FallenHero32
Footballguy
Which way?Seems steepTeam A Traded:Chris Johnson1st Round 2013 Rookie DraftTeam B Traded:Andrew Luck2nd Round 2013 Rookie Draft
Which way?Seems steepTeam A Traded:Chris Johnson1st Round 2013 Rookie DraftTeam B Traded:Andrew Luck2nd Round 2013 Rookie Draft
Price to get Luck I'm sure.Which way?Seems steepTeam A Traded:Chris Johnson1st Round 2013 Rookie DraftTeam B Traded:Andrew Luck2nd Round 2013 Rookie Draft
I'm Team A. Wanted honest opinions. My thought process is that I am stocked at RB, have Trent Richardson and am looking to be very good long term. I'd rather dump Chris Johnson now when he still has plenty value and while this guy is still willing to trade luck away since he was needing RB's. I am personally happy with it. I know I overpaid for an unproven, but highly praised rookie, but I love making big trades.Price to get Luck I'm sure.Which way?Seems steepTeam A Traded:Chris Johnson1st Round 2013 Rookie DraftTeam B Traded:Andrew Luck2nd Round 2013 Rookie Draft
Take out the first and it seems okI'm Team A. Wanted honest opinions. My thought process is that I am stocked at RB, have Trent Richardson and am looking to be very good long term. I'd rather dump Chris Johnson now when he still has plenty value and while this guy is still willing to trade luck away since he was needing RB's. I am personally happy with it. I know I overpaid for an unproven, but highly praised rookie, but I love making big trades.Price to get Luck I'm sure.Which way?Seems steepTeam A Traded:Chris Johnson1st Round 2013 Rookie DraftTeam B Traded:Andrew Luck2nd Round 2013 Rookie Draft
Couple of quick points:If you truly believe in a player such as Wilson, why not go after him before preseason when his value is low? I know nobody expected his value to go up like it has, but it is dynasty 101 to buy before the breakout.If RBs decline at 26 (they do not), then why is a 30+ year old keeping Spiller on the bench all year? I don't have any issue with trading Spiller, I think he is likely in a RBBC for this year and probably next, but 26 is the exact WRONG age to trade a RB... that is smack dab in the middle of their prime.'lbouchard said:I gave: CJ Spiller, Tim Tebow, ARI DST, 2013 3rdI got: Russ Wilson, S. Vereen, SEA DST, 2013 2ndThought process: I needed a QB (Tebow was my starter), and I'm really high on Wilson (my 2nd QB in this class, and I felt this way before preseason). We only have to start 1 RB, and I already have SJax, Murray, Reggie, Ingram, Lamar Miller. Spiller was expendable, and I was kind of getting tired of waiting for him. I think FJax keeps him on bench this whole year, and by then he's already 26, which is when RBs start to decline. I plan to flip Vereen to Ridley owner. And then I got a pick upgrade and a DEF upgrade. I would've traded Spiller for Wilson straight up, so to get 3 upgrades was nice. Sorry for rambling.
1). We just recently finished out startup auction (it started during the preseason). I wanted Russ, but I was capped out. So I traded for him after.2). ProFootballFocus actually ran a study looking at RB stats. I can't find their Draft Guide right now, but IIRC, RBs points usually started to go down after age 26 (or maybe it was 27). The 30 year old is probably keeping Spiller on the bench because he's a better running back. Spiller still isn't a good between the tackle runner. Only reason I even had him was because I got him for like 4% of cap with intent to flip. I'm not a believer.Couple of quick points:If you truly believe in a player such as Wilson, why not go after him before preseason when his value is low? I know nobody expected his value to go up like it has, but it is dynasty 101 to buy before the breakout.If RBs decline at 26 (they do not), then why is a 30+ year old keeping Spiller on the bench all year? I don't have any issue with trading Spiller, I think he is likely in a RBBC for this year and probably next, but 26 is the exact WRONG age to trade a RB... that is smack dab in the middle of their prime.'lbouchard said:I gave: CJ Spiller, Tim Tebow, ARI DST, 2013 3rdI got: Russ Wilson, S. Vereen, SEA DST, 2013 2ndThought process: I needed a QB (Tebow was my starter), and I'm really high on Wilson (my 2nd QB in this class, and I felt this way before preseason). We only have to start 1 RB, and I already have SJax, Murray, Reggie, Ingram, Lamar Miller. Spiller was expendable, and I was kind of getting tired of waiting for him. I think FJax keeps him on bench this whole year, and by then he's already 26, which is when RBs start to decline. I plan to flip Vereen to Ridley owner. And then I got a pick upgrade and a DEF upgrade. I would've traded Spiller for Wilson straight up, so to get 3 upgrades was nice. Sorry for rambling.
