matttyl
Footballguy
No, as I pointed out above, he still would not.Well, according to the statute for burglary in Louisiana it does, and that's what he'd be charged under. If he were being charged under wikipedia law, you'd have a great point.
No, as I pointed out above, he still would not.Well, according to the statute for burglary in Louisiana it does, and that's what he'd be charged under. If he were being charged under wikipedia law, you'd have a great point.
Um, yes it is....Not according to the FBI (or wiki or legal dictionary for that matter) but the point is that the target was likely the car and not the home. That is a big distinction.
Cut and paste, direct from wiki (which apparently you didn't read and/or comprehend).
United StatesBurglary is prosecuted as a felony or misdemeanor and involves trespassing and theft, entering a building or automobile, or loitering unlawfully with intent to commit any crime, not necessarily a theft – for example, vandalism.
That's great (even if you are posting incomplete info from that page) which is why I pointed to the actual FBI definition and made wiki a sidebar. But glad to see you are choosing wiki as your primary source.Either way you and Henry choosing to ignore that the likely target was the car and not the house.The FBI’s Uniform Crime Reporting (UCR) Program defines burglary as the unlawful entry of a structure to commit a felony or theft. To classify an offense as a burglary, the use of force to gain entry need not have occurred. The UCR Program has three subclassifications for burglary: forcible entry, unlawful entry where no force is used, and attempted forcible entry. The UCR definition of “structure” includes apartment, barn, house trailer or houseboat when used as a permanent dwelling, office, railroad car (but not automobile), stable, and vessel (i.e., ship).
oy veyNot according to the FBI (or wiki or legal dictionary for that matter) but the point is that the target was likely the car and not the home. That is a big distinction.Henry Ford said:You can say whatever you want about what it implies, but the legal definition includes vehicles.Chaka said:Burglary implies entering the home when this case looks like it was the car. That is an important distinction.matttyl said:Clifford, you above already claimed to "see it". You said yourself that you find it reasonable to think that the HO was in fear for his life or of harm. Therefore you must find him innocent of any murder charge.Clifford said:Look, I'm done. If you don't see it you're not going to. Peace.matttyl said:No, I am. The law is asking a jury to decide what they think. Why is that wrong?Clifford said:You're not examining the practicality of what the law is asking the prosecution to do.
So you're saying the law should be changed. Ok, to what? Why is it wrong to ask a jury of someone's peers if they think that a person's actions are reasonable or not? The burden of proof is always on the prosecution, are you going to change that to a "guilty until proven innocent" situation?
I posted the above case from Texas as with it the person's actions were not deemed reasonable to the jury. Maybe (likely) in this case they will be.
HO finds intruder on his property at 2 AM who doesn't comply with his command to freeze. Not sure we have to go any further than that on the "reality of the situation". The intruder had already committed one crime (trespassing) and was likely in the midst of committing another (burglary), and given the "reality of the situation" the HO could easily have believed his life was in danger.
If the kid hadn't been attempting to steal, he wouldn't have been shot. If the kid hadn't trespassed, he wouldn't have been shot. If his mother/brother had kept a better eye on him and made sure he wasn't out at 2 AM that morning, he wouldn't have been shot. But you're right - it's the homeowner's fault.
...and if there's only a 25% chance that he's there to murder you and your family, you have no business pulling a gun.Um, yes it is....Cut and paste, direct from wiki (which apparently you didn't read and/or comprehend). United StatesNot according to the FBI (or wiki or legal dictionary for that matter) but the point is that the target was likely the car and not the home. That is a big distinction.
Burglary is prosecuted as a felony or misdemeanor and involves trespassing and theft, entering a building or automobile, or loitering unlawfully with intent to commit any crime, not necessarily a theft for example, vandalism.That's great (even if you are posting incomplete info from that page) which is why I pointed to the actual FBI definition and made wiki a sidebar. But glad to see you are choosing wiki as your primary source.Either way you and Henry choosing to ignore that the likely target was the car and not the house.The FBIs Uniform Crime Reporting (UCR) Program defines burglary as the unlawful entry of a structure to commit a felony or theft. To classify an offense as a burglary, the use of force to gain entry need not have occurred. The UCR Program has three subclassifications for burglary: forcible entry, unlawful entry where no force is used, and attempted forcible entry. The UCR definition of structure includes apartment, barn,
house trailer or houseboat when used as a permanent dwelling, office, railroad car (but not automobile), stable, and vessel (i.e., ship).
