What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

Welcome to Our Forums. Once you've registered and logged in, you're primed to talk football, among other topics, with the sharpest and most experienced fantasy players on the internet.

WR Keenan Allen, CHI (2 Viewers)

Anyone been able to trade for him in dynasty? I'm looking into that now and wondering what I'll need to offer.

 
I picked up Allen in all my leagues as a replacement for Julio.Luckily I don't have to start KA right away, but I'm thinking he gives me the ability to trade away 1 of my better "name" WRs and bump him into my WR3 spot.

If this turns into a Danario 2012 scenario, we've found this year's WW gold.

 
I picked up Allen in all my leagues as a replacement for Julio.Luckily I don't have to start KA right away, but I'm thinking he gives me the ability to trade away 1 of my better "name" WRs and bump him into my WR3 spot.

If this turns into a Danario 2012 scenario, we've found this year's WW gold.
This would be my dream scenario!

 
Picked him up. PPR: I definitely don't see him as a WR2. I see more as a bye week fill in/WR4 type.

He had a nice final stat line. But he was at 3-45-1 with under 4 to play in comeback mode. Haven't had the chance to re-watch it yet, but I know the 30 yard catch at the end was against prevent.

To me, in a 12 team PPR league, saying he's a WR2 is going a bit overboard.
I just rewatched the game last night, and noticed that same thing. Two long passes to Keenan were in prevent mode on the last drive of the game. I like him and own him in Dynasty and a Keeper league, and think he is a future WR1, but for now, I think Rivers looks to Gates 1st, then Woodhead, then V.Brown.

V.Brown was used regularly/more consistently throughout the game.

This year, in PPR, I think V.Brown will be the more steady week-in, week-out 6 for 60 guy this year. Keenan is the big play guy. He looks good, but it is hard to tell from broadcast TV how good his routes are. It's hard to guess if SD will keep throwing big play shots to him unless they are way down like they were to OAK. He should continue to earn the trust of Rivers, and could become a WR1.

V.Brown's superpower is his route running (and hands). He is not a burner, but is always where he should be, squats in coverage, makes the catch. He has really good ball tracking, catching an over the shoulder ball (late 2nd quarter?) where he had to adjust from one side to the other, so he's not one-dimensional at all.

I am actually pretty excited (as a Chargers fan) with the young WR corps: Woodhead, Royal, VBrown, K.Allen, and hope Rivers keeps playing at a high level.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Anyone been able to trade for him in dynasty? I'm looking into that now and wondering what I'll need to offer.
In Dynasty, I think it is becoming obvious that he's in the class of DeAndre Hopkins. He's not AJ Green/Julio, but you probably have to pay top 20 WR prices in Dynasty.

 
I've got visions of a WR1 here, as soon as this season. He's getting all of Malcom Floyd's snaps and looks. Think about that for a second. There will be some down days, but thinking a lot of up ones as well, assuming Allen and Rivers stay healthy. Year end schedule is NYG, @Den, Oak. He could win fantasy championships as a WR3 on already strong squads.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Add me to the list of skeptics for value this season. Halfway through the 3Q vs OAK, he had 1 target and zero catches. He looked great, after that, but I don't want to put a WR2 or WR3 in my lineup and have to hope for comeback-mode or garbage-time to avoid regretting my play.

The talent is definitely there, but as others have said, until he ceases to be 4th-option for Rivers, I'm not putting him in my lineup unless they're playing Denver.

 
Add me to the list of skeptics for value this season. Halfway through the 3Q vs OAK, he had 1 target and zero catches. He looked great, after that, but I don't want to put a WR2 or WR3 in my lineup and have to hope for comeback-mode or garbage-time to avoid regretting my play.

The talent is definitely there, but as others have said, until he ceases to be 4th-option for Rivers, I'm not putting him in my lineup unless they're playing Denver.
The upside hope is that he's earned more trust from Rivers. When the game was on the line, he still looked at Allen even though it ended up in an INT. Plus I don't think this will be the last garbage time/comeback scenario the Chargers will be in. They look prime for shoot outs most weeks. This was the Raiders that had them that way.

 
Add me to the list of skeptics for value this season. Halfway through the 3Q vs OAK, he had 1 target and zero catches. He looked great, after that, but I don't want to put a WR2 or WR3 in my lineup and have to hope for comeback-mode or garbage-time to avoid regretting my play.