You are absolutely correct but the only time a young and potential stud #1 WR in a dynasty league with our roster structure where we require two starting Recievers and can also use a WR as a FLEX start would ever come onto the market would be at the very begining of his career BEFORE he plays a down.It is a gamble on my part but a calculated gamble.Your logic is fine, the person you traded for is the fault. When you have that much talent and can't start it all, you try to make a trade to get one player and sometimes you over pay for it, but usually you get a sure thing, not a talented rookie who could be good or bust.I can see how it could be viewed that way but I am the owner of team A and I'm not a Jags fan. Here is my reasoning for this trade that does indeed look lopsided.I'm loaded at RB, (AdP, DeMarco, Bradshaw) and we only have to start one RB yet can choose to start another RB as a flex. We have to start two WRs and can use a third WR as our flex and I have good starting WRs, (Colston, Steve Smitch CAR, Hakeem) but wanted another stud WR to provide flexibility and WRs have a longer fantasy shelf life, also I drafted Dywer with my last rookie draft pick and feel he's got a shot to take over for Mendenhall who is in his contract year and I'm not sure the Steelers keep him.'Chazzhawk said:Depending on the scoring for IDP that looks very lopsided. Must be a Jaguar fan'Bracie Smathers said:12 team DYNASTY
standard scoring (non-ppr)
IDP
Starting rosters - QB, RB, FLEX 'RB/WR/TE', 2 WRs, TE, 2 DL, 2 LB, 2 DBs
Team A sends to team B >>>
- RB Rashard Mendenhall
- RB James Starks
- S Patrick Chung
- LB Johnson Derrick
- the 2013 2nd rd draft pick acquired in previous trade from team B
Team B sends to team A >>>
- WR Justin Blackmon
IDP guys I gave up, DJ is a stud no doubt he is the meat of what I gave up but he just turned 30 and I drafted Kuechly with my first round rookie pick and Chung is very irratic in his scoring and I'm set at DB.
The second round pick was a throw in.
I like having room at the bottom of my roster to make wire moves and after pulling the trigger on this deal I picked up, LB Bobby Wagner and LB Demeco Ryemes so I don't feel hurt at RB or LB or at DB and I really like Blackmon and think he's got a good shot to turn into a long term number one fantasy WR.
I agre that it does look very lopsided from the outside but I made the offer knowing I wouldn't be hurt at RB or DB and I felt I could aggressively refill my LBers on the wire and that gamble paid off so right now I like the deal but Blackmon has to come thru for me for this to be considered a success however right now I like it.
Yes it is dynasty. To add some context here, I'm team B. RBs: Arian Foster, Trent Richardson, Doug Martin, Fred Jackson, and Rashad JenningsThis is the dynasty thread, so I'd assume it's dynasty. So we can't just assume one year.Pretty even trade if dynasty, for this year I like the Smith/Moore side16 team, PPR league. Start 2 RBs, 2 WRs, and a flex.