I'm not, you're the one quoting it as a source, and you apparently did so without even reading it. Our source would be the law of LA (you know, where the crime was committed), which says that you can burglarize a car.But glad to see you are choosing wiki as your primary source
And yet tourists are safe, right? I've never heard of anyone visiting New Orleans for the great food and music having to worry about crime.For one thing the child's own brother called him a professional thief.
For another, New Orleans' police are vastly underfunded. Chances are someone somewhere high up contributing to those who count are making money off the drug trade (and the murder) but that's another story.
New Orleans needs something like 33%-100% more police. This place is probably (bear with me) somewhat equivalent to (sorry) Baghdad and Iraq after Bush Jr. and Cheney went in - there was force to lay down the law, but not enough of it, security is a huge problem here.
Meanwhile you can live in much of this city and never be affected by it. There is so much murder here it is crazy, but typically it is criminal on criminal in terms of who gets hurt, but not always. I have no idea why it takes something like this to get the attention of a city, a state, a nation, but there it is. What you folks have been discussing has been going on a long time here, like over a hundred years.
Corruption is really at the center of it. But there is one other element that's been added - since the storm we have rediscovered our city and many people of professional and educated and entrepreneurial backgrounds are moving into once impoverished areas, and thus we see the conflict of people with different expectations with those who have been in the neighborhoods for a while who have often treated the idea of demanding better security and safer streets with suspicion because it meant calling for more police.
I don't know what to tell you all, but for starters this isn't Orlando, it's not the south and it's just barely America and you can take your national agendas and kick them out the discussion because they have no place here.
I said bear with me.And yet tourists are safe, right? I've never heard of anyone visiting New Orleans for the great food and music having to worry about crime.For one thing the child's own brother called him a professional thief.
For another, New Orleans' police are vastly underfunded. Chances are someone somewhere high up contributing to those who count are making money off the drug trade (and the murder) but that's another story.
New Orleans needs something like 33%-100% more police. This place is probably (bear with me) somewhat equivalent to (sorry) Baghdad and Iraq after Bush Jr. and Cheney went in - there was force to lay down the law, but not enough of it, security is a huge problem here.
Meanwhile you can live in much of this city and never be affected by it. There is so much murder here it is crazy, but typically it is criminal on criminal in terms of who gets hurt, but not always. I have no idea why it takes something like this to get the attention of a city, a state, a nation, but there it is. What you folks have been discussing has been going on a long time here, like over a hundred years.
Corruption is really at the center of it. But there is one other element that's been added - since the storm we have rediscovered our city and many people of professional and educated and entrepreneurial backgrounds are moving into once impoverished areas, and thus we see the conflict of people with different expectations with those who have been in the neighborhoods for a while who have often treated the idea of demanding better security and safer streets with suspicion because it meant calling for more police.
I don't know what to tell you all, but for starters this isn't Orlando, it's not the south and it's just barely America and you can take your national agendas and kick them out the discussion because they have no place here.
If it's like Iraq, then it's like Iraq with Paris right in the middle of it.
Well truly, God Bless You, we are and will always be about living life in the face of all odds against us.To be honest, there may be no city in America that I look more forward to visiting eventually than New Orleans. My two favorite things in life, outside of my loved ones, are great food and great music.
Eat beignets. Lots of them. Don't wear black when you do it.To be honest, there may be no city in America that I look more forward to visiting eventually than New Orleans. My two favorite things in life, outside of my loved ones, are great food and great music.
One of the most asinine posts I've ever readby righteous paranoia i mean you feel justified in thinking there is a boogeyman around every corner that wants nothing more than to hurt you...and he deserves whatever he gets ...a bullet to the head preferablyGun owners are not by any means a cult and if by "righteous paranoia" you mean some kind of religious thing, you are way off base with me. I would never shoot someone for standing on my lawn, but don't cross that 21 foot line without some kind of plausible explanation.gun owners are definitely in a cult all unto themselves built on righteous paranoia. Lets hope you`re right and you never have to shoot someone for standing on your lawnYou might want to stay out of Texas also.Jeez, glad I dont live in Louisiana
BK I appreciate messing with you but seriously I don't ever expect to have to shoot anyone, but if I or my wife have to defend ourselves or each other we will do that. A lot of people consider it living in a state of paranoia but we consider it being prepared.