The talent is definitely there, but as others have said, until he ceases to be 4th-option for Rivers, I'm not putting him in my lineup unless they're playing Denver.
The upside hope is that he's earned more trust from Rivers. When the game was on the line, he still looked at Allen even though it ended up in an INT. Plus I don't think this will be the last garbage time/comeback scenario the Chargers will be in. They look prime for shoot outs most weeks. This was the Raiders that had them that way.
Well, and I don't think there's any debating that he looked like the most dynamic player out there when he finally did get his chances, so there's always the hope of that "genie back in the bottle"-thing and they will start to make his role more prominent.

 
Add me to the list of skeptics for value this season. Halfway through the 3Q vs OAK, he had 1 target and zero catches. He looked great, after that, but I don't want to put a WR2 or WR3 in my lineup and have to hope for comeback-mode or garbage-time to avoid regretting my play.

The talent is definitely there, but as others have said, until he ceases to be 4th-option for Rivers, I'm not putting him in my lineup unless they're playing Denver.
There is another way to look at this. He's a rookie who hasn't gotten a lot of looks. When Rivers finally started going his way, he took off.

Perhaps this builds something for the future.

Vincent Brown is not nearly as talented as Keenan Allen. But Allen is a rookie, and can be expected to struggle at times.

In re-draft, I probably would be mildly interested. In dynasty, I'd be doing whatever it takes to get this guy.

 
Add me to the list of skeptics for value this season. Halfway through the 3Q vs OAK, he had 1 target and zero catches. He looked great, after that, but I don't want to put a WR2 or WR3 in my lineup and have to hope for comeback-mode or garbage-time to avoid regretting my play.

The talent is definitely there, but as others have said, until he ceases to be 4th-option for Rivers, I'm not putting him in my lineup unless they're playing Denver.
He played 100% of the snaps and when he started getting looks, he looked like the best WR out there. It's not when players get their opportunities, it's what they do with them when they get them.

 
Add me to the list of skeptics for value this season. Halfway through the 3Q vs OAK, he had 1 target and zero catches. He looked great, after that, but I don't want to put a WR2 or WR3 in my lineup and have to hope for comeback-mode or garbage-time to avoid regretting my play.

The talent is definitely there, but as others have said, until he ceases to be 4th-option for Rivers, I'm not putting him in my lineup unless they're playing Denver.
He played 100% of the snaps and when he started getting looks, he looked like the best WR out there. It's not when players get their opportunities, it's what they do with them when they get them.
Yeah this whole garbage time only point just never makes sense. Who cares when the players get their points as long as they get em

 
Add me to the list of skeptics for value this season. Halfway through the 3Q vs OAK, he had 1 target and zero catches. He looked great, after that, but I don't want to put a WR2 or WR3 in my lineup and have to hope for comeback-mode or garbage-time to avoid regretting my play.

The talent is definitely there, but as others have said, until he ceases to be 4th-option for Rivers, I'm not putting him in my lineup unless they're playing Denver.
He played 100% of the snaps and when he started getting looks, he looked like the best WR out there. It's not when players get their opportunities, it's what they do with them when they get them.
Yeah this whole garbage time only point just never makes sense. Who cares when the players get their points as long as they get em
Agreed. Most of Barry Sanders' career was played in garbage time... and he did OK for his Owners.

Allen's star is on the rise.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Bottom line is he got 15 targets in 2 games and 11/195/1 in those games. And an established red zone target. Who cares when the targets started to happen? The point is they happened. The argument about targets coming late is as silly as the guys who say, "well if you take away Adrian Peterson's 88 yard TD run, he averaged 1.5 ypc on 11 carries...he sucks". Ridiculous line of thinking.

 
All you need to know is that Allen is by and far the most talented receiving option on a team projected to throw a very healthy amount this year.

A dude with Allen's talent seeing the field 100% of the time and with a floor of 5-6ish targets a game has real value no matter which way you look at it.

 
Agree that Allen is the most talented receiving option. V Brown is a good route runner, but he projects as a move the chains guy. Royal is a nifty slot guy. Woodhead causes matchup nightmares whereever he lines up. And P Rivers is undergoing a renaissance throwing quick darts all around the field. The combination of talent across the field is a very good thing for owners of any of these guys. All of this is a good thing. But Allen is the guy who is emerging as the #1 wideout. It's not showing on the statline yet, but he will blow away that 5-6 ish floor on targets soon. He's just getting started. Bigger, stronger, soft hands, good instincts. The others are playing a role. Allen has the talent to be Rivers primary target. For fantasy purposes, I think his ceiling is head and shoulders over the other SD wideouts, not named Gates.

