[scooter]
Footballguy
I bet he likes good gravy, though.Good gravy. Eddie Lacy doesn't like Eddie Lacy.Around The NFL @AroundTheNFL 2m2 minutes ago
Eddie Lacy on James Starks: 'He's the better player between the two of us right now'
I bet he likes good gravy, though.Good gravy. Eddie Lacy doesn't like Eddie Lacy.Around The NFL @AroundTheNFL 2m2 minutes ago
Eddie Lacy on James Starks: 'He's the better player between the two of us right now'
On the other hand, if he were to exude confidence you would likely be ripping him for being delusional.he sounds very confident and certain that this will turn around quickly (sarcasm off).
I kind of agree.. But I don't think he needs to lose 30 lbs. even converting some of that weight to muscle with a net loss of 10-15 lbs would likely do wonders.He needs to get going the Pack are better with a in shape Lacy than Starks at his best. Lacy is a difference maker but he cant make a difference until he drop about 30-35 pounds.
Rumors have it he is about 265 and they want him at 230-235.I kind of agree.. But I don't think he needs to lose 30 lbs. even converting some of that weight to muscle with a net loss of 10-15 lbs would likely do wonders.He needs to get going the Pack are better with a in shape Lacy than Starks at his best. Lacy is a difference maker but he cant make a difference until he drop about 30-35 pounds.
I recently bought my only share of him for pretty low, I'm hoping that talent will rule the day eventually. I'm not going to pretend that it will happen, but I can see a path where him not getting lead back hits and some motivation can freshen his legs and present a window to help him lean up some.
Above all, I just don't think Starks can handle the load and Lacy will get another shot. Hopefully he is ready and effective when it happens.
That may be true, but I think losing 30-35 lbs is out of the question for our fantasy windowRumors have it he is about 265 and they want him at 230-235.
Last season, Lacy's 2.82 yards after contact average ranked as the third best among the 54 running backs that recorded at least 50 carries. This season, his 2.17 average ranks just 35th out of 47 such backs. He's not breaking tackles quite as often, seeing his average drop from one breaking tackle every 5.0 carries in 2014 to one every 9.2 carries in 2015.
Hell no. I have Starks, glad I drafted him as insurance. I'm rolling him out tomorrow and holding my breath.Ok so.... is anyone desperate enough to consider the Lion matchup and actually roll (and I do mean roll...) Eddie out as a starter tomorrow?
Me too. I will be quite pissed with all of this Starks is the lead back talk if Lacy gets the bulk of the work today.Hell no. I have Starks, glad I drafted him as insurance. I'm rolling him out tomorrow and holding my breath.Ok so.... is anyone desperate enough to consider the Lion matchup and actually roll (and I do mean roll...) Eddie out as a starter tomorrow?
You know damn well that Lacy will get two tds today. It's a mortal lock.Or he'll be inactive...Godsbrother said:Me too. I will be quite pissed with all of this Starks is the lead back talk if Lacy gets the bulk of the work today.BigBlue_RI said:Hell no. I have Starks, glad I drafted him as insurance. I'm rolling him out tomorrow and holding my breath.SaintsInDome2006 said:Ok so.... is anyone desperate enough to consider the Lion matchup and actually roll (and I do mean roll...) Eddie out as a starter tomorrow?
Same. I'm stoked.Really appreciate this move. Owner of both Starks and Lacy and will be rolling Starks out with complete confidence.
Updating to add week 9Lacy has a history of playing at a very high level when given a high work load.I really think this is where your thinking is wrong.I agree you can't play him ...I don't think anyone is raving about Starks. He is a middling talent and a backup RB. But he has been productive. Lacy has looked horrendous. That is a clear fact. Starks has played well in the passing game that is a clear fact.While I agree Lacy hasn't looked great ... I think this is more of a case of people pilling on and making a bad situation look worse then it is.
Despite being fat and injured Lacy is Avg 3.71 yds per carry ... Through the 1st 4 games of the season and prior to his injury he averaged 4.6 per carry
Starks who everyone is all of sudden raving about is avg 3.26 yds per carry in 7 out of 8 games ... Yes he has had 1 ridiculous good aberration of a game and has stunk worse then Big Foot the rest of the time.