A lot of bad stuff happens out there by blacks, whites, hispanics, white-blacks, black-whites, white hispanics and even white-asians and asian-blacks. Dude I don't care which category you fall into, if you come in my yard/house you are in my element not yours.![]()
Truth is, I would probably be the victim because I am too trusting, even to white-hispanics.
Reminded me of this videoA policeman has had training and is expected to be a better judge of whether someone is armed. If the average untrained person is allowed to use SYG with the excuse 'I thought he was reaching for a gun' then it's a license to kill.Not sure you're right. This same claim has been used all the time by policeman. Whenever a kid ends up dead, we're told they were reaching for something, and the police thought it was a gun, so they fired first. Logically, why wouldn't a homeowner also be able to fire first based on the same conditions?BTW, based on these sketchy facts the shooter regardless of race is in deep doodoo.
you must not read many gun threads in here ...feel free to peruse the many convo`s and get back to meOne of the most asinine posts I've ever readby righteous paranoia i mean you feel justified in thinking there is a boogeyman around every corner that wants nothing more than to hurt you...and he deserves whatever he gets ...a bullet to the head preferablyGun owners are not by any means a cult and if by "righteous paranoia" you mean some kind of religious thing, you are way off base with me. I would never shoot someone for standing on my lawn, but don't cross that 21 foot line without some kind of plausible explanation.gun owners are definitely in a cult all unto themselves built on righteous paranoia. Lets hope you`re right and you never have to shoot someone for standing on your lawnYou might want to stay out of Texas also.Jeez, glad I dont live in Louisiana
BK I appreciate messing with you but seriously I don't ever expect to have to shoot anyone, but if I or my wife have to defend ourselves or each other we will do that. A lot of people consider it living in a state of paranoia but we consider it being prepared.
A lot of bad stuff happens out there by blacks, whites, hispanics, white-blacks, black-whites, white hispanics and even white-asians and asian-blacks. Dude I don't care which category you fall into, if you come in my yard/house you are in my element not yours.![]()
Truth is, I would probably be the victim because I am too trusting, even to white-hispanics.
SYG laws scarred the poor lad and turned him into a criminal.
Even more than that - if this kid committed a recent burglary, I think we can safely say he's never going to learn anything. If getting shot in the head doesn't deter you from breaking and entering for at least a year or two, I think we should just assume you're an idiot.Fine young 15 year old... Kid is a role model, parents must be proud![]()
One million percent agreed.Even more than that - if this kid committed a recent burglary, I think we can safely say he's never going to learn anything. If getting shot in the head doesn't deter you from breaking and entering for at least a year or two, I think we should just assume you're an idiot.Fine young 15 year old... Kid is a role model, parents must be proud![]()
Surprising considering that it sounds like such a lovely city to live in.People commenting here have no idea what it's like to live in NO, where there are maybe (they say) 1100 cops for a city with one of the highest murder and crime rates in the country. These days 911 calls are not answered immediately, if they are the dispatcher may tell you to hold your water, or ask you if you really need a cop right away. The judges and magistrates are corrupt by and large, they can call in a release by bond by phone at the request of a defense attorney who may likely have given campaign (and maybe other) contributions, releasing a multiple offender whose case is not even in his court. There is probably not a commenter here who can honestly say they have lived in a city or place with this unusual set of circumstances.
Well, thanks, it is lovely, and we have shown a lot of mettle that we never knew we had since Katrina. But the crime and corruption problem has been here a long, long time. Not far away from where Coulter was shot there was a fimmaker who was murdered at her door. It led to the founding of this group. What can I say it's a city of contradictions.Surprising considering that it sounds like such a lovely city to live in.People commenting here have no idea what it's like to live in NO, where there are maybe (they say) 1100 cops for a city with one of the highest murder and crime rates in the country. These days 911 calls are not answered immediately, if they are the dispatcher may tell you to hold your water, or ask you if you really need a cop right away. The judges and magistrates are corrupt by and large, they can call in a release by bond by phone at the request of a defense attorney who may likely have given campaign (and maybe other) contributions, releasing a multiple offender whose case is not even in his court. There is probably not a commenter here who can honestly say they have lived in a city or place with this unusual set of circumstances.