I don't understand your flat earth angle. This guy's claim is first hand knowledge of events. If this guy is lying on court documents, he faces the penalties that would come with it.I think the media should report any evidence he has and it should be thoroughly investigated. Again, once the claim has been made by anyone that the earth is flat are you going to dismiss them or will you do a thorough investigation. I am not joking, I can find a person on the internet that will claim to you that the earth is flat. How can you NOT investigate his claim. Maybe I am not making this clear. He is making a claim.
If he is legit, he needs to find a better outlet than known fraudsters to tell his story.I don't understand your flat earth angle. This guy's claim is first hand knowledge of events. If this guy is lying on court documents, he faces the penalties that would come with it.
Well the RNC keeps changing the number to report voter fraud, so maybe they don't know who else to call?Why are all these claims being made too the media? Seems like it would be better served to report claims to law enforcement. If they are made to law enforcement then who cares what the media says. From everything I have seen 12 cases have come before the courts and have been dismissed.
Wait, are you saying that someone can't claim that the earth is flat? It's IMPOSSIBLE? That is what you are claiming?I don't understand your flat earth angle.
First hand knowledge of an event is different than a wild theory.Wait, are you saying that someone can't claim that the earth is flat? It's IMPOSSIBLE? That is what you are claiming?
I can agree with this. Sometimes the ambulance chaser is the first one you get.If he is legit, he needs to find a better outlet than known fraudsters to tell his story.
Nobody has first hand knowledge of tens of thousands of fraudulent votes, which is what you’re going to need to overturn any single state, and you’re going to need to overturn several states to change the result of this election.First hand knowledge of an event is different than a wild theory.
It was in reference to the whistleblower vs flat earth claim.Nobody has first hand knowledge of tens of thousands of fraudulent votes, which is what you’re going to need to overturn any single state, and you’re going to need to overturn several states to change the result of this election.
Claims are taken seriously if the claim is made by a person who can be trusted, who doesn’t CLEARLY have a self-interested motive and can be substantiated.Claims of voter fraud should be taken seriously. I'm sorry most people here disagree.
Overturning states doesn’t matter. It’s shining a light on these weasels and finding out what they did so people can have faith t ha t their vote counts.If voter fraud on a large scale happened people need to be held accountable.Nobody has first hand knowledge of tens of thousands of fraudulent votes, which is what you’re going to need to overturn any single state, and you’re going to need to overturn several states to change the result of this election.
Maybe you can explain to us what this is: I typed in “Dominion Hammer” to see if I could find it myself but all I got was a power metal album:It was in reference to the whistleblower vs flat earth claim.
But I do agree there, these one offs are small potatoes. The dominion/Hammer/scorecard claim is the one with the weight to swing the election.
That seems unlikely to swing an election of any kind.Maybe you can explain to us what this is: I typed in “Dominion Hammer” to see if I could find it myself but all I got was a power metal album:
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dominion_(HammerFall_album)
There is no evidence that voter fraud on a large scale happened. There is no evidence that anyone should not have faith that their votes count.Overturning states doesn’t matter. It’s shining a light on these weasels and finding out what they did so people can have faith t ha t their vote counts.If voter fraud on a large scale happened people need to be held accountable.
truth be told I wouldn’t the unofficial decision reversed. I couldn’t imaging the hissy that would be thrown by the left
An unsolicited affidavit is not a court document. Around here, I can take $20 and a handwritten note to a notary, and get myself an affidavit. I can then use it as a book mark, or a coaster, or maybe as a wall hanging.I don't understand your flat earth angle. This guy's claim is first hand knowledge of events. If this guy is lying on court documents, he faces the penalties that would come with it.
Very, very slight crack in the door -- a potential whistleblower need not have the entire case solved with hard proof all around like at the end of a Scooby Doo episode.In fact the claim should IMMEDIATELY be followed by evidence. Because the claim shouldn’t be made unless the person making the claim can prove it.
