rockaction
Footballguy
Hey mang, I'm infinite. No borders here.Or if you want to go neutral, appoint ren hoek or rocknation.
Hey mang, I'm infinite. No borders here.Or if you want to go neutral, appoint ren hoek or rocknation.
Just think of the “Notes to member” you could leave the people who you suspend. We’ll have come full circle.Hey mang, I'm infinite. No borders here.
Lots of repeating words colloquially discussing that person's intelligence, for sure.Just think of the “Notes to member” you could leave the people who you suspend. We’ll have come full circle.
Actually, you won't be here till Tuesday. Be cooler if you come back.You're an older dude? Geez, based on some of your posts I would have thought you were a teenage girl.
BAM!!!!!!!!!
I'm here till next Tuesday with shows at 7:00 and 9:00.
A dual what?How dare you speak of GB Carlton and my GB Rude in this way sir. Were I a younger man I would challenge you to a dual!
I perceive many of those persons somewhat differently than do you.I wanted to congratulate Joe for firing/demoting/whatever Bob McGaw.
I just learned in Maurile's thread that McGaw was gone. I knew I hadn't seen his posts in forever, wasn't sure what happened.
He was unhinged during the 2016 election and was banning people left and right solely because they supported Trump. Good riddance!
A recommendation, why not appoint a pro Trump (or at least neutral) mod to the PSF?
Maurile hates Trump, but is reasonable with his mod duties, which is fine.
The other two mods, Clayton and Aaron, don't even post in the PSF forum. Clayton is somewhat reasonable, but Aaron is widely recognized as extremely biased towards anyone who supports Trump.
I say get rid of Aaron, or at least prevent him from suspending people he disagrees with in a forum he doesn't even post in. Replace him with someone like jon mx or Max or Hell Toupee.
Or if you want to go neutral, appoint ren hoek or rocknation.
I of course was making light but Rude is salt of the Earth. Only know Carlton from here but he has always been chill.I perceive many of those persons somewhat differently than do you.
Cooler? Seriously? C'mon, man, it was a joke. You didn't get that from the wink emoji ? And from the obvious "I'm here till next Tuesday with shows at 7:00 and 9:00."?Actually, you won't be here till Tuesday. Be cooler if you come back.
That's a reasonable way of looking at it.I always thought I was less reasonable than Aaron.
The microphone might be broken. People keep dropping it.JAA said:Is this thing on? Asking for a friend
Haven’t you quit this place like 3 times now?KCitons said:This isn't a PSF moderation issue, since it occurred in the FFA stock thread. So, I will post it here.
There was a discussion about opening up the economy and the loss of life. To which I posted the following:
A few posters had an issue with me posting this comment and that it was off topic for a stock thread in the FFA. Keep in mind that I didn't start the conversation, and was the last of a handful of posters to even comment. Yet, I was the one poster called out as derailing the topic. (even though 75% of my post was about the market).
My followup response to a poster was this:
It's okay to discuss opening the economy at the risk of people dying. Which touches a nerve with me and is also off topic. But, if you make the comparison that banning guns, hunting, etc to save 40k lives a year, that's considered trolling? I was trying to put things into perspective. The last sentence is 100% accurate in that thread and is no worse than shorting a vaccine company to capitalize on a bad situation.
For this comment I received a 40 day suspension. Yep, 40 days. First suspension in 10 years on this board and it's 40 days for this? It just validates my opinion that moderation is out of control on this board.
Well you obviously must have upset someone sensitive and they reported you. Forty days in the hole seems excessive but we’ve all been assured things are fair and balanced. To sum up you must have a target on your backKCitons said:This isn't a PSF moderation issue, since it occurred in the FFA stock thread. So, I will post it here.
There was a discussion about opening up the economy and the loss of life. To which I posted the following:
A few posters had an issue with me posting this comment and that it was off topic for a stock thread in the FFA. Keep in mind that I didn't start the conversation, and was the last of a handful of posters to even comment. Yet, I was the one poster called out as derailing the topic. (even though 75% of my post was about the market).
My followup response to a poster was this:
It's okay to discuss opening the economy at the risk of people dying. Which touches a nerve with me and is also off topic. But, if you make the comparison that banning guns, hunting, etc to save 40k lives a year, that's considered trolling? I was trying to put things into perspective. The last sentence is 100% accurate in that thread and is no worse than shorting a vaccine company to capitalize on a bad situation.
For this comment I received a 40 day suspension. Yep, 40 days. First suspension in 10 years on this board and it's 40 days for this? It just validates my opinion that moderation is out of control on this board.
Haven't you been permabanned like 3 times?Haven’t you quit this place like 3 times now?
this is david dodds's board too, and he was run off by liberal posters complaining about him non stop.This is Joe’s board, he can run it any way he likes, fair or unfair, bias or unbiased, Pro or Anti Trump, or all things in the middle. I just don’t understand the need to cry victim, no one is forced to be here or interact. I would not waste one precious moment of this life hanging out and complaining in a place I feel I’m being treated unfairly and that drives me to the point of writing long posts to complain about it (multiple times I might add). Why add that to your life? It seems so unnecessary. I will just never understand this victim mentality that has become rampant in our society today.
