Ghost Rider
Footballguy
Let the smack talk begin.
18-1 was nice, but been waiting for this opportunity (again, and again, and . . . ) since the tuck rule. Too many times, my two teams have lost a playoff game to this team, this coach, and this QB.Been waiting for this game since Ben's rookie year.
There have been 50 Super Bowls played. The Broncos, Steelers, and Patriots have EACH been to 8 of them. All 3 are tied for most AFC titles. Combined, those 3 have appeared in 24/50 Super Bowls. It is a guarantee that dominance will continue. The rich get richer as 2 of those 3 will meet next weekend. The winner will become the first team to win 9 AFC titles. 25/51 Super Bowls will have been played by one of those 3 teams, pushing ever close to 50%.
Turrible Towel to wipe the blood off Steelers' bodies, IMO.PAIN! BLOOD! HELL ON EARTH!
Bolded is not true. It really helps to have franchise quarterbacks. And they're hard to find. When New England loses Brady, and the Steelers lose Ben, there is no guarantee that either team will even be very good, much less dominant.There have been 50 Super Bowls played. The Broncos, Steelers, and Patriots have EACH been to 8 of them. All 3 are tied for most AFC titles. Combined, those 3 have appeared in 24/50 Super Bowls. It is a guarantee that dominance will continue. The rich get richer as 2 of those 3 will meet next weekend. The winner will become the first team to win 9 AFC titles. 25/51 Super Bowls will have been played by one of those 3 teams, pushing ever close to 50%.
Last year, the Broncos beat the Patriots in the AFC title game, so it was also assured one of thee 3 teams were going to get back the bowl as well.
Just utter dominance of the AFC by these 3 teams.
For one of the greatest QBs of all time he really is a sissyGood thing he's playing PIT then
How is it not true? They are the only 2 teams left alive. It is a guarantee one of them will win another AFC title this year.Bolded is not true. It really helps to have franchise quarterbacks. And they're hard to find. When New England loses Brady, and the Steelers lose Ben, there is no guarantee that either team will even be very good, much less dominant.
Totally down for the Pats* to actually join in on the physicality contest that is coming.Turrible Towel to wipe the blood off Steelers' bodies, IMO.
Made me think of this... since 2004 Brady, Ben, or Peyton have been the QB for the AFC in the Super Bowl every year except for the year Flacco crashed the party.There have been 50 Super Bowls played. The Broncos, Steelers, and Patriots have EACH been to 8 of them. All 3 are tied for most AFC titles. Combined, those 3 have appeared in 24/50 Super Bowls. It is a guarantee that dominance will continue. The rich get richer as 2 of those 3 will meet next weekend. The winner will become the first team to win 9 AFC titles. 25/51 Super Bowls will have been played by one of those 3 teams, pushing ever close to 50%.
I'll take the sissy vs. a guy whose actions cannot be described or commented on here with being censored...any day.For one of the greatest QBs of all time he really is a sissy
He's talking about this year.Bolded is not true. It really helps to have franchise quarterbacks. And they're hard to find. When New England loses Brady, and the Steelers lose Ben, there is no guarantee that either team will even be very good, much less dominant.
I need Duterte as my bookie...man, he has it in the bag already.Rodrigo Duterte said:Steelers will win the game outright. Can't believe they are getting 6.
Why just start when Big Sloth came into the league (pillaging) though?Made me think of this... since 2004 Brady, Ben, or Peyton have been the QB for the AFC in the Super Bowl every year except for the year Flacco crashed the party.
2004 Brady
2005 Brady
2006 Ben
2007 Peyton
2008 Brady
2009 Ben
2010 Peyton
2011 Ben
2012 Brady
2013 Flacco - WTF?
2014 Peyton
2015 Brady
2016 Peyton
2017 Ben/Brady
Because that's when this streak started.Why just start when Big Sloth came into the league (pillaging) though?
Good news, the Steelers favorite past time is losing to the Patriots.18-1 was nice, but been waiting for this opportunity (again, and again, and . . . ) since the tuck rule. Too many times, my two teams have lost a playoff game to this team, this coach, and this QB.
Good news for Steelers fans. The past does not predict the future.....Good news, the Steelers favorite past time is losing to the Patriots.
Good luck. Steelers fans - so patient.shutting these New England fans up.....
Leave JaMarcus Russell out of this.Why just start when Big Sloth came into the league (pillaging) though?
I'm probably as worried about Blount this game as I am Brady. Blount is one of those emotional, "In yo face!" type of players. I can see him being really up for this game. "You grounded me from my bud smoking' buddy forever!"I don't see Blount being part of the game plan. As usual against the Steelers, this will be the Brady show. Let's see if they can finally slow him down. I expect him to throw deep on his very first attempt.
Unless Blount clones himself into Bell by next week I'm not worried. The Steelers run D has been very, very good of late. The Patriots will need to come out throwing.I'm probably as worried about Blount this game as I am Brady. Blount is one of those emotional, "In yo face!" type of players. I can see him being really up for this game. "You grounded me from my bud smoking' buddy forever!"
I'm worried that we game plan to stop Brady, and Belichick once again outsmarts the Pitt coach by running every time they go dime on 11 personnel. Once again, the Pitt coaching doesn't adjust until 8:00 left in the 4th, down by 14. I'm not worried about the players or the talent, I'm worried about the coaching and play calling.Unless Blount clones himself into Bell by next week I'm not worried. The Steelers run D has been very, very good of late. The Patriots will need to come out throwing.
Yeah I didnt quite get that, Ben moves better then Brady.Leave JaMarcus Russell out of this.
Amen.I'm worried that we game plan to stop Brady, and Belichick once again outsmarts the Pitt coach by running every time they go dime on 11 personnel. Once again, the Pitt coaching doesn't adjust until 8:00 left in the 4th, down by 14. I'm not worried about the players or the talent, I'm worried about the coaching and play calling.
You know BB has lost plenty of playoff games- even some at home. He's not the infallible James Bond villain people make him out to be.I'm worried that we game plan to stop Brady, and Belichick once again outsmarts the Pitt coach by running every time they go dime on 11 personnel. Once again, the Pitt coaching doesn't adjust until 8:00 left in the 4th, down by 14. I'm not worried about the players or the talent, I'm worried about the coaching and play calling.
Not animal sloth, The Goonies Sloth.Yeah I didnt quite get that, Ben moves better then Brady.
Well, that depends. . . on whether this year's rule-bend gets leaked or not.You know BB has lost plenty of playoff games- even some at home. He's not the infallible James Bond villain people make him out to be.
BB and TB are 17-3 at home in the playoffs but no playoff game is ever a lock.You know BB has lost plenty of playoff games- even some at home. He's not the infallible James Bond villain people make him out to be.
Obviously Pats will be favored and for good reason but this should be an interesting matchupBB and TB are 17-3 at home in the playoffs but no playoff game is ever a lock.
In Big Ben's three games against Brady in NE, he is 0-3 with the Pats winning by an average score of 39-25. But stats don't win football game . . . football players win football games.Ben is 3-5 vs the Patriots and Brady is 9-2 vs the Steelers. Oof. Trivia question. When was the last time the Steelers intercepted Brady? Answer, my 5th grader wasn't born yet.