Team A received:
Denarius Moore
Kevin Smith
Team B received:
Mike Wallace
That's a great trade almost regardless of the makeup of your team in my opinion. Moore has talent, but the Oakland WR situation looks like it could be a long-term guessing game with different guys having occasional big games, but not a ton of consistency. Smith is so injury prone and likely won't have much value past this year, if he can even hold onto the value that long. Very good trade with Wallace's value at a bit of a low point. He's still a talented guy who at worst should still be a WR2.Yes it is dynasty. To add some context here, I'm team B. RBs: Arian Foster, Trent Richardson, Doug Martin, Fred Jackson, and Rashad JenningsThis is the dynasty thread, so I'd assume it's dynasty. So we can't just assume one year.Pretty even trade if dynasty, for this year I like the Smith/Moore side16 team, PPR league. Start 2 RBs, 2 WRs, and a flex.
Team A received:
Denarius Moore
Kevin Smith
Team B received:
Mike Wallace
WRs: Brandon Lloyd, Mike Wallace, Sidney Rice, Greg Little, and Laurent Robinson
Giving up Kevin Smith and Denarius Moore to provide a WR2 I could count on was my motivation.
Interesting trade. I guess I can see both sides. If you have standard scoring and you're giving QBs 6 pts. for passing TDs and you can flex them...then it is a very QB-centric league with top QBs being worth a ton. I think in general, top QB for top RB, I'd take the QB. I mean, I'd strongly consider guys like Stafford and Brees over the top RBs.However, there's a real question as to whether Vick should be considered even a top 10 dynasty QB at this point (especially in 6 pt. passing TD leagues). He seems very hesitant to run this year. And that was where his value came from. If he is going to be primarily a pocket passer, then he's nothing special. And he probably doesn't have much time left. I think you have to go with the Richardson side here.10 team, non PPR, Super flex league (i.e., can start 2 QBs) with 6 point passing TDsTeam A gave Trent RichardsonTeam B gave Michael VickTeam B won the championship last season. Team A arguably has the worst team in the league but only had the 3rd pick this year, where he took Richardson.Team B is taking a risk, as his second best QB is now Dalton, and he has Foles, so he had Vick handcuffed. But he still made a great move IMO swapping out the injury prone Vick for a stud rookie RB. Team B is also from Ohio and is a big Browns fan.No idea what Team A is thinking doing this. He definitely had the worst QBs in the league, but Vick is not a great asset for a rebuilding team IMO.
How many years does Vick even have left? Terrible.10 team, non PPR, Super flex league (i.e., can start 2 QBs) with 6 point passing TDsTeam A gave Trent RichardsonTeam B gave Michael VickTeam B won the championship last season. Team A arguably has the worst team in the league but only had the 3rd pick this year, where he took Richardson.Team B is taking a risk, as his second best QB is now Dalton, and he has Foles, so he had Vick handcuffed. But he still made a great move IMO swapping out the injury prone Vick for a stud rookie RB. Team B is also from Ohio and is a big Browns fan.No idea what Team A is thinking doing this. He definitely had the worst QBs in the league, but Vick is not a great asset for a rebuilding team IMO.
Terrible trade in dynasty, for a one-week rental. Moore is worth much more than a mediocre QB.12-team, start 1QB, 2RB, 2WR, 2RB/WR, 2TE...I realized both my QB's (Brees and Newton) have a bye in week six so I traded Denarius Moore for Ryan Fitzpatrick
I liked team B even before week 112 team, ppr, 1RB/2WR/2FlexTeam A Received: Antonio + RidleyTeam B Received: Marshall
Wow team A should be arrested for robbery.10 team - dynasty hybrid... build up to full dynasty. 2 kept last year, keep 8 this year, keep 14 after next season.PPR / .5 for RB; QB, RB, RB, RB/WR, WR, WR, WR/TE, TETeam A gets:LeshoureAaron HernandezTeam B gets:Ronnie HillmanMendenhall
That is a lot to pay for richardson....he looks the part but the browns are terrible. This will take multiple years to payoff.Hate to bump my own post, but I'd like opinions on this. Lots of debate in my league on this trade.12 team PPRTeam A: RichardsonTeam B: Forte/D Moore/Rudolph/2013 1st (prob late)
You're going to regret this.Team A Giveswayne BoweTeam B Gives:Kevin SmithFWIW, I am Team A. My 2nd best RB is Ryan Williams in a 2RB 3 WR with 1 flex league. I have super deep wideouts while he has deep RBs and he had the option of Blackmon or Bowe. He went Bowe (clearly).Edit to add: I have Leshoure.