If you're a Lacy owner who has Starks it really is time to insert Starks ahead of Lacy unless you have better options. And Lacy is on the bench till he proves at least in one.....just one game this season that he can be the bell cow he was the past 2 seasons for one of the better offenses in the game.
It's about points. Lacy is not scoring them every week. Starks has been when given the touches. I felt lucky last week when we got a TD out of him vs Denver.....this week he flat out collapsed and I think played himself out of the starters role for now.
Something is totally wrong with him this season, be it his weight, the high ankle sprain, fumbles.....he is simply not getting it done. I am not risking him in my lineup anymore. Not worth it. I see clearly that he is not the same player this year. I thought the high ankle sprain had a lot to do with it.....but it does not matter. He is not producing. I don't care why anymore. I am not selling (in dynasty) at this rock bottom level anyway.
It doesn't look good, he 's played like crap and is the mirror image of Big Foot but I think given the same opportunity he'd be putting as good or better numbers than Starks.
Perfect example of hype
Starks has played well in the passing game that is a clear fact. (avg 8.8 yds per catch)
Eddie Lacy has been absolutely terrible in the passing game (avg 9.2 yds per catch) .... just getting a lot less opportunities
Just facts that Starks has played better. Not a ton better. That offense has not been what we have known. But Starks is looking like he is going to be more involved going forward.
Believe me, I want Lacy to be great. But he has been dreadful. Starks is not that much better save for 2 games too. Starks has had 2 great games. Lacy 2 decent games. Starks had games where he has scored 14.6, 24.7 and 24.2 Lacys 3 best were 17.90, 11.70 2 times.
It's ugly this year for Green Bay's running game. And the reason Lacy is not being given opportunities in the passing game??? Have you been watching him play? I mean have you really watched him play? I was giving him time and the benfit of the doubt due to his nasty ankle sprain, like most of his owners. But we have 4 more weeks of regular season games left in FF
Time is up.
Moving on, unless he shows he can be trusted again. There is a reason he is not getting the same opportunity. Because he is not playing good at all.
Starks has a history playing at a high level as a change of pace and playing at a low level when asked to carry the load
Just look at this season alone and it will tell you everything you need to know about Starks
Week 2 - Lacy goes down - Starks (on everyone's benches) catches the world off guard has a good week
Week 3 - Everyone jumps on the bandwagon, plugs him into their lineups ... Greenbay leans on him and he bombs 17 carries for 1.88 per
Week 4 - Carries fade - enthusiasm fades
Week 5 - Carries fade more - enthusiasm fades more
Week 6 - Back on everyone's benches ... he goes off 11 yards per carry and a TD
Week 7 - Back in everyone's lineup ... and he bombs 5 carries for 1.80 per
Week 8 - Back to the bench ... 80 yards receiving and a TD
His big production is always flukey and unexpected ...typical change of pace guy that cant handle the workload
ATT YDS AVGHere are the rushing stats of each from 5 of the last 6 GB games that shows exactly how badly Starks has out played Lacy
ATT YDS AVG
10 46 4.6
18 90 5.0
13 27 2.1
11 38 3.5
05 10 2.0
Total
57 211 3.70
ATT YDS AVG
17 32 1.9
09 28 3.1
05 17 3.4
05 09 1.8
10 39 3.9
Total
45 125 2.78
Your opinion feels very biased. Are you purposefully omitting Starks 10 for 112yds? I think the biggest indicator is in games where they have both played, lately. Starks is just playing better. If you don't agree with me, just look at the carries from today's game. How did Lacy do?ATT YDS AVGHere are the rushing stats of each from 5 of the last 6 GB games that shows exactly how badly Starks has out played Lacy
ATT YDS AVG
10 46 4.6
18 90 5.0
13 27 2.1
11 38 3.5
05 10 2.0
Total
57 211 3.70
ATT YDS AVG
17 32 1.9
09 28 3.1
05 17 3.4
05 09 1.8
10 39 3.9
Total
45 125 2.78
10 46 4.6
18 90 5.0
13 27 2.1
11 38 3.5
05 10 2.0
Total
57 211 3.70
ATT YDS AVG
17 32 1.9
09 28 3.1
05 17 3.4
05 09 1.8
10 39 3.9
15 42 2.8
Total
60 167 2.78
Updated to add Today's game ... who's better?