 
But Allen is the guy who is emerging as the #1 wideout. It's not showing on the statline yet, but he will blow away that 5-6 ish floor on targets soon.
Depends on the stat. The stats I'm looking at (snap % and utilization, particularly in RZ; combined w/Floyd and adjusted for rookie transition) project him as a WR1 ROS, IF the offense (i.e. Rivers) keep it up all season. My eye test corroborates the story. Kid looks extremely polished out there.

 
Add me to the list of skeptics for value this season. Halfway through the 3Q vs OAK, he had 1 target and zero catches. He looked great, after that, but I don't want to put a WR2 or WR3 in my lineup and have to hope for comeback-mode or garbage-time to avoid regretting my play.

The talent is definitely there, but as others have said, until he ceases to be 4th-option for Rivers, I'm not putting him in my lineup unless they're playing Denver.
He played 100% of the snaps and when he started getting looks, he looked like the best WR out there. It's not when players get their opportunities, it's what they do with them when they get them.
Yeah this whole garbage time only point just never makes sense. Who cares when the players get their points as long as they get em
Exactly. Fantasy championships are won in garbage time.

 
But Allen is the guy who is emerging as the #1 wideout. It's not showing on the statline yet, but he will blow away that 5-6 ish floor on targets soon.
Depends on the stat. The stats I'm looking at (snap % and utilization, particularly in RZ; combined w/Floyd and adjusted for rookie transition) project him as a WR1 ROS, IF the offense (i.e. Rivers) keep it up all season. My eye test corroborates the story. Kid looks extremely polished out there.
The floor is a slightly safe estimate, as Floyd saw 5 and 6 targets himself in Weeks 1/2 and for the most part Allen has seen very similar looks (also ratio wise). He's also easily more talented then Floyd and once Rivers realizes that the dude can get open at will in tight spaces with his burst and quick feet (also plays extremely well into the offensive scheme), that floor could indeed rise.

If only this dude wasn't a rookie I'd be ready to label him a solid WR2 with WR1 upside due to the RZ love.

This may be for a new thread entirely, but seeing as how the NFL has evolved into almost a strict passing league, how much does it even matter that he's a rook? Is the learning curve still the same? A lot of rookie WRs have looked "wise beyond their years" to me thus far. Is this, abnormal?

 
yea Garbage time smarbage time... he is a rookie.. and like others have stated he is clearly the most talented WR on the time, and was a top prospect coming out of the draft... River's is slinging it this year, and as he continues to build more and more rapport with Rivers he will continue to see more and more targets.. and could easily be last year's Danario Alexander

and since a lot of people have been bashing this website and forum lately..

I would like to take this opportunity to thank the Shark Pool and Football Guys for the following reasons:

Julius Thomas

Terrelle Pryor

Joique Bell

Kansas City's Defense

Keenan Allen

Phillip Rivers

Josh Gordon

Terrence Williams (Bye Week Filler)

Enough said....Thanks guys!!

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Watched the whole game with royal in my lineup and needed 4 more points than I got. A few of Royals targets were not catchable but throwaways. KW looked to be in the field the whole game. I dropped Vjax earlier in the year for Edelman. I got kw after that game. Target data is good but not including dump offs or throwaways, they seemed to run more plays through Gates and KW and to a lesser extent VJ.... And I'm dropping royal.
Were you drunk after watching the fights when you typed (and edited) this?
This is real fantasy football where Eddie Royal, Kellen Winslow, Vincent Jackson and Antonio Gates all play together on the same Chargers roster.
He forgot the part where Peyton Manning threw that TD Ed McCaffery who made an amazing one handed catch in the end zone vs Dallas.

 
Add me to the list of skeptics for value this season. Halfway through the 3Q vs OAK, he had 1 target and zero catches. He looked great, after that, but I don't want to put a WR2 or WR3 in my lineup and have to hope for comeback-mode or garbage-time to avoid regretting my play.

The talent is definitely there, but as others have said, until he ceases to be 4th-option for Rivers, I'm not putting him in my lineup unless they're playing Denver.
How was Brown's targets through the same point in the game?

