What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

2011 Oakland Raiders In-Season Thread (1 Viewer)

As far as the compensatory picks go, I'm only counting on a 3rd and 1 or 2 late round picks. The key players lost are Nnamdi, Gallery, and Miller. The key players gained are Boss and Heyer. There were a few other losses and additions but I doubt any of them are substantial enough to count towards compensatory picks. If any others are, it would only affect the 7th round.

So we lost 3 and gained 2 players for a net loss of 1 player. Thats a for sure pick. Considering the value of who we lost, especially Nnamdi, that pick seems likely to be a 3rd rounder. The NFL doenst give away many 3rd round picks but we are talking about one of the league's highest paid players.

If a player signed is considered substantially less valueable by formula than one lost the NFL can also give a pick, usually a late rounder. It may only be a 7th but maybe in our case this year we can hope for a little better. We should get one or two of these for losing more valuable players than we gained.

Boss's salary is around 4million per year, Heyer I think is a one year around 1.7m (it was reported the same we originally offered Mario Henderson). Miller's contract is between 6-7m per and Gallery I would guess is above or simuliar to the 4m per mark we paid Boss but I dont have the details. Other factors include playing time and post season awards. Gallery, Miller, and Boss have already missed games with injury while Heyer has been inactive for much of the season. This will lessen the formula value of Gallery, Miller, and Heyer, and Boss. If Boss is healthy the rest of the year while Gallery or Miller continue to miss games, we might end up with one less pick (2 instead of 3). If Heyer doesnt get on the field again this year, its conceivable that we could get a better pick (mid round).

So expect a 3rd round pick, a mid-late round pick, and possibly a third late round pick.

 
'massraider said:
I am nervous about Palmer, and I feel like everyone is assuming he is done, physically. But....what if he isn't? What if he is healthy? Have to admit, I am getting more and more excited about the move.
After a day of reading and researching, I am with you massraider, nervous that he is washed up but excited as all hell if he isn't. Heh for now I will still keep this on :bag: ...
 
I'm very excited about this trade. I think the compensation was a bit steep, however with that being said if we make it late into the playoffs where that 2013 draft pick become a 1st, then in my opinion it was worth it.

 
Been listening to Salomon Wilcots and he has an interesting take. He says Palmer's TD/Int ratio between his last 32 games is exactly the same as the 32 games prior to that.

Wilcots also claims that the coaches tape shows that much of the percieved decline in Palmer's play is due to the play of his receiving core (running the wrong routes, ect.) He points specifically to Palmer's stats the final two games without Ocho.

I would also point out that the Raiders have historically done very well after acquiring a starting QB from other teams, or cast off QBs (plunket, Gannon). I am optimistic this will be judge as a good trade in the long run.

 
Re compensatory picks, IIRC the pickscare based on the sise of the player's contact not signings vs lost players. I expect the Raiders to get a 3rd for NA, possibly a 5th and 6th for Gallery/Miller.

 
I am excited about the Raiders attitude overall with this trade. So many are scoffing at why they paid the price they did. If it's just for a shot at making the playoffs. They don't seem like they are content to just make the playoffs, but dare I say it, they seem to be preparing themselves for a playoff run. I don't want to get ahead of myself here. I've never been a Palmer fan, but the vibe and electricity that Hue Jackson gives the team exudes confidence, swagger, mojo.

It's fun to root for this team now, and I can't really say that I've felt that way for about a decade. The culture change alone is worth the heavy pricetag in trade.

:thumbup:

 
WOW...raiders got fleece johnson'ed on this deal. DAMN! LOL, typical. GG Bengals.
I can tell you are still sore from that 33-3 ### whipping the Raiders put on the Seahawks last year.Print out a copy of your insightful posts in this thread and use it to wipe those tears. :cry:
 
You could smell this coming, but Shaugnessy is done:

http://www.ibabuzz.com/oaklandraiders/2011/10/19/raiders-place-de-shaughnessy-on-injured-reserve/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+iba_raiders+%28Inside+The+Oakland+Raiders%29&utm_content=Google+Reader

The Raiders freed up a spot on the 53-man roster for quarterback Carson Palmer by placing veteran defensive end Matt Shaughnessy on the injured-reserve list.

