Henry Ford
Footballguy
Deep State.eh?
If Assange never committed a crime - why is he holed up in the Ecuadoran embassy?
Deep State.eh?
If Assange never committed a crime - why is he holed up in the Ecuadoran embassy?
I didn’t say he spoke with the people who committed the acts of terrorism on 9/11. I said Osama Bin Laden.I would too, if it were a criminal act of terrorism that killed thousands of people. It's doubtful I would apply the same scrutiny to a publisher that leaked emails and didn't commit a crime at all.
Best Fanesca in Europe?eh?
If Assange never committed a crime - why is he holed up in the Ecuadoran embassy?
Comes out muffled which is hard to understand.The gag order allows him to proclaim his innocence. I think this would fall into that category (but this is a problem with gag orders, they tend to be vague).
That's why the safe word has to be easy to understand.Sheriff Bart said:Comes out muffled which is hard to understand.
Lady gag order?That's why the safe word has to be easy to understand.
1 lent gravitas to the “trump is a Russian puppet” narrative by publishing news stories that FBI was investigating Trump RussiaBiff84 said:How did the dossier influence the election?
Political prisonerSinn Fein said:eh?
If Assange never committed a crime - why is he holed up in the Ecuadoran embassy?
1 by being published well after the election?1 lent gravitas to the “trump is a Russian puppet” narrative by publishing news stories that FBI was investigating Trump Russia
2 via FISA warrants and one hop rule, gave Clinton allies access to campaign communications
1 articles were published before the election1 by being published well after the election?
2 this happened when again?
I think he meant heresyHenry Ford said:Huh. That person should familiarize himself with the exclusions and exceptions to the definition of hearsay.
1 you claimed how the dossier helped. It was published in January of 20171 articles were published before the election
2 “outside contractors” had access to raw FISA data, FBI paid Steele and had a working relationship with him, Ohr’s wife worked for Fusion GPS and they passed intel
The unverified dossier was a key component to getting the FISA warrants and to getting reporting out that Trump was being investigated.1 you claimed how the dossier helped. It was published in January of 2017
2 who do you believe had such acces to fisa and what in the world do you think that had to do with the dossier? And wow another giant reach going on...dude
You keep trying there rove...The unverified dossier was a key component to getting the FISA warrants and to getting reporting out that Trump was being investigated.
If I use the same level of the evidence to determine “proof” for Trump that you’re using here, how many crimes would Trump be guilty of?1 lent gravitas to the “trump is a Russian puppet” narrative by publishing news stories that FBI was investigating Trump Russia
2 via FISA warrants and one hop rule, gave Clinton allies access to campaign communications
So, the Hillary campaign concocted a scheme with members of the CIA, FBI, NSA, DoJ, FISA judges, Austrialian and English diplomats, multiple law firms, a former head of MI-6, and the Russian government?1 lent gravitas to the “trump is a Russian puppet” narrative by publishing news stories that FBI was investigating Trump Russia
2 via FISA warrants and one hop rule, gave Clinton allies access to campaign communications
"Deep State be deeping"So, the Hillary campaign concocted a scheme with members of the CIA, FBI, NSA, DoJ, FISA judges, Austrialian and English diplomats, multiple law firms, a former head of MI-6, and the Russian government?
This plan went into action well before the Primary when it wasn't clear Trump would be the nominee, and all of the polls showed HRC held had a commanding lead.
20+ year US intelligence agents put their very careers on the line to take down a presumptive nominee who was a huge underdog anyways.
Even after all of that, all they got out of it was a single article in Yahoo news.
That's a hell of a conspiracy you've spun, Rove!.
All of them...everywhere...If I use the same level of the evidence to determine “proof” for Trump that you’re using here, how many crimes would Trump be guilty of?
When you put it like that it seems so obvious.So, the Hillary campaign concocted a scheme with members of the CIA, FBI, NSA, DoJ, FISA judges, Austrialian and English diplomats, multiple law firms, a former head of MI-6, and the Russian government?
This plan went into action well before the Primary when it wasn't clear Trump would be the nominee, and all of the polls showed HRC held had a commanding lead.
20+ year US intelligence agents put their very careers on the line to take down a presumptive nominee who was a huge underdog anyways.
Even after all of that, all they got out of it was a single article in Yahoo news.
That's a hell of a conspiracy you've spun, Rove!.
It's the derp stateSo, the Hillary campaign concocted a scheme with members of the CIA, FBI, NSA, DoJ, FISA judges, Austrialian and English diplomats, multiple law firms, a former head of MI-6, and the Russian government?
This plan went into action well before the Primary when it wasn't clear Trump would be the nominee, and all of the polls showed HRC held had a commanding lead.
20+ year US intelligence agents put their very careers on the line to take down a presumptive nominee who was a huge underdog anyways.
Even after all of that, all they got out of it was a single article in Yahoo news.
That's a hell of a conspiracy you've spun, Rove!.