 
Add me to the list of skeptics for value this season. Halfway through the 3Q vs OAK, he had 1 target and zero catches. He looked great, after that, but I don't want to put a WR2 or WR3 in my lineup and have to hope for comeback-mode or garbage-time to avoid regretting my play.

The talent is definitely there, but as others have said, until he ceases to be 4th-option for Rivers, I'm not putting him in my lineup unless they're playing Denver.
How was Brown's targets through the same point in the game?
He was targeted early and often. I was actually quite impressed with his performance to be honest as he was getting separation for the first time all year.

 
Add me to the list of skeptics for value this season. Halfway through the 3Q vs OAK, he had 1 target and zero catches. He looked great, after that, but I don't want to put a WR2 or WR3 in my lineup and have to hope for comeback-mode or garbage-time to avoid regretting my play.

The talent is definitely there, but as others have said, until he ceases to be 4th-option for Rivers, I'm not putting him in my lineup unless they're playing Denver.
There is another way to look at this. He's a rookie who hasn't gotten a lot of looks. When Rivers finally started going his way, he took off.

Perhaps this builds something for the future.

Vincent Brown is not nearly as talented as Keenan Allen. But Allen is a rookie, and can be expected to struggle at times.

In re-draft, I probably would be mildly interested. In dynasty, I'd be doing whatever it takes to get this guy.
:goodposting: The fact that Rivers looked his way as much as he did is good enough for me and that's all that matters. The time in which he did means nothing. He'll see more targets Rivers is not stupid.

 
Add me to the list of skeptics for value this season. Halfway through the 3Q vs OAK, he had 1 target and zero catches. He looked great, after that, but I don't want to put a WR2 or WR3 in my lineup and have to hope for comeback-mode or garbage-time to avoid regretting my play.

The talent is definitely there, but as others have said, until he ceases to be 4th-option for Rivers, I'm not putting him in my lineup unless they're playing Denver.
How was Brown's targets through the same point in the game?
He was targeted early and often. I was actually quite impressed with his performance to be honest as he was getting separation for the first time all year.
Brown did look much better and was targetted 3 times in the 1st, then 4 times in the 3rd...

However, actually looking at the game again, I don't think we can really call the 4th quarter garbage time. They were within 7 after the Allen TD with 10 minutes left. Oakland got a FG on the next drive and they were down 10 with 4:24 left. That isn't garbage time... the game is on the line there and they were making a comeback (and almost did FWIW). On the next drive, SD drove down to the Oakland 4 yd line - Allen was targetted 3 times and Brown just once. Then Rivers threw a bad pass to Allen in the endzone for an INT. He was wide open and the pass was late / behind him. Allen had 5 targets in the 4th quarter. Brown had only 1. The game was on the line and he was looking to Allen often including twice in the endzone.

That says a lot about River's confidence in the rookie IMO. Garbage time? I think not.

 
You also can't disregard the value of targets. Being "4th" in line here is better than being 2nd in places like OAK, SEA, SF and etc. etc. This isn't a Peyton led offense, but there are very few other passing attacks you'd want to be part of right now.

River's is a top five QB and SD is boasting a top 5 passing attack.

If Allen/this situation really does progress further, watch out. He'll be the WW darling this year.

 
Add me to the list of skeptics for value this season. Halfway through the 3Q vs OAK, he had 1 target and zero catches. He looked great, after that, but I don't want to put a WR2 or WR3 in my lineup and have to hope for comeback-mode or garbage-time to avoid regretting my play.

The talent is definitely there, but as others have said, until he ceases to be 4th-option for Rivers, I'm not putting him in my lineup unless they're playing Denver.
How was Brown's targets through the same point in the game?
He was targeted early and often. I was actually quite impressed with his performance to be honest as he was getting separation for the first time all year.
Brown did look much better and was targetted 3 times in the 1st, then 4 times in the 3rd...

However, actually looking at the game again, I don't think we can really call the 4th quarter garbage time. They were within 7 after the Allen TD with 10 minutes left. Oakland got a FG on the next drive and they were down 10 with 4:24 left. That isn't garbage time... the game is on the line there and they were making a comeback (and almost did FWIW). On the next drive, SD drove down to the Oakland 4 yd line - Allen was targetted 3 times and Brown just once. Then Rivers threw a bad pass to Allen in the endzone for an INT. He was wide open and the pass was late / behind him. Allen had 5 targets in the 4th quarter. Brown had only 1. The game was on the line and he was looking to Allen often including twice in the endzone.