That makes Shaughnessy ineligible to play for the Raiders again this season. He suffered a shoulder injury against the New York Jets on Sept. 25 and has not played since.

The Raiders held out hope that his shoulder might heal at some point this season. However, it appeared as if things weren’t going to improve enough for Shaughnessy to help out this season.

Jarvis Moss, Desmond Bryant and Trevor Scott are expected to fill the void in Shaughnessy’s absence.

 
http://www.ibabuzz.com/oaklandraiders/2011/10/19/jackson-sending-message-to-players/

PALMER IMPRESSES IN DEBUT

Palmer practiced with his new teammates for the first time Wednesday. He said it’s going to take some time to shake off the rust, but his teammates already like what they see.

“He looked great,” wide receiver Chaz Schilens said. “That’s all there is to it, man.”

Palmer said it was nice being in an NFL setting again after spending the past nine months or so finding creative ways to stay in shape.

“Definitely rusty,” Palmer said. “Good to be back in it but definitely have some rust to wear off. I haven’t thrown to NFL receivers in awhile. Whether it’s been high school kids or my brother, I have had one NFL guy to throw to in T.J. Houshmandzadeh but, other than that, I haven’t thrown to guys that can run like this and lots of guys that can run like this in seven-on-seven situations and team situations, things like that.”

Receiver Jacoby Ford said it would be difficult for Palmer to start this Sunday. Even so, it’s only a matter of time before Palmer and the receivers are in synch.

“He looked good,” Ford said. “It’s just a matter of the timing. He has to get that down and get used to the offense and new receivers. Whenever we can do that, we’ll be clicking on all cylinders.”

Jackson dismissed reports about Palmer starting against the Chiefs on Sunday.

“You hear it come from me?” Jackson said. “It didn’t come from anybody over here. I know I never said that.”

Jackson said he will wait until Friday night before he determines whether Palmer is far enough along to start. Palmer hasn’t played in a game of any kind since Jan. 2.

Receiver Derek Hagan, perhaps, is best qualified to pass judgment on the status of Palmer, given they spent some time together during the lockout.

“Carson looked great,” Hagan said. “Obviously, the same Carson I’ve been working with throughout the summer. We had a few throwing sessions out in L.A. He looks the same. He’s putting the ball right on the money. Obviously that’s something we’re looking forward to.”
 
If Palmer starts this week there will surely be a lot of rust and communication issues. Still could play better than Boller but Boller seems like a safer start. I just hope we dont have to switch out QBs because we started the wrong guy. We must not lose to KC at home. I was hoping we'd prepare Boller this week and Palmer during the bye. Splitting the snaps between them all week kind of makes two half prepped QBs.

I have a feeling they are trying to start Palmer. Hue isnt afraid to take risks for sure. Hopefully this one pays off.

 
Palmer not being prepared, or Boller playing is probably about the same. (to me)

So if you start Palmer, see what he looks like this week, that should give you even

more info to work with on the By-Week, if he's in decent shape I think he should be

at least in the lineup and play.

 
Lombardi says Carson needed Tommy John surgery but didn't have it.

What? This is the first I've heard this. He says it at about 4:45. I think Lombardi's credible enough to not just make that up.

So how do we feel about this? I'm not a doctor, but a Tommy John injury is pretty serious right? Can anyone comment intelligently about this injury and how well it can heal without surgery? I'm guessing the ligament involved wasn't fully torn if he opted to not have the surgery.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
In a radical switching of gears from Tommy John, I also gleaned this nugget from my favorite Raider board:

From a tweet from AP sportswiter Josh Dubnow:Courtesy of STATS: Opponents had 43 pass attempts vs blitz last 2 games; just 30 in 1st 4 (games).The 25 passes vs. blitz against Houston and 18 against Cleveland are 2 highest single game totals since start of 05
Could just be coincidence, but in the two games since Al's passing the shackles have come off the defense in terms of blitzing. God rest Al, but I was tired of our defense always looking so uncreative. That's not been the case last two weeks. Blitzes have come from all over to great effect. There is a lot of talent on that side of the ball if the scheming can be brought up a notch. Safety blitzing in particular seems like a strength b/c of the speed those guys have to come from way off the line to wreak havoc post snap.
 
