O.K.,I read the rules,maybe I missed it somewhere,but how many players actually count towards the point total?It's really eaiser to just read the rules. Not being a smart ###, but it will put you a huge leg up.So if you have say 15 guys on your team all different positions the top 5 will count?◦Aside from the cap, there are no roster limits or positional requirements at all. Take only five players, or take 40. Take all QBs, or take none. It's up to you.I am assuming it is the same rules for positions.1 qb2 rb3 wr1 te1 flex1 def1 k?????![]()
You should read the rules again. Doug went out of his way to make this extraodinarily clear.O.K.,I read the rules,maybe I missed it somewhere,but how many players actually count towards the point total?It's really eaiser to just read the rules. Not being a smart ###, but it will put you a huge leg up.So if you have say 15 guys on your team all different positions the top 5 will count?◦Aside from the cap, there are no roster limits or positional requirements at all. Take only five players, or take 40. Take all QBs, or take none. It's up to you.I am assuming it is the same rules for positions.1 qb2 rb3 wr1 te1 flex1 def1 k?????![]()
Look at the rules again, and pay close attention to a part of a sentence that is in all capital letters and bolded.O.K.,I read the rules,maybe I missed it somewhere,but how many players actually count towards the point total?
Based on sympathy for a 4-digiter:If your roster has 2 guys from all 12 teams in the playoffs, you get all the points any of them score. If your roster has 7 Patriots and 7 Saints because you know they will play in the Super Bowl, you will get the points scored by the 2 highest scoring guys on each team each week until the Super Bowl, when you get all the points scored by everyone on your roster and win the contest. Then you will pay me a 33% commission for explaining the rules to you.Mik789fl said:O.K.,I read the rules,maybe I missed it somewhere,but how many players actually count towards the point total?It's really eaiser to just read the rules. Not being a smart ###, but it will put you a huge leg up.So if you have say 15 guys on your team all different positions the top 5 will count?◦Aside from the cap, there are no roster limits or positional requirements at all. Take only five players, or take 40. Take all QBs, or take none. It's up to you.I am assuming it is the same rules for positions.1 qb2 rb3 wr1 te1 flex1 def1 k?????![]()
What about the Bears?If you think NE/Pitt/Atl are super bowl bound this contest gets even trickier.
Nobody thinks they're Super Bowl bound.What about the Bears?If you think NE/Pitt/Atl are super bowl bound this contest gets even trickier.
hopefully he grades on a curve cause I'm right there with ya........got a headache trying figure out who to pick....so right now my junk entry is 7 QB's6 DSTFascinating values for K and DEF. I'm guessing it's an experiment by Doug. I think I'm going to fail it.
Not sure, but I found Doug's sims in the thread from last year useful.Is last year's data floating out there anywhere?
Jay Cutler is there QB.What about the Bears?If you think NE/Pitt/Atl are super bowl bound this contest gets even trickier.
Loading up on players from teams not playing in week 1 is going to make it pretty tough to still be around after week 1.Jay Cutler is there QB.What about the Bears?If you think NE/Pitt/Atl are super bowl bound this contest gets even trickier.Actually the Pitt/NE player values are through the roof. In NE's case you would have to spend $31 for their RBs. Welker/Branch will run you $38. Brady $34 and their TEs $34. That's $105 of your cap and I'll guarantee that there are entires with those guys locked up plus the K and D for another $36.
You can pick up the key Chicago starters for less than $80. Culter/Forter/Knox/Clark are $21 cheaper (60 v. 81) compared to Ryan/Turner/White/Gonzo. Building a Chicago Super Bowl team and having funds for round one players is much easier.
True, but there's also a chance everyone advances because there aren't 4000 entries. Knowing how many entries there are therefore may be a key piece of information.Loading up on players from teams not playing in week 1 is going to make it pretty tough to still be around after week 1.Jay Cutler is there QB.What about the Bears?If you think NE/Pitt/Atl are super bowl bound this contest gets even trickier.Actually the Pitt/NE player values are through the roof. In NE's case you would have to spend $31 for their RBs. Welker/Branch will run you $38. Brady $34 and their TEs $34. That's $105 of your cap and I'll guarantee that there are entires with those guys locked up plus the K and D for another $36.
You can pick up the key Chicago starters for less than $80. Culter/Forter/Knox/Clark are $21 cheaper (60 v. 81) compared to Ryan/Turner/White/Gonzo. Building a Chicago Super Bowl team and having funds for round one players is much easier.
