'Concept Coop said:
Cruz put up 1500/9 in 14 games 2 years ago. 1,100/10 this year. If he's not a #1, then the term is pointless.
in fantasy i'll agree he can be considered a #1 WR. but i don't think the NFL sees him that way. he definitely put's up the numbers, but why would the giants let him get to free agency, even if it's a first round RFA tender? you just don't do that to franchise players or #1 WR's in my eyes.
If there are less than 32 #1's, then what is the point of the word? If you want to say he's not top 10, I understand that. Top 15 and I'll listen. But he's better than the average top option on NFL teams. The Giants are in a unique spot in that they have a lot of talent they are, or will need to pay very soon, including another top WR. They're just being financially smart about it.
As for the comments that he's a slot guy, that's partly true. He plays in both 2 and 3 WR sets, and moves around between two spots. That's the NFL today. It's about mismatches and schemes; it would be silly not to put this guy in the slot in 3 WR sets. I don't think that makes him less valuable, as he can hold his own at flanker too.