Lombardi says Carson needed Tommy John surgery but didn't have it.

What? This is the first I've heard this. He says it at about 4:45. I think Lombardi's credible enough to not just make that up.

So how do we feel about this? I'm not a doctor, but a Tommy John injury is pretty serious right? Can anyone comment intelligently about this injury and how well it can heal without surgery? I'm guessing the ligament involved wasn't fully torn if he opted to not have the surgery.
No idea. What I do know about Tommy John surgery:

Usually a baseball pitcher thing.

It replaces a ligament in the elbow with a tendon from elsewhere in the body, or a cadaver.

It's not very risky, there's been a lot of players that have had it, and come back. Takes a while tho. Of course, I assume it takes more time for a pitcher than a QB.

But this is a weird thing. If someone needs to have Tommy John surgery, that means a ligament needs to be replaced. How does that ligament not need to be replaced now?

 
Lombardi says Carson needed Tommy John surgery but didn't have it.

What? This is the first I've heard this. He says it at about 4:45. I think Lombardi's credible enough to not just make that up.

So how do we feel about this? I'm not a doctor, but a Tommy John injury is pretty serious right? Can anyone comment intelligently about this injury and how well it can heal without surgery? I'm guessing the ligament involved wasn't fully torn if he opted to not have the surgery.
This is from a couple years ago. It was reported Palmer needed Tommy John surgery but instead opted for rest and alternative treatments. Since that time many folks have commented his arm looks weaker (and the stats have taken a dive). Perhaps the stats took a nosedive for unrelated reasons. But this has been news for awhile.ETA - he hurt it in 2008 sometime. About a year later he claimed he was back to being 100%.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Oakland Raiders WR Darrius Heyward-Bey has done extra work with QB Carson Palmer after practice this week to try to build chemistry.
Good to hear on both DHB and Palmer being extra motivated to make them both better.
 
Posted this in the Carson Palmer thread. Risking shameless self-promotion of my musings in the interest of hyping up my Raider faithful brethern over this move.

My link

I like this move.

Not because there aren't questions about Palmer's arm strength, durability, or the opportunity cost of what we had to give up to get him.

But because this is what we HAD to do. In the year where the Raiders lost Al, nothing stays truer to the mantra of "Just Win, Baby" than this move. We are all-in, sacrificing whatever we need to to retain the best start we've had and the best opportunity we've had to win the division since Gannon.

This may smack of desperation to some, an out-and-out fleecing to others, and I can't blame the critics for howling. But right or wrong, when did we Raiders fans give a damned what the critics think? I mean, what actual choices were there out there in the QB market? There are very few elite QBs at the position (Brady, Rodgers, Brees, Manning), and a handful more that can be consistently great (Romo, Schaub, Big Ben, Rivers, Vick). Outside of these guys, Palmer gives the Raiders a likely shot at winning any given Sunday 4as any the rest of them.

To be able to nab Palmer and keep a turn-around season alive was the ONLY thing for the Raiders to do -- is it better to simply give up and roll over? And as such, was it really that much of a price to pay? For a QB who has strong connections and rapport to the first coach since Gruden who has instilled an old sense of Poise and Pride and winning mentality to the Silver & Black?

I mean, what did the Cards give up for Kolb? A Pro Bowl corner and a 2nd round draft pick.

What did the Falcons give up for Julio Jones? Two 1st round, a 2nd, and two 4th round picks. For a WR.

I'm sure there are tons of other or better examples. So does this really seem outlandish for the Raiders to go all-in on a guy who is an upgrade from Campbell, and fills the most glaring hole of need for the team right now?

Hell, I'd give up a 1st round pick to NOT have to watch Boller flub his way under center for the rest of the season.

I know this is like glass-half-full, Polyanna homerism. I don't care.

I'd rather see us scrap and claw and fight each and every game with every ounce we have, sacrificing potential for the sake of winning now, instead of rolling over and dying.

The Raiders needed this, regardless of what we had to pay to get it. Here's hoping that Palmer -- like so many Raiders before him -- gets to rejuvenate his career and find a place helping our beloved Raiders keep this train a rolling.

