HULLOBUDMAN
Footballguy
not sure what I am missing here. what does the -8.7 mean?My team rocks...165.90 (-8.70 for Holmes)
not sure what I am missing here. what does the -8.7 mean?My team rocks...165.90 (-8.70 for Holmes)
That means he already has 8.7 at wr or flex so Holmes has to score more than 8.7 to count. If he does score more than 8.7 his total score will be raised by the amount more than 8.7 that Holmes scores.not sure what I am missing here. what does the -8.7 mean?My team rocks...165.90 (-8.70 for Holmes)
133.9 with Portis (-13.9) and all of Suisham's points. Hopefully we'll get some field goals tonight.
Thought I could get a little more out of these guys. I'm up to 131.6 now. Too close to call.118.5 with Holmes (-4.6), Portis (-13.2) and Moss (-4.6) left.![]()
Please be high, please be high.....PLEASE be high...132.6Final Fantasy Star estimate: 133.3
oofPlease be high, please be high.....PLEASE be high...132.6Final Fantasy Star estimate: 133.3![]()
![]()
![]()
After yesterday the FS estimate was a couple of points off DD's number. Was your number adjusted with that info, or will DD's number probably still be a couple of points higher?Final Fantasy Star estimate: 133.3
Actually I may still be OK. Thomas Jones is listed at 19.70 on TFS but I add it up to 22.70.1 Rushing TD = 6 pts6 Receptions = 6 pts69 Rushing Yards = 6.9 pts38 Receiving Yards = 3.8 ptsTotal = 22.70 Will have to add up everything else now.Projected cutoff is 133.3 ... I'm out for sure with 131.6
I think rbs only get a half a point for reception.Actually I may still be OK. Thomas Jones is listed at 19.70 on TFS but I add it up to 22.70.1 Rushing TD = 6 pts6 Receptions = 6 pts69 Rushing Yards = 6.9 pts38 Receiving Yards = 3.8 ptsTotal = 22.70 Will have to add up everything else now.Projected cutoff is 133.3 ... I'm out for sure with 131.6![]()
That is correctI think rbs only get a half a point for reception.Actually I may still be OK. Thomas Jones is listed at 19.70 on TFS but I add it up to 22.70.1 Rushing TD = 6 pts6 Receptions = 6 pts69 Rushing Yards = 6.9 pts38 Receiving Yards = 3.8 ptsTotal = 22.70 Will have to add up everything else now.Projected cutoff is 133.3 ... I'm out for sure with 131.6![]()
Yeah, noticed when I went back and double-checked the scoring rules.That is correctI think rbs only get a half a point for reception.Actually I may still be OK. Thomas Jones is listed at 19.70 on TFS but I add it up to 22.70.1 Rushing TD = 6 pts6 Receptions = 6 pts69 Rushing Yards = 6.9 pts38 Receiving Yards = 3.8 ptsTotal = 22.70 Will have to add up everything else now.Projected cutoff is 133.3 ... I'm out for sure with 131.6![]()
Just trying to save you the hassle of adding up all of your players, and any false hope of what your score might be. We can still hope for a 131 cut line.Yeah, noticed when I went back and double-checked the scoring rules.That is correctI think rbs only get a half a point for reception.Actually I may still be OK. Thomas Jones is listed at 19.70 on TFS but I add it up to 22.70.1 Rushing TD = 6 pts6 Receptions = 6 pts69 Rushing Yards = 6.9 pts38 Receiving Yards = 3.8 ptsTotal = 22.70 Will have to add up everything else now.Projected cutoff is 133.3 ... I'm out for sure with 131.6![]()
![]()
I was going to look at the QB scoring when I noticed the RB receptions being .5. Then it hit me.Just trying to save you the hassle of adding up all of your players, and any false hope of what your score might be. We can still hope for a 131 cut line.Yeah, noticed when I went back and double-checked the scoring rules.That is correctI think rbs only get a half a point for reception.Actually I may still be OK. Thomas Jones is listed at 19.70 on TFS but I add it up to 22.70.1 Rushing TD = 6 pts6 Receptions = 6 pts69 Rushing Yards = 6.9 pts38 Receiving Yards = 3.8 ptsTotal = 22.70 Will have to add up everything else now.Projected cutoff is 133.3 ... I'm out for sure with 131.6![]()
![]()
And with Bama losing this Saturday to LSU, gonna be a rough week for youProjected cutoff is 133.3 ... I'm out for sure with 131.6
It could happen, but the odds are against it.Ministry of Pain said:And with Bama losing this Saturday to LSU, gonna be a rough week for youscottybo said:Projected cutoff is 133.3 ... I'm out for sure with 131.6
missed the cut here by less than 1 point (134.15). drat. it was a pretty good run nonetheless.
I will be very curious to see where the 800 eliminated teams come from this week.731 - 90-99.9% survival probabilityOK, so I have a lot more to say about the comments from BuckeyeArt and others. But what I'm about to show you might change the nature of the conversation somewhat, so I'll hold off.
I spent some time working on a simulation engine that will "play" the week's games 1000 times and then figure out how many of those 1000 weeks result in advancement for each contest team.
Note that, unlike the other set of power rankings, these are for this week only, and completely ignore future weeks.
