This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!
Wow. 10+ TD in each of his 3 years in the league, and last year was the only year he's missed a fantasy game. Over the last 2 years, he's scoring on pace with Calvin Johnson. What a nice guy you are to take that off his hands...
Should also add that I have 4 very startable WRs aside from Hilton with need at TE. Made this trade more sensible. I prefer not to have dillema on who should start.
I know, right? I'm downright charitable. He opened up Gronk to the league and worked this deal out with me a while later, so I assume it was the best (or his favorite) offer. I jumped on it because when putting him on the block he said he'd need "a top-5 pick this year or a future 1st and another TE". Rudolph must have done it for him, since my 1st should not be early.This being a 1.5PPR for TE league made it even easier to snap accept his offer.
that guy is a raging idiot. And the rest of your league is full of idiots to not easily beat that offer.
That is correct sir. I have a very good and young team, and still have a handful of 2014 1sts. Was a luxury trade if I could get it. I didn't, so I used the pick on two other deals and now have Lamar Miller instead.
Hard to believe you got turned down, unless the other team was really in "win now" mode. You've got to like getting L.Miller though.
Always good to get something for a player not likely to survive roster cuts.
Yes, Sjax is a starter for you there in non-PPR. In PPR Sjax still over Miller pretty easy for now for me. Bush in PPR seems like the #2 there.
Picks involved complete
Don't see much difference between them really... If you thought Randle was talented to draft begin with you weren't worried about his situation. Prefer Randle.
Meh, Hankerson.
Based on value fallen you would probably prefer the pair, though I still like Lattimore a lot at 1.10. Would probably take the gamble on Lattimore.
What is this?..................
VJax easily.
Wells because he at least might get a chance again.
Probably the Givens, though I don't like Bostic or Burkhead.
I like Robinson's upside, but wary if he will ever get there. I like Harper's solidity. Probably Robinson seeing as Jax has already been forward with how they plan to use him.
Any opinions on this trade?
Dont like it at all unless you know that 2014 1st will be pretty high. Tamme is worthless to me
I think calling worthless is hyperbole. He had 50/500 in a 2 TE scheme. He is just entering his prime. I believe last years stats are his floor this season. Also keep in mind this is a 16 team league.
He virtually got a mid-12th round pick, with 10 keepers, which is worth less than Ingram most likely (although given the parameters of his situation your statement is still valid).
It's not hyperbole. I said he is worthless to "me". I personally place no value on him. Don't ask for opinions if you can't handle them.Rhythmdoctor said:
No. Spiller regardless of format, then flip flop Bush/Sjax depending on whether it is PPR for the #2.zed2283 said:
Any thoughts on this trade? Im curious as to how others are valuing Denarius Moore and/or Jonathan Stewart or DeAngelo Williams
Im torn here... Tamme is not a target of mine but he does have a mind meld with Peytie Pie and sometimes that is all you need... a lot more 3 WR 1 TE sets so the TE could be very valuable in that kind of offense... even WITH all that said I don't think he cracks the top 10 in TE this yr or if he does it will be on the back half of that (maybe #9)
Ok, that's what I was thinking also. It's non-PPR so Spiller and Jackson, with R.Bush and L.Miller in relief.
A dollar for three quarters. It could work out if Ball or Hopkins really pops. I doubt it though.
I guess this was the most even trade in history since it garnered 0 comments? League is non-ppr, standard scoring.
This year, I would much rather have Fitz, who will be relevant for another three years. And drafting with longer than a 3-year window is a bad idea.Last year? Probably would have traded Fitz for the 1.05. Just depends on the rookie crop.I don't think it's an awful trade either way, but the person letting Fitz go is going to regret it for the next two years. After that, maybe it will be a good trade, if they happen to use the 1.01 on the eventual best player from this draft class. Too much risk for me. I'll take the future hall of famer.
It all depends on whether the Cardinals have their answer at QB... will Carson Palmer just throw it up there for fitz?