Ok, that is badass.Maybe you can explain to us what this is: I typed in “Dominion Hammer” to see if I could find it myself but all I got was a power metal album:
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dominion_(HammerFall_album)
Dominion is a voting software used in about 30 states. Some non partisan background reading on it can be found here.Maybe you can explain to us what this is: I typed in “Dominion Hammer” to see if I could find it myself but all I got was a power metal album:
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dominion_(HammerFall_album)
Powell is not nearly this. (Link2) (Link3) (Link4)It's a pretty bold claim by someone who I think is above the typical partisan personality. I know a couple media sites have claimed to have debunked it, but I hear the information is still being processed and vetted.
With what evidence? Claims don't deserve to be taken seriously just because they are claims. I mean, anyone can claim something. Maybe I'd feel differently if Sidney had hereby claimed it, but probably not even then.Sidney Powell has claimed the Hammer/scorecard (program/software) was used to manipulate the vote up to 3%.
It is in the process of being vetted. Feel free to ignore it if you think its bogus.With what evidence? Claims don't deserve to be taken seriously just because they are claims. I mean, anyone can claim something. Maybe I'd feel differently if Sidney had hereby claimed it, but probably not even then.
I'm simply trying to ascertain what the claim actually is. Can you give me the Cliff's Notes? "Fraud" isn't a claim.It is in the process of being vetted. Feel free to ignore it if you think its bogus.
Up to 3% of the vote digitally manipulated.I'm simply trying to ascertain what the claim actually is. Can you give me the Cliff's Notes? "Fraud" isn't a claim.
How? By whom? What information exists to lead one to that conclusion? Seriously, saying "up to 3% was fake" is no different than saying "there was fraud".Up to 3% of the vote digitally manipulated.
Going after Flynn was a partisan hit job in the first place. Her calling it out and defending him is the right thing to do.
That information has not been released yet.How? By whom? What information exists to lead one to that conclusion? Seriously, saying "up to 3% was fake" is no different than saying "there was fraud".
So how did you "hear" this?That information has not been released yet.
Hear it where?Dominion is a voting software used in about 30 states. Some non partisan background reading on it can be found here.
Sidney Powell has claimed the Hammer/scorecard (program/software) was used to manipulate the vote up to 3%.
It's a pretty bold claim by someone who I think is above the typical partisan personality. I know a couple media sites have claimed to have debunked it, but I hear the information is still being processed and vetted.
So how can you possibly say it seems legit, if so far, it's just "fraud!!1!!" with no supporting evidence whatsoever?That information has not been released yet.
Forgive me for putting absolutely 0% faith in that.Workplace gossip
You're right. We're just going in circles. The level of proof you need to see just isnt out there yet. I think it will come, others are justified to be skeptical. I'm not going to spend the day trying to convince people of what I think is a plausible claim.So how can you possibly say it seems legit, if so far, it's just "fraud!!1!!" with no supporting evidence whatsoever?
This is continuing to be an Abbott and Costello skit.
R: There's fraud!
Where?
R: Over there!
Uh, where, exactly?
R: Well, we have to look for it first.
If you haven't looked, how do you know it's there?
R: We did look, we found a bunch, you should look too.
OK, where should we look?
R: Over there!
Uh, where exactly?
R: Well, we have to look for it first...
Totally understand. I'd do the same in your shoes.Forgive me for putting absolutely 0% faith in that.
ETA -- Not that you didn't hear it, but that whoever is telling you this knows this information with any sort of accuracy.
My best friend's sister's boyfriend's brother's girlfriend heard from this guy who knows this kid who's going with a girl who saw voter fraud election night. I guess it's pretty serious.Forgive me for putting absolutely 0% faith in that.
ETA -- Not that you didn't hear it, but that whoever is telling you this knows this information with any sort of accuracy.
To be clear, if there is any evidence of voter fraud, I want to know. I don't care if it was a Republican or a Democrat committing it. And if there's evidence, then those votes need to be invalidated. I also want any evidence of fraud investigated.You're right. We're just going in circles. The level of proof you need to see just isnt out there yet. I think it will come, others are justified to be skeptical. I'm not going to spend the day trying to convince people of what I think is a plausible claim.
