He just needs carries. He is uber talented.Has Duke Johnson shown anything to this point that would lead anyone to believe he is a three down back and capable of grinding out the tough yards? I understand getting him out in space. It suits his slight frame and delicate build.
I don't think he is. He's pretty small. I wouldn't expect much goal line work for him even if he becomes the lead back.Has Duke Johnson shown anything to this point that would lead anyone to believe he is a three down back and capable of grinding out the tough yards? I understand getting him out in space. It suits his slight frame and delicate build.
The Chargers' run defense is awful.Chargers defense have given up the 2nd most (depending on scoring) RB fantasy production so far. Give the kid some touches this week, and I bet he puts up RB2'ish numbers at worst.
It's Cleveland. That's why.This is the week or dropped.
Why can't he get Riddick or Dunbar type receptions?
This Browns blog thinks so:Any chance this guy becomes the lead back?
Over Thomas Rawls?I think he's a must start flex player in PPR leagues today.
Yeah, that would have made a great day into an epic day (in PPR), but still pleased with the results.Damn. Just stuffed with a run from the 1 to punch it in. Would have been nice.
God bless this post. It was basically the last thing I looked at before setting my lineup after agonizing between Duke and Rawls, so I decided to go with Duke. Would have lost one of my matchups and sweated the other one down to the wire last night with a 1-point win.I think he's a must start flex player in PPR leagues today.
Yea I listened to Bloom and went Rawls.God bless this post. It was basically the last thing I looked at before setting my lineup after agonizing between Duke and Rawls, so I decided to go with Duke. Would have lost one of my matchups and sweated the other one down to the wire last night with a 1-point win.I think he's a must start flex player in PPR leagues today.
Congrats on your thought leadership.
I spent 25 ####### $ on Rawls so I had an RB2 this week meanwhile I had this guy on my bench all along. Im not bitter at all. But at least I won anyway.God bless this post. It was basically the last thing I looked at before setting my lineup after agonizing between Duke and Rawls, so I decided to go with Duke. Would have lost one of my matchups and sweated the other one down to the wire last night with a 1-point win.I think he's a must start flex player in PPR leagues today.
Congrats on your thought leadership.
Always win or lose based on your own gut calls. Bloom and every other "expert" can only speculate as to what any player will do on any given week.Yea I listened to Bloom and went Rawls.God bless this post. It was basically the last thing I looked at before setting my lineup after agonizing between Duke and Rawls, so I decided to go with Duke. Would have lost one of my matchups and sweated the other one down to the wire last night with a 1-point win.I think he's a must start flex player in PPR leagues today.
Congrats on your thought leadership.
That was much of my thinking (I'm a Charger homer). But regardless, you had to like what you saw from him if you're an owner. That goal line opportunity really surprised me. I doubt he gets many more of those - I figure Crowell or Turbin would get most of those chances. Seemed like they were going with the hot hand/and or trying to keep the Chargers from subbing in a goal line defensive package there.It was a great post but it also might mean his big day was just specific to playing San Diego.
I would temper expectations. I think this guy is going to be mister 4 or 14.Hope not im chasing those points this week
Possibly, but that's still pretty great given this year's RBs. Even that Woodhead-type usage makes him a solid play, especially as rosters get thin during bye weeks.I would temper expectations. I think this guy is going to be mister 4 or 14.Hope not im chasing those points this week
Yeah Id much rather have DukeIts strange that there seems to be more hype for Duke than Melvin Gordon.
1. Gordon is already the lead back. Duke isn't.
2. Gordon doesn't have the injury history. Duke gets hurt a lot.
3. Gordon catches a lot of balls, so you aren't losing anything there.
If you can, try to trade Duke for Gordon. Gordon's value seems pretty low right now.
In a redraft Id rather have Woodhead. Duke is basically a poor man's Woodhead.thinking of offering Woodhead for him.
I agree right now but I think Duke has a more realistic path to be more of a consistent workhorse than Woodhead does. Duke's snapcount has pretty consistently increased...31, 26, 40, 43 to a high of 54 (61% to Crowell's 34)...On the flipside in Woodhead's situation you have a rookie (Gordon) that like Duke is getting more comfortable and taking a bigger lionshare of the snapcount. Woodhead and Gordon's snapcount has been 42/36, 32/29, 34/28, 36/30 and this week 29/46. So it was basically a pretty even split until this week where Gordon got 61% of the snaps.In a redraft Id rather have Woodhead. Duke is basically a poor man's Woodhead.thinking of offering Woodhead for him.
I just offered Woodhead for Duke and got turned down...we have a dynasty aspect and rookies have a bit more value.Woodhead owner here and thinking about dealing him even though he's traditionally been money in PPR. Gordon seems to be coming on more and was actually targeted more than Woodhead against PIT last Monday.
I think Duke's arrow is trending up whereas Woodhead is staying the same or even pointing slightly down with Gordon coming on. That said Duke's not "the man" yet and it might not happen until next year with Crow playing well and Turbin coming on...so I think he's going to have a lot of up and down games.
They do (IMO), but not in the traditional sense. Looking at the receptions/receiving yards/rec TDs a team has allowed to opposing RBs can be helpful when making lineup decisions with regards to receiving backs.Matchups have no impact on receiving backs imo. As a matter if fact a case can be made that the tougher the run defense the more the team will have to utilize their pass catching rb
Stick with Duke and you'll probably wind up cutting him once he gets injured.shadyridr said:Yeah Id much rather have DukeRiversco said:Its strange that there seems to be more hype for Duke than Melvin Gordon.
1. Gordon is already the lead back. Duke isn't.
2. Gordon doesn't have the injury history. Duke gets hurt a lot.
3. Gordon catches a lot of balls, so you aren't losing anything there.
If you can, try to trade Duke for Gordon. Gordon's value seems pretty low right now.
Over the last three weeks he's the number 8 RB in my PPR league, and he's getting more involved each week. I would say there's pretty decent value in redraft leagues.A lot like Matt Jones in that he doesn't have a whole lot of value in redraft leagues unless Crowell (or Alf Morris) gets hurt. Love both of them in Dynasty.
yeah, Johnson has value in PPR leagues.Over the last three weeks he's the number 8 RB in my PPR league, and he's getting more involved each week. I would say there's pretty decent value in redraft leagues.A lot like Matt Jones in that he doesn't have a whole lot of value in redraft leagues unless Crowell (or Alf Morris) gets hurt. Love both of them in Dynasty.