Im happy for the late game receptions. But lets not act like this was anything close to resembling a good game. If this is outplaying Lacy it shouldnt take long for Lacy to get his job back.Starks still outplayed Lacy today if you look at Eddies 2015 overall. All that was missing was TD format to be a very good fantasy game.
The whole offense was awful. But again, compared to Lacy, Starks has looked better.Im happy for the late game receptions. But lets not act like this was anything close to resembling a good game. If this is outplaying Lacy it shouldnt take long for Lacy to get his job back.Starks still outplayed Lacy today if you look at Eddies 2015 overall. All that was missing was TD format to be a very good fantasy game.
Just awful. Lacy was probably on the sideline smiling because they cant peg it all on him. Starks had no room to run against a very generous run defense.Looks like the Packers O can stop blaming Lacy for their poor play. There is a lot broken right now.
Weren't you the guy telling me a month ago -- when I said he's fat, done and aging in dog years -- that you had no concern and how he was about to hit his stride?You know damn well that Lacy will get two tds today. It's a mortal lock.Or he'll be inactive...Me too. I will be quite pissed with all of this Starks is the lead back talk if Lacy gets the bulk of the work today.Hell no. I have Starks, glad I drafted him as insurance. I'm rolling him out tomorrow and holding my breath.Ok so.... is anyone desperate enough to consider the Lion matchup and actually roll (and I do mean roll...) Eddie out as a starter tomorrow?
Absolutely purposely omitting Starks 10 for 112 aberration and why wouldn't I ?Your opinion feels very biased. Are you purposefully omitting Starks 10 for 112yds? I think the biggest indicator is in games where they have both played, lately. Starks is just playing better. If you don't agree with me, just look at the carries from today's game. How did Lacy do?ATT YDS AVGHere are the rushing stats of each from 5 of the last 6 GB games that shows exactly how badly Starks has out played Lacy
ATT YDS AVG
10 46 4.6
18 90 5.0
13 27 2.1
11 38 3.5
05 10 2.0
Total
57 211 3.70
ATT YDS AVG
17 32 1.9
09 28 3.1
05 17 3.4
05 09 1.8
10 39 3.9
Total
45 125 2.78
10 46 4.6
18 90 5.0
13 27 2.1
11 38 3.5
05 10 2.0
Total
57 211 3.70
ATT YDS AVG
17 32 1.9
09 28 3.1
05 17 3.4
05 09 1.8
10 39 3.9
15 42 2.8
Total
60 167 2.78
Updated to add Today's game ... who's better?
2.8 yards per carry against Detroit at home and he had a fumble reversed on the most important drive of the gameStarks still outplayed Lacy today if you look at Eddies 2015 overall. All that was missing was TD format to be a very good fantasy game.
McCarthy: Starks will start Sunday, Lacy will go secondzeeshan2 said:
Rob Demovsky
✔@RobDemovsky
McCarthy: "Eddie [Lacy] will go second again this week." ... So James Starks is still the #Packers starting RB.
12:17 PM - 18 Nov 2015
Ball is not Bama - University of WisconsinThe Bama Curse. It got TRich, Ball, and now Lacy. Ingram is safe....for now
They do need Lacy to get it going.I think this week went about as well as could go for Lacy owners. Starks showed he's limited and the Packers lost to the lowly Lions at home.
This does not mean Lacy will get back to being the player of the past few years, but I think it does mean Lacy is going to get another shot at lead back duties this year.
Yikes! Anyone notice Lacy's history against Min ?
[SIZE=12.8px]4 Games (540 total yds and 6 tds) [/SIZE]
92 att 434 yds 4.72 Y/A 5 TDs
15 tgt 15 rec 106 yds 7.07 Y/R 1 TD