My first reaction when i saw this was that i would much rather have the AJ Green side. I'd still rather have AJ Green but can't blame you as there are so many starting positions and you got 2 very solid starters who both are relatively young for their positions.Also AJ Green isn't really the type of WR who gets his stats off tons of receptions, so he isn't a WR who is going to have 90-100 receptions a season which is big in a PPR league.14 team dynasty PPR. Start 1 QB, 2 RB, 3 WR, 1 FLEX, 1 TE.75/1/1.25 ppr Gave up AJ Green for Marshawn Lynch and Dwayne Bowe.Not crazy about giving up a young player that everyone loves, but depth is important in this format and I'm basically getting two proven starters for the price of one. Figured it would be easier to replace Green's future production than to find another immediate starter at RB.
That is a lot to give up for RG3Before the season I made this trade in a PPR dynasty. It is a ton to give up but my team is pretty stacked with young WRs and I wanted a long term replacement for Romo at QB. I feel much better about it after week 1 obviously. GaveReggie BushJake LockerJustin BlackmonReceivedRGIIII am also negotiating a deal to give up Julio Jones for LeSean McCoy. Normally I wouldn't trade Julio in dynasty but McCoy is tempting. Plus I still have a stacked WR squad (Calvin, AJ Green, Dez).
I don't think so. I would give that up for RGIII without a second thought. And don't forget the two empty roster spots have value.That is a lot to give up for RG3Before the season I made this trade in a PPR dynasty. It is a ton to give up but my team is pretty stacked with young WRs and I wanted a long term replacement for Romo at QB. I feel much better about it after week 1 obviously. GaveReggie BushJake LockerJustin BlackmonReceivedRGIIII am also negotiating a deal to give up Julio Jones for LeSean McCoy. Normally I wouldn't trade Julio in dynasty but McCoy is tempting. Plus I still have a stacked WR squad (Calvin, AJ Green, Dez).
That is all very nice, but this is the "In Season" trade thread and trades made before the season don't really belong here.Before the season I made this trade in a PPR dynasty. It is a ton to give up but my team is pretty stacked with young WRs and I wanted a long term replacement for Romo at QB. I feel much better about it after week 1 obviously.
Gave
Reggie Bush
Jake Locker
Justin Blackmon
Received
RGIII
I am also negotiating a deal to give up Julio Jones for LeSean McCoy. Normally I wouldn't trade Julio in dynasty but McCoy is tempting. Plus I still have a stacked WR squad (Calvin, AJ Green, Dez).
Amazing I traded away 2 1st, 2 2nd, 2 3rd back in the summer for Chris Johnson and one of those 1st was where Luck was picked.Now Luck is going for CJ + 1st when I had dealt basically Luck + 1st and more for CJ 4 months ago.CJ looks bad so I can see it people want to get out from under him. I don't feel real good about my deal knowing I could have got a stud QB and gave up more.In my non PPR league a couple days ago this deal went downLos Angeles gave up:Johnson, Chris TEN RBWallace, Mike PIT WRYear 2013 Round 1 Draft Pick from Los AngelesYear 2014 Round 2 Draft Pick from Los AngelesMontana gave up:Murray, DeMarco DAL RBJackson, DeSean PHI WRPrice to get Luck I'm sure.Which way?Seems steepTeam A Traded:Chris Johnson1st Round 2013 Rookie DraftTeam B Traded:Andrew Luck2nd Round 2013 Rookie Draft
Price on T-Rich has gone down huge no way you get this trade in May, June or July.Gave:MaclinSGreeneGot:TRich
You can say that now, but before the season? Basically it was pick 1.03 for pick 1.06 (averaged) + Locker (who is worth a 1st round rookie pick, probably a mid one) and Reggie Bush who is worth a late first round rookie pick. So yes it was a ton for RG3, I am glad it worked out for him though.I don't think so. I would give that up for RGIII without a second thought. And don't forget the two empty roster spots have value.That is a lot to give up for RG3Before the season I made this trade in a PPR dynasty. It is a ton to give up but my team is pretty stacked with young WRs and I wanted a long term replacement for Romo at QB. I feel much better about it after week 1 obviously. GaveReggie BushJake LockerJustin BlackmonReceivedRGIIII am also negotiating a deal to give up Julio Jones for LeSean McCoy. Normally I wouldn't trade Julio in dynasty but McCoy is tempting. Plus I still have a stacked WR squad (Calvin, AJ Green, Dez).