Trump Org's Weisselberg not cooperating with feds, sources say
Cohen brought up Trump Organization Chief Financial Officer Allen Weisselberg several times when discussing the hush-money payments Cohen made to women who claim past affairs with Trump — affairs the president has repeatedly denied.
Weisselberg received immunity to testify before a federal grand jury in New York during the course of the investigation into the payments, The Wall Street Journal, NBC News and others reported last summer. Cohen pleaded guilty in August to tax and bank fraud as well as to campaign finance violations tied to those hush-money payments.
Some news outlets have suggested Weisselberg's testimony means he is cooperating with federal probes involving Cohen, the president and the Trump Organization. But three people with direct knowledge of the matter tell NBC News that Weisselberg is not cooperating, has never been a cooperating witness, and has provided limited details in the course of his testimony.
A person close to the Trump Organization tells NBC News that Weisselberg is still with the Trump Organization and defends Trump and the company.
that should be entertaining. I wonder how Jordan and the other lackeys will try to spin that questioning.Not enough popcorn in the world for waiting on Trump's reaction to this:
Kyle GriffinVerified account @kylegriffin1
The House Intelligence Committee intends to call Trump Org. CFO Allen Weisselberg to testify, a Democratic committee aide told The Daily Beast.
House Intel is a Schiff - Nunes production.that should be entertaining. I wonder how Jordan and the other lackeys will try to spin that questioning.
You're right. I skipped over it and assumed it was part of the same House Oversight Committee investigation. Nunes will just waste time and try to obstruct the proceedings.House Intel is a Schiff - Nunes production.
Well his immunity deal only extends to the hush money, so I’d guess that he will be pleading the 5th a lot.Not enough popcorn in the world for waiting on Trump's reaction to this:
Kyle GriffinVerified account @kylegriffin1
The House Intelligence Committee intends to call Trump Org. CFO Allen Weisselberg to testify, a Democratic committee aide told The Daily Beast.
I think he'll show up wearing a Hamberdler costume.You're right. I skipped over it and assumed it was part of the same House Oversight Committee investigation. Nunes will just waste time and try to obstruct the proceedings.
Just saw that. InterestingMarch 6 - Cohen continues House Intel in closed hearing
March 14 - OPEN hearing with Felix Sater
Does this look like an obstructionist to you?You're right. I skipped over it and assumed it was part of the same House Oversight Committee investigation. Nunes will just waste time and try to obstruct the proceedings.
Ah yes, the white turtleneck. Halcyon days my friend.
Are you trying to make Devin Nunes look extremely cool?
That’s the bad guy from Despicable Me 3
He’s from Tulare. It’s more of a hick-town than Bakersfield. Let that sink in.Are you trying to make Devin Nunes look extremely cool?
I knew it would be this picture of Nunes even before opening it
I will never let this pic die.I knew it would be this picture of Nunes even before opening it
I wish this to be true.adonis said:Trump is really delving to new depths of disgrace.
The GOP is orbiting a black hole, and as they circle faster and faster as they approach the event horizon, they cheer at their speed - seemingly completely unaware that they're hurtling towards their own end.
Counterpoint.The reality of the Trump years though is that A) the GOP still isn't going to lose a good portion of the states they already control, B) By and large, their constituency is going to become MORE engaged in the ideals of Trumpism, and C) if there's a series of bad political cycles for them...they're going to make it a point of importance to look for "The Next Trump" candidate.
Good point here:
But as I’ve also pointed out before, people tend to overestimate the importance of turning out the base, and to underestimate the importance of not having everyone hate you.
I'm not too worried about this. Trump seems like lightening in a bottle to me - a candidate who's celebrity pedigree seemed to overshadow and obfuscate a significant share of independents, up against a week RNC slate and a DNC candidate who turned off many independents. Coming off the 2018 elections, I think it is fair to say that key segment of independents has rejected a fear mongering isolationist platform. Any other loudmouth nationalist is not going to come onto the scene popular enough to win a general election, much less get through a primary process, given that our continuing diversification, JMHO.C) if there's a series of bad political cycles for them...they're going to make it a point of importance to look for "The Next Trump" candidate.
"I told progressives not to vote Trump because they opposed his policy, and conservatives not to vote Trump because he would cause a backlash that was worse than anything they might get from him. I said that the left thrives by imagining themselves as brave rebels fighting an ignorant, regressive, hateful authority, and that “bringing their straw man to life and putting him in the Oval Office” would be “the biggest gift” they could give the Democrats, and would end up pushing an entire generation further to the left."
I told conservatives not to vote for Trump because he was a conman that would debase the office while stealing the WH china."I told progressives not to vote Trump because they opposed his policy, and conservatives not to vote Trump because he would cause a backlash that was worse than anything they might get from him. I said that the left thrives by imagining themselves as brave rebels fighting an ignorant, regressive, hateful authority, and that “bringing their straw man to life and putting him in the Oval Office” would be “the biggest gift” they could give the Democrats, and would end up pushing an entire generation further to the left."
Well put.