Are you talking about that PA postal worker’s claim? He recanted by affidavit to the IG office. I found a UPI article (in the AP family) with some more info than the early reporting earlier yesterday, with a quote from his postmaster, too.First hand knowledge of an event is different than a wild theory.
I'm genuinely trying to understand why you think it's a plausible claim. Is it purely based on the credibility you attach to the person making the claim?You're right. We're just going in circles. The level of proof you need to see just isnt out there yet. I think it will come, others are justified to be skeptical. I'm not going to spend the day trying to convince people of what I think is a plausible claim.
Why are they worth looking into?I've said they were claims every time. Should be easy to prove or debunk, but we're not to that stage yet.She needs to show her work. Powell is asserting things, not actually laying out a case.
On the other hand, this is how I learned about the Rod Stewart gerbil story.My best friend's sister's boyfriend's brother's girlfriend heard from this guy who knows this kid who's going with a girl who saw voter fraud election night. I guess it's pretty serious.
Project Veritas is a shameIs there a list of debunked claims. So far, I think theres.....
1) SharpieGate II - Arizona
2) The 3000 - Nevada
3) ANOTHER....false Project Vertias stunt - PA
4) Rudy G. And The Case Of Missing Poll Watchers - PA
5) 185K To Nuttin: How Joe Biden Scored 185K Votes One After Another - MI
Sidney Powell...I thought that name sounded familiar (and hardly above the typical partisan personality).Dominion is a voting software used in about 30 states. Some non partisan background reading on it can be found here.
Sidney Powell has claimed the Hammer/scorecard (program/software) was used to manipulate the vote up to 3%.
It's a pretty bold claim by someone who I think is above the typical partisan personality. I know a couple media sites have claimed to have debunked it, but I hear the information is still being processed and vetted.
On 10/28/2020 at 7:24 AM, knowledge dropper said:
Interesting
October 28, 2020
Biden Is Running a Protection Racket
By Sidney Powell
Joe Biden's big pitch is his promise to restore calm. It's a con. It's Antifa and Black Lives Matter — both on his side — that are stirring everything up. He's trying to run a protection racket: vote Democrat, or the chaos continues
Biden talks of calm, but it is not Trump-supporters storming restaurants and other public places across the country to demand obeisance to their agenda. Instead, from Washington to Kentucky to Florida, it is the "Black Lives Matter" movement — which Biden has made a centerpiece of his campaign — that has smashed up restaurants, threatened their owners, and demanded that diners raise the black power fist. As one headline put it, "aggressive mob of white BLM protesters threaten and film white diners at DC restaurants and DEMAND they raise their fist and show solidarity with them...or else."
Biden speaks of tolerance, but it isn't MAGA people marching into our schools, newsrooms, and even corporate boardrooms to demand absolute allegiance; it's Biden-supporting leftists. As President Trump warned in his Independence Day address at Mt. Rushmore, if you do not "perform its rituals, recite its mantras, and follow its commandments, then you will be censored, banished, blacklisted, persecuted, and punished."
[...]
That tied to the media already "debunking" the claim while the information is still be examined.I'm genuinely trying to understand why you think it's a plausible claim. Is it purely based on the credibility you attach to the person making the claim?
- looks fine to meHere is another example of an unnecessary fact check by twitter.
https://twitter.com/scrowder/status/1326195408620711936?s=20
He's blowing in the wind. He also set up a gofundme page that got up to $160K, then was quashed by GoFundMe.com. Less than nothing there.Are you talking about that PA postal worker’s claim? He recanted by affidavit to the IG office.
What's the point of whistleblowers or poll watchers if we're going to immediately dismiss their claims?Why are they worth looking into?
If I said Trump was a communist, is that worth looking into?
OK, we'll just have to disagree on this person's credibility.That tied to the media already "debunking" the claim while the information is still be examined.