That says a lot about River's confidence in the rookie IMO. Garbage time? I think not.
Thanks for this, great observation and feedback.

GM

 
what's even more exciting is how often he was being utilized in the red zone. He could have had 3 TDs on the night as one was called back (I still say he knee was in) and on the other he got wide open but Rivers saw him too late, tried to force it and threw a pick.
Dan Fouts agrees with you. I still say a knee does not equal two feet.
One knee definitely equals two feet; that's not really in dispute.

But I thought his knee came down out of bounds. It was in bounds with respect to the back of the end zone, which was the angle they kept showing, but to me it looked out of bounds with respect to the sideline.

In any case, I thought I was kind of high on Allen, but I keep reading comments by others that make me sound pessimistic by comparison. People would consider trading Cecil Shorts for him?

Remember that a lot of people were pretty high on Eddie Royal not too long ago. (Only a week or two ago, I was in a small minority of people who liked Brown and Allen better than Royal.)

The nature of this offense, I think, is that the WRs are going to take turns getting hot. Brown, Allen, and Royal will all have big weeks occasionally. The only consistent producers will be Gates and Woodhead.

It's not that I'm low on Allen. I like him. I think he has good talent and he's in a pretty good situation. But I like him as a flex option. Definitely not as a fantasy WR2. He has that potential, but so do a lot of WRs around the league.

For a discussion about Allen by the FBG staff, see this week's Roundtable. Again, the other staffers surprised me a bit by generally being higher on him than I am.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
what's even more exciting is how often he was being utilized in the red zone. He could have had 3 TDs on the night as one was called back (I still say he knee was in) and on the other he got wide open but Rivers saw him too late, tried to force it and threw a pick.
Dan Fouts agrees with you. I still say a knee does not equal two feet.
One knee definitely equals two feet; that's not really in dispute.

But I thought his knee came down out of bounds. It was in bounds with respect to the back of the end zone, which was the angle they kept showing, but to me it looked out of bounds with respect to the sideline.

In any case, I thought I was kind of high on Allen, but I keep reading comments by others that make me sound pessimistic by comparison. People would consider trading Cecil Shorts for him?

Remember that a lot of people were pretty high on Eddie Royal not too long ago. (Only a week or two ago, I was in a small minority of people who liked Brown and Allen better than Royal.)

The nature of this offense, I think, is that the WRs are going to take turns getting hot. Brown, Allen, and Royal will all have big weeks occasionally. The only consistent producers will be Gates and Woodhead.

It's not that I'm low on Allen. I like him. I think he has good talent and he's in a pretty good situation. But I like him as a flex option. Definitely not as a fantasy WR2. He has that potential, but so do a lot of WRs around the league.

For a discussion about Allen by the FBG staff, see this week's Roundtable. Again, the other staffers surprised me a bit by generally being higher on him than I am.
Yeah according to fantasypros, Bloom has him ranked 16th this week (highest amongst all experts) you have him ranked 42nd where as Dobbs has him ranked 47th.

Although I think Bloom's ranking is quite generous, are there really 41 WRs you'd rather have this week? You technically do not view him as flex worthy.

 
are there really 41 WRs you'd rather have this week? You technically do not view him as flex worthy.
I'd definitely call the 40s range "flex".

In the middle of the season the player distribution per owner isn't going to be as clear cut as one player in the 1-12 range, another from the 13-24 range, etc.

And some leagues have two flex spots, or start 3 WR with one flex.

 
are there really 41 WRs you'd rather have this week? You technically do not view him as flex worthy.
I'd definitely call the 40s range "flex".

In the middle of the season the player distribution per owner isn't going to be as clear cut as one player in the 1-12 range, another from the 13-24 range, etc.

And some leagues have two flex spots, or start 3 WR with one flex.
Forgive me, that was stupid. Of course that doesn't take into account RBs and etc.

Still, that does imply that he's not worth starting in leagues which are forced to start three WRs.

 
what's even more exciting is how often he was being utilized in the red zone. He could have had 3 TDs on the night as one was called back (I still say he knee was in) and on the other he got wide open but Rivers saw him too late, tried to force it and threw a pick.
Dan Fouts agrees with you. I still say a knee does not equal two feet.
One knee definitely equals two feet; that's not really in dispute.

But I thought his knee came down out of bounds. It was in bounds with respect to the back of the end zone, which was the angle they kept showing, but to me it looked out of bounds with respect to the sideline.

