Welcome to Our Forums. Once you've registered and logged in, you're primed to talk football, among other topics, with the sharpest and most experienced fantasy players on the internet.
I don't want this to go unnoticed. Kid took a lot of unfair heat that he WOULD NOT have taken in a Barrack Obama hat. Good for him.
I dont have a problem with a media company not reporting about its own legal affairs.
I don't either. If they all did, it'd be Fox Sex Scandal channel.
I get that, but they reported it when it was filed. Wasn't on abcnews or MSNBC either.
Do MSNBC, CNN, or Fox even do any original reporting?
I hadn't really considered this before, but I think its absolutely right. On both the national and local scale. I definitely still see the need for it on a local level. But the NYT and WaPo should not be doing it anymore.
Honestly, i haven't watched in recent months, so maybe it's gone away. I know the coverage used to change to international news for a few hours late night/early morning, back when I was awake at weird hours.
This guy did some pretty good investigative journalism and live reporting at the outset of the kids in cages debacle.
I meant an actual example. Like an article or a tweet showing them printing something that wasnt credible.
So what issues on your side of the aisle would you question the credibility of that you would say shouldn't be given the time of day?
This is pathetic, and also why I laugh when people claim CNN is a bunch of leftists or whatever.
I don't think he is somebody that only wants to hear one side of the story, but the NYT/Clinton email thing is a talking point I see a lot. It is kind of frustrating to me. The problem I really have with it is that it all stems from a left slanted study. I know it to be left slanted because it was a small time frame selected including when news broke.
CNN is so liberal they hired a GOP operative with no journalism experience to coordinate its 2020 coverage.What do you mean? I don't get it.
—On Tuesday evening, a CNN spokesperson emailed Vox and said they “just wanted to be super clear – Sarah is not leading, overseeing, or running political coverage.”
Interesting. Thanks!
Doesn't seem right to chalk Sanders up as an even exchange with Trump. Trump is a far right authoritarian, Sanders is a progressive populist. I know it's tempting for centrists to chalk them up as one in the same, but they're not. They really couldn't be more different.
I also don't like the insinuation that Sanders' worldview is based on that of a 'bombastic revolutionary,' as opposed to an informed assessment. Their editorial is crawling with these sorts of underhanded jabs, that Sanders is a pie in the sky fantasist and Warren is the grounded pragmatist. The Democratic Party is being remade in Sanders' image before our eyes, and they want to act like selfie Warren is the standard bearer for the 'radical' approach. Come on.
An even more ludicrous example of the issue you cited was when the media was essentially cheering on the prospect of gun violence connected to the Joker premier. That was crazy.
Not sure what the N-D word is but she got tongue tied. Pretty lame to suggest otherwise.
So weak.
Oh I see this is just blatant trolling. Carry on.