I've done some serious number crunching and my educated and highly statistically significant guess is that there will be far fewer than 4000 entries. Therefore, I encourage everyone to avoid taking any players who are playing in week 1 - it is a waste of your salary cap space. :XTrue, but there's also a chance everyone advances because there aren't 4000 entries. Knowing how many entries there are therefore may be a key piece of information.Loading up on players from teams not playing in week 1 is going to make it pretty tough to still be around after week 1.Jay Cutler is there QB.What about the Bears?If you think NE/Pitt/Atl are super bowl bound this contest gets even trickier.Actually the Pitt/NE player values are through the roof. In NE's case you would have to spend $31 for their RBs. Welker/Branch will run you $38. Brady $34 and their TEs $34. That's $105 of your cap and I'll guarantee that there are entires with those guys locked up plus the K and D for another $36.
You can pick up the key Chicago starters for less than $80. Culter/Forter/Knox/Clark are $21 cheaper (60 v. 81) compared to Ryan/Turner/White/Gonzo. Building a Chicago Super Bowl team and having funds for round one players is much easier.
I've now used the search function, and have to state that no one should draw any conclusions from my last post. Sorry about that.I've done some serious number crunching and my educated and highly statistically significant guess is that there will be far fewer than 4000 entries. Therefore, I encourage everyone to avoid taking any players who are playing in week 1 - it is a waste of your salary cap space.True, but there's also a chance everyone advances because there aren't 4000 entries. Knowing how many entries there are therefore may be a key piece of information.![]()
I think it will be a bit lower due to two things:1) No GB/Ari shootout to artificially inflate the scores.2) Pricing is higher this year.My week 1 target has been 115 points, but I have no idea if that is good enough...currently project to 120 to give a little cushion. I think the projected cut line will be a little higher than last year since this is the second time playing with the same rules...
I think it will be a bit lower due to two things:1) No GB/Ari shootout to artificially inflate the scores.My week 1 target has been 115 points, but I have no idea if that is good enough...currently project to 120 to give a little cushion. I think the projected cut line will be a little higher than last year since this is the second time playing with the same rules...
2) Pricing is higher this year.
Very challenging contest that should be great fun.I said projected cut line (which was about 110). The actual cut line was way over 110 because of the shoot out.Txns8 said:I think it will be a bit lower due to two things:1) No GB/Ari shootout to artificially inflate the scores.JB Breakfast Club said:My week 1 target has been 115 points, but I have no idea if that is good enough...currently project to 120 to give a little cushion. I think the projected cut line will be a little higher than last year since this is the second time playing with the same rules...
2) Pricing is higher this year.
What was week 2 like?I said projected cut line (which was about 110). The actual cut line was way over 110 because of the shoot out.Txns8 said:I think it will be a bit lower due to two things:1) No GB/Ari shootout to artificially inflate the scores.JB Breakfast Club said:My week 1 target has been 115 points, but I have no idea if that is good enough...currently project to 120 to give a little cushion. I think the projected cut line will be a little higher than last year since this is the second time playing with the same rules...
2) Pricing is higher this year.
4 QBs3 Rbs5 WRs1 TE0 K1 DLove these contests I have 3 QBs,4 RBs, 11 WRs, 5 TEs and 1 K.Goin to leave it alone and see how quick I'm eliminated in this one.
You may want to try again, this roster doesn't have a chance.QB - Drew Brees - NO - $34QB - Tom Brady - NE - $34QB - Aaron Rodgers - GB - $29QB - Peyton Manning - IND - $26RB - BenJarvus Green-Ellis - NE - $17RB - Reggie Bush - NO - $11RB - Jerome Harrison - PHI - $4RB - James Starks - GB - $4RB - LeRon McClain - BAL - $3RB - Mewelde Moore - PIT - $3WR - Wes Welker - NE - $23WR - Deion Branch - NE - $15WR - Blair White - IND - $9WR - Devery Henderson - NO - $8WR - Ben Obomanu - SEA - $5WR - Chris Chambers - KC - $4WR - Antwaan Randle El - PIT - $4WR - Donte Stallworth - BAL - $3WR - Brad Smith - NYJ - $3WR - Eric Weems - ATL - $2WR - Devin Aromashodu - CHI - $2WR - Riley Cooper - PHI - $2TE - Donald Lee - GB - $3TE - Justin Peelle - ATL - $2Total value: 250