In any case, I thought I was kind of high on Allen, but I keep reading comments by others that make me sound pessimistic by comparison. People would consider trading Cecil Shorts for him?

Remember that a lot of people were pretty high on Eddie Royal not too long ago. (Only a week or two ago, I was in a small minority of people who liked Brown and Allen better than Royal.)

The nature of this offense, I think, is that the WRs are going to take turns getting hot. Brown, Allen, and Royal will all have big weeks occasionally. The only consistent producers will be Gates and Woodhead.

It's not that I'm low on Allen. I like him. I think he has good talent and he's in a pretty good situation. But I like him as a flex option. Definitely not as a fantasy WR2. He has that potential, but so do a lot of WRs around the league.

For a discussion about Allen by the FBG staff, see this week's Roundtable. Again, the other staffers surprised me a bit by generally being higher on him than I am.
I thought I was pretty high on Allen, until I read all the excitement here. I am quite bullish on Allen long term, but I still think there are likely to be some growing pains, and those who are relying on Allen this season as much more than a flex option or bye week/injury filler might be setting themselves up for disappointment.

I am hopeful that Allen lives up those lofty expectations, but I am not ready to put him there yet. For Dynasty purposes, I am all in, however.

 
All aboard, Dwayne Bowe is on the Bench and hopefully will not be needed unless Cecil Shorts cant go. Hoping for big things out of Allen.

 
He's an ideal WR3-4 right now in a great, high volume passing offense for PPR. He's clearly a big-time talent but he's started two games. There's really nothing to debate right now, in other words, he's good and is in a good situation and the Chargers will throw a lot against some bad defenses the rest of the season. But we havne't seen enough to truly trust him as a starter. That said, in those fantasypros rankings, almost 20 guys have him ranked 50th or below. That's just not paying attention. Whoever is turning in those rankings is clearly not a professional.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Watched the whole game with royal in my lineup and needed 4 more points than I got. A few of Royals targets were not catchable but throwaways. KW looked to be in the field the whole game. I dropped Vjax earlier in the year for Edelman. I got kw after that game. Target data is good but not including dump offs or throwaways, they seemed to run more plays through Gates and KW and to a lesser extent VJ.... And I'm dropping royal.
:lmao: what?
 
He's an ideal WR3-4 right now in a great, high volume passing offense for PPR. He's clearly a big-time talent but he's started two games. There's really nothing to debate right now, in other words, he's good and is in a good situation and the Chargers will throw a lot against some bad defenses the rest of the season. But we havne't seen enough to truly trust him as a starter. That said, in those fantasypros rankings, almost 20 guys have him ranked 50th or below. That's just not paying attention. Whoever is turning in those rankings is clearly not a professional.
Yeah, its a joke. Last week I decided to roll out Allen and Williams over Stevie and Bowe and 99% of all experts would have told me I was doing it wrong.

Even now 78% say Bowe is the optimal start over Allen and I think that's pretty silly. Could Bowe outscore him this week? Absolutely. Should you be starting Bowe over Allen after what we've seen so far this season? Absolutely not.

 
I plugged him in last week when I heard Calvin was out instead of Sidney Rice, who most "pros" have ranked in the 30s.

I stopped looking at rankings lists a couple years ago, but I was curious when people mentioned him being in the 40s. The worst is some of the shows on TV with "experts." Caught one on NFL Network the other night, some of those guys are pretty clueless, but some of it is the format. In 3 words, tell me why u like this guy.

 
He's an ideal WR3-4 right now in a great, high volume passing offense for PPR. He's clearly a big-time talent but he's started two games. There's really nothing to debate right now, in other words, he's good and is in a good situation and the Chargers will throw a lot against some bad defenses the rest of the season. But we havne't seen enough to truly trust him as a starter. That said, in those fantasypros rankings, almost 20 guys have him ranked 50th or below. That's just not paying attention. Whoever is turning in those rankings is clearly not a professional.
Yeah, its a joke. Last week I decided to roll out Allen and Williams over Stevie and Bowe and 99% of all experts would have told me I was doing it wrong.

Even now 78% say Bowe is the optimal start over Allen and I think that's pretty silly. Could Bowe outscore him this week? Absolutely. Should you be starting Bowe over Allen after what we've seen so far this season? Absolutely not.
Do I start this guy over AJ Green, Reggie Wayne, or TY Hilton at this juncture?

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top