He made a choice as a business owner, every business owner does that everyday. He could have made a different one. I miss his posts too (even if some were a bit “off”) and liked having his voice around as well but that was his choice. The run off narrative is BS.this is david dodds's board too, and he was run off by liberal posters complaining about him non stop.
I miss when David Dodds use to post in political threads, he brought a lot of interesting points up.
Really? You must not remember how nasty people were to him.He made a choice as a business owner, every business owner does that everyday. He could have made a different one. I miss his posts too (even if some were a bit “off”) and liked having his voice around as well but that was his choice. The run off narrative is BS.
He was told to stop posting in the PSF. It's not BSHe made a choice as a business owner, every business owner does that everyday. He could have made a different one. I miss his posts too (even if some were a bit “off”) and liked having his voice around as well but that was his choice. The run off narrative is BS.
The run off is not BS.He made a choice as a business owner, every business owner does that everyday. He could have made a different one. I miss his posts too (even if some were a bit “off”) and liked having his voice around as well but that was his choice. The run off narrative is BS.
See what I mean?Dodds didn't post unpopular "opinions." He posted insane conspiracy theories. There's an issue today where dangerous and unfounded nonsense gets called as such and people complain their "opinions" are being silenced, and I'm still not sure the best way to handle that. Twitter is trying by adding labels to official White House tweets but I'm not sure that's a long term solution.
I remember, I was defending him. But he still had a choice. It’s his business and he could have chosen differently, he didn’t. This isn’t a democracy here, it’s a private business and Joe and David own the decisions they make.Really? You must not remember how nasty people were to him.
This board is overwhelmingly liberal, and he wasn't posting popular liberal points, and it enraged the liberals so much that they started personally trashing him non stop.
They literally chased him out of political threads.
I’m not at all arguing this point. Lots of people were not happy with what he was saying. This is not in dispute.See what I mean?
would you label those complaining about Dodds cry babies that should have found something else to do with their time besides crying about what an owner does on his board?I remember, I was defending him. But he still had a choice. It’s his business and he could have chosen differently, he didn’t. This isn’t a democracy here, it’s a private business and Joe and David own the decisions they make.
He was told to stop posting in the PSF. It's not BS
I don’t (and I don’t think any of you do either but could be wrong) know the ownership relationship between Joe and Dodd’s, be it a 50/50 thing or some other percentage. But I’m assuming the 50/50 type thing. If it’s skewed in Joes favor then its Joes choice (as it should be) if not then Dodd’s made a business choice/decision.The run off is not BS.
Yes. 100%. Please go back to my first post today on that topic.would you label those complaining about Dodds cry babies that should have found something else to do with their time besides crying about what an owner does on his board?
I don't know either and don't care but Joe has said numerous times he asked David not to post here. It's not a secretI don’t (and I don’t think any of you do either but could be wrong) know the ownership relationship between Joe and Dodd’s, be it a 50/50 thing or some other percentage. But I’m assuming the 50/50 type thing. If it’s skewed in Joes favor then its Joes choice (as it should be) if not then Dodd’s made a business choice/decision.
Sure. And if David acquiesced he made a choice. This is not complicated guys. David is a smart grown businessman. If Joe ask him to stop and he did he made a choice to stop. Plain and simple. Again I do not agree with it and wish he were still here, but that doesn’t change the choice he made.I don't know either and don't care but Joe has said numerous times he asked David not to post here. It's not a secret
David Dodds is the GOAT when it comes to fantasy, and he built FBGs up to where it is today based on his tremendous fantasy knowledge in my opinion.I don't know either and don't care but Joe has said numerous times he asked David not to post here. It's not a secret
DoneGuys. Can we please this a break for the weekend at least. I already feel bad with the Minneapolis situation. Please let's just drop the slapping back and forth.
No I don’t.See what I mean?
Apologize, I missed this post. I won’t post in this thread anymoreGuys. Can we please this a break for the weekend at least. I already feel bad with the Minneapolis situation. Please let's just drop the slapping back and forth.
This sums it up. He posted what you disagreed with.No I don’t.
When Dodds stated that the Rothschilds and George Soros secretly controlled the media in this country I regarded that as an anti-Semitic slur and said so. As a Jew I was deeply offended.
I’m glad he doesn’t post anymore. His political posts were an embarrassment.
This is a smart guy.But at his place all you will get is a smile during any discussion involving politics or religion.
100% agree and have suggested as much in one form or another. But, theyve already said it a net loss for their business. It wouldnt mean anything to the crew if they didnt take something personal away from it. The way it is, is the only reason it is still alive.The smartest thing Joe, David, and all the rest could do is just to have zero "personal" presence in this forum. Leave it to "faceless mod" to crack the whip when necessary. No need to have posters taking this to a personal level.
I know a restaurant owner who has always subscribed to this. Outside of work he has defined opinions that are often quite different from mine. But at his place all you will get is a smile during any discussion involving politics or religion.
Ok thank you for clarifying that with me. When I read about Mods are suppose to tell what was the offended post I was not sure if they are suppose quote the offending post and then summarize why it went against board rules or not. Thats where I got confused.@DJackson10, both of your suspensions have the "Note for member" field filled in (just quoting the offending post).
In terms of the length of the suspension, I don't know what to tell you. The mods move in mysterious ways. Whoever gives the suspension tries to figure out what duration would be reasonable under the circumstances and makes a judgment call, but it's more art than science (and refrigerator art at that).