next year. Add Bell if he lands in a good spot. I wonder if we could see a throwback first round of all RBs in non-PPR.In PPR, Chubb is #10 in ppg in weeks 7-16, at least for now (Lindsay could pass him tonight).
In weeks 7-16, he has 167/799/6 rushing (4.8 ypc) and 18/153/2 receiving (8.5 ypr) in 9 games. Scale that to 16 games and it is 297/1420/11 rushing and 32/272/3 receiving = 1692 total yards, 14 total TDs, and 32 receptions.
The rushing production is very strong, but his receiving production is not on par with the RBs most rankings have ahead of him (Gurley, Barkley, Elliott, Kamara, McCaffrey, Gordon).
No way he belongs in a top 3 ranking of RBs for next season.
all valid points...In PPR, Chubb is #10 in ppg in weeks 7-16, at least for now (Lindsay could pass him tonight).
In weeks 7-16, he has 167/799/6 rushing (4.8 ypc) and 18/153/2 receiving (8.5 ypr) in 9 games. Scale that to 16 games and it is 297/1420/11 rushing and 32/272/3 receiving = 1692 total yards, 14 total TDs, and 32 receptions.
The rushing production is very strong, but his receiving production is not on par with the RBs most rankings have ahead of him (Gurley, Barkley, Elliott, Kamara, McCaffrey, Gordon).
No way he belongs in a top 3 ranking of RBs for next season.
Yep.... though it's very against Andy to pull a move like this. If I were them I'd sign him though and not even pick an offensive player in the draft.Bell has mentioned wanting to play in INDY...if that happens, he joins the conversation IMO....however I think they have enough depth there already that he may want them more than they would want him....IMO Bell to KC makes way too much sense for both sides if KC can manage the cap...obviously defense is a need but sometimes you have to think about making your strengths stronger and figuring other things out.....Bell to a top team would change the price of donuts....if he did go to KC....hmmmmm
Sometimes RBs stats can be inflated when they start playin mid season due to ‘fresh legs’. Not saying Chubb won’t be good but I’d be wary of projecting out a full season with those stats.Nick Chubb: Did not have more than THREE CARRIES, until Week 7. Did not have a reception until week 8.
Total Rushing: 972yds, 5.3ypc, 8TDs, long of 92.
Total Receiving: 153yds, 18 receptions, 2TDs.
TOTAL to WEEK 16: 1125yds, 10TDs.
..... and I repeat, he didnt get more than THREE carries, until Week 7.
Ya'll are missing the boat here. Big time.