Only time will tell.
Just Win Baby

As an aside -- has anyone lobbied the FBG's moderators for a tributary Al Davis emoticon? We should.

 
Great post Stompin' Tom.

You know, why aren't Colts fans more pissed that the Colts didn't try and get a vet? Why aren't Seattle fans more upset?

Long story short, the Raiders don't play scared. Hue doesn't coach scared, and they don't make personnel moves scared. The can take a chance, and everyone isn't worried about making a bold move, and getting second-guessed by the higher ups.

No one is saying trading draft picks for vets is a sound strategy every year. No one believes that. But if we get return for those picks, what's the problem?

The big thing to me, I think this is a nice year to make a little try at a run in the NFL. Teams are down, top teams are showing weakness, there's room for another elite team. Steelers, Colts, down. Chargers, no one thinks they are invincible. Jets, well, we know they can be had. Ravens and Pats. If you are talking final four in the conference, who else is a lock?

NFC has one great team, and a bunch of teams that have shown their a## a bit.

Take a shot on Carson, and if it turns out that Hue knows he is healthy, and "back", I don't think you can dismiss the Raiders as a contender.

 
A really, really fun thing to read:http://www.insidebayarea.com/raiders/ci_19160098

Hue Jackson isn't limiting his aggressive nature to player acquisition and offensive play-calling. The Raiders coach has authorized defensive coordinator Chuck Bresnahan to dial up the pressure on defense."I don't want to play the same thing all the time," Jackson said after practice Thursday. "I think it's been pretty vanilla here in the past, and I think guys have kind of known how to attack us."According to the statistical service Stats, LLC, the Raiders brought pressure 8.5 times per game on runs and passes in the first four games, and 28.5 times per game in the last two against Houston and Cleveland.Teams averaged 9.6 yards per play against the Oakland blitz through the first four and 3.4 in the last two.Against the Browns, free safety Michael Huff came free and was upended by a blocker, forcing a Colt McCoy incompletion on his first pass attempt of the day. On the next play, safety Matt Giordano blitzed and got a sack.Oakland kept up the pressure, and the Browns never got in sync.Kansas City coach Todd Haley, whose Chiefs play at Oakland on Sunday, told reporters by conference call the frequency of blitzing is the biggest difference in the Raiders."You're seeing some multiple pressures, and those pressures aren't only coming from the linebackers; you're seeing safeties and some unique, exotic coverages tied to those pressures," Haley said.Although the Raiders still play a lot of man-to-man defense, backing a blitz with zones wasn't something McCoy expected to see."He came up to us after the game and said, 'I thought you guys were going to play more man,' " safety Mike Mitchell said. "When we can throw in some wrinkles with some different looks, they're not going to know what to expect."The Raiders sacked Houston quarterback Matt Schaub three times and McCoy twice but pressured them throughout as both had passing efforts below 50 percent. Schaub misfired on 24 of his last 39 throws."When you watch the film, you'll definitely see a little bit more variety from what I've seen in past years with the defense and the defensive scheme and the pressures that they bring," Chiefs quarterback Matt Cassel said by conference call."We're definitely more colorful now that we're not as vanilla, we're not as predictable as we've been in years past," Raiders cornerback Stanford Routt said. "Try to confuse the quarterback and get him to make decisions and reads in the actual play rather than already being able to make a presnap read and determination where he wants to go with the ball."
 
A really, really fun thing to read:http://www.insidebayarea.com/raiders/ci_19160098