Here it is.
I'll probably keep tweaking it in the coming weeks, so it should probably be considered beta, but I think it's solid enough to get your thoughts on it.
771 - 80-89.9% survival probability
560 - 70-79.9% survival probability
382 - 60-69.9% survival probability
260 - 50-59.9% survival probability
155 - 40-49.9% survival probability
120 - 30-39.9% survival probability
76 - 20-29.9% survival probability
30 - 10-19.9% survival probability
21 - 0.4-9.9% survival probability
Surv% N Surv Pct--------------------------- 0-- 9 21 0 0.010--19 30 5 16.720--29 76 16 21.130--39 120 36 30.040--49 155 74 47.750--59 260 157 60.460--69 382 257 67.370--79 560 429 76.680--89 771 650 84.390--99 731 681 93.2
Should be a good game to watch. It will be fun watching 2 of the highest paid teams in the SEC square offIt could happen, but the odds are against it.Ministry of Pain said:And with Bama losing this Saturday to LSU, gonna be a rough week for youscottybo said:Projected cutoff is 133.3 ... I'm out for sure with 131.6
The good news is that there's no style points. I'm waiting for the clock to strike 12 on my team as well, but they keep hanging around. 104390.No way I should be in it. 111834.
I love the stats, Doug. Just another part of this contest to dig into when I am bored at work.Team "Rocky" - Given only a 13.3% survival probability, he had to use Torain's .1pt and Colston's bye week. http://subscribers.footballguys.com/contest/2008/101052.phpSurv% N Surv Pct--------------------------- 0-- 9 21 0 0.010--19 30 5 16.720--29 76 16 21.130--39 120 36 30.040--49 155 74 47.750--59 260 157 60.460--69 382 257 67.370--79 560 429 76.680--89 771 650 84.390--99 731 681 93.2I will be very curious to see where the 800 eliminated teams come from this week.731 - 90-99.9% survival probabilityOK, so I have a lot more to say about the comments from BuckeyeArt and others. But what I'm about to show you might change the nature of the conversation somewhat, so I'll hold off.
I spent some time working on a simulation engine that will "play" the week's games 1000 times and then figure out how many of those 1000 weeks result in advancement for each contest team.
Note that, unlike the other set of power rankings, these are for this week only, and completely ignore future weeks.
Here it is.
I'll probably keep tweaking it in the coming weeks, so it should probably be considered beta, but I think it's solid enough to get your thoughts on it.
771 - 80-89.9% survival probability
560 - 70-79.9% survival probability
382 - 60-69.9% survival probability
260 - 50-59.9% survival probability
155 - 40-49.9% survival probability
120 - 30-39.9% survival probability
76 - 20-29.9% survival probability
30 - 10-19.9% survival probability
21 - 0.4-9.9% survival probability
Damn, you're good.Code:Surv% N Surv Pct--------------------------- 0-- 9 21 0 0.010--19 30 5 16.720--29 76 16 21.130--39 120 36 30.040--49 155 74 47.750--59 260 157 60.460--69 382 257 67.370--79 560 429 76.680--89 771 650 84.390--99 731 681 93.2
It's interesting to look at some of the teams with little to no chance to make it according to the schedule above that slid by.There's a guy in there with no RB 2 and no Flex in week 9, but still slid by.There are several with zero's from QB's that made it.Damn, you're good.Code:Surv% N Surv Pct--------------------------- 0-- 9 21 0 0.010--19 30 5 16.720--29 76 16 21.130--39 120 36 30.040--49 155 74 47.750--59 260 157 60.460--69 382 257 67.370--79 560 429 76.680--89 771 650 84.390--99 731 681 93.2
![]()
Doesn't get much prettier than that for a projection tool. :doublethumbsup:Damn, you're good.Code:Surv% N Surv Pct--------------------------- 0-- 9 21 0 0.010--19 30 5 16.720--29 76 16 21.130--39 120 36 30.040--49 155 74 47.750--59 260 157 60.460--69 382 257 67.370--79 560 429 76.680--89 771 650 84.390--99 731 681 93.2
![]()
Only one group fell outside of the range and that was only by 2 teams.Great stat work.I feel really bad for the 50 teams in that 90% range that fell. But it's also awesome to see 5 teams in the 10% range make it.I was in the 80% group and made it through with my second lowest score of the year of 153.0. This is so fascinating (as long as my team is still alive, of course). I'm pretty happy so far since this is my first time to try the contest.Drinen, are you doing this again this week?Damn, you're good.Code:Surv% N Surv Pct--------------------------- 0-- 9 21 0 0.010--19 30 5 16.720--29 76 16 21.130--39 120 36 30.040--49 155 74 47.750--59 260 157 60.460--69 382 257 67.370--79 560 429 76.680--89 771 650 84.390--99 731 681 93.2
![]()
381 of 1395 teams with Marshall were eliminated (about 27%)http://subscribers.footballguys.com/apps/c...mp;query_type=1Is there a way to tell how many teams with B. Marshall went out over the weekend with his poor performance.
After scanning through the teams with high percentages to get by the weak, but happened not to make it, it looks like the few I scanned have B. Marshall.