Welcome to Our Forums. Once you've registered and logged in, you're primed to talk football, among other topics, with the sharpest and most experienced fantasy players on the internet.
I think he's a 4-5 year stud. And still not sure he's worth 1.1 only because.....
he's in a class with the best TE prospect I've ever seen who won't turn 21 until a few weeks into the season and a WR who if I combine his talent plus incoming situation I might have to go all the way back to Julio to find a WR I would have ranked higher entering the league.
I am trying to see what this connection is beyond Bama. Just your eyeball test?
Well in that case, Chase and Harris are looking like 2nd round dynasty picks to me. They have bust written all over them. Only worse move would be taking Kyle Pitts.
Sort of. Trent's stats were far better not that it means that much for NFL projection.
https://twitter.com/adamschefter/status/1071007618766909441?s=21
Show me the video of Bennie snell 22 mph on a treadmill I guess?Iceman03 said:
Henry produced as a Junior similar to Harris as a senior. Henry is bigger and faster as well.Dr. Octopus said:
Lynch is his agent? I don't know if I should snicker about that or change my perception of Lynch a bit.
Jacobs is the better hopeful comparison. However he is also a great demonstration if the effects of line play on the run game.Dr. Octopus said:
I'll take what's behind Door #3, Monty.It's driving me crazy deciding between him and Chase at the 1.1 in a non-ppr.
My league starts 2 RB. My current depth chart is swift, ekeler, hines, mckissick. Start 3 WRs. I have AJ, lamb, Diontae, Sutton, Hardman. I have 1.1, 1.7, 2.3. Non PPR.It's driving me crazy deciding between him and Chase at the 1.1 in a non-ppr.
It’s a hell of a choice in non-PPR. Given the scarcity at RB I go Harris in 1 QB non-ppr.It's driving me crazy deciding between him and Chase at the 1.1 in a non-ppr.
It's an epic conundrum. I have the 1 & 4 and then 6-8.
I didnt know which picks you had. Given your scenario I’d go Chase or Pitts at 1.01. You’ll have a RB waiting for you at 4. I’d likely go with Chase over Pitts but I don’t think you can go wrong with either.It's an epic conundrum. I have the 1 & 4 and then 6-8.
If I take Harris, then the next two could/should be Chase & Pitts. Williams isn't a bad consolation at 4. But missing out on both Chase & Pitts would be a bummer.
But if I take Chase, then I run the risk that two RBs go before four, and I really need a RB. And I don't want to take Etienne before Pitts.
But if I take Pitts at one, then Chase HAS to go in the next two, right? Then one of Harris or Williams is there at four.
BUT...If I take Pitts at 1, then I can likely get Smith at 6 so I still get a great receiver...
If you take Pitts 1 then you will likely get RB2 at 4 then WR2 + 3 and QB1 6-8.It's an epic conundrum. I have the 1 & 4 and then 6-8.
If I take Harris, then the next two could/should be Chase & Pitts. Williams isn't a bad consolation at 4. But missing out on both Chase & Pitts would be a bummer.
But if I take Chase, then I run the risk that two RBs go before four, and I really need a RB. And I don't want to take Etienne before Pitts.
But if I take Pitts at one, then Chase HAS to go in the next two, right? Then one of Harris or Williams is there at four.
It may not be the best route, but it's probably the safest so long as you're cool without Najee. The only possible curve ball would be Chase not going 2 or 3, but that seems unlikely given what I've seen in drafts the last week.
I'd take Harris. You said you really need a RB, and in a non-ppr I'd be mildly surprised if both Chase and Pitts go before RB#2. Worst case you get RB's 1 and 2, which isn't so bad in your situation.It's an epic conundrum. I have the 1 & 4 and then 6-8.
If I take Harris, then the next two could/should be Chase & Pitts. Williams isn't a bad consolation at 4. But missing out on both Chase & Pitts would be a bummer.
But if I take Chase, then I run the risk that two RBs go before four, and I really need a RB. And I don't want to take Etienne before Pitts.
But if I take Pitts at one, then Chase HAS to go in the next two, right? Then one of Harris or Williams is there at four.
I’m going against the grain and taking Chase. Haven’t been this impressed by a WR as a whole since AJ Green came out. I think Najee will be solid. But Chase feels like a top 10 wideout in tandem with Burrow for a decade.It's driving me crazy deciding between him and Chase at the 1.1 in a non-ppr.
Well I need everything. Blew up an orphaned team and the only pieces left are Chubb and Tee Higgins.
In non ppr I would pick Harris #1 then hope Pitts doesn't go 2 or 3. I am comfortable with the risk in going with that route. I think you need to decide whether you are comfortable with that risk or if you want to ensure a clean draft.So you all see my boggle.
Lightweight. I once took over a dynasty team and my top three players were Eli Manning, Cedric Benson, and Kevin Curtis.
That's great on one hand, really, but on the other I have to start two RBs. And sitting at six I could miss out on all three of the top backs. But I AM leaning toward rolling the dice this way.
You are going to have a winning team 1 year after blowing up a roster. Get one next year. Even if I am wrong on Harris, he won't be around long. Waiting until next year should just add time to your window. I would trade Chubb for 2022 picks.
Pitts at 1 in non ppr would be a colossal mistake. Not the right thread as this has digressed a bit more than it shoukd for this thread, but just putting that out there.