Hue Jackson isn't limiting his aggressive nature to player acquisition and offensive play-calling. The Raiders coach has authorized defensive coordinator Chuck Bresnahan to dial up the pressure on defense."I don't want to play the same thing all the time," Jackson said after practice Thursday. "I think it's been pretty vanilla here in the past, and I think guys have kind of known how to attack us."According to the statistical service Stats, LLC, the Raiders brought pressure 8.5 times per game on runs and passes in the first four games, and 28.5 times per game in the last two against Houston and Cleveland.Teams averaged 9.6 yards per play against the Oakland blitz through the first four and 3.4 in the last two.Against the Browns, free safety Michael Huff came free and was upended by a blocker, forcing a Colt McCoy incompletion on his first pass attempt of the day. On the next play, safety Matt Giordano blitzed and got a sack.Oakland kept up the pressure, and the Browns never got in sync.Kansas City coach Todd Haley, whose Chiefs play at Oakland on Sunday, told reporters by conference call the frequency of blitzing is the biggest difference in the Raiders."You're seeing some multiple pressures, and those pressures aren't only coming from the linebackers; you're seeing safeties and some unique, exotic coverages tied to those pressures," Haley said.Although the Raiders still play a lot of man-to-man defense, backing a blitz with zones wasn't something McCoy expected to see."He came up to us after the game and said, 'I thought you guys were going to play more man,' " safety Mike Mitchell said. "When we can throw in some wrinkles with some different looks, they're not going to know what to expect."The Raiders sacked Houston quarterback Matt Schaub three times and McCoy twice but pressured them throughout as both had passing efforts below 50 percent. Schaub misfired on 24 of his last 39 throws."When you watch the film, you'll definitely see a little bit more variety from what I've seen in past years with the defense and the defensive scheme and the pressures that they bring," Chiefs quarterback Matt Cassel said by conference call."We're definitely more colorful now that we're not as vanilla, we're not as predictable as we've been in years past," Raiders cornerback Stanford Routt said. "Try to confuse the quarterback and get him to make decisions and reads in the actual play rather than already being able to make a presnap read and determination where he wants to go with the ball."
:thumbup: That's sweet music to my ears. I like the more aggresive playcalling for the defense. I just wish Bresnehan would stay away from the prevent late in games, because it blows.
 
There was a lot that Al brought to the table over the years but one of the negatives was that his knowledge of the game restrained his coaches to what he viewed as the Raider way. He was very resistant to any change other than getting pressure on the QB with our front 4 and play bump and run man to man. The thing was that the game has changed, yes, more sophisticated offenses and defense but more importantly the rules. It was much easier to be effective in that 'vanilla' D when the DB's had much more leeway and safeties could intimidate you away from certain routes (like going over the middle). Offenses pretty much have known what the Raiders were going to do every game and it was a question of who executes better. Now the coaches have the freedom to keep the opposing teams guessing.

 
Every defense going forward will have Carson Palmer on the brain. I think it would be awesome to incorporate some kind of wildcat/triple option package for three of four plays per game, with McFadden being the point man just like he was at Arkansas. I know we tried it a few times in the past, but it can be perfected. Instead of using the plodding Bush in the formation, I'd have Ford and Taiwan Jones involved instead.

Example: Personnel is Palmer, McFadden, Jones, Ford, DHB, five lineman and Boss.

Palmer breaks the huddle to increase the chances that the defense is still in a nickel package, then he splits out WIDE and is uninvolved in the play. McFadden and Jones line up in the backfield with nobody under center. Ford comes in motion, and all three players are in the backfield when the ball is snapped. (Kinda like what the Dolphins sprung on the Pats in '08). Talk about crazy speed! If one of them finds a crack due to undisciplined defensive gap play, it's a house call.

:football:

After running this formation a few times, if the safeties get too nosy, McFadden is more than capable of throwing the ball to DHB.

 
Schefter is now reporting it's 95% that Boller starts. :rolleyes: ESPN and to a lesser extent NFLN has some egg on their face on this one. You had to dig to really find out that Hue Jackson refuted these reports.

This is a big week for the team. They have some players that are still out, important ones, and Palmer isn't up to speed. If they can get a win against KC here, the bye week is at about the best spot we could hope for. If they can get a win, have Palmer up to speed in two weeks, and get most/all of Reece, C. Johnson, SeaBass, Huff, Rolando, and Chekwa healthy, it'll be really nice.

 
Pryor is splitting first team work this week with Palmer and Boller. First team reps are precious right now in trying to get Palmer or Boller comfortable and ready to start this weekend, so this is curious.

Could Hue be working on a few wrinkles with Pryor as an option QB with DMC? Maybe we'll see Pryor once or twice each game in a wildcat formation since Hue lost that aspect of his playbook when Palmer replaced Campbell. Why not let the big fast running QB go in for a few wildcat plays? It's not like they've invested big dollars in him if he gets hurt. If he can help you now in a slash role, why not get his athleticism on the field while he slowly learns to be a real QB? I like it.

