Welcome to Our Forums. Once you've registered and logged in, you're primed to talk football, among other topics, with the sharpest and most experienced fantasy players on the internet.
Well don't tell anyone but I hope you are successful in selling Chase high later on down the road as you mentioned doing before.I’m on the other side of the argument now. Go Chase!
I just talked myself into acquiring him, really.Well don't tell anyone but I hope you are successful in selling Chase high later on down the road as you mentioned doing before.
Logical inconsistencies might help you get a better price.
There is a lot to like about having any pieces of this offense I think.
That’s my hope. I feel like I bought fairly low with Samuel + a 2nd.
Music to my ears.
Same, although I think they could use both together at times. They did that a bit last year with Drake and Edmonds. I do think there is a 100% chance Conner is the RB on the field inside the 5, so Edmonds is almost a lock to be under 10 TDs, so RB1 upside probably isn't really attainable. However, Edmonds is very much a guy I'd like as an RB3, with solid RB2 upside. I'm expecting something more like a 55-45 split, that said, I could really see Edmonds finishing 2nd on the team in receiving, especially if Rondale Moore doesn't pop right away.Music to my ears.
I’m still skeptical that they brought in Conner just for breather back duties but ya love to hear the cards actually talking about featuring him.
Exactly what he is on my team now. CEH/Carson ~> Chase
I’m not paying attention to redraft ADP yet (& won’t for 5-6 weeks) but in terms ECR the conversation isn’t CEH (14-15) v Carson (17-18) v Edmonds (26) - it’s Chase v Gaskin v Hunt.
I completely agree with this. Sorry if I was unclear, in my dynasty league I traded for Chase Edmonds who is now my third running back behind those other two.
Agree on all counts. I think his one touchdown last year was a little bit fluky. I would expect to see a minimum of 4, especially since that offense should be maturing a little bit and becoming more efficient.
I hope that most of us are not trying to win an argument as much as searching for the "truth." Defending your belief is 100% expected, but one shouldn't change their belief just because now they are the owner. That being said, changing/modifying your belief based on hearing/reading good info from other posters IS what this should be about and it is possible that is what changed your opinion...some.I’m on the other side of the argument now. Go Chase!
wow. I can’t believe he kept Sony over Chase. Henderson is pretty close in valuation, IMO.
Liked the usage pre-garbage time. Also liked that Conner really didn’t look great.
I think you are confusing one underperforming player for another. Edmonds is a RB getting vultured by James Connor.
Beyond that rotoworld blurb I wonder if there has there been any indication that he’ll play next week. Could be a situation where they wait until the weekend to activate.
Obviously his health is a question mark, we won't know how he is physically until he gets back out there and shows us, but I wouldn't worry about Conner any more than before. He's run for the same 3.8 ypc since Edmonds has been out (against mediocre run defenses), and while his receiving numbers have obviously increased, I see no reason why those wouldn't go back to Edmonds when he returns.Johnny Utah #9 said:
Thanks for the insight. I wouldn’t be starting him this week, but needed him for next week. So it would basically be playing Chase in his first game back vs. Williams next week. Of course I’m making the assumption Swift is out next week as well, which is a total unknown at this point. Not an ideal situation for sure, but thank you for the insight.
Well, with McCaffrey and Henry out, and Barkley and Elliott being nowhere near 100%, it might not be a huge stretch. He's definitely top ten as far as available and healthy backs go. Taylor, Ekalar, Cook, Mixon, Kamura and Fournette are certainly ahead, but Conner may be next in line.
