Sparky Big Time
Footballguy
To be succinct, we don't. Society always has and always will transform naturally. Where we are arrogant enough to decide we must force change, the outcomes are not likely to be what we want, nor positive.
In all seriousness, realignment isn't what we need. It's a detachment from our divisive media, social media and politicians. If that's the image of the world we're relying on, one that benefits them, not us, then our anxiety and rage will continue to build. Instead, let's view the world through our own eyes and experience. We'll see we have a lot more in common than the media and politicians suggest.
Here's a challenge: Try going without watching the news or tracking political stories on social media and this forum for a week. Focus your time on other things. Then, after a few days, gauge whether you feel better or worse about society. Having done this experiment for almost a year in 2021, I can tell you my life was much better. Unfortunately, as you can see, I got sucked back into politics thanks to the war in Ukraine. I know it's in my best interests to check back out again.
I see it on LinkedIn too. It's gross.I removed everything even slightly political from my Facebook feed. The problem is people can't help themselves and they inject politics into EVERYTHING. I work in real estate so I am in some real estate groups, investment groups, some local area groups to places I invest in. Holy cow, there just can't be a discussion about any of those things without half the people starting with "Brandon" or "Trump" or "demonrats" or whatever.
Sometimes I just wonder if this is where these people saw themselves in life 15 years ago. Angrily browsing Facebook just ruining any rational discussion by injecting politics where no one wants it.
I second this division of Michigan.U live in the Midwest? I'm willing to send Wayne and Oakland counties from Michigan so you get detroit as well as the economic engine of the region to the blue. The rest goes red. I'm ready to be cut deals.
All of itDoes this include stopping the welfare from the federal level down to the state level?
With remote work I'll go live in a state with low income tax and nice weather.If we did this I know some of you would be trying to cross the border for our jobs and health insurance. We'll need a wall. A big, beautiful wall. And you're gonna pay for it.
No more big tech, social media, “revisionist” history.I'm curious about how those living in the Traditional Remaining USA want their government to be? Same as before only more conservative?
I'm all in, though this gets REALLY ugly for the southeast. Many here wouldn't likely be happy with this approach.All of it
Wouldn't be such a thing if federal funds are cut off as Philo suggests.With remote work I'll go live in a state with low income tax and nice weather.
And no guns, good luck keeping those thingsThe D's have the jobs and health insurance, silly.
The "centrists" can live in 90% of the existing country since and finally enjoy not having the constant fringe noise in our left and right ears. We'll actually get things done and all the fringe folks can have California and Florida and each begin their slide into poverty and failure by utilizing completely different avenues to race to the exact same destination.So I’m a centrist and my wife’s a conservative. We have a great marriage but will we have to divorce now? What about my dog, she seems pretty liberal (requires me “big government” to feed and take care of her)? Where do us centrist live? What about the MAGA and Woke wings of the respective parties, do they further segregate within their own territories? Can we just carve out those 2 extremes and force them to live together Hunger Games style so the rest of us can live in relative peace?
We currently send most of our income taxes to the Fed today. I would think states can still function with a modest income tax say 10 - 15%.The Commish said:Wouldn't be such a thing if federal funds are cut off as Philo suggests.
ETA: Let me revise....wouldn't be such a thing that you'd likely want to be a part of.
Yeah, I can't imagine that situation. Once the rest of the industrialized world catches up to the brilliance of the American conservative, they'll be able to keep their jobs and healthcare.Cowboysfan8 said:And no guns, good luck keeping those things
There’s no question our land will be where everybody wants to live. We’re the only group that understands compromise therefore we’d have the best of both worlds. The only issue I have with your statement is as a born and bred Californian I’m not sure either group deserves this beautiful state.(HULK) said:The "centrists" can live in 90% of the existing country since and finally enjoy not having the constant fringe noise in our left and right ears. We'll actually get things done and all the fringe folks can have California and Florida and each begin their slide into poverty and failure by utilizing completely different avenues to race to the exact same destination.
Or food or getting anyone to fix your crap when it breaks.Cowboysfan8 said:And no guns, good luck keeping those things
The Commish said:Wouldn't be such a thing if federal funds are cut off as Philo suggests.