ETA: the NFL dropped the third QB rule this offseason, allowing the third QB to be an active player on game day, making Pryor's appearance as a wildcat QB a more legitimate possibility. Hue Jax is going to find a way to use this guy.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Pryor is splitting first team work this week with Palmer and Boller. First team reps are precious right now in trying to get Palmer or Boller comfortable and ready to start this weekend, so this is curious. Could Hue be working on a few wrinkles with Pryor as an option QB with DMC? Maybe we'll see Pryor once or twice each game in a wildcat formation since Hue lost that aspect of his playbook when Palmer replaced Campbell. Why not let the big fast running QB go in for a few wildcat plays? It's not like they've invested big dollars in him if he gets hurt. If he can help you now in a slash role, why not get his athleticism on the field while he slowly learns to be a real QB? I like it.
C'mon man, Wildcat theories are stupid.
 
'Raider Nation said:
C'mon man, Wildcat theories are stupid.
I'm not saying 15 wildcat plays a game like the Dolphins of a few years ago, but I could see some experimentation and possibly more if the experiments are successful. You don't think Hue will be creative with Pryor and DMC? Pryor is the perfect guy to do this with. He has Cam Newton measurables (actually he's faster) and a fig newton price. If this were John Fox, I'd agree with you, but this is Huge Action.
 
'Raider Nation said:
C'mon man, Wildcat theories are stupid.
I'm not saying 15 wildcat plays a game like the Dolphins of a few years ago, but I could see some experimentation and possibly more if the experiments are successful. You don't think Hue will be creative with Pryor and DMC? Pryor is the perfect guy to do this with. He has Cam Newton measurables (actually he's faster) and a fig newton price. If this were John Fox, I'd agree with you, but this is Huge Action.
:mellow: Dude, I'm kidding. Check out what I wrote two posts before yours.
 
'Raider Nation said:
C'mon man, Wildcat theories are stupid.
I'm not saying 15 wildcat plays a game like the Dolphins of a few years ago, but I could see some experimentation and possibly more if the experiments are successful. You don't think Hue will be creative with Pryor and DMC? Pryor is the perfect guy to do this with. He has Cam Newton measurables (actually he's faster) and a fig newton price. If this were John Fox, I'd agree with you, but this is Huge Action.
:mellow: Dude, I'm kidding. Check out what I wrote two posts before yours.
Doh! You hooked me. Thanks for letting me loose.I'm excited to see what Huge Action has next, wildcat and otherwise!
 
'Raider Nation said:
Every defense going forward will have Carson Palmer on the brain. I think it would be awesome to incorporate some kind of wildcat/triple option package for three of four plays per game, with McFadden being the point man just like he was at Arkansas. I know we tried it a few times in the past, but it can be perfected. Instead of using the plodding Bush in the formation, I'd have Ford and Taiwan Jones involved instead.

Example: Personnel is Palmer, McFadden, Jones, Ford, DHB, five lineman and Boss.

Palmer breaks the huddle to increase the chances that the defense is still in a nickel package, then he splits out WIDE and is uninvolved in the play. McFadden and Jones line up in the backfield with nobody under center. Ford comes in motion, and all three players are in the backfield when the ball is snapped. (Kinda like what the Dolphins sprung on the Pats in '08). Talk about crazy speed! If one of them finds a crack due to undisciplined defensive gap play, it's a house call.

:football:

After running this formation a few times, if the safeties get too nosy, McFadden is more than capable of throwing the ball to DHB.
You gotta have Moore on the field for this.
 
Right now I am terrified of what might be in store with Campbell/Edwards/Boller at QB.
Count me in the group that loves the trade for Palmer. For a team that has not had a good option at QB for 10 years, you have to take risks to find an answer at that position.
 
The three kickers we worked out:Dave Rayner, Ricky Schmitt, and Rhys Lloyd.
Raynor signed. You know, normally for a team losing their kicker for a couple of weeks is not that big of a deal. You bring in another kicker and may get a small drop off in what you can do- but with Sebas, it really hurts. We no longer have an almost give me 50 yards out and that can really impact the game plan.
 