I like that trade for T-Rich. I still think he will be a top 10 back or better for the next 4 or 5 years.Price on T-Rich has gone down huge no way you get this trade in May, June or July.Gave:MaclinSGreeneGot:TRich
Not sure how the IDP scoring is but it looks like California won that deal by a lot12 team PPR leagueLas Vegas gave up:Martin, Doug TBB RBAsomugha, Nnamdi PHI CBNorthern California gave up:LaFell, Brandon CAR WRMoore, Lance NOS WRYear 2013 Round 1 Draft Pick from Las Vegas
Hated to deal Maclin, but like you said getting that potential top 10 back for a WR and really a RB 3-4..I wont complain to roll out Stafford, Mathews, TRich, Nicks, Nelson, and AHernandez for a long timeI like that trade for T-Rich. I still think he will be a top 10 back or better for the next 4 or 5 years.Price on T-Rich has gone down huge no way you get this trade in May, June or July.Gave:MaclinSGreeneGot:TRich
Lot's of people don't like Lynch and I'm not here to argue that but I would argue this often repeated reason makes no sense to me. What in his history suggests he's going to get paid and quit playing hard?That contract set him up for life and since he was arrested driving a Ford Econoline van I'm going to assume he's pretty smart with his money. Still that contract amounts to a 2 year deal at $17 million. That's really good money of course but is it really enough to quit making an effort especially doing a job he probably enjoys? Entering the 2014 season he'll be 28 years old and carrying a contract worth $5-5.5 million that is not guaranteed. I'd argue he's got plenty of reasons to stay motivated and productive if he wants to see more than $17 million from Seattle.Also one other point I'd make. If money was Lynch's main motivation it would have better suited him to get suspended for his DWI this season and not let it carry over to a possible suspension next season. This year his per game check amounts to $250,000 per game and this amount jumps to $437,500 per game next year. So a two game suspension next season would cost him $375,000 more than a two game suspension this season as an example.I'm not that high on Lynch since he got paid
He's getting $17M whether he sucks or not. Could he play hard for the next two years in order to ensure making $5.5M in 2014, possibly, but there's not a whole lot of motivation there for a guy who is now set for life. He probably the most over-rated RB in the NFL, IMO, and "beast mode" is a joke.Lot's of people don't like Lynch and I'm not here to argue that but I would argue this often repeated reason makes no sense to me. What in his history suggests he's going to get paid and quit playing hard?That contract set him up for life and since he was arrested driving a Ford Econoline van I'm going to assume he's pretty smart with his money. Still that contract amounts to a 2 year deal at $17 million. That's really good money of course but is it really enough to quit making an effort especially doing a job he probably enjoys? Entering the 2014 season he'll be 28 years old and carrying a contract worth $5-5.5 million that is not guaranteed. I'd argue he's got plenty of reasons to stay motivated and productive if he wants to see more than $17 million from Seattle.Also one other point I'd make. If money was Lynch's main motivation it would have better suited him to get suspended for his DWI this season and not let it carry over to a possible suspension next season. This year his per game check amounts to $250,000 per game and this amount jumps to $437,500 per game next year. So a two game suspension next season would cost him $375,000 more than a two game suspension this season as an example.I'm not that high on Lynch since he got paid