ETA: Let me revise....wouldn't be such a thing that you'd likely want to be a part of.
Just pass laws making it illegal for crap to break. Why do I have to think of everything?Or food or getting anyone to fix your crap when it breaks.
That tooOr food or getting anyone to fix your crap when it breaks.
I was trying to give both Liberaland and Conservistan a fighting chance with access to a coast. Plus those two states both have strong leans already. I almost went with Texas for Conservistan but I was happy to take the opportunity to move the Florida Man meme out of my country.There’s no question our land will be where everybody wants to live. We’re the only group that understands compromise therefore we’d have the best of both worlds. The only issue I have with your statement is as a born and bred Californian I’m not sure either group deserves this beautiful state.
Pretty sure the immigrants will have that covered.Or food or getting anyone to fix your crap when it breaks.
Reality TV would suddenly become interesting.dkp993 said:So I’m a centrist and my wife’s a conservative. We have a great marriage but will we have to divorce now? What about my dog, she seems pretty liberal (requires me “big government” to feed and take care of her)? Where do us centrist live? What about the MAGA and Woke wings of the respective parties, do they further segregate within their own territories? Can we just carve out those 2 extremes and force them to live together Hunger Games style so the rest of us can live in relative peace?
You can do that now I’d imagine.Low taxes is relative. I'd move to the state with the best weather and lowest taxes.
Might be the only Reality TV I’d watch. Question though. Can both teams lose? (Please).Reality TV would suddenly become interesting.
You can do that now I’d imagine.
Magachusetts, Michigun and everything right of center (roughly Kansas) can go to the Redderlands, while anything left of the Rockies is officially Bluetopia.Hoh said:Will we rename the states to something more befitting the ideologies? Like “Wokelahoma” and “Cancelvania”?
When the Big One hits California, they won’t be getting foreign aid from red statesquick-hands said:Go back to the states. Then they can negotiate how they want to proceed. I'll be moving to a state that keeps the constitution and bill of rights. So a flyover state. You know the blue states will vote to create heaven on earth. So they will end up like Venezuela or the former soviet union.
Yeah, I just got told a couple weeks ago that I don't have to return to office for at least the next school year, if ever. The equity partner was somewhat vague. So, I've been looking at Florida.
Magachusetts, Michigun and everything right of center (roughly Kansas) can go to the Redderlands, while anything left of the Rockies is officially Bluetopia.
Each new country gets a coast, and roughly the same population.
The existing eastern borders of WY, MT, CO and NM work pretty well. Coincidentally, the Bluetopian states are pretty much all my current favorites, so I’d never need to set foot in the Redderlands.I was thinking of a more diagonal split.
Team Red gets Southern Calf to the NE Team Blue gets from the NW down to the Gulf Coast, We just set up a DMZ in the middle.
I've been thinking three, with two closely aligned coastal nations. Could be four if Texas decides to go its own way before conservatives lose control there. But a B1G nation of states bordering the Great Lakes is fun to think about.Country won't split into two parts. Probably 5 or 6 parts.
You could move to Idaho?What if I don’t want to be part of either side?
What about when the southern half of Florida goes underwater?When the Big One hits California, they won’t be getting foreign aid from red states
They starveWhat happens when team Red cuts off some of the water to CA in order to save it for itself?
Yea they will. But they won't appreciate it. They will say we owe them. HrrrmphWhen the Big One hits California, they won’t be getting foreign aid from red states
For the academic exercise of it, it's hard to believe California wouldn't be split into. Obviously in population it's a very blue state, but there are some pretty good land masses of red area in California. I believe the same is true of Oregon. Illinois is a blue state but it's Chicago and a bunch of red. The problem is then how do you resolve it without a fight? For instance, Chicago isn't going to want to be part of team Red and the rest of Illinois isn't going to cede all that land to the blue side. What happens when team Red cuts off some of the water to CA in order to save it for itself?
It’s basically this way in the entire country. Large cities are blue and rural is red.Same thing in PA. Philly & Pitt are blue. The center with all the farmland is red.