The three kickers we worked out:Dave Rayner, Ricky Schmitt, and Rhys Lloyd.
Raynor signed. You know, normally for a team losing their kicker for a couple of weeks is not that big of a deal. You bring in another kicker and may get a small drop off in what you can do- but with Sebas, it really hurts. We no longer have an almost give me 50 yards out and that can really impact the game plan.
KC is catching us at as good a spot as they could ask for. Transitioning between QBs, no kicker, and a lot of injuries. :yucky: Thank God we at home. Any divisional opponent cannot be taken lightly, as the entire AFC West found out last year. They ALL thought they had a better team, and the Raiders ran the table. KC has played consistently better recently, I actually expect Cassel to come out throwing. Their best chance is to make Boller throw, so just running Jackie Battle doesn't seem like the smartest move. Go after the young cornerbacks, see if Bowe and Breaston can break free. I am pretty nervous about this game.
 
I am nervous about Palmer, and I feel like everyone is assuming he is done, physically. But....what if he isn't? What if he is healthy? Have to admit, I am getting more and more excited about the move.
After a day of reading and researching, I am with you massraider, nervous that he is washed up but excited as all hell if he isn't. Heh for now I will still keep this on :bag: ...
Sherlock Holmes would say data data data and that we need to see Carson Palmer play with the Raiders to make a judgement. Everyone else making confident statements before he ever takes a snap are already en route to clouding their own judgment and reasoning abilities. If he succeeds in Oakland, they will probably spin his success into failure (alter the facts to fit the views) to protect their cred, or go silent and hope everyone forgets what they said.
 
KC is catching us at as good a spot as they could ask for. Transitioning between QBs, no kicker, and a lot of injuries. :yucky: Thank God we at home. Any divisional opponent cannot be taken lightly, as the entire AFC West found out last year. They ALL thought they had a better team, and the Raiders ran the table. KC has played consistently better recently, I actually expect Cassel to come out throwing. Their best chance is to make Boller throw, so just running Jackie Battle doesn't seem like the smartest move. Go after the young cornerbacks, see if Bowe and Breaston can break free. I am pretty nervous about this game.
KC has won their last two games. They are the defending division champs. They are coming off a bye week...The Chiefs are going down Baby!
 
I'll be on the sideline of this game. Look for the red Phillies cap. :thumbup:
A red hat when the chiefs are in town?!(sorry... that's the jealousy in me coming out! Enjoy the game!!)
thanks man!Left the red hat in my car. Since I'll be on the sideline with a press credential, I can't have any NFL apperal.
Now how are we suppose to find now, I guess you should have worn a yellow footballguys.com hat. :P ;)
 
KC is catching us at as good a spot as they could ask for. Transitioning between QBs, no kicker, and a lot of injuries. :yucky: Thank God we at home.

Any divisional opponent cannot be taken lightly, as the entire AFC West found out last year. They ALL thought they had a better team, and the Raiders ran the table. KC has played consistently better recently, I actually expect Cassel to come out throwing. Their best chance is to make Boller throw, so just running Jackie Battle doesn't seem like the smartest move. Go after the young cornerbacks, see if Bowe and Breaston can break free. I am pretty nervous about this game.
:goodposting: PFFFFFFFFFFFT.....

Can we bring in Palmer now, since he can't POSSIBLY be worse than Boller?

 
Boller sucks! There I said it before the game was over. Somebody blasted Tebow before he ended up winning late. Hope I can bump this post to eat crow. But I seriously doubt it. :wall: :wall:

 
Now I've tried to positive about the Palmer trade. But I got some serious issues about trading 2 future #1 picks for a guy that is too rusty to play. I have to think that Hue Jackson had his fingerprints all over this trade, and should have seen some recent film on this guy. Had some kind of private workout. If he's that rusty that he can't play ahead of a garbage QB like Boller, I got to have some serious doubts over the value of that trade.

Another way to look at it is Boller is a huge dropoff from Campbell. Like Peyton Manning to Curtis Painter. Al Davis wanted this to be Jason Campbell's team. But there was never a sustainable backup plan in place. It was always "all-in" on Campbell. The trade for Palmer if they really want to spin they wanted him all along could have been made much cheaper at the beginning of the season, and by now Palmer would have been ready.

The smugness of Hue in his pressers acting like Palmer was his man all along doesn't add up. The trade now looks like a panic move. Boller isn't even an emergency QB. This is for certain his last stop and season in the NFL. Hue and AD should have known better than to have no backup plan in place in case Campbell went down. At this point, we are going to lose this game to the Chiefs regardless, so why not put Palmer in there and work out some game day rust?

 
well it goes back to the drafting of Russell - it's hard to keep pumping money into the same position . . . after Campbell got hurt, then they HAD to address the issue - before that, they were just praying that the band aid (Jason) would suffice . . .

 
Now I've tried to positive about the Palmer trade. But I got some serious issues about trading 2 future #1 picks for a guy that is too rusty to play. I have to think that Hue Jackson had his fingerprints all over this trade, and should have seen some recent film on this guy. Had some kind of private workout. If he's that rusty that he can't play ahead of a garbage QB like Boller, I got to have some serious doubts over the value of that trade. Another way to look at it is Boller is a huge dropoff from Campbell. Like Peyton Manning to Curtis Painter. Al Davis wanted this to be Jason Campbell's team. But there was never a sustainable backup plan in place. It was always "all-in" on Campbell. The trade for Palmer if they really want to spin they wanted him all along could have been made much cheaper at the beginning of the season, and by now Palmer would have been ready.The smugness of Hue in his pressers acting like Palmer was his man all along doesn't add up. The trade now looks like a panic move. Boller isn't even an emergency QB. This is for certain his last stop and season in the NFL. Hue and AD should have known better than to have no backup plan in place in case Campbell went down. At this point, we are going to lose this game to the Chiefs regardless, so why not put Palmer in there and work out some game day rust?
Lets not overract to one week with a limited playbook. I do not think they could have made this trade cheaper in the beginning of the year. Mike Brown only traded him because the raiders offered so much otherwise he would have rather let him stay "retired." I also read that Hue told Peter King when he got the job that he wanted Palmer to be the QB of the Raiders. For all we know they may have tried to get Palmer before the season, but Al may not have been willing to give up what they did now.
 
Just heard Carson interviewed after the game. He was frustrated, naturally, and mentioned that he literally only knew 10% of the playbook. It certainly was not pretty, but I'm not going to overreact after one performance, especially considering he's been on the team for ten minutes. I'm willing to be optimistic and reserve judgment until after the bye week.

It helps matters that the Chargers also lost, so in the big picture, hopefully this loss won't be too devastating.

 
Good news first!

Much much needed bye is next week.

On to the bad news...

we just lost to the Chiefs on our turf. We still have to play in KC and have two games against San Diego. This was an important game. If we werent playing a division opponent, maybe McClain doesnt even try to play.

A week after our QB goes down and days after our kicker falls, the real centerpiece of our offense, our RB, gets nicked as well as our defensive signal caller. We really need this bye week.

None of our QBs were prepared for this game. Having 3 guys sharing the first string snaps in practice when none of them have started for us before was a recipe for disaster from the beginning. Might as well have run a high school level offense with Pryor starting. We would have had a better chance. So yeah, I think the coaching staff is partially to blame for this one. Its not their fault Campbell got hurt or that Pryor was suspended. It is their fault though that they prepared like Boller was supposed to fail and started him anyway. If Boller is really that bad, why is he even on the team? Spreading their attention between 3 QBs going against a division rival who was coming off a bye week. Ugly, ugly, ugly! I hope its another lesson learned for Hue Jackson. He's now got two weeks to fix it.

While its nice to see Routt and Van Dyke making good tackles, why is a CB getting 10 tackles? They both actually played pretty well. Especially considering they were the only two actice CBs in the game. Speaking of that, Huff tackles worse than most NFL corners. Ok, so Huff is really half CB half FS. So am I supposed to give him half a break?

We saw a great game from a linebacker this week. Unfortunately he played for the other team. We have to be able to punch that ball in. This week I didnt mind Hue going for it on fourth down. Being down 14 in the first half is a much different situation than being up 14 halfway through the 4th quarter. not a bad call, just not good enough blocking. Speaking of our blockers, the penalties were back this week.

Ok, back to the good news...

Its Bye Week, Yaah!

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top